Re: memcached not showing as option in rb-site install
The thing to make sure then is that the version of Python that's being used for Review Board is 2.6. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Eric P eric.maill...@gmail.com wrote: Is that cmemcache? I see this on starting 'rb-site install'. Server Cache (optional): * memcached (cmemcache, memcache) But I think I already installed both of those (libmemcache as well). $ yum install memcached ... Package memcached-1.2.8-1.fc11.i586 already installed and latest version And cmemcache (are these the Python bindings for memcached?). $ ls -1 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/cmemcache* /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/cmemcache-0.95-py2.6.egg-info /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/cmemcache.py /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/cmemcache.pyc Eric P Christian Hammond wrote: You're probably missing the python bindings. The first or second page of rb-site install should tell you exactly what was missing. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com mailto:chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Eric P eric.maill...@gmail.com mailto:eric.maill...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm trying to figure out why memcached is not showing as option in 'rb-site install' during the cache mechanism step. I'm running Fedora 11, and the repos memcached is installed (memcached 1.2.8) and running. $ ps ax |grep memcache 15438 ?Ssl0:00 memcached -d -p 11211 -u memcached -m 64 -c 1024 -P /var/run/memcached/memcached.pid $ rb-site install /var/www/reviews.example.com http://reviews.example.com ... * What cache mechanism should be used? memcached is strongly recommended. Use it unless you have a good reason not to. You can type either the name or the number from the list below. (1) file Cache Type: I wonder what I'm missing... Thanks for reading. Eric P --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Can not use post-review to post a perforce review
Hi guys,
Two days ago, I followed the documentation on page of Review Board and
installed it.
Everything seemed great. The site was established successfully. I
could register, use admin, set repository. But when I tried to use
post-review to post a perforce review. I failed!
The command is: post-review.py 2 (perforce changeset no.).
The log is below:
=
p4 info
repository info: Path: yli-01-pc.com:1666, Base path: None, Suppor
ts changesets: True
Generating diff for changenum 2
p4 describe -s 2
Processing edit of //depot/Readme.txt
Writing //depot/Readme.txt#1 to c:\docume~1\jason\locals~1
\temp\tmpra6drg
p4 print -q //depot/Readme.txt#1
p4 where //depot/Readme.txt
diff -urNp c:\docume~1\jason\locals~1\temp\tmpra6drg
E:\abcdefg\Readme.txt
Looking for '127.0.0.1 /' cookie in C:\Documents and
Settings\Jason\Local Se
ttings\Application Data\.post-review-cookies.txt
Loaded valid cookie -- no login required
Attempting to create review request for 2
HTTP POSTing to http://127.0.0.1:80/api/json/reviewrequests/new/:
{'reposito
ry_path': 'yli-01-pc.com:1666', 'changenum': '2'}
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd;
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xml:lang=en lang=en
head
title500 - Internal Server Error | Review Board/title
/head
body
h1Something broke! (Error 500)/h1
p
It appears something broke when you tried to go to here. This is
either
a bug in Review Board or a server configuration error. Please
report
this to your administrator.
/p
/body
/title
Unable to access http://127.0.0.1:80/api/json/reviewrequests/new/ The
host path
may be invalid
HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error
==
It seems the diff file has been created, but can not create a new
post on RB site.
I know nothing about Django and json.
my apache conf:
===
VirtualHost *:80
# ServerName review.mybrion.net
DocumentRoot E:/reviewboard_tmp3/htdocs
# Error handlers
ErrorDocument 500 /errordocs/500.html
# Serve django pages
Location /
PythonPath ['E:/reviewboard_tmp3/conf'] + sys.path
SetEnv DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE reviewboard.settings
SetEnv PYTHON_EGG_CACHE E:/reviewboard_tmp3/tmp/egg_cache
SetHandler mod_python
PythonHandler django.core.handlers.modpython
PythonAutoReload Off
PythonDebug On
# Used to run multiple mod_python sites in the same apache
PythonInterpreter reviewboard_reviewboard_tmp3
/Location
# Serve static media without running it through mod_python
# (overrides the above)
Location /media
SetHandler None
/Location
Location /errordocs
SetHandler None
/Location
Directory E:/reviewboard_tmp3/htdocs
# Options Indexes FollowSymLinks
# AllowOverride all
Order Allow,Deny
Allow from all
/Directory
# Alias static media requests to filesystem
Alias /media E:/reviewboard_tmp3/htdocs/media
Alias /errordocs E:/reviewboard_tmp3/htdocs/errordocs
/VirtualHost
===
Anyone knows how to fix it? Thanks.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: memcached not showing as option in rb-site install
It is. $ python -V Python 2.6 Eric On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Christian Hammondchip...@chipx86.com wrote: The thing to make sure then is that the version of Python that's being used for Review Board is 2.6. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Eric P eric.maill...@gmail.com wrote: Is that cmemcache? I see this on starting 'rb-site install'. Server Cache (optional): * memcached (cmemcache, memcache) But I think I already installed both of those (libmemcache as well). $ yum install memcached ... Package memcached-1.2.8-1.fc11.i586 already installed and latest version And cmemcache (are these the Python bindings for memcached?). $ ls -1 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/cmemcache* /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/cmemcache-0.95-py2.6.egg-info /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/cmemcache.py /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/cmemcache.pyc Eric P Christian Hammond wrote: You're probably missing the python bindings. The first or second page of rb-site install should tell you exactly what was missing. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com mailto:chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Eric P eric.maill...@gmail.com mailto:eric.maill...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm trying to figure out why memcached is not showing as option in 'rb-site install' during the cache mechanism step. I'm running Fedora 11, and the repos memcached is installed (memcached 1.2.8) and running. $ ps ax |grep memcache 15438 ? Ssl 0:00 memcached -d -p 11211 -u memcached -m 64 -c 1024 -P /var/run/memcached/memcached.pid $ rb-site install /var/www/reviews.example.com http://reviews.example.com ... * What cache mechanism should be used? memcached is strongly recommended. Use it unless you have a good reason not to. You can type either the name or the number from the list below. (1) file Cache Type: I wonder what I'm missing... Thanks for reading. Eric P --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: memcached not showing as option in rb-site install
In addition to verifying a Python 2.6 install, I went through and reinstalled Memcached, libmemcache and cmemcache, but memcached is still grayed out in rb-site install. I noticed there's a patch for libmemcache on the cmemcache site. Here: http://gijsbert.org/downloads/cmemcache/libmemcache-1.4.0.rc2.patch Is that in any way related to my issue (note: I didn't apply it when I built libmemcache). Thanks, Eric On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Eric Peric.maill...@gmail.com wrote: It is. $ python -V Python 2.6 Eric On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Christian Hammondchip...@chipx86.com wrote: The thing to make sure then is that the version of Python that's being used for Review Board is 2.6. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Eric P eric.maill...@gmail.com wrote: Is that cmemcache? I see this on starting 'rb-site install'. Server Cache (optional): * memcached (cmemcache, memcache) But I think I already installed both of those (libmemcache as well). $ yum install memcached ... Package memcached-1.2.8-1.fc11.i586 already installed and latest version And cmemcache (are these the Python bindings for memcached?). $ ls -1 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/cmemcache* /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/cmemcache-0.95-py2.6.egg-info /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/cmemcache.py /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/cmemcache.pyc Eric P Christian Hammond wrote: You're probably missing the python bindings. The first or second page of rb-site install should tell you exactly what was missing. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com mailto:chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Eric P eric.maill...@gmail.com mailto:eric.maill...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm trying to figure out why memcached is not showing as option in 'rb-site install' during the cache mechanism step. I'm running Fedora 11, and the repos memcached is installed (memcached 1.2.8) and running. $ ps ax |grep memcache 15438 ? Ssl 0:00 memcached -d -p 11211 -u memcached -m 64 -c 1024 -P /var/run/memcached/memcached.pid $ rb-site install /var/www/reviews.example.com http://reviews.example.com ... * What cache mechanism should be used? memcached is strongly recommended. Use it unless you have a good reason not to. You can type either the name or the number from the list below. (1) file Cache Type: I wonder what I'm missing... Thanks for reading. Eric P --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Hg mirror of Reviewboard available
We love DVCS (another way to said we hate SVN :) and we want send patch and contribution. So we create a Hg mirror :) http://hg.reviewboard.mirrors.securactive.org/trunk/ -- Sebastien Douche sdou...@gmail.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
rb-site install - Review Board is taking a nap
Hi (me again), I have all my dependency issues sorted, and I've installed my first Review Board site per the documentation. When I go to visit the site, I see the 'Review Board is taking a nap' dialog box. In my Apache error_log, I see some errors: [error] [client 127.0.0.1] mod_python (pid=3617, interpreter='reviewboard_reviews_mysite_com', phase='PythonHandler', handler='django.core.handlers.modpython'): Application error ... [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Traceback (most recent call last): [Thu Jun 25 09:51:56 2009] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py, line 1537, in HandlerDispatch\ndefault=default_handler, arg=req, silent=hlist.silent) ... [error] [client 127.0.0.1] OperationalError: attempt to write a readonly database FYI. Here are the params I used to set up the site. rb-site install reviews.mysite.com \ --domain-name=reviews.mysite.com \ --site-root=/ \ --media-url=/media \ --db-type=sqlite3 \ --cache-type=memcached \ --cache-info=memcached://localhost:11211/ \ --web-server-type=apache \ --python-loader=modpython I'm not sure what to make of those errors. It looks like there are a couple issues. Anyway, thanks for reading. Eric P --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: rb-site install - Review Board is taking a nap
I've yet to do an install like that, and someone else may correct me, but normally that message means that the apache user does not have write access to bothr the sqlite file and the folder that contains it. Try tracking that down and changing the permissions/owner. --Jeff 2009/6/25 Eric P eric.maill...@gmail.com Hi (me again), I have all my dependency issues sorted, and I've installed my first Review Board site per the documentation. When I go to visit the site, I see the 'Review Board is taking a nap' dialog box. In my Apache error_log, I see some errors: [error] [client 127.0.0.1] mod_python (pid=3617, interpreter='reviewboard_reviews_mysite_com', phase='PythonHandler', handler='django.core.handlers.modpython'): Application error ... [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Traceback (most recent call last): [Thu Jun 25 09:51:56 2009] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py, line 1537, in HandlerDispatch\ndefault=default_handler, arg=req, silent=hlist.silent) ... [error] [client 127.0.0.1] OperationalError: attempt to write a readonly database FYI. Here are the params I used to set up the site. rb-site install reviews.mysite.com \ --domain-name=reviews.mysite.com \ --site-root=/ \ --media-url=/media \ --db-type=sqlite3 \ --cache-type=memcached \ --cache-info=memcached://localhost:11211/ \ --web-server-type=apache \ --python-loader=modpython I'm not sure what to make of those errors. It looks like there are a couple issues. Anyway, thanks for reading. Eric P -- Jeff O|||O --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: rb-site install - Review Board is taking a nap
I actually ran rb-site w/o those params. I just wanted to convey that info (should've done it another way). I gave web server ownership to the 'db' directory (running sqlite3) and its content, and that did the trick. Thanks! That step should probably be added to the docs for those who use sqlite. Somewhere here: http://www.review-board.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/sites/creating-sites/#changing-permissions Thanks again for everyone's help. My ulterior motive here is to convince the boss to use Review Board over Crucible. The path looks clear now (yay!) Eric P On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Jeff Androsj...@bigredtj.com wrote: I've yet to do an install like that, and someone else may correct me, but normally that message means that the apache user does not have write access to bothr the sqlite file and the folder that contains it. Try tracking that down and changing the permissions/owner. --Jeff 2009/6/25 Eric P eric.maill...@gmail.com Hi (me again), I have all my dependency issues sorted, and I've installed my first Review Board site per the documentation. When I go to visit the site, I see the 'Review Board is taking a nap' dialog box. In my Apache error_log, I see some errors: [error] [client 127.0.0.1] mod_python (pid=3617, interpreter='reviewboard_reviews_mysite_com', phase='PythonHandler', handler='django.core.handlers.modpython'): Application error ... [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Traceback (most recent call last): [Thu Jun 25 09:51:56 2009] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py, line 1537, in HandlerDispatch\n default=default_handler, arg=req, silent=hlist.silent) ... [error] [client 127.0.0.1] OperationalError: attempt to write a readonly database FYI. Here are the params I used to set up the site. rb-site install reviews.mysite.com \ --domain-name=reviews.mysite.com \ --site-root=/ \ --media-url=/media \ --db-type=sqlite3 \ --cache-type=memcached \ --cache-info=memcached://localhost:11211/ \ --web-server-type=apache \ --python-loader=modpython I'm not sure what to make of those errors. It looks like there are a couple issues. Anyway, thanks for reading. Eric P -- Jeff O|||O --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How to test email setup, configure logging
Without changing anything, I'm seeing a reviewboard.log in /var/log/ reviewboard. Not a lot there. repetitions of 2009-06-25 11:49:02,320 - INFO - Logging to /var/log/reviewboard/ reviewboard.log with a minimum level of DEBUG 2009-06-25 11:49:02,322 - INFO - Log file for Review Board v1.0 So... looks like logging works. I plan to look at the source code to try and understand why the emails aren't getting through. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: rb-site install - Review Board is taking a nap
Not sure about what you are seeing in the logs because I did not look at my logs. But I was getting that error when SELinux was enabled. Try turning off SELinux. On Jun 25, 12:34 pm, Eric P eric.maill...@gmail.com wrote: Hi (me again), I have all my dependency issues sorted, and I've installed my first Review Board site per the documentation. When I go to visit the site, I see the 'Review Board is taking a nap' dialog box. In my Apache error_log, I see some errors: [error] [client 127.0.0.1] mod_python (pid=3617, interpreter='reviewboard_reviews_mysite_com', phase='PythonHandler', handler='django.core.handlers.modpython'): Application error ... [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Traceback (most recent call last): [Thu Jun 25 09:51:56 2009] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py, line 1537, in HandlerDispatch\n default=default_handler, arg=req, silent=hlist.silent) ... [error] [client 127.0.0.1] OperationalError: attempt to write a readonly database FYI. Here are the params I used to set up the site. rb-site install reviews.mysite.com \ --domain-name=reviews.mysite.com \ --site-root=/ \ --media-url=/media \ --db-type=sqlite3 \ --cache-type=memcached \ --cache-info=memcached://localhost:11211/ \ --web-server-type=apache \ --python-loader=modpython I'm not sure what to make of those errors. It looks like there are a couple issues. Anyway, thanks for reading. Eric P --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: rb-site install - Review Board is taking a nap
Yep, I did that as well while I was trying to get this all working. Thanks, Eric On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:18 PM, grimbeavertbrez...@gmail.com wrote: Not sure about what you are seeing in the logs because I did not look at my logs. But I was getting that error when SELinux was enabled. Try turning off SELinux. On Jun 25, 12:34 pm, Eric P eric.maill...@gmail.com wrote: Hi (me again), I have all my dependency issues sorted, and I've installed my first Review Board site per the documentation. When I go to visit the site, I see the 'Review Board is taking a nap' dialog box. In my Apache error_log, I see some errors: [error] [client 127.0.0.1] mod_python (pid=3617, interpreter='reviewboard_reviews_mysite_com', phase='PythonHandler', handler='django.core.handlers.modpython'): Application error ... [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Traceback (most recent call last): [Thu Jun 25 09:51:56 2009] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py, line 1537, in HandlerDispatch\n default=default_handler, arg=req, silent=hlist.silent) ... [error] [client 127.0.0.1] OperationalError: attempt to write a readonly database FYI. Here are the params I used to set up the site. rb-site install reviews.mysite.com \ --domain-name=reviews.mysite.com \ --site-root=/ \ --media-url=/media \ --db-type=sqlite3 \ --cache-type=memcached \ --cache-info=memcached://localhost:11211/ \ --web-server-type=apache \ --python-loader=modpython I'm not sure what to make of those errors. It looks like there are a couple issues. Anyway, thanks for reading. Eric P --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
post-review + perforce - Error running 'where' command
Hello! I'm trying to set up Review Board to work with a Perforce server. The Perforce executable is called sd instead of p4, but works in the exact same way as Perforce does. I had replaced all the instances of p4 with sd in the post-review script. I've created a new changelist that affects only one file, and before submitting it I try running the post-review script (last version from nightlies). This is what I get: sd print -o c:\users\aalegr~1.ntd\appdata\local\temp\dfbl_migdevroot\tmpgms4az -q //depot/branch/x/file.cpp#15 Perforce client error: Usage: sd -? for usage. Invalid option: -G. Failed to execute command: ['sd', '-G', 'where', '//depot/depot/branch/ x/file.cpp'] Any ideas? If I try doing this with a changelist that has already been submitted I get a different error: Error creating review request: The change number specified could not be found (code 203) I suppose this is because Review Board is trying to use p4 instead of sd... What else will not work correctly because my perforce client executable is sd instead of p4? Thanks!! Angel.- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: post-review + perforce - Error running 'where' command
Perhaps it might be easier to create a script called p4 that delegates everything through to sd. Cheers Kerry On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:01 AM, angeliti angel...@gmail.com wrote: Hello! I'm trying to set up Review Board to work with a Perforce server. The Perforce executable is called sd instead of p4, but works in the exact same way as Perforce does. I had replaced all the instances of p4 with sd in the post-review script. I've created a new changelist that affects only one file, and before submitting it I try running the post-review script (last version from nightlies). This is what I get: sd print -o c:\users\aalegr~1.ntd\appdata\local\temp\dfbl_migdevroot\tmpgms4az -q //depot/branch/x/file.cpp#15 Perforce client error: Usage: sd -? for usage. Invalid option: -G. Failed to execute command: ['sd', '-G', 'where', '//depot/depot/branch/ x/file.cpp'] Any ideas? If I try doing this with a changelist that has already been submitted I get a different error: Error creating review request: The change number specified could not be found (code 203) I suppose this is because Review Board is trying to use p4 instead of sd... What else will not work correctly because my perforce client executable is sd instead of p4? Thanks!! Angel.- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: post-review + perforce - Error running 'where' command
It's unlikely doskey will affect this process. You'll need an actual p4.bat. Why is this called sd? Is it actually p4? We need very specific commands to work very specifically. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 4:53 PM, angeliti angel...@gmail.com wrote: I tried creating an alias doskey p4=sd $* and I still have the same problems :( On Jun 25, 4:37 pm, Kerry Sainsbury ke...@fidelma.com wrote: Perhaps it might be easier to create a script called p4 that delegates everything through to sd. Cheers Kerry On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:01 AM, angeliti angel...@gmail.com wrote: Hello! I'm trying to set up Review Board to work with a Perforce server. The Perforce executable is called sd instead of p4, but works in the exact same way as Perforce does. I had replaced all the instances of p4 with sd in the post-review script. I've created a new changelist that affects only one file, and before submitting it I try running the post-review script (last version from nightlies). This is what I get: sd print -o c:\users\aalegr~1.ntd\appdata\local\temp\dfbl_migdevroot\tmpgms4az -q //depot/branch/x/file.cpp#15 Perforce client error: Usage: sd -? for usage. Invalid option: -G. Failed to execute command: ['sd', '-G', 'where', '//depot/depot/branch/ x/file.cpp'] Any ideas? If I try doing this with a changelist that has already been submitted I get a different error: Error creating review request: The change number specified could not be found (code 203) I suppose this is because Review Board is trying to use p4 instead of sd... What else will not work correctly because my perforce client executable is sd instead of p4? Thanks!! Angel.- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 1186 in reviewboard: Review Request descriptive timestamp doesn't match actual timestamp
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1186 by robwalker01: Review Request descriptive timestamp doesn't match actual timestamp http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1186 *NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.* What version are you running? 1.0 Release What's the URL of the page containing the problem? http://10.0.0.9/r/3/ What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Create a review request. 2. Update the request with comments, reviews, etc. 3. Wait a day, then look at the timestamps for those comments and reviews. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? Today is June 25th, at about 10:40am. The timestamp description I see for a review I posted yesterday (June 24th) should say something to the effect of Posted 1 day, 1 hour ago, or something like that. Instead, it literally displays: Posted 5 hours, 32 minutes ago (June 24th, 2009, 9:42 a.m.) Obviously the post is older than 5 hours. What operating system are you using? What browser? Server OS: Xubuntu Jaunty 32bit Client OS: Windows XP 32bit Browser: Firefox 3.0.11 Please provide any additional information below. I haven't made any new requests or comments today. The only thing I have changed is that I disabled the search function in the admin. Any other writes to the cache or database would be audit/automation stuff from within Review Board itself. I'm using Postgres 8.3.7 for the database, with a file-based cache. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 1188 in reviewboard: Change password link displayed to AD user in Admin area
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1188 by tbrezins: Change password link displayed to AD user in Admin area http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1188 *NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.* What version are you running? 1.0 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? /admin What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Grant an Active Directory user Admin rights 2. Login to the Admin area with that user 3. A Change password link is displayed in the upper right corner. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? Since you can not change the password of an Active Directory user this option should not be visible. What operating system are you using? What browser? Windows XP / Firefox 3 Please provide any additional information below. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
