Re: [Rosegarden-user] a duo of ethicall questions
You should watch Rick Beato's senate testimony on Youtube users and musical content. Youtube is not at fault pulling videos down and censoring it is the Record Companies and such that makes up their own laws and they mostly violate "Fair Use" just out of greed. That behavior have to stop. i am not a fan of Beato, but I am glad he had the guts to go testify. Maybe something good comes from that, and there will be legislation to stop these record companies from making money illegally out of fair use such as parody and teaching. On the other hand, dont worry about "advanced age" eat right my friend that is the best advice you can ever get and stay away from franken foods, restaurants, fast foods and such. If you eat organic and cast out foods that disagree with you, health changes considerably and so does life expectancy. Doctors couldnt help me with my ailments, for years. It was only after my daughter became a Naturopath that about all my problems disappeared. I eat right now and still sift through what doesnt agree with me etc. After following her advice, i have no tinitus anymore amazing!, rheumatic effects in my hands that stopped me from playing disappeared, strange recurrent tumors I battled with for decades disappeared etc etc. I have my life back and is completely healthy again. Dont let anyone tell you food is not important. The hydrogenated oils that you WILL get from restaurants or any prepared food will hurt you. Eat what agrees with you and make sure it is always organic. Big Agriculture aned their pesticides/chemicals is slowing killing us. I am living testament of that. All my decades long trouble was pesticide/hydrogenated/sucrose & refined food related. I dont use any sugar anymore, only organic honey...makes a huge difference. Anyway, enough of my advice. All our musical contributions are necessqary on youtube etc. Everything helps to keep the music alive, including yours. Keep going. On 2020-08-08 19:25, krsg...@trixtar.org wrote: greetings First and foremost as I have just read (this time the full) 'authors' and story page and can only say THANK-YOU, THANK-YOU to the Rosegarden team; I mean the strife, the endless hours through lonely nights mostly between day jobs, the thanklessness, you name it. My attitude has always been humble and grateful but it just got upgraded quite a bit. I've only done very rudimentary Perl programming a long long time ago but I can imagine. So that's the first ethical issue, my 2 cents says that that page should be the "I have read it all" checkbox-page leading to a download. I have used Rosegarden to produce (read hack and cannibalize) about 4 songs on guitar which I took up as a way to head off brain-rot with my advancing age. I have about 500 lifetime fav songs of which maybe 40 are guitar candidates. With the help of Rosegarden I have already done most of the 40 backing tracks with temporary stand-in digital leads of one sort or another. But given the past completion-rate I will likely run out of time to do all the remaining 36, I figure if I get to a total of 10 I should be lucky. The guitar 'covers' I think pose no ethical issues, here's the last one that took me a year just like the one before it: https://tinyurl.com/y4cyeb6x But what about the rest of them which are provisionally entirely digital 'covers'? Does that concept exist at all? Can I load them up on the tube as digital covers pending some future guitar overlay? Doing music is as much work as coding and I wouldn't wanna screw any copyright musician out of deserved dues. I have learned *a LOT* just from tinkering around with Rosegarden, this digital jobbie for instance has some twists in the bass handling (don't know if anyone will catch it) and I think it's a splashy sounding nice rework of the french original so I'd like to share it but without stepping on toes: https://tinyurl.com/yxocsu4e https://preview.tinyurl.com/yxocsu4e Tnaks in advance for all pro/con ideas ___ Rosegarden-user mailing list Rosegarden-user@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
[Rosegarden-user] a duo of ethicall questions
greetings First and foremost as I have just read (this time the full) 'authors' and story page and can only say THANK-YOU, THANK-YOU to the Rosegarden team; I mean the strife, the endless hours through lonely nights mostly between day jobs, the thanklessness, you name it. My attitude has always been humble and grateful but it just got upgraded quite a bit. I've only done very rudimentary Perl programming a long long time ago but I can imagine. So that's the first ethical issue, my 2 cents says that that page should be the "I have read it all" checkbox-page leading to a download. I have used Rosegarden to produce (read hack and cannibalize) about 4 songs on guitar which I took up as a way to head off brain-rot with my advancing age. I have about 500 lifetime fav songs of which maybe 40 are guitar candidates. With the help of Rosegarden I have already done most of the 40 backing tracks with temporary stand-in digital leads of one sort or another. But given the past completion-rate I will likely run out of time to do all the remaining 36, I figure if I get to a total of 10 I should be lucky. The guitar 'covers' I think pose no ethical issues, here's the last one that took me a year just like the one before it: https://tinyurl.com/y4cyeb6x But what about the rest of them which are provisionally entirely digital 'covers'? Does that concept exist at all? Can I load them up on the tube as digital covers pending some future guitar overlay? Doing music is as much work as coding and I wouldn't wanna screw any copyright musician out of deserved dues. I have learned *a LOT* just from tinkering around with Rosegarden, this digital jobbie for instance has some twists in the bass handling (don't know if anyone will catch it) and I think it's a splashy sounding nice rework of the french original so I'd like to share it but without stepping on toes: https://tinyurl.com/yxocsu4e https://preview.tinyurl.com/yxocsu4e Tnaks in advance for all pro/con ideas ___ Rosegarden-user mailing list Rosegarden-user@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
Re: [Rosegarden-user] Fixed Midi Configuration Setup
I tried everything to keep the configured mid input and output devices but if I rebooted or close and open Rosegarden it is always different and (wrong) midi devices that are listed and not what I configured. I set the studio options and saved and tried everything I could. Nothing helps. So how do I force Rosegarden to stick to the midi devices I configured and saved. It seems to ignore my configurations. On 2020-08-07 04:57, david wrote: I have no idea. I think once you set up a studio and make it your default, all *new* RG projects start with the default studio. I don't know if there's a way to set *old* RG projects to use the new default studio. Maybe someone else on the list knows how to do that? On 8/6/20 10:54 PM, liebre...@grossmann-venter.com wrote: that doesnt help[ as I am opening files I used the previous day and saved with the correct settings. Rosegarden either doesnt keep midi device settings for every file or something is messed up or there is something I dont understand. Does it load the same Studio file for all Project files or does it keep track of the midi device setup for each Project file ? On 2020-08-06 19:43, David W. Jones wrote: Hmm, I thought that was set under Studio settings? Set up your studio, save it as your default studio? ___ Rosegarden-user mailing list Rosegarden-user@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
Re: [Rosegarden-user] Start oddity : was: Repeatable crash :(
Now running build 15906 and I'm not seeing the problem anymore {shrug}
On Tue, 4 Aug 2020 17:18:23 -0400
Ted Felix wrote:
> We've made some very significant changes to the way we discover and
>connect to synths. You're probably running into a problem there.
>
> Run your usual test that is failing, then in the preferences, click
>on the Details... button and copy/paste the text to an email for me.
>That should help me figure out what we need to change to accommodate
>your particular setup.
>
> In the meantime, to avoid the connection annoyances, you might want
>to consider going back to [r15892].
>
>Thanks.
>Ted.
>
>On 8/4/20 3:33 PM, Will Godfrey wrote:
>> Bit slow getting back to this. It seems fine now thanks.
>>
>> I'm actually running build 15904. I don't know if I'm missing something but
>> Rosegarden no longer seems to connect to Yoshimi, if Yoshimi is already
>> running.
>> If Rosegarden is started first, then the connection is made.
>>
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
___
Rosegarden-user mailing list
Rosegarden-user@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
[Rosegarden-user] CPU load
@ David W. Jones Hi David! Thank you for your response. Until now I thought only politicians are able to work more than 100% :-) I test Rosegarden on a MacBook Pro 8.1 (i5 with 4 cores@2.6GHz) but also run Athlon XP 3000+ machines, they still perfectly handle songs with many MIDI tracks and several audio tracks. Ted solved this problem with r15609. Greetings, Michael ___ Rosegarden-user mailing list Rosegarden-user@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
