Re: Is mysql 4.x in future Redhat release?
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 12:32, Wayne Betts wrote: > I'd like to know if Redhat has plans to incorporate mysql 4.x into a > release sometime soon (instead of the current 3.x version). > (I know that I can build/install mysql 4.0x myself if needed -- that's > not my question.) > > Any info on redhat's adoption of mysql 4.x will be appreciated. Check the list archives this has been discussed before. MySQL changed their licensing policy for the 4.x releases and this licensing change is preventing Red Hat from shipping the 4.x releases. I don't recall what the exact problem is, but I believe it had something to do with linking against the 4.x libraries. Regards, Jim H -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: red hat 10 release date
On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 15:14, Jeff Wimmer wrote: > So RedHat is dropping the "end user" version and concentrating on > commercial enterprise based products? Is that what I'm understanding here? Correct. They are dropping the "end user/consumer" version for the Fedora Project. The only RH "products" will be the RHEL line. > This would seem rather dumb on RH's part, since I doubt they have enough > sales to support the company RH has grown into people wise just by > enterprise sales alone. VERY dumb move on their part ifyou ask me. I agree that RH needs a product priced for the SOHO and small business markets. This is something IMO they currently do not have in their RHEL line of products. Only time will tell if this turns into a disaster. I'm going to miss the boxed sets. I have bought a boxed set for every RH release since 5.2. Hopefully RH will bring them back in the future in some way. Plus now the only way I can support RH (unless I have a future need to an RHEL product) is to buy a subscription to RHN. I prefer to do manual updates and don't use RHN. So I guess I end up buying something that I will probably never put to use. :-P I guess I will consider it the price for a "Fedora boxed set". My big concern is how stable the Fedora Project is going to be with the frequent release schedule. I have not installed any of the Fedora test releases, but I will download and install the final release. This first release is essentially what would have been RH 10. As for releases after this one, my current attitude about the changes is to "wait and see". Regards, Jim "No longer a Red Hat Linux user, but maybe a Fedora Project user" H P.S. I'm typing this out on a Debian install I did 1 1/2 weeks ago. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Redhat Certification
On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 16:35, Go, Jeffrey wrote: > I am testing for my RHCT in 3 weeks..with all of the latest developments, should I > even bother to do this? > > This will be for the RHCT for RH 9.0 RHCE/RHCT certifications are based on the Enterprise Linux products. https://www.redhat.com/training/rhce/rhce_faq.html#current Quoting "The validity period for all RHCEs and RHCTs is now officially pegged to the release of the Enterprise product commercially available at the time certification was earned, and certification shall be current until after one (1) major release of the Enterprise product. All RHCEs earned on Red Hat Linux 7.3 or prior will be considered current until the release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS/ES/WS 4. All RHCEs and RHCTs earned on Red Hat Linux 8.0 or 9 will remain current until the release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5. Validity and current status of an RHCE certificate will continue to be verified at Certification Central." Regards, Jim H signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: red hat 10 release date
On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 14:18, Joe Szilagyi wrote: > Does anyone happen to know what it is? Thanks. There is no longer and will never be a Red Hat 10. The consumer version of Red Hat Linux essentially no longer exists. It has been replaced by "Fedora Linux Project". The first release of "Fedora Core" is scheduled to be released November 3rd. It should be noted and I am quoting from the Fedora Project web site.. "The Fedora Project is not a supported product of Red Hat, Inc." Visit the link below for more about what the Fedora Project is. http://fedora.redhat.com/ Regards, Jim H -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: RH9 mouse cursors
On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 04:37, Jens Tautenhahn wrote: > > BTW: The use of PGP/GnuPG in an public mailinglist isn't helpfully when > your public key is not available on key servers. www.keyserver.net click find and enter my e-mail address. It has been available there for a very long time. I guess you didn't try that server. Regards, Jim H signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RH9 mouse cursors
On Sat, 2003-10-04 at 23:15, Jim Hayward wrote: > > Then restart X. Shez, what was I thinking. :-P Forget I said that. Just logout and login back in. Regards, Jim H signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RH9 mouse cursors
On Sat, 2003-10-04 at 09:11, NiteOwl wrote: > Anyone knows how to get rid of those annoying color mouse cursors in RH9? > I need the old, plain, default, non-flashing, vanilla X11R6 cursors, please!!! Well, if you "really" don't want the new cursors... Create the file ( if you don't already have it ) ~/.Xresources and place in it: Xcursor.core yes Then restart X. Regards, Jim H signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Is there a tripwire list?
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 07:57, Edward Croft wrote: > I have been trying to get tripwire configured, but because I run nightly > backups I get warnings due to time changes on files. I have added the -a > which I thought was to ignore access times, but I still get it. It makes > tripwire almost useless as it reports over 2000 errors. Most of the > errors are the same as the one below. Google is your friend. ;-) http://www.linuxmanagers.org/pipermail/linuxmanagers/2003-May/001167.html Regards, Jim H signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Kernel Options
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 01:15, david carvalho wrote: > How do I check the current options my kernel is running, if I didn't > install kernel-source ? Look in /boot/config- From a RH 9 box with kernels two kernels installed. These are installed by the kernel RPM. Not the kernel-source RPM. # ls /boot/config* /boot/config-2.4.20-19.9 /boot/config-2.4.20-20.9 Regards, Jim H signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: OT: Verisign petition
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 18:02, Ed Wilts wrote: > Red Hat may throw it into rawhide, Already in Rawhide... $ rpm -qp --changelog bind-9.2.2-23.src.rpm * Wed Sep 17 2003 Daniel Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 9.2.2-23 - patch support for "delegation-only" Regards, Jim H -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: GTK - Which version is RH9 Running?
On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 03:30, Nick Wilson wrote: > How can I find out which version of GTK I'm running please? > I'm using RH9 and am trying to install gimp-1.3.17 and it's telling me > it can't find GLIB 2 or higher...? OK let me try this again, now that my brain is awake. Never answer questions right after you crawl out of bed .:-P RH 9 comes with both GTK/GLIB 1.x and 2.2.1. The development versions of the Gimp require GTK/GLIB 2.2.2 Regards, Jim H -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: GTK - Which version is RH9 Running?
On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 03:30, Nick Wilson wrote: > How can I find out which version of GTK I'm running please? > I'm using RH9 and am trying to install gimp-1.3.17 and it's telling me > it can't find GLIB 2 or higher...? RH 9 comes with both GLIB/GTK 1.x and 2.0. The development versions of the Gimp require GLIB/GTK 2.2. Regards, Jim H -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Neightbour table overflow
On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 11:07, Ed Cooley wrote: > After upgrading to redhat 9, we are getting the following errors. This > machine is our gateway/DNS server and we are having a lot of problems with > internet connectivity. > > Jul 7 13:11:31 s5web kernel: Neighbour table overflow. > Jul 7 13:11:31 s5web last message repeated 4 times > Jul 7 13:11:33 s5web kernel: NET: 4 messages suppressed. Check and see if the loopback interface is up. Last time I saw anyone with this problem was with RH 6.2 and lo not running was always the problem. Regards, Jim H signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: What replaces GtkHTML in GTK2
On Sat, 2003-07-05 at 20:45, Thomas Frayne wrote: > I have gtkhtml2-2.2.0-5 and gtkhtml2-devel-2.2.0-5. The structure > GtkHTML is defined in gtkhtml-types.h in gtkhtml-1.1.9-0.9 and in > gtkhtml3-devel-3.0.5-2, but gtkhtml-types.h does not exist in > gtkhtml2-devel-2.2.0-5. I think this could be considered to be confusing. It looks like instead of porting the original gtkhtml-1.x codebase to GTK2, they created an entirely new code base for GTK 2.x. This new branch is gtkhtml2. The gtkhtml3 version is a direct port of the gtkhtml-1.x code base. The new code base in GTK, gtkhtml2, does not have all the features required for Ximian to port Evolution to GTK2. Thus Ximian themselves ported the original gtkhtml-1.x code base to GTK2 for use in Evolution. Take a look at this long thread I found, "GtkHtml 1, 2 and 1->2". It seems to explain what is happening. From this thread the gtkhtml3 code base looks to be completely Ximian maintained branch. http://lists.gnome.org/archives/gnome-hackers/2002-April/thread.html#00097 Regards, Jim H signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: What replaces GtkHTML in GTK2
On Sat, 2003-07-05 at 05:41, Thomas Frayne wrote: > I am using Redhat 9, Gnome 2.2. > > GtkHTML is defined in gtkhtml-types.h in GTK1, but I could not find a > GTK2 header file containing GtkHTML. Am I missing a GTK2 header file? > Is there a GTK2 replacement for GtkHTML? You are looking for gtkhtml2, gtkhtml2-devel. There are multiple versions of gtkhtml that comes with RH 9... $ rpm -qa | grep gtkhtml | sort gnome-python2-gtkhtml2-1.99.14-5 gtkhtml-1.1.9-0.9 gtkhtml2-2.2.0-5 gtkhtml2-devel-2.2.0-5 gtkhtml3-3.0.5-2 gtkhtml3-devel-3.0.5-2 gtkhtml-devel-1.1.9-0.9 Ignore the gtkhtml3 packages on my system. They are not included with RH 9. I have them because I have Evolution 1.4.0 installed. Regards, Jim H -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: XFree86 file sizes
On Fri, 2003-07-04 at 05:18, Allan Duncan wrote: > I was looking at the recent files on rawhide, and found this > > 52725654 Jun 13 18:30 XFree86-4.3.0-15.1.i386.rpm > 46353377 Jun 13 18:30 XFree86-devel-4.3.0-15.1.i386.rpm This is because these packages are built for debugging purposes, i.e. they are built with symbol information. If you want to use packages from Rawhide you are better off recompiling the SRPM. To build the Rawhide SRPM you have to install it and then edit the spec file to disable the symbol information. %define DebuggableBuild0 Regards, Jim H -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Best way to get evolution 1.4 ?
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 00:43, Stéphane Jourdan wrote: > Maybe it's not exactly the best place to ask for it, but as I'd like to > keep my redhat free of Ximian packages (bad experiences in the past), I > was wondering what's the best way to get Evolution 1.4 under RH9 ? > > Any good feedback from some packages found here and there on the web ? RH 9 RPMS can be found here or you can compile the necessary SRPMS from Rawhide. I complied from Rawhide. They work for me. Your mileage may vary. http://people.redhat.com/~katzj/evolution/RPMS/ Regards, Jim H -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Redhat 9 add/remove problem
On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 17:36, Tinus Norstved wrote: > > The following packages could not be found on your system. > installation cannot continue until they are installed > unlocateable package | required by > krb5-libs = 1.2.7-10| krb5-devel > openssl = 0.9.7.a-2 | openssl-devel It appears to be an unfixed bug from RH 8. It must also effect RH 9. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83485 Regards, Jim H signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Two pthread libraries on Red Hat 9
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 03:06, Thomas Bailey wrote: > I was wondering if anyone could explain to me the difference between the > pthread libraries in /lib and /lib/tls on RedHat 9. > I'm curious as to whether anyone knows a) if this is a bug in the > default threading library and b) if anyone knows a more elegant way to > force my application to link against the 'right' libraries other than > changing the permissions on the 'wrong' libraries. I have tried the > -nostdlib option to gcc. You might try asking on the redhat-devel mailing list. The traffic on the list is light, but questions very seldom go unanswered. https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list Regards, Jim H signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: is there a Gnome/GTK+ text editor with source highlighting
On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 18:54, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > I love KATE on KDE but I love Gnome (much more useable and out of the > way) > > is there a text editor on gnome that has highlighting in it? Take a look at Bluefish. It is a GTK2 application. It supports syntax highlighting for quite a few languages and you can add your own. Using current CVS is recommended. Please report any bugs you might find. ;-) http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/ The next version of gedit is going to feature syntax highlighting. Another option, Jedit. It is a very nice editor. It is a Java application. http://jedit.org/ Regards, Jim H -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Red Hat 7.2 HTML Editor.
On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 18:52, John N. Alegre wrote: > What are peoples top suggestions for free linux HTML page creation software. I > want something that can handle all the latest HTML extensions, style sheets, > dual frames, etc. etc. I want it to be free and I want it to be compatible > with remote display to another X-Window server. I am running Linux 7.2 on this > particular Linux boxen. The GTK 1.x version of Bluefish will run on RH 7.2. Bluefish 0.7 was the last GTK 1.x version released. The GTK 1.x branch is no longer being developed. The GTK 2.x version currently is the only branch being actively developed. http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/ Regards, Jim H -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Toshutil installation failed
On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 15:32, Carl C. von Bell wrote: > Friends. > > I try to install the toshutils on my Toshiba, and encounter problems when > running ./configure. > > I have Redhat 9 2.4.20-13.9 installed. > > configure:1071:27: X11/Intrinsic.h: No such file or directory Intrinsic.h is included with the XFree86-devel package. You probably do not have it installed. Regards, Jim H -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Starting Open Office without the splash screen
On Fri, 2003-04-04 at 15:18, Jeff Bearer wrote: > Does anyone know of a command line flag or some other setting that hides > the spash screen? Edit /usr/lib/openoffice/program/sofficerc (this is where it is on a RH 8 box) and change "Logo=1" to "Logo=0" Regards, Jim H -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: bluefish crashes
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 06:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > I've just installed the last relase of bluefish, but when I click on the > menu "external command" (or control, I got the italian version) the program > shutdown immediately. Happens only to me? Last release? The last GTK 1.x release, 0.7? Or the last GTK2 release, 0.9? The GTK 1.x branch is dead. Only the GTK2 branch is under development. You my want to grab current CVS if you are using the GTK2 version. A better place to ask questions about bluefish would be the bluefish-dev mailing list. See the link below to subscribe. http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/development.php Regards, Jim H -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Change default browser in RH8?
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 06:50, Kevin Krumwiede wrote: > I set Galeon as my default browser in Control Center/Extras/Preferred > Applications. The settings you are changing have no effect on GTK 1.x apps. Which Evolution is. You need to edit ~/.gnome/Gnome http-show=galeon "%s" https-show=galeon "%s" Regards, Jim H -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: source installs fail when pkc-config cant find libs.
On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 07:56, Andrew Couture wrote: > > checking for libgnomeui-2.0 libgtop-2.0 libpanelapplet-2.0... > Package libgnomeui-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search > path. > Perhaps you should add the directory containing > `libgnomeui-2.0.pc' > to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable > No package 'libgnomeui-2.0' found > You need to install the libgnomeui-devel package. If you get similar errors for any other missing *.pc files, you will need to install the corresponding devel packages. Regards, Jim H -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: IPTABLES -L -M ??
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 06:02, Mike Burger wrote: > Locate "iptstate"...a google search should turn it up. It runs like top, > in that it refreshes every second...it shows the source and destination > IPs, as well as the ports being accessed. ipstate http://freshmeat.net/projects/iptstate/?topic_id=152%2C253 I wasn't aware of ipstate. I was using conntrack-viewer. http://cv.intellos.net/ Regards, Jim H signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: GCC Problems ???
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 17:10, Aly Dharshi wrote:
Oops typo in my second fix. In my first reply. That should read.
> #include
>
> int main()
> {
> std::cout << "Testing 1 2 3 ... \n";
> return 0;
> }
Regards,
Jim H
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: GCC Problems ???
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 17:10, Aly Dharshi wrote:
> #include
>
> int main()
> {
> cout << "Testing 1 2 3 ... \n";
> return 0;
> }
>
>
> Tried compiling this simple program and can't understand why the error,
> system produces the following errors:
>
> test_cc1.cc: In function `int main()':
> test_cc1.cc:5: `cout' undeclared (first use this function)
> test_cc1.cc:5: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for
> each
>function it appears in.)
>
> Any suggestions as to why this maybe ?
Not a problem with GCC. Your code is incorrect. GCC 3.2 in RH 8.0 is
more standards compliant then any version released by Red Hat before.
Incorrect code that compiled before will not now.
Two ways to fix it.
#include
using namespace std;
int main()
{
cout << "Testing 1 2 3 ... \n";
return 0;
}
or
#include
int main()
{
std:cout << "Testing 1 2 3 ... \n";
return 0;
}
Grab your C++ book and read the chapter on namespaces.
Regards,
Jim H
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: What RPM contains rhn_register
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 20:21, Daevid Vincent wrote: > I don't seem to have the 'rhn_register' program and don't know which > .rpm contains it. Anyone know? > Since you don't say what version you are running, I'm going to take a wild guess and say you are running 8.0, correct? If you are, the functionality provided by rhn_register in older versions of Red Hat has been incorporated into the up2date program. From the command line: up2date --register Regards, Jim H signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
RE: What RPM contains rhn_register
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 23:25, Daevid Vincent wrote: > YES! You are the man! Thanks. > > Is there some icon or something where I missed that? Whenever I tried to > update, I just get a dialog that says, "run rhn_register as root"... :( > You didn't miss anything. It is just that the message in the dialog box has not been updated to reflect the fact that rhn_register no longer exists in 8.0. The message is very confusing if you are not aware of this. I don't know if this has been filed in bugzilla or not yet. It is something that needs to be fixed for the next release. Regards, Jim H signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RH 8.0 Kernel Compile error.
On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 10:37, Andrew MacKenzie wrote: > make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.19/drivers/scsi' > ln -sf sim710.scr fake7.c > gcc296 -E -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.19/include -traditional > -DCHIP=710 fake7.c | grep -v '^#' | perl -s script_asm.pl -ncr710 > script_asm.pl : Illegal combination of registers in line 72 : MOVE CTEST7 > & 0xef TO CTEST7 > Either source and destination registers must be the same, > or either source or destination register must be SFBR. > make[2]: *** [sim710_d.h] Error 255 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.19/drivers/scsi' > make[1]: *** [_modsubdir_scsi] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.19/drivers' > make: *** [_mod_drivers] Error 2 > It looks to me like this error happens when a perl script is being executed. perl -s script_asm.pl -ncr710 script_asm.pl : Illegal combination of registers in line 72 : It looks like this is either a Perl bug in 8.0 or a problem with that specific perl script. Regards, Jim H signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Dia - Diagram Editor
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 02:57, Bal Sondh wrote: > Hello, > > I am running RH 7.3. > I cannot import Viso's .vxd files to diagram editor. Will Diagram be able to > read this format in any future releases of this application? > Look at the FAQ on Dia's website it will answer your question. http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia/ Regards, Jim H signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Package list for 8.0 Professional?
On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 06:59, Keith Winston wrote: > I've searched redhat.com and google to find a list of packages in the > upcoming 8.0 Professional version. Why is this so hard to find? > Because the next version of Red Hat has not been officially released by Red Hat. If rumors are correct you can read all about the next version on Monday Sept 30. Regards, Jim H signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Another RH7.2->7.3 upgrade prob - X flickers
On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 02:24, Gary Stainburn wrote: > However, I've got a problem with X. Since upgrading I've got a flickering > screen. Whenever the screen is being updated - e.g. while I'm typing this - > I get flickers appearing all over the screen. The best way I can describe it > is like watching TV with a poor signal and white noise appearing. > > I'm using a S3 Virge DX card and a proview monitor and everything worked fine This is a known issue with 7.3 and S3 Virge DX/GX chipsets > #Option "fifo_moderate" Uncomment this line in your XF86Config-4. It should cure your problem. Regards, Jim H ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: where to install gcc?
On Mon, 2002-07-01 at 09:00, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > > Someone at Red Hat had gcc 3.1 RPMs that were designed to coexist > peacefully with the shipped gcc, but I can't recall who it was. Also, > there were gcc3.0.4 RPMs available for RHL 7.2. Those are probably still > available at ftp.redhat.com. > ftp://people.redhat.com/jakub/gcc3/ Regards, Jim H ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: C Program compile error
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:17:40 -0700 Frank Carreiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I try and compile. Getting the following message: > > --- > > In function `main`: > undefined reference to `pow` > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > --- > > I'm trying to calculate a value (x) raised to the y power. I suspect > there is a library not found by the linker (wild guess). > > Any thoughts on how I can track this down? > > Thx $ apropos pow README.machten [perlmachten] (1) - Perl version 5 on Power MachTen systems apm (1) - query Advanced Power Management (APM) BIOS apmd (8) - Advanced Power Management (APM) daemon exp (3) - exponential, logarithmic and power functions ldexp(3) - multiply floating-point number by integral power of 2 log [exp](3) - exponential, logarithmic and power functions log10 [exp] (3) - exponential, logarithmic and power functions pow [exp](3) - exponential, logarithmic and power functions poweroff [halt] (8) - stop the system Then look at the manpage for the pow function >From the manpage EXP(3) Linux Programmer's Manual EXP(3) NAME exp, log, log10, pow - exponential, logarithmic and power functions SYNOPSIS #include The pow function is in math.h Regards, Jim H msg72484/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
