[RBW] Re: iBOB crosspost - thinking about 2nd fork to make Redwood lower trail.

2016-01-12 Thread Michael Hechmer
David, I have a very nice chrome low trail, hi clearance fork I could part 
with at an attractive price if you are interested.  Say $75 plus shipping.
https://www.icloud.com/sharedalbum/#B02JRveFpJq8vUK
Michael

On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 3:45:30 PM UTC-5, David Banzer wrote:
>
> I posted this over on iBOB, but certainly would appreciate feedback from 
> those who have tried out low trail forks on their Riv.
>
> I'm considering as a winter project, rebuilding my Riv Redwood as a 
> low-trail 700c bike. I'm not going to mess with the original fork, so my 
> options would be finding a high rake donor fork, going custom, or re-raking 
> one of these unpainted Riv forks: http://www.rivbike.com/product-p/f5.htm.
> I'm going with the Riv fork as the fork crown would be the same as the 
> original and it would have the upper/mid brazeons and double fork eyelets. 
> I should've bought one of these when they were 25% off before the New Year, 
> but oh well.
> I've talked with a local framebuilder and he's able to re-rake it for a 
> fairly minimal cost. Re-raking would effectively shorten the fork length, 
> which actually would be perfect as the clearance on the new Riv fork would 
> be greater than the original fork.
> I could even rattle-can it with this: 
> http://www.homedepot.com/p/Testors-3-oz-Lime-Ice-Lacquer-Spray-Paint-3-Pack-1835MT/204481439
> I need to look into the overall durability of that paint, but if it'd 
> work, it's a pretty darn close color match to the original paint: 
> http://i821.photobucket.com/albums/zz136/dabanzer/Rivendell%20Redwood/B61B6C6D-7A97-413F-AF27-B9238D63044B_zpspuzmrkru.jpg
>
> My main question is this: What rake would be appropriate for this 700c 
> bike running Compass Barlow Pass (38mm) tires? Headtube is 73 degrees. I'm 
> leaning towards 65mm rake, which would give a trail measurement of 40mm.
>
> Any thoughts - including don't do it - are appreciated.
> David
> Chicago
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[RBW] Re: iBOB crosspost - thinking about 2nd fork to make Redwood lower trail.

2016-01-12 Thread dougP
David:

A few years ago I had Tom Matchak 
(http://tommatchakcycles.blogspot.com/2007/03/frame-neutral-replacement-fork.html
 
) build a lower trail fork for my Atlantis.  It's 40 mm trail, and I use 40 
to 45 mm tires on my 700c wheels.  It came out nice & I like the 
improvement in handling (I like front loads).  He used a crown that's not 
far off the stock one and it doesn't stand out.  Tom was very accomodating 
about adding the various attachment fittings.  I have 2 eyelets at the fork 
end; a thru attachment mid-fork for low rider rack, and the upper hour 
glass eyelets for the small Nitto front rack.  

dougP


On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 12:45:30 PM UTC-8, David Banzer wrote:
>
> I posted this over on iBOB, but certainly would appreciate feedback from 
> those who have tried out low trail forks on their Riv.
>
> I'm considering as a winter project, rebuilding my Riv Redwood as a 
> low-trail 700c bike. I'm not going to mess with the original fork, so my 
> options would be finding a high rake donor fork, going custom, or re-raking 
> one of these unpainted Riv forks: http://www.rivbike.com/product-p/f5.htm.
> I'm going with the Riv fork as the fork crown would be the same as the 
> original and it would have the upper/mid brazeons and double fork eyelets. 
> I should've bought one of these when they were 25% off before the New Year, 
> but oh well.
> I've talked with a local framebuilder and he's able to re-rake it for a 
> fairly minimal cost. Re-raking would effectively shorten the fork length, 
> which actually would be perfect as the clearance on the new Riv fork would 
> be greater than the original fork.
> I could even rattle-can it with this: 
> http://www.homedepot.com/p/Testors-3-oz-Lime-Ice-Lacquer-Spray-Paint-3-Pack-1835MT/204481439
> I need to look into the overall durability of that paint, but if it'd 
> work, it's a pretty darn close color match to the original paint: 
> http://i821.photobucket.com/albums/zz136/dabanzer/Rivendell%20Redwood/B61B6C6D-7A97-413F-AF27-B9238D63044B_zpspuzmrkru.jpg
>
> My main question is this: What rake would be appropriate for this 700c 
> bike running Compass Barlow Pass (38mm) tires? Headtube is 73 degrees. I'm 
> leaning towards 65mm rake, which would give a trail measurement of 40mm.
>
> Any thoughts - including don't do it - are appreciated.
> David
> Chicago
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[RBW] Re: iBOB crosspost - thinking about 2nd fork to make Redwood lower trail.

2016-01-12 Thread RonaTD


On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 2:45:30 PM UTC-6, David Banzer wrote:
 

> I'm considering as a winter project, rebuilding my Riv Redwood as a 
> low-trail 700c bike...My main question is this: What rake would be 
> appropriate for this 700c bike running Compass Barlow Pass (38mm) tires? 
> Headtube is 73 degrees. I'm leaning towards 65mm rake, which would give a 
> trail measurement of 40mm.
>  
>

I had the fork on my original prototype Heron Road pulled to 55 mm, which 
was as far as John Sotherland felt he could take it without risking 
collapse. It only has clearance for 28's. I also have a Terraferma 650B 
ultra low trail bike for comparison. I loved the Heron as designed and 
built, but I like it even better with the extra rake. It can take a light 
load in a handlebar bag and feels like just the right balance of stability 
and responsiveness. I don't feel any need to add more rake than that. By 
comparison, my Terraferma is a very difficult bike to ride no hands, and 
gets worse as weight is added to the front bag. For the sake of science, 
I'm having Waterford make a new fork for that bike, with a bit less rake. 
My hypothesis is that the current fork is not aligned properly, and that a 
fresh, properly aligned fork will make a lot of difference, while the 4mm 
less rake won't make much difference at all.

Keep in mind that a different fork may have a different axle-to-headtube 
dimension, which would change the head angle. Adding more rake changes the 
angle again. If you start with the same length fork and add some rake, you 
will steepen the head angle. A little trig work will tell you by how much. 
I will have to check my archives to see what I calculated the effect is on 
my Heron.

Can you really fit 38's in the Redwood? Sounds like a great bike for the 
vertically enhanced folk.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[RBW] Re: iBOB crosspost - thinking about 2nd fork to make Redwood lower trail.

2016-01-12 Thread David Banzer
Hi Ted,
The Redwood will fit Compass Barlow Pass tires, mine measure 37mm so 
technically not 38mm. No room for fenders though, and I'm using Tektro 
sidepulls, the bigmouth variety.
The Riv Sam fork (sidepull version) is longer than the Redwood fork, so 
with re-raking I'm hoping it'll get close to the fork length of the 
original fork.
When I first got my Redwood, I tried it with a tall Acorn rando bag and 
didn't care for the handling. If I could improve the handling with a loaded 
front bag, the Redwood would be my ideal road bike. 
David
Chicago


On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 6:27:10 PM UTC-6, RonaTD wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 2:45:30 PM UTC-6, David Banzer wrote:
>  
>
>> I'm considering as a winter project, rebuilding my Riv Redwood as a 
>> low-trail 700c bike...My main question is this: What rake would be 
>> appropriate for this 700c bike running Compass Barlow Pass (38mm) tires? 
>> Headtube is 73 degrees. I'm leaning towards 65mm rake, which would give a 
>> trail measurement of 40mm.
>>  
>>
>
> I had the fork on my original prototype Heron Road pulled to 55 mm, which 
> was as far as John Sotherland felt he could take it without risking 
> collapse. It only has clearance for 28's. I also have a Terraferma 650B 
> ultra low trail bike for comparison. I loved the Heron as designed and 
> built, but I like it even better with the extra rake. It can take a light 
> load in a handlebar bag and feels like just the right balance of stability 
> and responsiveness. I don't feel any need to add more rake than that. By 
> comparison, my Terraferma is a very difficult bike to ride no hands, and 
> gets worse as weight is added to the front bag. For the sake of science, 
> I'm having Waterford make a new fork for that bike, with a bit less rake. 
> My hypothesis is that the current fork is not aligned properly, and that a 
> fresh, properly aligned fork will make a lot of difference, while the 4mm 
> less rake won't make much difference at all.
>
> Keep in mind that a different fork may have a different axle-to-headtube 
> dimension, which would change the head angle. Adding more rake changes the 
> angle again. If you start with the same length fork and add some rake, you 
> will steepen the head angle. A little trig work will tell you by how much. 
> I will have to check my archives to see what I calculated the effect is on 
> my Heron.
>
> Can you really fit 38's in the Redwood? Sounds like a great bike for the 
> vertically enhanced folk.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.