Re: [Fwd: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early]

2003-03-24 Thread James_Martin
Red Hat generally only bumps up the main version number due to binary
icompatibilities.  That being said, they could do this on a whim if they
like.  It is merely a ploy to get people to go use their "Advanced" line of
products if they want product stability.  A great way to aggrevate their
RHCE's too!  They will probably a) come out with an RHASCE (Red Hat
Advanced Server Certified Engineer) or b) they will have to fix their RHCE
program.  I certified on 7.2, and was told it would be good for the next 2
major versions, being 8 and 9.  I should be good 'till RH10.

James



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: RHCE looking for a job

2003-03-20 Thread James_Martin
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 05:03:54PM -0800, nate wrote:

> I replied to the poster off-list ..but wanted to point out that
> certs in the UNIX/linux world are about worthless at the moment.
> I've been lookin for a job for 7 months, applied to about 70 positions,
> had about 20 interviews, came *really* close(I think) to getting a job
> at a local company yesterday but alas no.

I'm going to have to disagree.. It all depends where you live, how well you
interview, who you know, how much you are asking for, how much experience
you have, etc.  It took me 6 months to find a new job (I was employed for
that time).  I went on about 5 interviews.  The job I have now _required_
an RHCE, and thus I landed it.

James S. Martin, RHCE
Contractor
Administrative Office of the United Sates Courts
Washington, DC
(202) 502-2394



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Code Editor?

2003-03-19 Thread James_Martin
I like kwrite on KDE... but Jedit is great, it works on both Windows and
Unix (it's written in java) and has some cool plugins.

James S. Martin, RHCE
Contractor
Administrative Office of the United Sates Courts
Washington, DC
(202) 502-2394



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Changing startup screen & colors for XDMCP

2003-03-18 Thread James_Martin
I know this doesn't answer your question, but if this is a production
server, I would recommend _not_ installing Gnome and having the box in
runlevel 5.. In addtional to security problems, it's also a resource hog.
Cygwin has a XFree86 server you can run on your box, and then you can run
any GUI applications on the server through your SSH connection and they
will be displayed locally.

James S. Martin, RHCE
Contractor
Administrative Office of the United Sates Courts
Washington, DC
(202) 502-2394



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Starting an application as root

2003-03-17 Thread James_Martin
Do a "man sudo".



James S. Martin, RHCE
Contractor
Administrative Office of the United Sates Courts
Washington, DC
(202) 502-2394



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Is RH8 Ever Going to be Updated?

2003-03-17 Thread James_Martin
For a Linux distro with a "ports" like system, try Gentoo.  www.gentoo.org.



James S. Martin, RHCE
Contractor
Administrative Office of the United Sates Courts
Washington, DC
(202) 502-2394



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: services on the command line

2003-03-07 Thread James_Martin
To get a status of all services:

service --status-all



James S. Martin, RHCE
Contractor
Administrative Office of the United Sates Courts
Washington, DC
(202) 502-2394




DuSTiN KRySaK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/07/2003 01:41 PM
Please respond to redhat-list

 
To: Redhat Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: 
Subject:services on the command line


Hi there... 

How does one restart/stop/start a service from the command line?

I have a desktop reference book of commands, and can't seem to find it in
there.

Also - how would one see the services available on the command line and
their current status (start/stopped)?

Thanks!

Dustin



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list





-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Swap Limits

2003-02-20 Thread James_Martin
Todd,

Yes I have an *idea* of how much latency it would create.  Unfortunately I 
don't think Red Hat does.Folks want to follow what company X says, and 
not what I personally believe.  So right now when I have to tell people 
that "Yes I know what Red Hat is saying, but they're wrong" it takes a 
little strategy.  Anyhow, I appreciate the insight.




James S. Martin, RHCE
Contractor
Administrative Office of the United Sates Courts
Washington, DC





"Todd A. Jacobs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
02/19/2003 09:01 PM
Please respond to redhat-list

 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:Re: Swap Limits


On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> It is my understanding that swap partitions are limited in size to 2GB,

Perhaps. File system limits go beyond that, now. Whether or not this still 

applies to swap partitions is kind of murky, but it shouldn't apply to 
swap *files*.

I'm not sure that this is a valid questions, though. Do you have any
*idea* how much latency you'd create with 4GB+ of swap? Even on a seperate
SCSI spindle, you'd spend huge amounts of time waiting for paging
operations if you were actively swapping that much RAM.

I usually allocate about 1GB at the beginning of the disk. Even that slows 

things down a little, but provides plenty of elbow room without seriously 
degrading performance.

A better question is why you think you'd need more than 3GB of RAM. You
could probably get away with a gig or less unless your apps are totally
out of control and building huge heap structures for silly reasons.

You should always use *some* swap, but the old multipliers aren't really
valid anymore. You need to balance memory requirements with paging
requirements, e.g. make sure you have enough RAM+SWAP to run your apps,
but remember that paging to disk will slow you down...maybe even kill your
server if you spend too much time disk-thrashing your swap.

-- 
"Of course I'm in shape! Round's a shape, isn't it?"



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list





-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Q: Strange Kernal Comment at boot... Please Help!

2003-02-19 Thread James_Martin
Ok, so I'm half right.

James S. Martin, RHCE
Contractor
Administrative Office of the United Sates Courts
Washington, DC
(202) 502-2394




"nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
02/19/2003 05:03 PM
Please respond to redhat-list

 
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: 
Subject:Re: Q: Strange Kernal Comment at boot... Please Help!


J. Nyhuis said:
>Can anyone suggest where I can go to get this resolved? 
Is pay
> phone support the only option?  I'd rather resolve this over E-mail if
> possible.


this is not a problem. that is normal. it is saying it is defaulting your
IDE controller to 33Mhz, which is what the standard PCI bus runs at.
Some server boards are capable of 66Mhz operation, but even those in all
cases I have seen the onboard IDE controller is on the 33Mhz side.

33Mhz is not the same as the ATA speed(e.g. 33/66/100/133).

nate





-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list





-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Q: Strange Kernal Comment at boot... Please Help!

2003-02-19 Thread James_Martin
I always thought this means the speed of the IDE device as in 33, 66, 100, 
133, etc.  It's not referring to the speed of the motherboard's Front Side 
Bus.  In other words, you can ignore it since you have all SCSI drives.

James S. Martin, RHCE
Administrative Office of the United Sates Courts
Washington, DC





"J. Nyhuis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
02/19/2003 04:41 PM
Please respond to redhat-list

 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:Q: Strange Kernal Comment at boot... Please Help!


 Can anyone suggest where I can go to get this resolved? 
Is pay
phone support the only option?  I'd rather resolve this over E-mail if
possible.
 Thanks in advance!
John N.

>
>Greetings,
>
>I just installed RH 8.0 on an old Dell Poweredge 2200, and am getting a
>strange error at boot.
>
>"ide assuming 33MHz systembus for PIO mode, override with ide bus=xx"
>
>The system actually has a 66MHz bus, and has onboard SCSI.  There are no
>ide devices in the system.
>
>Is this an defunct entry (as there is no ide controller), or is RH8.0
>not using my mainboard's full bus speed?  I'll be using this machine for
>a firewall, so I will need the full systembus speed (66MHz).
>
>Assuming it makes a difference in performance, How do I fix this issue?
>
>I've looked through the last few months of posting to this list and the
>user's guide and have not come up with anything that sheds light on the
>subject.
>
>Any advice would be appreciated...
>Thanks in advance!
>
>John Nyhuis
>Systems Administrator
>Cell Systems Initiative
>University of Washington
>
>
>



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list





-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Swap Limits

2003-02-19 Thread James_Martin
It is my understanding that swap partitions are limited in size to 2GB, 
yet Red Hat's documentation points that your swap partition should be 2x 
the size of your physical memory.  Therefore, if you have a 2GB + of RAM, 
what is the best approach for sizing your swap partition?  Using multiple 
swap partitions or just keeping a maximum of 2GB swap?

Thanks,

James S. Martin, RHCE
Administrative Office of the United Sates Courts
Washington, DC



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list