Re: nfs client
Syed Masuduzzaman wrote: > I install RH7.0 as workstation. > > I try to mount to another linux server ( it is perfectly installed) > but find following error > > "mount:RPC: Unable to receive;errno=Connection refused" > > I checked on my machine /proc/filesystems but nfs is missing > > I further look in to ntsysv BUT nfs is checked. > > I also checked /proc/filesystems in to different Linux machine and nfs > is not also present there BUT it can easily mounting from linux server > > I want to configure my linux machine as nfs client CAN ANYONE HELP ME In my experience it has to do with the way the permissions are set in the exports file. Look in /var/log/messages on the server machine and see what it says. if it has to do with permissions, the client has not been given permissions to mount that directory in exports. If you are still having problems, post your /etc/exports file and the log messages from /var/log/messages and someon will most likely be able to help Bret ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: nfs client
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: > On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Syed Masuduzzaman wrote: > > > I install RH7.0 as workstation. > > > > I try to mount to another linux server ( it is perfectly installed) but > > find following error > > > > "mount:RPC: Unable to receive;errno=Connection refused" > > > It sounds like the server you are trying to connect to will not accept > nfs connections from your RH7.0 machine. Check /etc/hosts.allow and > /etc/exports on the server, to make sure you 7.0 machines IP is listed. Also make sure /usr/sbin/rpc.mountd is running on the server. Werner > > > > I checked on my machine /proc/filesystems but nfs is missing > > > As root, run modprobe nfs, and check it again. It should be listed. It > should be loaded automaticly when you mount a nfs directory. > > > > I further look in to ntsysv BUT nfs is checked. > > > You do not need nfs running on the client machine, just on the server. > So you do not need nfs running on the RH7.0 machine. You do need nfs > support loaded. (The nfs.o module.) > > > > I also checked /proc/filesystems in to different Linux machine and nfs is > > not also present there BUT it can easily mounting from linux server > > > > I want to configure my linux machine as nfs client CAN ANYONE HELP ME > > > > > > I hope this helps. > Mikkel > ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: nfs client
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Syed Masuduzzaman wrote: > I install RH7.0 as workstation. > > I try to mount to another linux server ( it is perfectly installed) but > find following error > > "mount:RPC: Unable to receive;errno=Connection refused" > It sounds like the server you are trying to connect to will not accept nfs connections from your RH7.0 machine. Check /etc/hosts.allow and /etc/exports on the server, to make sure you 7.0 machines IP is listed. > > I checked on my machine /proc/filesystems but nfs is missing > As root, run modprobe nfs, and check it again. It should be listed. It should be loaded automaticly when you mount a nfs directory. > > I further look in to ntsysv BUT nfs is checked. > You do not need nfs running on the client machine, just on the server. So you do not need nfs running on the RH7.0 machine. You do need nfs support loaded. (The nfs.o module.) > > I also checked /proc/filesystems in to different Linux machine and nfs is > not also present there BUT it can easily mounting from linux server > > I want to configure my linux machine as nfs client CAN ANYONE HELP ME > > I hope this helps. Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup. ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: NFS Client Performance
On 15-May-98 David Villeger wrote: > Hi, > > I need to decide whether to use Linux (RedHat 5) or FreeBSD. > > My application requires a Sun NFS servers and several PCs sending > emails (the queue is NFS mounted from the Sun). > > I'd prefer Linux as I think it has better features and better > performance. However, I heard that Linux compares _very_ poorly with > FreeBSD as an NFS client. > > Is that true? I don't want to start a religious war. I just would like > to get some serious documented facts. Possibly even some benchmark > comparisons. I think the people at [EMAIL PROTECTED] might have some ideas. I think you can use [EMAIL PROTECTED] to subscribe. Dave -- PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES! http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
Re: NFS Client Performance
On Fri, 15 May 1998, David Villeger wrote: > I'd prefer Linux as I think it has better features and better > performance. However, I heard that Linux compares _very_ poorly with > FreeBSD as an NFS client. I wouldn't say that it compares VERY poorly. The 2.0 kernel is a lot faster than it used to be. The 2.2 kernel will be faster yet, probably as good as anybody else. Right at the moment I would probably say that FreeBSD has a slight performance edge, but really ALL NFS clients are pretty inferior when compared to Sun's. So don't avoid Linux just for the NFS performance. Linux has a history of catching up pretty fast whenever it lags behind in just about any area. :) -- PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES! http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
