[Repeater-Builder] Sinclair antennas suggestions

2008-08-17 Thread georgiaskywarn
What Sinclair antenna would be a match to the db420?  Anyone know a
ball park figure on pricing?  Any dealer suggestions to deal with?

The suggestion in earlier post mentioned that Sinclair might custom
cut a vhf / uhf style antenna...something like what the db314 is.
Curious also if anyone has had a Sinclair custom built before.

Other dc grounded antenna suggestions are welcomed too.
Thanks!
Robert
KD4YDC



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Sinclair antennas suggestions

2008-08-17 Thread Chuck Kelsey
Contact Sinclair, Comprod, TX/RX Systems or Telewave directly. They all sell 
direct to hams, I believe. All can provide what you desire. All will be 
expensive.

Chuck
WB2EDV



- Original Message - 
From: georgiaskywarn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2008 7:43 AM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Sinclair antennas suggestions


 What Sinclair antenna would be a match to the db420?  Anyone know a
 ball park figure on pricing?  Any dealer suggestions to deal with?

 The suggestion in earlier post mentioned that Sinclair might custom
 cut a vhf / uhf style antenna...something like what the db314 is.
 Curious also if anyone has had a Sinclair custom built before.

 Other dc grounded antenna suggestions are welcomed too.
 Thanks!
 Robert
 KD4YDC


 



 Yahoo! Groups Links






RE: [Repeater-Builder] Sinclair antennas suggestions

2008-08-17 Thread gervais fillion

If you contact Comprod,we have done business with them and they gave us a price 
as radio-amateur.
it depends on what antenna you need too.
And they gave great support after we baught it!
73/s
gervais ve2ckn


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Sinclair antennas suggestions

2008-08-17 Thread Eric Lemmon
Robert,

You can peruse the Sinclair catalog at www.sinctech.com
It is a Canadian company, so shipping to Stateside addresses is one factor
to consider.  I bought two SRL-222 VHF dipole antennas for 2m use, several
years ago, and they are both performing very well.  Sinclair products are
generally well-designed and well-made, but they are expensive.  You can
special-order almost any Sinclair product through commercial distributors
such as Tessco, Talley, and Hutton.  The only item I have ordered direct
from Sinclair was a new cable harness for a Q-202G duplexer, to convert it
from high-split to low-split, for operation in the 2m band.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
 

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of georgiaskywarn
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2008 4:43 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Sinclair antennas suggestions

What Sinclair antenna would be a match to the db420? Anyone know a
ball park figure on pricing? Any dealer suggestions to deal with?

The suggestion in earlier post mentioned that Sinclair might custom
cut a vhf / uhf style antenna...something like what the db314 is.
Curious also if anyone has had a Sinclair custom built before.

Other dc grounded antenna suggestions are welcomed too.
Thanks!
Robert
KD4YDC



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Sinclair Antennas

2006-05-25 Thread va7aa
Tnx Nate...

If you can I'd shake the antenna while it is hot, while a weak signal is on 
the repeater input... that'll tell you real quick...as you probably know, 
dioding from anything loose really raises hell with repeaters... also 
dis-similar metals moving

Just to clarify... yes it is the VHF 210-C4 variety, the new ones made 
within the past 5 yrs or so that I am talking about... we have also had some 
trouble with the SRL2330 VHF duplexers, while the specs say 600khz you 
really have to struggle to get em and keep em there with any decent (-80db 
or better/side for the 6 can variety) rejection at a decent insertion 
loss -1.5db.  Notch (reject) caps go seen to go bad prematurely, especially 
if you screw on em a few too many times.  The inside scoop suggests that 
those duplexers should not be used at that close a spacing... so we went out 
and spent some serious coin and are now replacing everything with new 
Daniels and Comprod equipment getting tired of running up and down the 
hill every other day fixing junk that's long outlived it's natural 
lifespan that old service monitor/spectrum analyser I have is getting 
heavier by the day.

73
Richard
VA7AA




- Original Message - 
From: Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 3:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Sinclair Antennas


 Richard wrote:

 snip

 Anyone have experiences over the past few years? Particularly the 4
 bay open dipole collinear variety of which we almost exclusivly use.

 Richard
 VA7AA

 We have a VHF Sinclair that we're investigating, but I can't say that we
 have any hard evidence yet that we have a failure at the antenna.

 I'm more suspicious of other things right now, but we're seeing more
 reflected power back than we should from our new Sinclair on a VHF
 system.  It was deployed 2 summers ago.

 Nate WY0X





 Yahoo! Groups Links









 -- 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.7.1/347 - Release Date: 5/24/2006

 








 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Sinclair Antennas

2006-05-25 Thread Nate Duehr
va7aa wrote:
 Tnx Nate...
 
 If you can I'd shake the antenna while it is hot, while a weak signal is on 
 the repeater input... that'll tell you real quick...as you probably know, 
 dioding from anything loose really raises hell with repeaters... also 
 dis-similar metals moving

We haven't heard anything that sounds like a shake it type failure. 
No crackles, etc.

The antenna is side-mounted so it doesn't move a whole lot, but the site 
is very windy at times.  Well over 50 MPH with gusts above that.

The 6m antenna has a whip section on top, for example, and it was 
pushed over into the tower hard enough to get stuck there this winter. 
(Yeah, we're going to swap it for something a little more stout, 
probably.  It's on the list of things to-do...)

 Just to clarify... yes it is the VHF 210-C4 variety, the new ones made 
 within the past 5 yrs or so that I am talking about... 

Understand.  I just figured I'd say hello and let you know we have 
something possibly wrong on one of our systems using a newer one, but 
nothing that points to the antenna yet.  Just to keep in touch.

I highly doubt our problem is the antenna, but guessing isn't knowing.

 we have also had some 
 trouble with the SRL2330 VHF duplexers, while the specs say 600khz you 
 really have to struggle to get em and keep em there with any decent (-80db 
 or better/side for the 6 can variety) rejection at a decent insertion 
 loss -1.5db.  Notch (reject) caps go seen to go bad prematurely, especially 
 if you screw on em a few too many times.  The inside scoop suggests that 
 those duplexers should not be used at that close a spacing... so we went out 
 and spent some serious coin and are now replacing everything with new 
 Daniels and Comprod equipment 

No newer (or older) Sinclair duplexers in service here that I remember. 
  Can't comment on any of that.

 getting tired of running up and down the 
 hill every other day fixing junk that's long outlived it's natural 
 lifespan that old service monitor/spectrum analyser I have is getting 
 heavier by the day.

Heh... yep.  One of our members did that big job a few years ago, 
swapping everything out for Mastr II stations... etc.  Took a lot more 
time and effort than anyone but us techies gave him credit for, and 
we're all enjoying the benefits now -- everything's solid as a rock -- 
other than the ()*[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] Kendecomm 220 MHz 
repeater which was recently 
found to be 3.3 KHz off-frequency.  (Which seems about right for the 
quality level of the components I found inside and their age.)

Nate WY0X




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] Sinclair Antennas

2006-05-24 Thread Richard
Has anyone lately been having quality issues with the Sinclair base
station/coliinear antennas over the past 5 or 6 years? Ever since they
abandoned their US mfg operations and moved their factory to Mexico...
changed their model numbers (for supposedly the same product)(dumb
move in my opinion)seems we have noticed some negative changes in
general quality. Internal harnesses have become intermittant, swaged
fittings come loose... all causing considerable IMD/desense and
general grief for commercial and amateur operators alike. When you
have repeater antennas on windblown icy mountaintops that are
basically inaccessable for repairs for 6 months of the year, you
cannot have this kind of thing happen...   

Anyone have experiences over the past few years? Particularly the 4
bay open dipole collinear variety of which we almost exclusivly use.

Richard
VA7AA 


 













 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] Sinclair Antennas

2006-05-24 Thread Jeff DePolo
 Has anyone lately been having quality issues with the Sinclair base
 station/coliinear antennas over the past 5 or 6 years? 

Can't comment on the whitesticks, but the yagis have gone downhill.  I had a
couple of 900 MHz Sinclair yagis that were built like the proverbial brick
outhouse.  They discontinued the model I had been buying, but they had a
replacement model which was slightly more expensive.  I ordered one and was
really disappointed.  The old ones had heavy solid-rod elements (3/8
diameter I believe).  The new one had smaller 1/4 diameter tubing elements
which never would have held up to falling ice.  The mounting hardware was
cheesy compared to the old.

Their dipole arrays still seem to be built the same.

--- Jeff







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Sinclair Antennas

2006-05-24 Thread Nate Duehr
Richard wrote:

snip

 Anyone have experiences over the past few years? Particularly the 4
 bay open dipole collinear variety of which we almost exclusivly use.
 
 Richard
 VA7AA 

We have a VHF Sinclair that we're investigating, but I can't say that we 
have any hard evidence yet that we have a failure at the antenna.

I'm more suspicious of other things right now, but we're seeing more 
reflected power back than we should from our new Sinclair on a VHF 
system.  It was deployed 2 summers ago.

Nate WY0X




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/