[RDA-L] analytical description in RDA
Hi, all I have a question about recoding a title proper of a part of resource and the larger resource for an analytical description. RDA 1.5.3, types of description, shows that the larger resource may be recorded in a series statement, related work, or related manifestation. When using an analytical description, details relating to the larger resource or to other parts of the resource may be recorded in any of the following ways that are applicable: a) as a series statement (see 2.12http://access.rdatoolkit.org/document.php?id=rdachp2target=rda2-7630#rda2-7630 ) b) as a reference to a related work (see 25.1http://access.rdatoolkit.org/document.php?id=rdachp25target=rda25-69#rda25-69) c) as a reference to a related manifestation (see 27.1http://access.rdatoolkit.org/document.php?id=rdachp27target=rda27-45#rda27-45 ). RDA 2.3.2.6 tells us recording the collective title for the larger resource as a series title. Record the collective title for the larger resource as a series title (see 2.12.2http://access.rdatoolkit.org/document.php?id=rdachp2target=rda2-7759#rda2-7759 ). Optional Addition http://access.rdatoolkit.org/document.php?id=lcpschp2target=lcps2-337#lcps2-337 Record the collective title for the larger resource as the title of a related work (see 25.1http://access.rdatoolkit.org/document.php?id=rdachp25target=rda25-69#rda25-69 ). So the solution should be recoding the title of the larger resource in 490 field and/or having an authorized access point in 8xx field. Is that right? But under AACR2, most of time I use 773 fields instead of 490. I feel that 773 fields make more sense. Can I use 773 fields under RDA? Thank you. Joan Wang -- Zhonghong (Joan) Wang, Ph.D. Cataloger -- CMC Illinois Heartland Library System (Edwardsville Office) 6725 Goshen Road Edwardsville, IL 62025 618.656.3216x409 618.656.9401Fax
[RDA-L] Can Lecturer be used as a valid relator term and do you have a good example of a DVD + Book RDA record?
Hi everyone, I've searched the list and couldn't find if these questions had been asked before so here goes. 1. We are cataloging a Great Courses DVD and course guide. We have the lecturer and course guide author in the 100 field. What should his relator term be? Is $e creator sufficient? Though he isn't the creator of the DVD...? He is a kind of performer and author...? Using $e lecturer seems silly. 2. Related note: Can the relationship designator just be left off entirely? 3. Does anyone have a good example of a mixed media RDA record? One combining both DVD and course guide, for instance. Thank you! Sommer
Re: [RDA-L] Can Lecturer be used as a valid relator term and do you have a good example of a DVD + Book RDA record?
How about written and narrated by? Jinny Wesson Library Resource Center Library Coordinator Technical Services/Cataloging 3000 NE 4th St. Renton, WA 98056 (425) 235-2331 jwes...@rtc.edu mailto:jwes...@rtc.edu From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Browning, Sommer Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 2:21 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: [RDA-L] Can Lecturer be used as a valid relator term and do you have a good example of a DVD + Book RDA record? Hi everyone, I’ve searched the list and couldn’t find if these questions had been asked before so here goes. 1. We are cataloging a Great Courses DVD and course guide. We have the lecturer and course guide author in the 100 field. What should his relator term be? Is $e creator sufficient? Though he isn’t the creator of the DVD…? He is a kind of performer and author…? Using $e lecturer seems silly. 2. Related note: Can the relationship designator just be left off entirely? 3. Does anyone have a good example of a mixed media RDA record? One combining both DVD and course guide, for instance. Thank you! Sommer This message has been scanned by McAfee EWS3200 at the RTC internet gateway.
Re: [RDA-L] New format reproductions and RDA
Stephen Early asked:
And whether I like it or not, RDA treats the microfilm as the
manifestation on which I must base my description. Since you've
been going through RDA longer than I have*, I would be interested in
your comments/justifications.
The short answer is I don't. RDA has WEMI; Bibframe has W/I. The
WEMI distinctions and definitions so far have little practical
applicability.
While some micro and electronic resources may be published by their
respective providers (e.g., Credo), in fact for most the content was
determined by the original print publisher (264 1), the micro vendor
is manufacturer of the micro version (264 3), and the electronic
aggregator is distributor (264 2).
We will have to wait and see what the PN standard does with RDA. The
current standard has original print publisher, and ignores both
manufacturer and distributor. So you are closer to the present PN
standard by having original publisher in 264 1. Someone who wants PN
can simply remove the 2nd 264, as opposed to changing it from the
micro/electronic one to the print one.
__ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
{__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
___} |__ \__
Re: [RDA-L] Can Lecturer be used as a valid relator term and do you have a good example of a DVD + Book RDA record?
Sommer Browning said:
1. We are cataloging a Great Courses DVD and course guide. We have th=
e lecturer and course guide author in the 100 field. What should his relato=
r term be?
I suspect we would consider the lecturer to be just one contributor to
something having mixed respossibility, and would make him a 700, with
title main entry.
In terms of relator code or term, you might consider:
$4spk Speaker
$4tch Teacher
$espeaker
$eteacher
__ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
{__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
___} |__ \__
Re: [RDA-L] Can Lecturer be used as a valid relator term and do you have a good example of a DVD + Book RDA record?
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Browning, Sommer [sommer.brown...@ucdenver.edu] Sent: April-05-13 5:21 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: [RDA-L] Can Lecturer be used as a valid relator term and do you have a good example of a DVD + Book RDA record? I’ve searched the list and couldn’t find if these questions had been asked before so here goes. 1. We are cataloging a Great Courses DVD and course guide. We have the lecturer and course guide author in the 100 field. What should his relator term be? Is $e creator sufficient? Though he isn’t the creator of the DVD…? He is a kind of performer and author…? Using $e lecturer seems silly. The presence in the 100 field also would mean that the name would form part of the authorized access point for the work, but this is not appropriate for moving image works (Great Courses DVDs are cataloged primarily as moving image DVD videos, with the course guide being accompanying material). For moving images works, only the preferred title for the DVD is used alone for the authorized access point for the work (RDA 6.27.1.3), so the lecturer would not be found in the 100 field. As a lecturer, the person would be contributing to the expression, essentially as a 'performer'. In the list of designators under 'performer' are 'speaker' or 'teacher'. The designator ' speaker' is the best fit, as RDA refers specifically to the delivery of a lecture (as opposed to a 'teacher' who is providing instructions or a demonstration). The lecturer is also the writer of the course guide, so that is a clear work relationship. Instead of a contributor to the expression, the lecturer is the Creator of a work, specifically an 'author.' Adding these two designators to the lecturer in 700 field would be the best fit for the two roles: $e speaker $e author 2. Related note: Can the relationship designator just be left off entirely? Yes, but the person would not be found in the 100 field because the description is primarily for a moving image work. A name in a 700 field can have designators supporting relationships to works or expressions in the resource, but the 100 field is reserved for allowable names that can form part of the authorized access point for the work. Thomas Brenndorfer Guelph Public Library
