[kudu-CR] KUDU-2249 give the TableRecordReader their own KuduClient to use.
David Ribeiro Alves has posted comments on this change. ( http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8921 ) Change subject: KUDU-2249 give the TableRecordReader their own KuduClient to use. .. Patch Set 1: (1 comment) http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8921/1/java/kudu-mapreduce/src/main/java/org/apache/kudu/mapreduce/KuduTableInputFormat.java File java/kudu-mapreduce/src/main/java/org/apache/kudu/mapreduce/KuduTableInputFormat.java: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8921/1/java/kudu-mapreduce/src/main/java/org/apache/kudu/mapreduce/KuduTableInputFormat.java@253 PS1, Line 253: private KuduClient getKuduClient() { : : String masterAddresses = conf.get(MASTER_ADDRESSES_KEY); : this.operationTimeoutMs = conf.getLong(OPERATION_TIMEOUT_MS_KEY, : AsyncKuduClient.DEFAULT_OPERATION_TIMEOUT_MS); : KuduClient kuduClient = new KuduClient.KuduClientBuilder(masterAddresses) : .defaultOperationTimeoutMs(operationTimeoutMs) : .build(); : KuduTableMapReduceUtil.importCredentialsFromCurrentSubject(kuduClient); : return kuduClient; : } > Hi David, Thanks for pointing out the discussion. I'd still like to, at the very least, have a comment, on the commit message and/or on the code explaining: i) the rationale, in terms of how many new clients we can expect; ii) how this is not going to cause 10s or 100s of new clients to spawn, increasing the load on the master iii) or if it is, how there is no way to avoid it. -- To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8921 To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings Gerrit-Project: kudu Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: I24f45ee9253790c5348cabd0afe6c6a4b6d3f3d4 Gerrit-Change-Number: 8921 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: Clemens Valiente Gerrit-Reviewer: Clemens Valiente Gerrit-Reviewer: David Ribeiro Alves Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 04:16:09 + Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
[kudu-CR] KUDU-2191 (5/n): Add Kerberos SASL support to the HMS client
Adar Dembo has posted comments on this change. ( http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8692 ) Change subject: KUDU-2191 (5/n): Add Kerberos SASL support to the HMS client .. Patch Set 4: (2 comments) I didn't review sasl_client_transport or the krpc changes. http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8692/4/src/kudu/hms/hms_client.cc File src/kudu/hms/hms_client.cc: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8692/4/src/kudu/hms/hms_client.cc@140 PS4, Line 140: // TODO(dan): check necessary? Perhaps move this logic (and thus the construction of protocol and client_) into Start(), so that you can return a bad Status? Alternatively, you could make HmsClient use two-phase initialization and add an Init() method that can return a bad Status. http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8692/4/src/kudu/hms/mini_hms.h File src/kudu/hms/mini_hms.h: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8692/4/src/kudu/hms/mini_hms.h@58 PS4, Line 58: // Configures the mini HMS to use Kerberos. Why build this as a setter vs. adding it to the constructor? There's no use case for calling it multiple times, right? Or for calling it after Start? -- To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8692 To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings Gerrit-Project: kudu Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: I8f217ae05fd36c8ee88fe20eeccd73d49233a345 Gerrit-Change-Number: 8692 Gerrit-PatchSet: 4 Gerrit-Owner: Dan Burkert Gerrit-Reviewer: Adar Dembo Gerrit-Reviewer: Dan Burkert Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins Gerrit-Reviewer: Mike Percy Gerrit-Reviewer: Sailesh Mukil Gerrit-Reviewer: Tidy Bot Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 00:44:27 + Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
[kudu-CR] [master/tserver] enforce re-replication scheme consistency
Alexey Serbin has posted comments on this change. ( http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8901 ) Change subject: [master/tserver] enforce re-replication scheme consistency .. Patch Set 4: (10 comments) http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8901/4/src/kudu/consensus/replica_management.proto File src/kudu/consensus/replica_management.proto: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8901/4/src/kudu/consensus/replica_management.proto@23 PS4, Line 23: // Message to communicate on the replica management details between involved : // actors. > "Communicates replica management information between servers." Done http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8901/4/src/kudu/consensus/replica_management.proto@39 PS4, Line 39: required > I think this field (like pretty much all proto fields) should be optional, It's a good call. http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8901/4/src/kudu/integration-tests/raft_consensus_nonvoter-itest.cc File src/kudu/integration-tests/raft_consensus_nonvoter-itest.cc: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8901/4/src/kudu/integration-tests/raft_consensus_nonvoter-itest.cc@1685 PS4, Line 1685: it > in Done http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8901/4/src/kudu/integration-tests/raft_consensus_nonvoter-itest.cc@1686 PS4, Line 1686: make > makes Done http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8901/4/src/kudu/integration-tests/raft_consensus_nonvoter-itest.cc@1714 PS4, Line 1714: // The easiest way to have everything setup is to start the cluster with : // compatible parameters. > Could you move this comment above where the flags are set? I was confused b Done http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8901/4/src/kudu/integration-tests/raft_consensus_nonvoter-itest.cc@1739 PS4, Line 1739: SleepFor(MonoDelta::FromMilliseconds(heartbeat_interval_ms * 3)); > warning: either cast from 'int' to 'int64_t' (aka 'long') is ineffective, o Done http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8901/4/src/kudu/master/master.proto File src/kudu/master/master.proto: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8901/4/src/kudu/master/master.proto@80 PS4, Line 80: INCOMPATIBILITY > Consider "Incompatible". I think the codes in this enum mean 'the reason for an error', so from that perspective 'INCOMPATIBILITY' looks better. http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8901/4/src/kudu/master/master.proto@293 PS4, Line 293: iff > nit: extra f? Given the identical phrasing below I'm guessing this f is ext Done http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8901/4/src/kudu/master/master.proto@294 PS4, Line 294: optional consensus.ReplicaManagementInfoPB replica_management_info = 7; > Would it be better to put some kind of repeated feature flag here instead o I thought about the feature flag, but I decided to go with a field. The feature flag is to indicate whether some feature is supported/understood by the implementation, not whether it's turned on or off. So, it should be more than just one bit for that anyway. The other reason I opted for a field is that I think we should eventually get rid of different replica management schemes. However, I will give it a second thought. http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8901/4/src/kudu/master/master_service.cc File src/kudu/master/master_service.cc: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8901/4/src/kudu/master/master_service.cc@158 PS4, Line 158: what is > nit: remove Done -- To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8901 To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings Gerrit-Project: kudu Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: I71c4c2e72bb2d62cec6de0f6d00b418377e8ae85 Gerrit-Change-Number: 8901 Gerrit-PatchSet: 4 Gerrit-Owner: Alexey Serbin Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexey Serbin Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins Gerrit-Reviewer: Mike Percy Gerrit-Reviewer: Tidy Bot Gerrit-Reviewer: Will Berkeley Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 00:44:49 + Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
[kudu-CR] KUDU-2191 (4/n): HMS Thrift client fault handling
Adar Dembo has posted comments on this change. ( http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8494 ) Change subject: KUDU-2191 (4/n): HMS Thrift client fault handling .. Patch Set 7: (6 comments) http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8494/7/src/kudu/hms/hms_client.h File src/kudu/hms/hms_client.h: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8494/7/src/kudu/hms/hms_client.h@51 PS7, Line 51: the to http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8494/7/src/kudu/hms/hms_client.h@84 PS7, Line 84: explicit No longer needed now that this is multi-arg? http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8494/7/src/kudu/hms/hms_client.h@85 PS7, Line 85: MonoDelta send_timeout = MonoDelta::FromSeconds(60), Would be more ergonomic to create an HmsClientOptions struct and stuff these (with documentation) in there. http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8494/7/src/kudu/hms/mini_hms.cc File src/kudu/hms/mini_hms.cc: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8494/7/src/kudu/hms/mini_hms.cc@111 PS7, Line 111: "-p", std::to_string(port_), Was this change made so that you could use Start() to restart and have it use the same port as before? Might want to document that behavior. Also, how do we prevent test flakiness caused by another application binding to our previously bound ephemeral port? http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8494/7/src/kudu/hms/mini_hms.cc@131 PS7, Line 131: WARN_NOT_OK Why not RETURN_NOT_OK? http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8494/7/src/kudu/hms/mini_hms.cc@139 PS7, Line 139: KUDU You can drop this prefix. In Continue() too. -- To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8494 To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings Gerrit-Project: kudu Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic48bbb833bbae39b383ae239054b9710da3c746d Gerrit-Change-Number: 8494 Gerrit-PatchSet: 7 Gerrit-Owner: Dan Burkert Gerrit-Reviewer: Adar Dembo Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins Gerrit-Reviewer: Mike Percy Gerrit-Reviewer: Tidy Bot Gerrit-Reviewer: Todd Lipcon Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 00:36:29 + Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
[kudu-CR] Add 'kudu fs list' tool
Adar Dembo has posted comments on this change. ( http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8911 ) Change subject: Add 'kudu fs list' tool .. Patch Set 6: (10 comments) http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8911/6/src/kudu/tools/kudu-tool-test.cc File src/kudu/tools/kudu-tool-test.cc: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8911/6/src/kudu/tools/kudu-tool-test.cc@404 PS6, Line 404: const vector kFsModeRegexes = { This should be updated. http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8911/6/src/kudu/tools/tool_action_fs.cc File src/kudu/tools/tool_action_fs.cc: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8911/6/src/kudu/tools/tool_action_fs.cc@396 PS6, Line 396: switch (group) { What happens if I add an entry to FieldGroup but forgot to update this switch? Do I get a compile error? A warning? Nothing? If it's not a compile error, is there anything we should add here to guarantee good behavior? Like a default statement, a LOG(FATAL), or something like that? http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8911/6/src/kudu/tools/tool_action_fs.cc@415 PS6, Line 415: static const Field kFieldVariants[] = { Could you use the enum macros from gutil/casts.h to avoid this? http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8911/6/src/kudu/tools/tool_action_fs.cc@483 PS6, Line 483: // Returns rowset info for the field. Worth logging the min/max keys of the rowset? http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8911/6/src/kudu/tools/tool_action_fs.cc@584 PS6, Line 584: CHECK_OK(fs_manager->OpenBlock(block, &readable_block)); CHECK_OK seems wrong for a CLI tool; why not RETURN_NOT_OK and return an error from List if one of these fails? http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8911/6/src/kudu/tools/tool_action_fs.cc@620 PS6, Line 620: tablet_ids.emplace_back(FLAGS_tablet_id); Do we need to ToLowerCase this? http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8911/6/src/kudu/tools/tool_action_fs.cc@633 PS6, Line 633: WARN_NOT_OK(TabletMetadata::Load(&fs_manager, tablet_id, &tablet_metadata), Why not RETURN_NOT_OK on this? http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8911/6/src/kudu/tools/tool_action_fs.cc@652 PS6, Line 652: if (FLAGS_rowset_id > 0 && FLAGS_rowset_id != rowset.id()) { Shouldn't this be FLAGS_rowset_id != -1 && FLAGS_rowset_id != rowset.id() ? http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8911/6/src/kudu/tools/tool_action_fs.cc@688 PS6, Line 688: // TODO(dan): should orphaned blocks be included, perhaps behind a flag? Perhaps, but this comment is slightly misplaced; orphaned blocks are a tablet-level thing, not a rowset-level thing, so the comment should be outside the inner (rowset_metadata) loop. http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8911/6/src/kudu/tools/tool_action_fs.cc@786 PS6, Line 786:"Possible values: table, table-id, tablet-id, partition, " Seems like it might be easy to accidentally omit an entry; could we construct this list on-the-fly by iterating on the Field enum class? -- To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8911 To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings Gerrit-Project: kudu Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: I7f5a63e636d95e3ee55bb4955cece7f5d0b7532d Gerrit-Change-Number: 8911 Gerrit-PatchSet: 6 Gerrit-Owner: Dan Burkert Gerrit-Reviewer: Adar Dembo Gerrit-Reviewer: Dan Burkert Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins Gerrit-Reviewer: Mike Percy Gerrit-Reviewer: Tidy Bot Gerrit-Reviewer: Todd Lipcon Gerrit-Reviewer: Will Berkeley Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 00:22:53 + Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
[kudu-CR] periodic: fix a comment
Adar Dembo has submitted this change and it was merged. ( http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8931 ) Change subject: periodic: fix a comment .. periodic: fix a comment Change-Id: Id04bff4f6505595f60f26abe88de58cdded4d9d0 Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8931 Reviewed-by: Alexey Serbin Tested-by: Kudu Jenkins --- M src/kudu/rpc/periodic.h 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Approvals: Alexey Serbin: Looks good to me, approved Kudu Jenkins: Verified -- To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8931 To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings Gerrit-Project: kudu Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-MessageType: merged Gerrit-Change-Id: Id04bff4f6505595f60f26abe88de58cdded4d9d0 Gerrit-Change-Number: 8931 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: Adar Dembo Gerrit-Reviewer: Adar Dembo Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexey Serbin Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins Gerrit-Reviewer: Mike Percy
[kudu-CR] periodic: fix a comment
Alexey Serbin has posted comments on this change. ( http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8931 ) Change subject: periodic: fix a comment .. Patch Set 1: Code-Review+2 -- To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8931 To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings Gerrit-Project: kudu Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: Id04bff4f6505595f60f26abe88de58cdded4d9d0 Gerrit-Change-Number: 8931 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: Adar Dembo Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexey Serbin Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins Gerrit-Reviewer: Mike Percy Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 20:09:27 + Gerrit-HasComments: No
[kudu-CR] periodic: fix a comment
Hello Mike Percy, Alexey Serbin, I'd like you to do a code review. Please visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8931 to review the following change. Change subject: periodic: fix a comment .. periodic: fix a comment Change-Id: Id04bff4f6505595f60f26abe88de58cdded4d9d0 --- M src/kudu/rpc/periodic.h 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) git pull ssh://gerrit.cloudera.org:29418/kudu refs/changes/31/8931/1 -- To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8931 To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings Gerrit-Project: kudu Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-MessageType: newchange Gerrit-Change-Id: Id04bff4f6505595f60f26abe88de58cdded4d9d0 Gerrit-Change-Number: 8931 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: Adar Dembo Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexey Serbin Gerrit-Reviewer: Mike Percy
[kudu-CR] KUDU-721: Support for Decimal type, Part 1 (Server, C++ Client)
Alexey Serbin has posted comments on this change. ( http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8830 ) Change subject: KUDU-721: Support for Decimal type, Part 1 (Server, C++ Client) .. Patch Set 6: (12 comments) It seems I took a quick look at PS1 some time ago. Will re-visit this week. http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8830/5/src/kudu/client/schema.h File src/kudu/client/schema.h: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8830/5/src/kudu/client/schema.h@64 PS5, Line 64: public: nit: alignment http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8830/1/src/kudu/client/schema.h File src/kudu/client/schema.h: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8830/1/src/kudu/client/schema.h@71 PS1, Line 71: : pre I don't think this is needed unless we want to protect against list-initialized constructors. http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8830/1/src/kudu/client/schema.h@76 PS1, Line 76: ret drop http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8830/1/src/kudu/client/schema.h@81 PS1, Line 81: ret drop http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8830/1/src/kudu/client/schema.h@321 PS1, Line 321: /// Add the documented description for the precision parameter. http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8830/1/src/kudu/client/schema.h@328 PS1, Line 328: /// Add the documented description for the scale parameter. http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8830/5/src/kudu/common/common.proto File src/kudu/common/common.proto: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8830/5/src/kudu/common/common.proto@54 PS5, Line 54: DECIMAL32 = 17; nit: could you add a comment to explain why 15 and 16 are skipped? http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8830/5/src/kudu/common/decimal_value.h File src/kudu/common/decimal_value.h: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8830/5/src/kudu/common/decimal_value.h@32 PS5, Line 32: nit: spacing http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8830/5/src/kudu/common/decimal_value.h@43 PS5, Line 43: nit: by code guidelines, the indent should be 2 spaces. http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8830/1/src/kudu/common/schema.cc File src/kudu/common/schema.cc: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8830/1/src/kudu/common/schema.cc@50 PS1, Line 50: DataType type) const { nit: misaligned line for the second parameter http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8830/1/src/kudu/common/schema.cc@57 PS1, Line 57: true Why true, not false? If there is some specific reason, please add a comment about that. http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8830/1/src/kudu/common/schema.cc@125 PS1, Line 125: return strings::Substitute("$0$1 $2", nit: missed space -- To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8830 To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings Gerrit-Project: kudu Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: I3b06142f43c66973f36376bd2c88ca6f8d9f7632 Gerrit-Change-Number: 8830 Gerrit-PatchSet: 6 Gerrit-Owner: Grant Henke Gerrit-Reviewer: Adar Dembo Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexey Serbin Gerrit-Reviewer: Dan Burkert Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins Gerrit-Reviewer: Tidy Bot Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 19:57:40 + Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
[kudu-CR] KUDU-721: Support for Decimal type, Part 1 (Server, C++ Client)
Adar Dembo has posted comments on this change. ( http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8830 ) Change subject: KUDU-721: Support for Decimal type, Part 1 (Server, C++ Client) .. Patch Set 6: (4 comments) I only looked at the public API changes. http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8830/6/src/kudu/client/schema.h File src/kudu/client/schema.h: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8830/6/src/kudu/client/schema.h@64 PS6, Line 64: public: Nit: indentation http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8830/6/src/kudu/client/schema.h@70 PS6, Line 70: explicit KuduColumnTypeAttributes(int32_t precision, int32_t scale) The 'explicit' keyword is only needed to avoid implicit conversions with single-arg constructors, no? http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8830/6/src/kudu/client/schema.h@75 PS6, Line 75: const int32_t precision() const { These accessors are returning an int32_t 'copy', so what value does the 'const' keyword add (as in 'const int32_t ...')? http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8830/6/src/kudu/client/schema.h@84 PS6, Line 84: private: Do you anticipate KuduColumnTypeAttributes evolving for other use cases in the future? If so, you should PIMPL the class: define a private Data nested class, store precision/scale within it, and have the public class merely store an allocated pointer to the nested class. -- To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8830 To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings Gerrit-Project: kudu Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: I3b06142f43c66973f36376bd2c88ca6f8d9f7632 Gerrit-Change-Number: 8830 Gerrit-PatchSet: 6 Gerrit-Owner: Grant Henke Gerrit-Reviewer: Adar Dembo Gerrit-Reviewer: Dan Burkert Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins Gerrit-Reviewer: Tidy Bot Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 19:18:24 + Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
[kudu-CR] KUDU-2216. Post process gtest generated xml to include the output from the *.txt files
Adar Dembo has posted comments on this change. ( http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8757 ) Change subject: KUDU-2216. Post process gtest generated xml to include the output from the *.txt files .. Patch Set 12: (2 comments) http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8757/12/build-support/jenkins/add_std_out_to_junit.py File build-support/jenkins/add_std_out_to_junit.py: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8757/12/build-support/jenkins/add_std_out_to_junit.py@68 PS12, Line 68: Globs for *.gz ands *. xml logs in log_location, then sorts the logs I'm missing a ton of context, but why not run this script out of run-test.sh instead of build-and-test.sh? That way it'll run once per test and the precise gz/xml file pair will be known, right? http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8757/12/build-support/jenkins/add_std_out_to_junit.py@69 PS12, Line 69: I Comment style nit: you'll find the pronouns "we" and "us" more commonly used than "I" and "me". -- To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8757 To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings Gerrit-Project: kudu Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: I9f4a9a147f29e37e380cb32ff5af43e1290a1a70 Gerrit-Change-Number: 8757 Gerrit-PatchSet: 12 Gerrit-Owner: Edward Fancher Gerrit-Reviewer: Adar Dembo Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward Fancher Gerrit-Reviewer: Jean-Daniel Cryans Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins Gerrit-Reviewer: Mike Percy Gerrit-Reviewer: Todd Lipcon Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 19:07:51 + Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
[kudu-CR] KUDU-2229. consensus: Leader should not start FD
Adar Dembo has posted comments on this change. ( http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8711 ) Change subject: KUDU-2229. consensus: Leader should not start FD .. Patch Set 4: (1 comment) http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8711/4/src/kudu/rpc/periodic.h File src/kudu/rpc/periodic.h: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8711/4/src/kudu/rpc/periodic.h@144 PS4, Line 144: // Returns true iff the failure detected has been started. FWIW, this comment is wrong: it refers to failure detection rather than to this generic periodic timer system. -- To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8711 To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings Gerrit-Project: kudu Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: Ie2ec9c5499e8e4c1659333bd53dd2d7f6dae81f5 Gerrit-Change-Number: 8711 Gerrit-PatchSet: 4 Gerrit-Owner: Mike Percy Gerrit-Reviewer: Adar Dembo Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexey Serbin Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins Gerrit-Reviewer: Mike Percy Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 18:51:52 + Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
[kudu-CR] KUDU-2249 give the TableRecordReader their own KuduClient to use.
Clemens Valiente has posted comments on this change. ( http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8921 ) Change subject: KUDU-2249 give the TableRecordReader their own KuduClient to use. .. Patch Set 1: (1 comment) Hi David, I discussed this on the dev mailing list here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kudu-dev/201712.mbox/%3CAM0PR0502MB405140DD23048A17522BB55C9C070%40AM0PR0502MB4051.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com%3E The problem is the getInputSplit() closing the client that the Reader want to use. There's no real clean way of sharing the client and closing it properly. Due to the mapreduce architecture, each tablet usually will read from a separate Map Container and thus need its own client anyway. This just fixes a bug in the rare scenario that the getinputsplit and record reader are executed in one container. http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8921/1/java/kudu-mapreduce/src/main/java/org/apache/kudu/mapreduce/KuduTableInputFormat.java File java/kudu-mapreduce/src/main/java/org/apache/kudu/mapreduce/KuduTableInputFormat.java: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8921/1/java/kudu-mapreduce/src/main/java/org/apache/kudu/mapreduce/KuduTableInputFormat.java@253 PS1, Line 253: private KuduClient getKuduClient() { : : String masterAddresses = conf.get(MASTER_ADDRESSES_KEY); : this.operationTimeoutMs = conf.getLong(OPERATION_TIMEOUT_MS_KEY, : AsyncKuduClient.DEFAULT_OPERATION_TIMEOUT_MS); : KuduClient kuduClient = new KuduClient.KuduClientBuilder(masterAddresses) : .defaultOperationTimeoutMs(operationTimeoutMs) : .build(); : KuduTableMapReduceUtil.importCredentialsFromCurrentSubject(kuduClient); : return kuduClient; : } > Kudu clients cache state internally, like tablet locations. Changing this t Hi David, I discussed this on the dev mailing list here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kudu-dev/201712.mbox/%3CAM0PR0502MB405140DD23048A17522BB55C9C070%40AM0PR0502MB4051.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com%3E The problem is the getInputSplit() closing the client that the Reader want to use. There's no real clean way of sharing the client and closing it properly. Due to the mapreduce architecture, each tablet usually will read from a separate Map Container and thus need its own client anyway. This just fixes a bug in the rare scenario that the getinputsplit and record reader are executed in one container. -- To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8921 To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings Gerrit-Project: kudu Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: I24f45ee9253790c5348cabd0afe6c6a4b6d3f3d4 Gerrit-Change-Number: 8921 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: Clemens Valiente Gerrit-Reviewer: Clemens Valiente Gerrit-Reviewer: David Ribeiro Alves Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 08:39:45 + Gerrit-HasComments: Yes