RE: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola TLD-1100 Wanted,please help if you can.

2008-10-23 Thread greg huffman
Hi,after I just e-mailed you I got thinking,my friend wants to hook up the old 
bag phone to the head.You guys in this club are much more knowledgable on the 
old stuff than he is so I figured I would ask if this is the best way to do it.

What would you advise ? I would put in a whole unit if it's easier but I don't 
know how to hook it up to the modern cell networks.The bag idea is just what we 
were thinking was the easiest,any advice would be great,Greg.



Re: [Repeater-Builder] eBay security

2008-10-23 Thread K
Just forward the message to [EMAIL PROTECTED],com  and they will tell you if it 
is from them.

 Thank you
73
Kenny
KG5KS
DEC B AR



[Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola TLD-1100 Wanted,please help if you can.

2008-10-23 Thread lenaw12
...my friend wants to hook up the old bag phone...

The FCC has just allowed the Cellular companies to discontinue Analog
service and it is already happening around here...in a year the bag
phone may be useless?

LW


--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, greg huffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,after I just e-mailed you I got thinking,my friend wants to hook
up the old bag phone to the head.You guys in this club are much more
knowledgable on the old stuff than he is so I figured I would ask if
this is the best way to do it.
 
 What would you advise ? I would put in a whole unit if it's easier
but I don't know how to hook it up to the modern cell networks.The bag
idea is just what we were thinking was the easiest,any advice would be
great,Greg.





[Repeater-Builder] Re:eBay security

2008-10-23 Thread George Csahanin
Chuck-

My Ebay account was hacked a few years back. The way you get it back is to 
contact support there, and they will call you at the phone number on record 
to verify. But you initiate it all, not them. And I don't remember a SSN 
ever being used with Ebay.

Are you actually not able to get into your account? Have you tried? And I 
mean by entering ebay.com to browser, not following a link in a phishing 
e-mail.

GeorgeC
W2DB 



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola TLD-1100 Wanted,please help if you can.

2008-10-23 Thread Mike Morris WA6ILQ
At 07:26 PM 10/22/08, you wrote:
Hi,after I just e-mailed you I got thinking,my friend wants to hook 
up the old bag phone to the head.You guys in this club are much 
more knowledgable on the old stuff than he is so I figured I would 
ask if this is the best way to do it.

What would you advise ? I would put in a whole unit if it's easier 
but I don't know how to hook it up to the modern cell networks.The 
bag idea is just what we were thinking was the easiest,any advice 
would be great,Greg.


Check this out...
http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/tutorial_info.php?tutorials_id=51page=

Take their set of parts, isolate and tap onto the hookswitch and dial
contacts from the telephone head you have, and run with it.
You'll need to build a voltage regulator circuit that will take the +12
to +14 from the vehicle battery and knock it down to 3.6 to 3.7v at 2a
but there are a number of regulators that will do that.
Personally, I'd use a switching supply for that.

Or if you want to just buy a working portable rotary phone you
can buy one ready to go for $300

Mike WA6ILQ



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola TLD-1100 Wanted,please help if you can.

2008-10-23 Thread Derek J. Lassen

See http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/cellphone/8928/

At 10:26 PM 10/22/2008 -0400, you wrote:

Hi,after I just e-mailed you I got thinking,my friend wants to hook 
up the old bag phone to the head.You guys in this club are much 
more knowledgable on the old stuff than he is so I figured I would 
ask if this is the best way to do it.


What would you advise ? I would put in a whole unit if it's easier 
but I don't know how to hook it up to the modern cell networks.The 
bag idea is just what we were thinking was the easiest,any advice 
would be great,Greg.





[Repeater-Builder] Guideline for scanning manuals?

2008-10-23 Thread George Henry
What are the guidelines for scanning manuals for the RB site?  I want to scan  
upload the manuals for the MSR 2000, but they are HUGE...  Tried doing the VHF 
manual today at 200 dpi, and even choosing Acrobat's reduced file size 
option, it came out to 101 MB!!!  (the UHF and Audio/Control manuals are coming 
any day)

I presume they should be scanned in BW, not greyscale or color (unless needed 
for images/PC board layouts...), but at what resolution?  And Kevin or Mike, 
can you send me the ftp instructions again?  I seem to have lost them..

George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Guideline for scanning manuals?

2008-10-23 Thread Chris Carruba
If you scan and save the files as TIF's they will be very large no matter what 
the resolution is.. 
choose jpg or jpeg

 Best Regards,


Chris Carruba (WQIK389)
CompuTec Data Systems
Co Administrator irc.spidernet.org
http://www.spidernet.org


«§» Amateur Radio Programming Discussions  RSS files «§»
/server irc.spidernet.org
/join #radio-prog



- Original Message 
From: George Henry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: repeater-builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 4:33:23 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Guideline for scanning manuals?


What are the guidelines for scanning manuals for the RB site?  I want to scan  
upload the manuals for the MSR 2000, but they are HUGE...  Tried doing the VHF 
manual today at 200 dpi, and even choosing Acrobat's reduced file size 
option, it came out to 101 MB!!!  (the UHF and Audio/Control manuals are coming 
any day)

I presume they should be scanned in BW, not greyscale or color (unless needed 
for images/PC board layouts...), but at what resolution?  And Kevin or Mike, 
can you send me the ftp instructions again?  I seem to have lost them ..

George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413



  

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Guideline for scanning manuals?

2008-10-23 Thread Eric Lemmon
George,

I do a lot of manual scanning, and I have evolved a standard of sorts that
I personally follow, and recommend to others.  This is a personal
preference, and should not be considered a requirement for any submission to
be published on the Repeater-Builder site.  Herewith are my personal
preferences:

1.  Always scan directly into PDF as a document, never into any image format
such as JPEG, JIF, or TIFF.
2.  Always scan at 300 DPI resolution, to maximize laser printing clarity
without making the files too large.
3.  Always scan schematics and text as 1-bit (line) drawings, with the white
and black points set for optimum contrast and density.
4.  Scan photographs and color separations as 8-bit (gray scale) drawings,
if necessary to preserve detail.  If not, scan as a line drawing.
5.  Never make segmented scans of long pages.  Take those pages to a
graphics shop for full-page scans into PDF.
6.  Always scan pages as they are bound, so that all scans are 11 inches
high regardless of orientation or length. (PDFs are automatically rotated
for printing)
7.  Always add page numbers, using the Adobe Text Tool, when they are
missing.
8.  Always add a note to indicate if a following page is blank.
9.  Don't scan irrelevant pages, such as how to order spare parts from
depots that haven't existed for years.
10. Never scan and submit for publication any manual that is still in print,
unless you want to be sued for copyright infringement.

I prefer to use Adobe Acrobat 4.0 Professional for most scanning, and I then
perform optimization in Adobe Acrobat 7.0 Professional.  The result is a
document that is not only versatile, but is much smaller than any image
format.  Long pages can be printed on a document (roll) printer at most
commercial graphics shops, along with many Kinko's shops.  The real beauty
of PDF is that a portion of any long page can be selected using the Adobe
Reader Snapshot tool, and then printed on standard 8.5 by 11 inch paper.
For example, you might want to print just the final stage in a power
amplifier schematic diagram that was originally almost three feet long.
Just use the snapshot tool to select that portion, and now you have exactly
what you want.  You can also save that selection as a separate PDF to send
to someone in an e-mail.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY



-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Henry
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 2:33 PM
To: repeater-builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Guideline for scanning manuals?

What are the guidelines for scanning manuals for the RB site?  I want to
scan  upload the manuals for the MSR 2000, but they are HUGE...  Tried
doing the VHF manual today at 200 dpi, and even choosing Acrobat's reduced
file size option, it came out to 101 MB!!!  (the UHF and Audio/Control
manuals are coming any day)

I presume they should be scanned in BW, not greyscale or color (unless
needed for images/PC board layouts...), but at what resolution?  And Kevin
or Mike, can you send me the ftp instructions again?  I seem to have lost
them..

George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413


 



[Repeater-Builder] DB antenna question

2008-10-23 Thread n3dab
I'm running out of antenna mounting positions at my site. Has anyone 
tried any of the following ideas and if so what were the results ?  
The intent here is to run 2 rptrs. using a common mast to support 2 
antennas.

1. Mounting the dipoles and harness from a UHF DB420 on the same mast 
as a VHF DB224, or vice versa. (UHF and VHF antennas on the same 
mast)  

2. Mounting the dipoles and harness from a DB420 on the same mast of 
an existing DB420.(2-DB420 UHF antennas on the same mast)

3. Taking an existing DB420 antenna and feeding the upper and lower 
halves with separate feedlines to make 2-6 Db antennas on the same 
mast. The lower harness section would be replaced with with the upper 
harness section from a junk antenna. 

In 1. and 2. the dipoles of each antenna would be at right angles 
to the existing antenna.  In 3. the overall gain of the single 
antenna would be reduced to about 6 Db for the upper and lower 
halves.  Additionally extra filter cavities would probably be 
required to keep the 2 rptrs. using the antennas from interfering 
with each other.

If any of the above ideas are practical this would allow me to recoup 
some additonal mounting positions or at the least reduce the clutter 
of antennas I have now.
 
All constructive comments will be appreciated. 

Doug   N3DAB/WPRX486/WPJL709 



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Guideline for scanning manuals?

2008-10-23 Thread Kevin Custer

George Henry wrote:

What are the guidelines for scanning manuals for the RB site?


There really aren't any except for common sense.  Manuals that are of 
quality are going to be big in size, especially when the manuals have 
lots of pages.  Newer manuals that are produced digitally are smaller in 
size because of the nature of the beast.  The scanning process is 
something that takes time to perfect and then you still have that 
trade-off of quality verses size.  That being said, we have lots of 
server space and size is not a concern from a hosting standpoint.  This 
doesn't mean we should scan all manuals for availability on this (or any 
other) site at the highest quality / largest file size.  Again, common 
sense tells us to have a good compromise.  The exception would be a 
schematic or something else other than text that comes out not legible 
that is important to the overall value of the manual.




   And Kevin or Mike, can you send me the ftp instructions again?  I seem to 
have lost them..



Public FTP for Repeater-Builder donations:

Server address:  ftp.repeater-builder.com
UN = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PW = guest
Normal log-in method - standard FTP protocol.

This dumps you into to a directory where we watch for donations - BUT, 
anyone sending a donation needs to email the _ALL_ 3 following webmasters:

Kevin Custer  W3KKC
Mike Morris  WA6ILQ
Bob Meister  WA1MIK

I didn't give email addresses as you can look on the RB site and get them.

Kevin


Re: [Repeater-Builder] DB antenna question

2008-10-23 Thread Chuck Kelsey
You should be able to utilize the lower section harness as well.

Chuck
WB2EDV


- Original Message - 
 3. Taking an existing DB420 antenna and feeding the upper and lower 
 halves with separate feedlines to make 2-6 Db antennas on the same 
 mast. The lower harness section would be replaced with with the upper 
 harness section from a junk antenna. 
 
 


Re: [Repeater-Builder] DB antenna question

2008-10-23 Thread Maire-Radios
they have made them in the past DB

John


  - Original Message - 
  From: n3dab 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 8:06 PM
  Subject: [Repeater-Builder] DB antenna question


  I'm running out of antenna mounting positions at my site. Has anyone 
  tried any of the following ideas and if so what were the results ? 
  The intent here is to run 2 rptrs. using a common mast to support 2 
  antennas.

  1. Mounting the dipoles and harness from a UHF DB420 on the same mast 
  as a VHF DB224, or vice versa. (UHF and VHF antennas on the same 
  mast) 

  2. Mounting the dipoles and harness from a DB420 on the same mast of 
  an existing DB420.(2-DB420 UHF antennas on the same mast)

  3. Taking an existing DB420 antenna and feeding the upper and lower 
  halves with separate feedlines to make 2-6 Db antennas on the same 
  mast. The lower harness section would be replaced with with the upper 
  harness section from a junk antenna. 

  In 1. and 2. the dipoles of each antenna would be at right angles 
  to the existing antenna. In 3. the overall gain of the single 
  antenna would be reduced to about 6 Db for the upper and lower 
  halves. Additionally extra filter cavities would probably be 
  required to keep the 2 rptrs. using the antennas from interfering 
  with each other.

  If any of the above ideas are practical this would allow me to recoup 
  some additonal mounting positions or at the least reduce the clutter 
  of antennas I have now.

  All constructive comments will be appreciated. 

  Doug N3DAB/WPRX486/WPJL709 



   

[Repeater-Builder] Re: DB antenna question

2008-10-23 Thread Laryn Lohman
Chuck, what do you do with the unconnected N connector at the top end
of the bottom harness?  

Laryn K8TVZ


--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Chuck Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 You should be able to utilize the lower section harness as well.
 
 Chuck
 WB2EDV
 
 
 - Original Message - 
  3. Taking an existing DB420 antenna and feeding the upper and lower 
  halves with separate feedlines to make 2-6 Db antennas on the same 
  mast. The lower harness section would be replaced with with the upper 
  harness section from a junk antenna. 
  
 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] DB antenna question

2008-10-23 Thread Jeff DePolo
 1. Mounting the dipoles and harness from a UHF DB420 on the same mast 
 as a VHF DB224, or vice versa. (UHF and VHF antennas on the same 
 mast) 

There will be a lot of interaction between the two.  I wouldn't do this.
You'd also likely need extra filtering on the ground between the VHF and UHF
repeaters since the coupling between antennas will be very high.
 
 2. Mounting the dipoles and harness from a DB420 on the same mast of 
 an existing DB420.(2-DB420 UHF antennas on the same mast)

Really bad idea.  At that point, you may as well just use one antenna and a
combiner/multicoupler at the bottom - you'd likely need almost the same
amount of filtering with the two antennas separated on the same mast
because there will be so much coupling.
 
 3. Taking an existing DB420 antenna and feeding the upper and lower 
 halves with separate feedlines to make 2-6 Db antennas on the same 
 mast. The lower harness section would be replaced with with the upper 
 harness section from a junk antenna. 

Better idea.  This used to be order-able as a DB420D, which was really two
DB408's on the same mast, one stacked above the other, with the feeders for
both antennas terminating at the bottom.  The isolation between antennas was
something like 30 dB, so again, you'll still need adequate filtering
downstairs.
 
 If any of the above ideas are practical this would allow me to recoup 
 some additonal mounting positions or at the least reduce the clutter 
 of antennas I have now.

Can you mount two antennas on the same mount, one rightside-up, and the
other inverted?  If you do this, be careful if you invert-mount a DB420.
The mechanical connection in the center relies somewhat on gravity to keep
the two halves together; if you invert-mount, gravity is working against
you.

--- Jeff WN3A



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: DB antenna question

2008-10-23 Thread Chuck Kelsey
It gets cut off along with the Y, the short section of VB83 and the 
balance of the pigtail.

You should end up with a section of VB8 that you can add a new connector to.

Chuck
WB2EDV



- Original Message - 
From: Laryn Lohman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 9:02 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: DB antenna question


 Chuck, what do you do with the unconnected N connector at the top end
 of the bottom harness?

 Laryn K8TVZ





Re: [Repeater-Builder] DB antenna question

2008-10-23 Thread rb_n3dab
How do you suggest terminating the connector that normally connects to the top 
half.  Just seal it water tight ? 
--
Doug   
N3DAB/WPRX486/WPJL709

 Chuck Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

=
You should be able to utilize the lower section harness as well.

Chuck
WB2EDV


- Original Message - 
 3. Taking an existing DB420 antenna and feeding the upper and lower 
 halves with separate feedlines to make 2-6 Db antennas on the same 
 mast. The lower harness section would be replaced with with the upper 
 harness section from a junk antenna. 
 
 



RE: [Repeater-Builder] DB antenna question

2008-10-23 Thread rb_n3dab
Thanks Jeff.  OK, idea 1. and 2. are basically shot down in flames.  Idea 3. I 
can handle.   Again the question, if I use the original harness how do I 
terminate the connector where the lower section joined the upper.  Just weather 
proof it ??

Answer to your last comment is no  All my antennas are mounted on 2 GI pipe, 
bracketed to the side of the house, that run from the ground to approx. 5' 
above the roof line (25'+/-).   My site is my house located on top of a small 
mountain (2750'AMSL) roughly 1000' above average surrounding terrain.  I also 
have covenents to deal with (no towers).  Average coverage has been approx. 40+ 
miles where not blocked by higher terrain from my NW to NE.   Roger on the 
gravity connection bit on the 2 have but a 3/8-1/2SS bolt thru the joint 
would solve that problem. 
--
Doug   
N3DAB/WPRX486/WPJL709

 Jeff DePolo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

=
 1. Mounting the dipoles and harness from a UHF DB420 on the same mast 
 as a VHF DB224, or vice versa. (UHF and VHF antennas on the same 
 mast) 

There will be a lot of interaction between the two.  I wouldn't do this.
You'd also likely need extra filtering on the ground between the VHF and UHF
repeaters since the coupling between antennas will be very high.
 
 2. Mounting the dipoles and harness from a DB420 on the same mast of 
 an existing DB420.(2-DB420 UHF antennas on the same mast)

Really bad idea.  At that point, you may as well just use one antenna and a
combiner/multicoupler at the bottom - you'd likely need almost the same
amount of filtering with the two antennas separated on the same mast
because there will be so much coupling.
 
 3. Taking an existing DB420 antenna and feeding the upper and lower 
 halves with separate feedlines to make 2-6 Db antennas on the same 
 mast. The lower harness section would be replaced with with the upper 
 harness section from a junk antenna. 

Better idea.  This used to be order-able as a DB420D, which was really two
DB408's on the same mast, one stacked above the other, with the feeders for
both antennas terminating at the bottom.  The isolation between antennas was
something like 30 dB, so again, you'll still need adequate filtering
downstairs.
 
 If any of the above ideas are practical this would allow me to recoup 
 some additonal mounting positions or at the least reduce the clutter 
 of antennas I have now.

Can you mount two antennas on the same mount, one rightside-up, and the
other inverted?  If you do this, be careful if you invert-mount a DB420.
The mechanical connection in the center relies somewhat on gravity to keep
the two halves together; if you invert-mount, gravity is working against
you.

--- Jeff WN3A




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: DB antenna question

2008-10-23 Thread rb_n3dab
I can't see ruining the bottom half of a good harness when I have top top half 
from another antenna that is been damaged that I can use.  Last time I had to 
replace one of the connectors on a DB antenna the VB material in the cable 
either was still sticky or got that way from trying to solder the new connector 
on it and it was a real pain.  Is there a trick to it that I don't know ??
--
Doug   
N3DAB/WPRX486/WPJL709

 Chuck Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

=
It gets cut off along with the Y, the short section of VB83 and the 
balance of the pigtail.

You should end up with a section of VB8 that you can add a new connector to.

Chuck
WB2EDV



- Original Message - 
From: Laryn Lohman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 9:02 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: DB antenna question


 Chuck, what do you do with the unconnected N connector at the top end
 of the bottom harness?

 Laryn K8TVZ