Re: Deleted users and pending Review id from Review board server
On Friday 03 February 2012 15:00:27 jack jack wrote: I need to cleanup some pending review id from the review board and also remove some users who are not present the organization. How to do this any pointer will help me. http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.6/admin/configuration/users/#deleting- users Brad -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Active Directory Authentication with TLS
On Wednesday 18 January 2012 02:08:50 Thilo-Alexander Ginkel wrote: When disabling TLS, everything works like expected. Are you just enabling / disabling TLS? Any ideas? Do I need to register the AD DC's CA certificate as trusted root somewhere? Check you're using the right port for your AD configuration (perhaps 636 or 3269 depending on whether you're trying to talk to the GC or not). HTH Brad -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: development effort
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 05:19:06 PM zsolt farkas wrote: We are quite satisfied with the current functionality, however we would soon need some additional features implemented. As we are mainly a C++ company, we have limited knowledge in python and the related technologies. This lead us to the conclusion, if we could support the project with other resources to develop these features. I'm not sure if you got an answer to this, but there are at least two ways to support ReviewBoard. The first is that you could choose to make a contribution to the project: http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ However it seems like you're looking for dedicated development. Its open source, so you have a lot of options. One that I'd consider (in your situation, as I understand it) is to work with the lead developers (Chris and David). They announced a company a while back: http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2010/11/12/announcing-the-formation-of- beanbag-inc/ I don't see much of a web page for that company yet, but the RBCommons web pages have a contact email address: supp...@beanbaginc.com. [I have no association with the company, and I'm only a happy user of the software]. I'm sure there are other options, but the real advantage (IMO) of BeanBag is that you're pretty certain your changes are going to be good enough to be upstreamed, so they'll appear in future versions without needing to redo the integration. HTH. Brad -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Users list by API is trimmed
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 08:19:44 pm Gilles Moris wrote: I have already 34 users registered on the site, but using the the API http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/webapi/2.0/resources/user-list/ I only get a list of 25 people. Note that the documentation includes this in the request: max-results (optional) Integer The maximum number of results to return in this list. By default, this is 25. Brad -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Requesting ideas for Google Summer of Code
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 08:44:48 am Christian Hammond wrote: Hi everyone, We've signed up again this year to take part in Google's Summer of Code. We're still awaiting acceptance, but want to brainstorm some ideas that students can work on. I'd like to see integration with buildbot (via the try scheduler). The idea is that you can do an initial review, make sure the code doesn't look malicious, and then say what will happen if I commit this now across whatever test configurations you have in buildbot. I did some initial work ( http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1336/ ) on this, but I'm too clueless about django UI stuff to finish it off. The concept (at least on the submittal side) isn't too complex though. Figuring out how to get the results back into reviewboard might be more interesting. Brad -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Requesting ideas for Google Summer of Code
On Thursday 11 March 2010 05:39:29 pm Christian Hammond wrote: I would love integration like this, but it's going to have to wait until we land Extensions support in 2.0. Otherwise we end up complicating the codebase, dependencies, UI and settings. I respect your call on this, but my (hackish) work didn't seem much more complex than the other optional dependencies (LDAP/AD, search, S3, couchdb). Brad -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Problem with devel build
When I press Save, I now get a message at the top of the screen (just under Add repository and above General Information) says: [Icon of red circle with white hyphen] Please correct the error below. [Icon of yellow/orange triangle with white exclamation mark] global name 'logging' is not defined OK, here is the fix for that: diff --git a/reviewboard/scmtools/svn.py b/reviewboard/scmtools/svn.py index 2d42247..843b101 100644 --- a/reviewboard/scmtools/svn.py +++ b/reviewboard/scmtools/svn.py @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ +import logging import re import urllib import urlparse I can now create the Repository. Brad -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Problem with devel build
Christian,
Thanks for the quick response on those queries.
On Friday 01 January 2010 04:58:36 Christian Hammond wrote:
The documentation doesn't match because it covers 1.0.x, and you're
running the 1.1 (soon 1.5) development branch.
I guessed this is the case. I was just a bit optimistic when I saw that
there was a manual for the dev version :-)
You shouldn't have to add the scmtools by hand. Did you run the
prepare-dev script? It should do it for you. If you did and it failed,
run 'setup.py install' and then ./reviewboard/manage.py
registerscmtools'
I did run the prepare-dev script, and it appeared to work (extract from
my original email below).
On Thursday, December 31, 2009, bradh br...@frogmouth.net wrote:
I'm trying to follow the instructions at
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/codebase/dev/getting-started/#gettingstar
ted and it looks like its mostly working. The prepare-dev.py script ends
with Your Review Board tree is ready for development.
So I tried running setup.py install in the reviewboard checkout. It
appears that it can't find a suitable version of djblets, even after I
tried installing (again with setup.py install) the git version.of djblets.
The setup.py install of reviewboard ends with:
Installed /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.1alpha3.dev-py2.6.egg
Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard==1.1alpha3.dev
Searching for Djblets=0.5.7
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/Djblets/
Reading http://www.review-board.org/wiki/Djblets
Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/Djblets/0.5/
Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/
No local packages or download links found for Djblets=0.5.7
error: Could not find suitable distribution for
Requirement.parse('Djblets=0.5.7')
Brad
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Problem with devel build
On Friday 01 January 2010 09:21:31 Brad Hards wrote:
So I tried running setup.py install in the reviewboard checkout. It
appears that it can't find a suitable version of djblets, even after I
tried installing (again with setup.py install) the git version.of
djblets. The setup.py install of reviewboard ends with:
No local packages or download links found for Djblets=0.5.7
error: Could not find suitable distribution for
Requirement.parse('Djblets=0.5.7')
I hacked around this by changing the the version information in the git
version of djblets and installing that.
I could then run setup.py install for reviewboard, and it installed OK.
I started the devserver, and logged into reviewboard. Still no SCM tools, but
I ran the ./reviewboard/manage.py registerscmtools command and got back
lines that told me New SCM Tool X (reviewboard.scmtools.x.XTool for X in
Subversion, Git, Bazaar, CVS, Perforce, Clear Case and Mercurual.
Restarted the devserver, and I now see the various tools when I go to Add
Repository. I filled it in with
Name: OpenChange
Show this repository selected
Hosting service: Custom
Repository type: Subversion
Path: http://svn.openchange.org/openchange
Mirror path, Username, Password all empty
Use hosting service's bug tracker not selected
Type: None
Encoding left empty
When I press Save, I now get a message at the top of the screen (just under
Add repository and above General Information) says:
[Icon of red circle with white hyphen] Please correct the error below.
[Icon of yellow/orange triangle with white exclamation mark] global name
'logging' is not defined
Brad
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
