Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]]
Well I am on my Lap top and it has Auto Fix. I can't fine where to turn it off. The big problem is it looks good till I send it. Then after it goes off the sreen it fixes what it does not like. 73 Russ - Original Message - From: mch [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 5:38 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR Russ, you need to get hold of a spell checker. :-) (or not have it automatically 'fix' all the things it thinks is wrong.) Joe M. russ wrote: The problem was not price. In fact the Kenwood Systems stuff was more money. When Motorola closed it's service (Factory) state wide service of there units went away. 2nd was the fact that the new Motorola stuff was not as good as the older Micros. Ever since mother M stopped building radio's in the US they went down the tubes. They (the State)compared Johnson, (there number 2 Joyce) Motorola, Midland, MA Com. For state wide support and less break downs then any of the above. It was Kenwood systems. in fact in the last year the break down rate is less the 1% with Kenwood Systems. I have a copy of the full report form the state if you would like a copy. Neat reading. The state of PA went with MA/Com for there state wide system for many of the same reasons. Add one thing Kenwood systems was two Million higher then MA/Com. This seems to be going on all over. There was a time when Motorola was king. But in the pass few year they have lost more contracts then they ever have. So that is the answer to the why question. Very best. Russ, W3CH - Original Message - From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 8:08 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR In my opinion, the reason someone might change from Motorola to Kenwood is price ... and perhaps attitude. Neil - WA6KLA russ wrote: I do not think so on the cars. I think you need to think about Motorola in the early years. Maggiore was the same in the early years. If it was build after Paul statrted building them and since 1997 or so they did a 100% turn around. Ever wonder why the State police in GA stoped useing Motorola and went to Kenwood systems? Any way you are beatting a dead horse. Any way like you said if the user likes it it is fine. But like one guy said on the list today. He has used evey thing and they all have there place. Please go look up the Part 90. It thourgh me for a loop. Part 95 GMRS I guess It did not but the Part 90 did. I see so much of it out there. Any way. Have a great day and a good night. 73, Russ, W3CH - Original Message - From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 5:03 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR I'll have to check that about part 90!! Regarding the Maggiore, if the user is happy then I guess that is all that matters. There are many that have had bad experiences with that equipment. This reminds me of a article in the newspaper the other day. They did an article on the Yugo brand of cars, discussing how so many people dislike them but a certain few are very loyal and happy. Maybe the Maggiore Yugos have a lot in common. If it were me type acceptance was a problem, I would use the Micor or Mastr II as the receiver the Maggiore as the transmitter. russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: THE FCC! They came off the list a few years back. Go read for your self. Still a pile of the out there that have not been replaced but that does not back it right. Just a fact. 73 Russ. On the side there are about 40 very happy Maggiore users on the list? Most just do not want to get in a back and forth. Again came out and see a good system well installed. 73 Russ, W3CH - Original Message - From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:29 AM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]] ... snip ... Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]]
I do not think so on the cars. I think you need to think about Motorola in the early years. Maggiore was the same in the early years. If it was build after Paul statrted building them and since 1997 or so they did a 100% turn around. Ever wonder why the State police in GA stoped useing Motorola and went to Kenwood systems? Any way you are beatting a dead horse. Any way like you said if the user likes it it is fine. But like one guy said on the list today. He has used evey thing and they all have there place. Please go look up the Part 90. It thourgh me for a loop. Part 95 GMRS I guess It did not but the Part 90 did. I see so much of it out there. Any way. Have a great day and a good night. 73, Russ, W3CH - Original Message - From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 5:03 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR I'll have to check that about part 90!! Regarding the Maggiore, if the user is happy then I guess that is all that matters. There are many that have had bad experiences with that equipment. This reminds me of a article in the newspaper the other day. They did an article on the Yugo brand of cars, discussing how so many people dislike them but a certain few are very loyal and happy. Maybe the Maggiore Yugos have a lot in common. If it were me type acceptance was a problem, I would use the Micor or Mastr II as the receiver the Maggiore as the transmitter. russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: THE FCC! They came off the list a few years back. Go read for your self. Still a pile of the out there that have not been replaced but that does not back it right. Just a fact. 73 Russ. On the side there are about 40 very happy Maggiore users on the list? Most just do not want to get in a back and forth. Again came out and see a good system well installed. 73 Russ, W3CH - Original Message - From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:29 AM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]] Mastr II and Micor not ok to use in part 90?!?!?!?!? Says who? russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gee I was work at ATC when the memo came down to remove all Master 2 RCA and Micores if they where not type accepted for the service they had listed on the paper work. I did not know untill that time that they where not ok to use for part 95 GMRS or part 90 Business. Yes you find a bad Maggiore every once in a while. The old one where bad. I have not seen any of the new ones bad. I am sure there out there. Just like the stuff you are talking about has there share of bad ones. We could go back and forth and you just takes up time. Lots of time. Hey I am an old tube man my self. I alway thought a tube was cleaner. I till beleve that but yet we build new TV stuff that is very high power and not tube. I started my 1st job at a 500 watt day time only omni with a Gates transmitter. BUT! You know they (and I) have come a long way. You realy have to look a round. As I have stated time and time again the early Maggiore stuff was crap. I had one of the 1st ones that Frank build and it was junk. I replaced it with a Micore that ran well for years. It died one winter night and I bought one of the new ones from Maggioe as a temp replacement. I sold the Micore and started replacing all the rest of my old stuff with Maggiore and never looked back. As I said come on out pick a site. I will let you go see a Maggiore in HIGH Rf areas or in the sticks. I get suppy any test equment you mite need ot bring your own. I was suprezed at 1st but they work well and will follow an HT or mobile in to the noise that outhers even with a pre-amp would not. The offer is open. I would love to give you a tour. Have a great day! Very best of 73, Russ, W3CH - Original Message - From: Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 8:06 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]] - Original Message - From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 7:54 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]] There are only 2 people who I have ever seen say that Maggoire is good equipment. Russ and a well know fool on this group. Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: russ wrote: THE BELOW IS SOMTHING THAT A LOT OF US KNOW AND SOME WILL NOT ADMITT. The way the mother M keeps down the desence is to not have a lot of sencitive
Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]]
In my opinion, the reason someone might change from Motorola to Kenwood is price ... and perhaps attitude. Neil - WA6KLA russ wrote: I do not think so on the cars. I think you need to think about Motorola in the early years. Maggiore was the same in the early years. If it was build after Paul statrted building them and since 1997 or so they did a 100% turn around. Ever wonder why the State police in GA stoped useing Motorola and went to Kenwood systems? Any way you are beatting a dead horse. Any way like you said if the user likes it it is fine. But like one guy said on the list today. He has used evey thing and they all have there place. Please go look up the Part 90. It thourgh me for a loop. Part 95 GMRS I guess It did not but the Part 90 did. I see so much of it out there. Any way. Have a great day and a good night. 73, Russ, W3CH - Original Message - From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 5:03 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR I'll have to check that about part 90!! Regarding the Maggiore, if the user is happy then I guess that is all that matters. There are many that have had bad experiences with that equipment. This reminds me of a article in the newspaper the other day. They did an article on the Yugo brand of cars, discussing how so many people dislike them but a certain few are very loyal and happy. Maybe the Maggiore Yugos have a lot in common. If it were me type acceptance was a problem, I would use the Micor or Mastr II as the receiver the Maggiore as the transmitter. russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: THE FCC! They came off the list a few years back. Go read for your self. Still a pile of the out there that have not been replaced but that does not back it right. Just a fact. 73 Russ. On the side there are about 40 very happy Maggiore users on the list? Most just do not want to get in a back and forth. Again came out and see a good system well installed. 73 Russ, W3CH - Original Message - From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:29 AM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]] ... snip ... Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]]
The problem was not price. In fact the Kenwood Systems stuff was more money. When Motorola closed it's service (Factory) state wide service of there units went away. 2nd was the fact that the new Motorola stuff was not as good as the older Micros. Ever since mother M stopped building radio's in the US they went down the tubes. They (the State)compared Johnson, (there number 2 Joyce) Motorola, Midland, MA Com. For state wide support and less break downs then any of the above. It was Kenwood systems. in fact in the last year the break down rate is less the 1% with Kenwood Systems. I have a copy of the full report form the state if you would like a copy. Neat reading. The state of PA went with MA/Com for there state wide system for many of the same reasons. Add one thing Kenwood systems was two Million higher then MA/Com. This seems to be going on all over. There was a time when Motorola was king. But in the pass few year they have lost more contracts then they ever have. So that is the answer to the why question. Very best. Russ, W3CH - Original Message - From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 8:08 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR In my opinion, the reason someone might change from Motorola to Kenwood is price ... and perhaps attitude. Neil - WA6KLA russ wrote: I do not think so on the cars. I think you need to think about Motorola in the early years. Maggiore was the same in the early years. If it was build after Paul statrted building them and since 1997 or so they did a 100% turn around. Ever wonder why the State police in GA stoped useing Motorola and went to Kenwood systems? Any way you are beatting a dead horse. Any way like you said if the user likes it it is fine. But like one guy said on the list today. He has used evey thing and they all have there place. Please go look up the Part 90. It thourgh me for a loop. Part 95 GMRS I guess It did not but the Part 90 did. I see so much of it out there. Any way. Have a great day and a good night. 73, Russ, W3CH - Original Message - From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 5:03 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR I'll have to check that about part 90!! Regarding the Maggiore, if the user is happy then I guess that is all that matters. There are many that have had bad experiences with that equipment. This reminds me of a article in the newspaper the other day. They did an article on the Yugo brand of cars, discussing how so many people dislike them but a certain few are very loyal and happy. Maybe the Maggiore Yugos have a lot in common. If it were me type acceptance was a problem, I would use the Micor or Mastr II as the receiver the Maggiore as the transmitter. russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: THE FCC! They came off the list a few years back. Go read for your self. Still a pile of the out there that have not been replaced but that does not back it right. Just a fact. 73 Russ. On the side there are about 40 very happy Maggiore users on the list? Most just do not want to get in a back and forth. Again came out and see a good system well installed. 73 Russ, W3CH - Original Message - From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:29 AM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]] ... snip ... Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]]
brent wrote: AGREED PRICE !!! save money = more radio(s) to me as long as they work to my needs they are all great ! ! Tennessee H.P went to Kenwood also..had a great package deal. - Original Message - From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 7:08 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR In my opinion, the reason someone might change from Motorola to Kenwood is price ... and perhaps attitude. Neil - WA6KLA Actually, Kenwood commercial equipment from the last 10-15 years is on a par with any other conventional (non-trunked) equipment out there. I'd put a Kenwood up against an _equivalent_ Motorola any day. -- Jim Barbour WD8CHL Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]]
This is very true! If you like LTR they are ok. They just came out with an APCO system and I under stand they will have 38 new models this year. I saw a demo at a show it did not look bad but they will have to be out for a while. I have a Kenwood TK-8150 in my SUV it has LTR (work) HAm and GMRS all in the same radio. Neat radio with a remote (small) control head. Of corse I have a Kenwood 742 tri band ham rig and a Icom-706 mark two G. I have a Maxtrac for 927 ham that is getting replaced with a Spectra soon I hope. The bottom line is the new Kenwood Systems stuff is real good. BTW it is not cheap. You get what you pay for. smile Very best of 73, Russ, W3CH - Original Message - From: Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 10:11 AM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR brent wrote: AGREED PRICE !!! save money = more radio(s) to me as long as they work to my needs they are all great ! ! Tennessee H.P went to Kenwood also..had a great package deal. - Original Message - From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 7:08 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR In my opinion, the reason someone might change from Motorola to Kenwood is price ... and perhaps attitude. Neil - WA6KLA Actually, Kenwood commercial equipment from the last 10-15 years is on a par with any other conventional (non-trunked) equipment out there. I'd put a Kenwood up against an _equivalent_ Motorola any day. -- Jim Barbour WD8CHL Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]]
Russ, you need to get hold of a spell checker. :-) (or not have it automatically 'fix' all the things it thinks is wrong.) Joe M. russ wrote: The problem was not price. In fact the Kenwood Systems stuff was more money. When Motorola closed it's service (Factory) state wide service of there units went away. 2nd was the fact that the new Motorola stuff was not as good as the older Micros. Ever since mother M stopped building radio's in the US they went down the tubes. They (the State)compared Johnson, (there number 2 Joyce) Motorola, Midland, MA Com. For state wide support and less break downs then any of the above. It was Kenwood systems. in fact in the last year the break down rate is less the 1% with Kenwood Systems. I have a copy of the full report form the state if you would like a copy. Neat reading. The state of PA went with MA/Com for there state wide system for many of the same reasons. Add one thing Kenwood systems was two Million higher then MA/Com. This seems to be going on all over. There was a time when Motorola was king. But in the pass few year they have lost more contracts then they ever have. So that is the answer to the why question. Very best. Russ, W3CH - Original Message - From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 8:08 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR In my opinion, the reason someone might change from Motorola to Kenwood is price ... and perhaps attitude. Neil - WA6KLA russ wrote: I do not think so on the cars. I think you need to think about Motorola in the early years. Maggiore was the same in the early years. If it was build after Paul statrted building them and since 1997 or so they did a 100% turn around. Ever wonder why the State police in GA stoped useing Motorola and went to Kenwood systems? Any way you are beatting a dead horse. Any way like you said if the user likes it it is fine. But like one guy said on the list today. He has used evey thing and they all have there place. Please go look up the Part 90. It thourgh me for a loop. Part 95 GMRS I guess It did not but the Part 90 did. I see so much of it out there. Any way. Have a great day and a good night. 73, Russ, W3CH - Original Message - From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 5:03 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR I'll have to check that about part 90!! Regarding the Maggiore, if the user is happy then I guess that is all that matters. There are many that have had bad experiences with that equipment. This reminds me of a article in the newspaper the other day. They did an article on the Yugo brand of cars, discussing how so many people dislike them but a certain few are very loyal and happy. Maybe the Maggiore Yugos have a lot in common. If it were me type acceptance was a problem, I would use the Micor or Mastr II as the receiver the Maggiore as the transmitter. russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: THE FCC! They came off the list a few years back. Go read for your self. Still a pile of the out there that have not been replaced but that does not back it right. Just a fact. 73 Russ. On the side there are about 40 very happy Maggiore users on the list? Most just do not want to get in a back and forth. Again came out and see a good system well installed. 73 Russ, W3CH - Original Message - From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:29 AM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]] ... snip ... Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]]
I never claimed IBOC was a good idea!! Neal Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IBOC FM I guess there is a 3rd fool in hereLOL JOHN MACKEY wrote: Russ - Please RE-READ my statement. (I never called you a fool or anything else other than Russ) I said Russ AND a well know fool on this group. However, if you choose to include yourself as the second party, I can't stop you. BTW - I don't have to prove you a fool, your statements and actions will prove or dis-prove that! John Mackey, KS0F, GROL, MS, builder of a IBOC-FM station, builder of one of the very first VOIP repeater linked systems across country in 1998. (Gee, my claims are nearly as long as yours, Russ!!) russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well the fool has lots of paper to back him up! BSEE. GROL. (use to be a 1st class) Plus many more. So i'm a fool? When are you coming out to prove me a fool? Please jump on the next bat and prove me a fool. BTW I have build some of the largest DTV and HDTV systems around. I am not a name caller or a fool. So when are you going to take the (your words not any one else's words) to prove me wrong? Name calling is not the way to go. Please come and show us all just how smart you are. I am all way willing to learn. If you can't do more then call names as you have then so be it. But as far as Maggiore (new stuff) you have no Idea. So please lets help people with good info not half bad info! Or name calling! 73 Russ, W3CH - Original Message - From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 7:54 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]] There are only 2 people who I have ever seen say that Maggoire is good equipment. Russ and a well know fool on this group. Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: russ wrote: THE BELOW IS SOMTHING THAT A LOT OF US KNOW AND SOME WILL NOT ADMITT. The way the mother M keeps down the desence is to not have a lot of sencitive but the Maggiore (new) is so clean I do not know how they do it. I have seen what you are talking about at some of our sites. Fell had a Micore and the receiver would shut. We lent him a maggiore on this pair and he loves it and his users love it. He fixed up a Mater Two and that (HE SAID) works better but the users like the sound and the range of the Maggiore. Very best of 73, Russ, W3CH Trustee W3PS/r This guys turning into a bit of a troll. Maggiore's are dirty, unreliable, broad as a barn, and if I saw one at a site I was at, I'd be demanding it be removed. If I was the owner/manager of the site, I'd unplug it and tell whoever put it in to pick it up outa the trash bin, and don't darken my door again. -- Jim Barbour WD8CHL Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]]
No the fool is the person in your company who said lets put IBOC on the station then wrote the Check. 1 year later royality check.. another year goes by another royality check... ect ect. JOHN MACKEY wrote: I never claimed IBOC was a "good" idea!! Neal Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IBOC FM I guess there is a 3rd fool in hereLOL JOHN MACKEY wrote: Russ - Please RE-READ my statement. (I never called you a fool or anything else other than "Russ") I said "Russ AND a well know fool on this group". However, if you choose to include yourself as the second party, I can't stop you. BTW - I don't have to prove you a fool, your statements and actions will prove or dis-prove that! John Mackey, KS0F, GROL, MS, builder of a IBOC-FM station, builder of one of the very first VOIP repeater linked systems across country in 1998. (Gee, my claims are nearly as long as yours, Russ!!) "russ" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well the fool has lots of paper to back him up! BSEE. GROL. (use to be a 1st class) Plus many more. So i'm a fool? When are you coming out to prove me a fool? Please jump on the next bat and prove me a fool. BTW I have build some of the largest DTV and HDTV systems around. I am not a name caller or a fool. So when are you going to take the (your words not any one else's words) to prove me wrong? Name calling is not the way to go. Please come and show us all just how smart you are. I am all way willing to learn. If you can't do more then call names as you have then so be it. But as far as Maggiore (new stuff) you have no Idea. So please lets help people with good info not half bad info! Or name calling! 73 Russ, W3CH - Original Message - From: "JOHN MACKEY" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 7:54 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]] There are only 2 people who I have ever seen say that Maggoire is good equipment. Russ and a well know fool on this group. "Jim B." [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: russ wrote: THE BELOW IS SOMTHING THAT A LOT OF US KNOW AND SOME WILL NOT ADMITT. The way the mother "M" keeps down the desence is to not have a lot of sencitive but the Maggiore (new) is so clean I do not know how they do it. I have seen what you are talking about at some of our sites. Fell had a Micore and the receiver would shut. We lent him a maggiore on this pair and he loves it and his users love it. He fixed up a Mater Two and that (HE SAID) works better but the users like the sound and the range of the Maggiore. Very best of 73, Russ, W3CH Trustee W3PS/r This guys turning into a bit of a troll. Maggiore's are dirty, unreliable, broad as a barn, and if I saw one at a site I was at, I'd be demanding it be removed. If I was the owner/manager of the site, I'd unplug it and tell whoever put it in to pick it up outa the trash bin, and don't darken my door again. -- Jim Barbour WD8CHL Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]]]
hmmm, I don't know about that... When a grant comes down to pay 70 percent of the costs you can use it to buy a NEW SOLID STATE transmitter to replace a 23 year old tube transmitter, it begins to make sense. (Not to mention a few other benefits) Neal Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No the fool is the person in your company who said lets put IBOC on the station then wrote the Check. 1 year later royality check.. another year goes by another royality check... ect ect. JOHN MACKEY wrote: I never claimed IBOC was a good idea!! Neal Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IBOC FM I guess there is a 3rd fool in hereLOL JOHN MACKEY wrote: Russ - Please RE-READ my statement. (I never called you a fool or anything else other than Russ) I said Russ AND a well know fool on this group. However, if you choose to include yourself as the second party, I can't stop you. BTW - I don't have to prove you a fool, your statements and actions will prove or dis-prove that! John Mackey, KS0F, GROL, MS, builder of a IBOC-FM station, builder of one of the very first VOIP repeater linked systems across country in 1998. (Gee, my claims are nearly as long as yours, Russ!!) russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well the fool has lots of paper to back him up! BSEE. GROL. (use to be a 1st class) Plus many more. So i'm a fool? When are you coming out to prove me a fool? Please jump on the next bat and prove me a fool. BTW I have build some of the largest DTV and HDTV systems around. I am not a name caller or a fool. So when are you going to take the (your words not any one else's words) to prove me wrong? Name calling is not the way to go. Please come and show us all just how smart you are. I am all way willing to learn. If you can't do more then call names as you have then so be it. But as far as Maggiore (new stuff) you have no Idea. So please lets help people with good info not half bad info! Or name calling! 73 Russ, W3CH - Original Message - From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 7:54 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]] There are only 2 people who I have ever seen say that Maggoire is good equipment. Russ and a well know fool on this group. Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: russ wrote: THE BELOW IS SOMTHING THAT A LOT OF US KNOW AND SOME WILL NOT ADMITT. The way the mother M keeps down the desence is to not have a lot of sencitive but the Maggiore (new) is so clean I do not know how they do it. I have seen what you are talking about at some of our sites. Fell had a Micore and the receiver would shut. We lent him a maggiore on this pair and he loves it and his users love it. He fixed up a Mater Two and that (HE SAID) works better but the users like the sound and the range of the Maggiore. Very best of 73, Russ, W3CH Trustee W3PS/r This guys turning into a bit of a troll. Maggiore's are dirty, unreliable, broad as a barn, and if I saw one at a site I was at, I'd be demanding it be removed. If I was the owner/manager of the site, I'd unplug it and tell whoever put it in to pick it up outa the trash bin, and don't darken my door again. -- Jim Barbour WD8CHL Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]]
To Neal NewmanI think [EMAIL PROTECTED] is referring to me as the fool. Obviously he has no idea who I am nor my past contributions to scientific and television research. Having noted past demeaning comments to some from this individual, I wish he would keep his negative comments to himself .If he continues to degrade people it will deteriorate the purpose of this fine group. Neal pass along my best to your wife, hope she is now feeling well. Carol is doing fine after her surgery. Russ W3CH sometime we have to meet over coffee. Regards to all, Gary Katona K2UQ Trenton, NJ Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]]
I'll have to check that about part 90!! Regarding the Maggiore, if the user is happy then I guess that is all that matters. There are many that have had bad experiences with that equipment. This reminds me of a article in the newspaper the other day. They did an article on the Yugo brand of cars, discussing how so many people dislike them but a certain few are very loyal and happy. Maybe the Maggiore Yugos have a lot in common. If it were me type acceptance was a problem, I would use the Micor or Mastr II as the receiver the Maggiore as the transmitter. russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: THE FCC! They came off the list a few years back. Go read for your self. Still a pile of the out there that have not been replaced but that does not back it right. Just a fact. 73 Russ. On the side there are about 40 very happy Maggiore users on the list? Most just do not want to get in a back and forth. Again came out and see a good system well installed. 73 Russ, W3CH - Original Message - From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:29 AM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]] Mastr II and Micor not ok to use in part 90?!?!?!?!? Says who? russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gee I was work at ATC when the memo came down to remove all Master 2 RCA and Micores if they where not type accepted for the service they had listed on the paper work. I did not know untill that time that they where not ok to use for part 95 GMRS or part 90 Business. Yes you find a bad Maggiore every once in a while. The old one where bad. I have not seen any of the new ones bad. I am sure there out there. Just like the stuff you are talking about has there share of bad ones. We could go back and forth and you just takes up time. Lots of time. Hey I am an old tube man my self. I alway thought a tube was cleaner. I till beleve that but yet we build new TV stuff that is very high power and not tube. I started my 1st job at a 500 watt day time only omni with a Gates transmitter. BUT! You know they (and I) have come a long way. You realy have to look a round. As I have stated time and time again the early Maggiore stuff was crap. I had one of the 1st ones that Frank build and it was junk. I replaced it with a Micore that ran well for years. It died one winter night and I bought one of the new ones from Maggioe as a temp replacement. I sold the Micore and started replacing all the rest of my old stuff with Maggiore and never looked back. As I said come on out pick a site. I will let you go see a Maggiore in HIGH Rf areas or in the sticks. I get suppy any test equment you mite need ot bring your own. I was suprezed at 1st but they work well and will follow an HT or mobile in to the noise that outhers even with a pre-amp would not. The offer is open. I would love to give you a tour. Have a great day! Very best of 73, Russ, W3CH - Original Message - From: Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 8:06 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]] - Original Message - From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 7:54 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]] There are only 2 people who I have ever seen say that Maggoire is good equipment. Russ and a well know fool on this group. Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: russ wrote: THE BELOW IS SOMTHING THAT A LOT OF US KNOW AND SOME WILL NOT ADMITT. The way the mother M keeps down the desence is to not have a lot of sencitive but the Maggiore (new) is so clean I do not know how they do it. I have seen what you are talking about at some of our sites. Fell had a Micore and the receiver would shut. We lent him a maggiore on this pair and he loves it and his users love it. He fixed up a Mater Two and that (HE SAID) works better but the users like the sound and the range of the Maggiore. Very best of 73, Russ, W3CH Trustee W3PS/r This guys turning into a bit of a troll. Maggiore's are dirty, unreliable, broad as a barn, and if I saw one at a site I was at, I'd be demanding it be removed. If I was the owner/manager of the site, I'd unplug it and tell whoever put it in to pick it up outa the trash bin, and don't darken my door again. -- Jim Barbour WD8CHL Yahoo! Groups Links
