[Repeater-Builder] Antenna question for the forum.

2008-01-26 Thread w2sxk
Goodafternoon,

Me and a friend are putting up a secondary VHF repeater and have a 
antenna question. Being we are on a budget but have looked at these 2 
antennas as options.

Diamond F22A monoband base or the Husler G6-144B 

Any pros or cons to these antennas and which would you choose or you 
have another option?

Antenna will be mounted between 30-40' on multiuse rohn 45 tower fed 
with LMR-400 and subjected to typical Northeast USA weather North of 
NYC. Ofcourse if money wasn't an issue, I would prompt for a more 
durible antenna specifically suited for repeater use. We need to keep 
antenna size down to less then 10' in length and cost down as well. 
My choice was the Diamond F22A. It apears similiar in size and 
construction to the X-200 dual band and I have not had any issues 
with my current intallation. Any comments or suggestions???


73,
Steve - W2SXK
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






[Repeater-Builder] Re: EF Johnson CR1010 Crystal Replacement

2008-01-26 Thread John D.
Eric,

I tried that today and they positively will not work on the new type 
of crystal holders due to the way they are made since they cannot 
reliably make them work.  They said they have done them in the past 
and lost money, wasted time, and angered customers in the process. 

John

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Eric Lemmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 John,
 
 I suggest that you send the holders, with the old crystals, to 
International
 Crystal or to any competent crystal house.  Simply instruct ICM to 
change
 the TX and RX from the existing frequencies to the desired new 
frequencies.
 It'll cost you about $100 for the pair, but you'll wind up with 
crystals
 that are guaranteed to work on the new channels.
 
 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John D.
 Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 5:28 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] EF Johnson CR1010 Crystal Replacement
 
 I have a CR1010 repeater that needs to have new crystals installed 
to 
 change the frequency from 451.200 to 451.250 on the TX and 456.200 
to 
 456.250 on the Rx. I tried to get crystals from EF Johnson and they 
 said they no longer support this repeater. I then tried to get 
 crystals from International Crystal and they said there were two 
types 
 of holders new and old. They said that if I had the new type I 
would 
 be unable to get crystals for them or they would never work. It 
just 
 so happens this repeater has the new crystals so does anybody know 
 where I can get a set of old crystal holders so I can change the 
freq. 
 on this repeater? Also does anybody have any other good ideas on 
how I 
 can proceed with this unit.
 
 Thanks





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Antenna question for the forum.

2008-01-26 Thread Chuck Kelsey
You'll hear this from others -- DO NOT use the LMR-400 cable in duplex 
situations.

This subject comes up about every other week here.

Chuck
WB2EDV



- Original Message - 
From: w2sxk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 4:43 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Antenna question for the forum.


 Goodafternoon,

 Me and a friend are putting up a secondary VHF repeater and have a
 antenna question. Being we are on a budget but have looked at these 2
 antennas as options.

 Diamond F22A monoband base or the Husler G6-144B

 Any pros or cons to these antennas and which would you choose or you
 have another option?

 Antenna will be mounted between 30-40' on multiuse rohn 45 tower fed
 with LMR-400 and subjected to typical Northeast USA weather North of
 NYC. Ofcourse if money wasn't an issue, I would prompt for a more
 durible antenna specifically suited for repeater use. We need to keep
 antenna size down to less then 10' in length and cost down as well.
 My choice was the Diamond F22A. It apears similiar in size and
 construction to the X-200 dual band and I have not had any issues
 with my current intallation. Any comments or suggestions???


 73,
 Steve - W2SXK
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




[Repeater-Builder] Re: Stupid Question about Db antennas.

2008-01-26 Thread Maxwell D Pratt
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, dallasreact112
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have a question about the DB base antennas such as the DB-224, DB-
 420, etc. As most of you know they consist of folded dipole trombones 
 Bernie Parker
 
 K5BP

Bernie 
 There is no such thing as a stupid question . If you want to know
something just ask. you might get some stupid answers but you might
get the one you are looking for too. 
 
  Dale  N8SAC



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Stupid Question about Db antennas.

2008-01-26 Thread Larry Wagoner
At 08:27 AM 1/26/2008, you wrote:
There is no such thing as a stupid question . If you want to know
something just ask. you might get some stupid answers but you might
get the one you are looking for too.


Since we are in such a giving mood - let me ask something ...

I have my hands on what I believe to be a Sinclair 224 Antenna.
It is similar to a DB224, but has a smaller diameter mast, with 
thicker wall, and the harness is interior to the mast.
The dipoles are fed through the interior of the bracket that holds the dipoles.
Other than sweeping it with an antenna analyzer, and pulling each 
dipole bracket off to examine the interior for signs of arcing, is 
there any check I should do to be sure of the antenna being OK before 
we lift it?

I have a best SWR of 1.12 at 147.1.  I plan to use it at 
145.150.  The SWR per my MFJ 259 is 1.22 at 145.150.

I have seen no sign of arcing inside the brackets.

Ideas?

Larry
N5WLW  



[Repeater-Builder] Re: Desense Problem on 222 MHz Repeater

2008-01-26 Thread nj902
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Eric Lemmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
I think you may have overlooked the fact that desense was observed 
even when a dummy load was connected directly to the output of the 
duplexer.  That pretty much eliminates anything external to the 
repeater itself, doesn't it?

-
-

I don't think I overlooked anything.  I suggest that you re-read his 
posts.  He said that he has 1 dB of desensitization when the system 
is tested on a dummy load, in excess of 15 dB of desensitization 
when running on one antenna and an improvement of about 6 dB when 
running on split antennas.

I called his desensitization on the load minimal  I don't see how 
you can call 1 dB equivalent to 15 dB and put the blame on the 
repeater equipment.

Actually, there is one fact that is important, that there is still 
on the order of 9 dB of desensitization when running on split 
antennas.  This alone strongly suggests that the repeater transmit 
RF is illuminating a passive IM source. [or is incident upon and 
mixing at a source that is illuminated by the DTV signal]

Passive IM [PIM] can occur in many places.  If the signal level of 
the interferer is high enough, it could occur in your antenna, in 
your coax, or in one of your connectors. Each could have a 
contribution.  Deciding where is is occuring is the issue.  Within 
your system or external?

The industry is beginning to develop practices to deal with PIM.  
Andrew has published some information regarding PIM in transmission 
lines as has Amphenol with respect to PIM in connectors.  See 
also Intermodulation in Coaxial Connectors, RF Design, September 
1996.

In this case, there are several possibilities to consider.  If the 
spectrum analyzer can show the character of the noise that is 
causing the desensitization, and if that interference appears 
similar to to the DTV signal, then the task is to look for ways to 
identify its mix point and to defeat it.  [I suggest that the source 
of degradation is a noise like interferer because it appears from 
the previous posts that the proper tests have been conducted to rule 
out a narrowband interferer.]

I would also suggest swapping antennas when running split.  If the 
results differ - it could give some guidance as to the proximity of 
the mix point to one or the other.  

Another test to run would be to measure the absolute level of the 
DTV signal at the transmission line to each of the two antennas.  
This will tell you how strong the signal is near your antennas. 

Remember that the wideband character of the DTV signal is going to 
affect the way that you measure it.



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: EF Johnson CR1010 Crystal Replacement

2008-01-26 Thread Eric Lemmon
John,

I stand corrected.  I know that EFJ produced some oddball radios, but until
now I have never heard of a crystal holder or channel element that could not
be recrystalled by ICM.  Live and learn!

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
 

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John D.
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 5:55 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: EF Johnson CR1010 Crystal Replacement

Eric,

I tried that today and they positively will not work on the new type 
of crystal holders due to the way they are made since they cannot 
reliably make them work. They said they have done them in the past 
and lost money, wasted time, and angered customers in the process. 

John

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com , Eric Lemmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 John,
 
 I suggest that you send the holders, with the old crystals, to 
International
 Crystal or to any competent crystal house. Simply instruct ICM to 
change
 the TX and RX from the existing frequencies to the desired new 
frequencies.
 It'll cost you about $100 for the pair, but you'll wind up with 
crystals
 that are guaranteed to work on the new channels.
 
 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
 [mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of John D.
 Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 5:28 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] EF Johnson CR1010 Crystal Replacement
 
 I have a CR1010 repeater that needs to have new crystals installed 
to 
 change the frequency from 451.200 to 451.250 on the TX and 456.200 
to 
 456.250 on the Rx. I tried to get crystals from EF Johnson and they 
 said they no longer support this repeater. I then tried to get 
 crystals from International Crystal and they said there were two 
types 
 of holders new and old. They said that if I had the new type I 
would 
 be unable to get crystals for them or they would never work. It 
just 
 so happens this repeater has the new crystals so does anybody know 
 where I can get a set of old crystal holders so I can change the 
freq. 
 on this repeater? Also does anybody have any other good ideas on 
how I 
 can proceed with this unit.
 
 Thanks




 



[Repeater-Builder] Someone mentioned PIM

2008-01-26 Thread skipp025

There is a light at the end of this tunnel... 

Sinclair Engineers really pushed the PIM issue out into 
the public eye when I first started dealing with them. 

The Sinclair Company has changed so much (make your own 
decisions) from those earlier days but you will notice 
most of their current antenna designs directly mention 
low PIM Engineered Designs. 

The reported IM within/from certain rf-connectors is the reason 
I no longer use Nickel Plated hard-line connectors found priced 
so reasonable on Ebay.  :-(   Sometimes a deal is not...  

back to the woodwork...   and soaking wet with the rain. 
cheers, 
s. 

 This alone strongly suggests that the repeater transmit 
 RF is illuminating a passive IM source. [or is incident upon and 
 mixing at a source that is illuminated by the DTV signal]
 
 Passive IM [PIM] can occur in many places.  If the signal level of 
 the interferer is high enough, it could occur in your antenna, in 
 your coax, or in one of your connectors. Each could have a 
 contribution.  Deciding where is is occuring is the issue.  Within 
 your system or external?
 
 The industry is beginning to develop practices to deal with PIM.  
 Andrew has published some information regarding PIM in transmission 
 lines as has Amphenol with respect to PIM in connectors.  See 
 also Intermodulation in Coaxial Connectors, RF Design, September 
 1996.




[Repeater-Builder] Re: Notch and other Suck-Out Cavities

2008-01-26 Thread skipp025
Re: Notch and other Suck-Out Cavities 

Many of the more common notch cavities are single port 
designs. I've also seen and setup some very creative 
applications using two-port band-pass bottles where the 
second port is terminated with a load.  

In one or two cases the terminated band-pass Cavity properly 
set up... solved a very pesky problem where the high-Q single 
port notch cavity layout did not. 

cheers, 
s. 

 Steve Allred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Just make sure to pull the unused loop out of the cavity.
 Steve / K6SCA
 
 Gary Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 If you have an extra band pass cavity then you 
 also have a notch cavity. Just connect a T to one port of 
 the band pass cavity and ignore the other port on the cavity. 
 This will work as a notch cavity for your testing.  
 73
 Gary  K4FMX




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: EF Johnson CR1010 Crystal Replacement

2008-01-26 Thread Ted Bleiman K9MDM - MDM Radio

WONDERING OUT LOUD.WHO DID JOHNSON USE TO MAKE
THEM IN THE FOIST PLACE??? MAYBE THEY CAN TELL
YOU SINCE THEY OBVIOUSLY DIDN'T DO IT THEIR DAMN
SELVES.

SOME ONE HAD TO MFGR THE THINGS

MDM

--- Eric Lemmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 John,
 
 I stand corrected.  I know that EFJ produced
 some oddball radios, but until
 now I have never heard of a crystal holder or
 channel element that could not
 be recrystalled by ICM.  Live and learn!
 
 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of John D.
 Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 5:55 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: EF Johnson
 CR1010 Crystal Replacement
 
 Eric,
 
 I tried that today and they positively will not
 work on the new type 
 of crystal holders due to the way they are made
 since they cannot 
 reliably make them work. They said they have
 done them in the past 
 and lost money, wasted time, and angered
 customers in the process. 
 
 John
 
 --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com ,
 Eric Lemmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 
  John,
  
  I suggest that you send the holders, with the
 old crystals, to 
 International
  Crystal or to any competent crystal house.
 Simply instruct ICM to 
 change
  the TX and RX from the existing frequencies
 to the desired new 
 frequencies.
  It'll cost you about $100 for the pair, but
 you'll wind up with 
 crystals
  that are guaranteed to work on the new
 channels.
  
  73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
  [mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com ]
 On Behalf Of John D.
  Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 5:28 PM
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
  Subject: [Repeater-Builder] EF Johnson CR1010
 Crystal Replacement
  
  I have a CR1010 repeater that needs to have
 new crystals installed 
 to 
  change the frequency from 451.200 to 451.250
 on the TX and 456.200 
 to 
  456.250 on the Rx. I tried to get crystals
 from EF Johnson and they 
  said they no longer support this repeater. I
 then tried to get 
  crystals from International Crystal and they
 said there were two 
 types 
  of holders new and old. They said that if I
 had the new type I 
 would 
  be unable to get crystals for them or they
 would never work. It 
 just 
  so happens this repeater has the new crystals
 so does anybody know 
  where I can get a set of old crystal holders
 so I can change the 
 freq. 
  on this repeater? Also does anybody have any
 other good ideas on 
 how I 
  can proceed with this unit.
  
  Thanks
 
 
 
 
  
 
 


  Ted Bleiman K9MDM
  MDM  Radio If its in stock...we've got it!
P O Box 31353
Chicago, IL 60631-0353 
773.631.5130  fax 773.775.8096  
   
  web http://www.mdmradio.com - 
   email -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  DIRECT ALL EMAIL 
  












  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: EF Johnson CR1010 Crystal Replacement

2008-01-26 Thread Paul Finch
MDM,

I was wondering about that myself!  What does the New style elements look
like?  When were they installed by Johnson?  I worked in a Johnson shop
until 83 and still have a lot of Johnson radios on the air and don't
remember anything like this.  Admittedly, I have been out of the new Johnson
equipment for a while.

Paul
 

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted Bleiman K9MDM -
MDM Radio
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 5:08 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: EF Johnson CR1010 Crystal Replacement


WONDERING OUT LOUD.WHO DID JOHNSON USE TO MAKE
THEM IN THE FOIST PLACE??? MAYBE THEY CAN TELL
YOU SINCE THEY OBVIOUSLY DIDN'T DO IT THEIR DAMN
SELVES.

SOME ONE HAD TO MFGR THE THINGS

MDM

--- Eric Lemmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 John,
 
 I stand corrected.  I know that EFJ produced
 some oddball radios, but until
 now I have never heard of a crystal holder or
 channel element that could not
 be recrystalled by ICM.  Live and learn!
 
 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of John D.
 Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 5:55 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: EF Johnson
 CR1010 Crystal Replacement
 
 Eric,
 
 I tried that today and they positively will not
 work on the new type 
 of crystal holders due to the way they are made
 since they cannot 
 reliably make them work. They said they have
 done them in the past 
 and lost money, wasted time, and angered
 customers in the process. 
 
 John
 
 --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com ,
 Eric Lemmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 
  John,
  
  I suggest that you send the holders, with the
 old crystals, to 
 International
  Crystal or to any competent crystal house.
 Simply instruct ICM to 
 change
  the TX and RX from the existing frequencies
 to the desired new 
 frequencies.
  It'll cost you about $100 for the pair, but
 you'll wind up with 
 crystals
  that are guaranteed to work on the new
 channels.
  
  73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
  [mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com ]
 On Behalf Of John D.
  Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 5:28 PM
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
  Subject: [Repeater-Builder] EF Johnson CR1010
 Crystal Replacement
  
  I have a CR1010 repeater that needs to have
 new crystals installed 
 to 
  change the frequency from 451.200 to 451.250
 on the TX and 456.200 
 to 
  456.250 on the Rx. I tried to get crystals
 from EF Johnson and they 
  said they no longer support this repeater. I
 then tried to get 
  crystals from International Crystal and they
 said there were two 
 types 
  of holders new and old. They said that if I
 had the new type I 
 would 
  be unable to get crystals for them or they
 would never work. It 
 just 
  so happens this repeater has the new crystals
 so does anybody know 
  where I can get a set of old crystal holders
 so I can change the 
 freq. 
  on this repeater? Also does anybody have any
 other good ideas on 
 how I 
  can proceed with this unit.
  
  Thanks
 
 
 
 
  
 
 


  Ted Bleiman K9MDM
  MDM  Radio If its in stock...we've got it!
P O Box 31353
Chicago, IL 60631-0353 
773.631.5130  fax 773.775.8096  
   
  web http://www.mdmradio.com - 
   email -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  DIRECT ALL EMAIL 
  












 


Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs




 
Yahoo! Groups Links





No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.11/1244 - Release Date: 1/25/2008
7:44 PM
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.11/1244 - Release Date: 1/25/2008
7:44 PM
 







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


[Repeater-Builder] ICOM F221S Mobiles and Repeater

2008-01-26 Thread Tony L.
Seeking feedback on the ICOM F221S mobile or CY F221S repeater UHF 
versions as to suitability for use in the 70cm ham band.

Can the radios be programmed with Windows software, or are they like 
many Motorola products - i.e., you need a slow computer running DOS.

Thanks.



Tony



RE: [Repeater-Builder] ICOM F221S Mobiles and Repeater

2008-01-26 Thread Paul Finch
Tony,

They are great little radios and you can program them with any Windows you
want to.  If you use them in repeater service turn the power down and use a
good amp.

Paul
 

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony L.
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 10:10 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] ICOM F221S Mobiles and Repeater

Seeking feedback on the ICOM F221S mobile or CY F221S repeater UHF 
versions as to suitability for use in the 70cm ham band.

Can the radios be programmed with Windows software, or are they like 
many Motorola products - i.e., you need a slow computer running DOS.

Thanks.



Tony





 
Yahoo! Groups Links





No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.12/1245 - Release Date: 1/26/2008
3:45 PM
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.12/1245 - Release Date: 1/26/2008
3:45 PM
 







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/