I do not think so on the cars. I think you need to think about Motorola in
the early years. Maggiore was the same in the early years. If it was build
after Paul statrted building them and since 1997 or so they did a 100% turn
around. Ever wonder why the State police in GA stoped useing Motorola and
went to Kenwood systems? Any way you are beatting a dead horse. Any way like
you said if the user likes it it is fine. But like one guy said on the list
today. He has used evey thing and they all have there place. Please go look
up the Part 90. It thourgh me for a loop. Part 95 GMRS I guess It did not
but the Part 90 did. I see so much of it out there. Any way.
Have a great day and a good night.
73,
Russ, W3CH
----- Original Message -----
From: "JOHN MACKEY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver
with COR]]]]
> I'll have to check that about part 90!!
>
> Regarding the Maggiore, if the user is happy then I guess that is all that
> matters. There are many that have had bad experiences with that equipment.
> This reminds me of a article in the newspaper the other day. They did an
> article on the Yugo brand of cars, discussing how so many people dislike
them
> but a certain few are very loyal and happy. Maybe the Maggiore & Yugos
have a
> lot in common.
>
> If it were me & type acceptance was a problem, I would use the Micor or
Mastr
> II as the receiver & the Maggiore as the transmitter.
>
> "russ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > THE FCC! They came off the list a few years back.
> >
> > Go read for your self. Still a pile of the out there that have not been
> > replaced but that does not back it right. Just a fact.
> > 73 Russ.
> >
> > On the side there are about 40 very happy Maggiore users on the list?
Most
> > just do not want to get in a back and forth.
> > Again came out and see a good system well installed.
> > 73 Russ, W3CH
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "JOHN MACKEY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:29 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver
with
> > COR]]]
> >
> >
> > > Mastr II and Micor not ok to use in part 90?!?!?!?!?
> > > Says who?
> > >
> > > "russ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Gee I was work at ATC when the memo came down to remove all Master 2
> > RCA
> > > > and Micores if they where not type accepted for the service they had
> > listed
> > > > on the paper work. I did not know untill that time that they where
not
> > ok
> > > to
> > > > use for part 95 GMRS or part 90 Business. Yes you find a bad
Maggiore
> > every
> > > > once in a while. The old one where bad. I have not seen any of the
new
> > ones
> > > > bad. I am sure there out there. Just like the stuff you are talking
> > about
> > > > has there share of bad ones. We could go back and forth and you just
> > takes
> > > > up time. Lots of time. Hey I am an old tube man my self. I alway
> thought
> > a
> > > > tube was cleaner. I till beleve that but yet we build new TV stuff
that
> > is
> > > > very high power and not tube. I started my 1st job at a 500 watt day
> > time
> > > > only omni with a Gates transmitter. BUT! You know they (and I) have
> come
> > a
> > > > long way.
> > > > You realy have to look a round. As I have stated time and time again
> the
> > > > early Maggiore stuff was crap. I had one of the 1st ones that Frank
> > build
> > > > and it was junk. I replaced it with a Micore that ran well for
years.
> It
> > > > died one winter night and I bought one of the new ones from Maggioe
as
> a
> > > > temp replacement. I sold the Micore and started replacing all the
rest
> > of
> > > my
> > > > old stuff with Maggiore and never looked back. As I said come on out
> > pick a
> > > > site. I will let you go see a Maggiore in HIGH Rf areas or in the
> > sticks. I
> > > > get suppy any test equment you mite need ot bring your own. I was
> > suprezed
> > > > at 1st but they work well and will follow an HT or mobile in to the
> > noise
> > > > that outhers even with a pre-amp would not. The offer is open. I
would
> > love
> > > > to give you a tour.
> > > > Have a great day!
> > > > Very best of 73,
> > > > Russ, W3CH
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 8:06 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with
> > COR]]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "JOHN MACKEY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 7:54 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver
with
> > > COR]]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > There are only 2 people who I have ever seen say that Maggoire
is
> > good
> > > > > > equipment. Russ and a well know fool on this group.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Jim B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > russ wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > THE BELOW IS SOMTHING THAT A LOT OF US KNOW AND SOME WILL
NOT
> > > > ADMITT.
> > > > > > > > The way the mother "M" keeps down the desence
> > > > > > > > is to not have a lot of sencitive but the Maggiore (new) is
so
> > > clean
> > > > I
> > > > > do
> > > > > > > > not know how they do it.
> > > > > > > > I have seen what you are talking about at some of our sites.
> > Fell
> > > > had
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > > Micore and the receiver would shut. We lent him a maggiore
on
> > this
> > > > > pair
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > he loves it and his users love it. He fixed up a Mater Two
and
> > that
> > > > > (HE
> > > > > > > > SAID) works better but the users like the sound and the
range
> of
> > > the
> > > > > > > > Maggiore.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Very best of 73,
> > > > > > > > Russ, W3CH
> > > > > > > > Trustee W3PS/r
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This guys turning into a bit of a troll.
> > > > > > > Maggiore's are dirty, unreliable, broad as a barn, and if I
saw
> > one
> > > at
> > > > a
> > > > > > > site I was at, I'd be demanding it be removed. If I was the
> > > > > > > owner/manager of the site, I'd unplug it and tell whoever put
it
> > in
> > > to
> > > > > > > pick it up outa the trash bin, and don't darken my door again.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Jim Barbour
> > > > > > > WD8CHL
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
