Re: RPM Fusion mediacenter Spin

[Kevin Kofler]

Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Github with the kickstart:
> https://github.com/rpmfusion-infra/rpmfusion-kickstarts

I see the following:
> @firefox
> chromium (with chromium-libs-media-freeworld)
> qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld

How many browsers are you going to ship?

Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

[Bug 4782] Review request: rpmfusion-free-obsolete-packages - A package to obsolete retired packages from rpmfusion-free

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4782

--- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler  ---
I object to Obsoleting packages without replacement. (And if there is a
replacement, the replacement should Obsolete the package, not a catch-all like
this.) If the package has broken dependencies, users will have to remove it
anyway. If it does not, then why force them to remove a working package?

(I had actually posted this objection to the list on January 31, before the
package was approved, but unfortunately, it was eaten by
https://lists.rpmfusion.org/archives/list/rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org/message/JTJY75IIMA3POJEEJMAIOYJG2Y3T7JJ4/
. :-( So now the damage is already done.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Cannot post to this list through Gmane anymore

[Kevin Kofler]

Hi,

I normally use KNode and Gmane to post to mailing lists. This used to work on
this list, too. But the last message that made it through that way was from
January 4! None of the 11 mails I tried to send since then made it through
according to the HyperKitty "user posting activity" history.

Yes, I am subscribed, with mail delivery disabled. (I use KNode and Gmane
(NNTPS) to read the mails.)

I am sending this message with HyperKitty as a workaround.

Can this please be fixed?

Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647

--- Comment #29 from leigh scott  ---
or you forgot the name space (free,nonfree)

[leigh@localhost ~]$ pkgdb-admin list
#212 (Awaiting Review) - hobbes1069 requested the new package "rpms/unifi" on
"master"
  review: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/4647
#213 (Awaiting Review) - hobbes1069 requested the new package "rpms/unifi" on
"f28"
  review: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/4647
#214 (Awaiting Review) - hobbes1069 requested the new package "rpms/unifi" on
"f27"
  review: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/4647
#215 (Awaiting Review) - hobbes1069 requested the new package "rpms/unifi" on
"f26"
  review: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/4647
#216 (Awaiting Review) - hobbes1069 requested the new package "rpms/unifi" on
"el7"
  review: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/4647
#217 (Awaiting Review) - hobbes1069 requested the new package "rpms/unifi" on
"el6"
  review: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/4647
Total: 6 actions
[leigh@localhost ~]$ pkgdb-admin process 212
#212 (Awaiting Review) - hobbes1069 requested the new package "rpms/unifi" on
"master"
  review: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/4647
Error: Bug object has no attribute 'comments'.
If 'comments' is a bugzilla attribute, it may not have been cached when the bug
was fetched. You may want to adjust your include_fields for getbug/query.
ERROR:root:Generic error catched:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkgdb2client/admin.py", line 628, in
main
arg.func(arg)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkgdb2client/admin.py", line 568, in
do_process
data = __handle_request_package(actionid, action)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkgdb2client/admin.py", line 306, in
__handle_request_package
action['info'], bugid, PKGDBCLIENT, action['user'])
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkgdb2client/utils.py", line 297, in
check_package_creation
for user in get_users_in_bug(bugid):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkgdb2client/utils.py", line 155, in
get_users_in_bug
users = set([com['author'] for com in bugbz.comments])
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/bugzilla/bug.py", line 110, in
__getattr__
raise AttributeError(msg)
AttributeError: Bug object has no attribute 'comments'.
If 'comments' is a bugzilla attribute, it may not have been cached when the bug
was fetched. You may want to adjust your include_fields for getbug/query.
[leigh@localhost ~]$ pkgdb-admin process 212
#212 (Awaiting Review) - hobbes1069 requested the new package "rpms/unifi" on
"master"
  review: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/4647
Error: Bug object has no attribute 'comments'.
If 'comments' is a bugzilla attribute, it may not have been cached when the bug
was fetched. You may want to adjust your include_fields for getbug/query.
ERROR:root:Generic error catched:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkgdb2client/admin.py", line 628, in
main
arg.func(arg)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkgdb2client/admin.py", line 568, in
do_process
data = __handle_request_package(actionid, action)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkgdb2client/admin.py", line 306, in
__handle_request_package
action['info'], bugid, PKGDBCLIENT, action['user'])
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkgdb2client/utils.py", line 297, in
check_package_creation
for user in get_users_in_bug(bugid):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkgdb2client/utils.py", line 155, in
get_users_in_bug
users = set([com['author'] for com in bugbz.comments])
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/bugzilla/bug.py", line 110, in
__getattr__
raise AttributeError(msg)
AttributeError: Bug object has no attribute 'comments'.
If 'comments' is a bugzilla attribute, it may not have been cached when the bug
was fetched. You may want to adjust your include_fields for getbug/query.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647

leigh scott  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||leigh123li...@gmail.com

--- Comment #28 from leigh scott  ---
(In reply to Richard from comment #27)
> Yes, I was just trying to get something to work for now :) I'll see about
> implementing your method.
> 
> I was trying to think of a way that if a new arch is added that it will
> cause the build to fail so I can address it. I'll think on that one some
> more.
> 
> Thanks for the review!

Can you take more care next time you do a package request as you had white
space at the end of the package name, this makes it impossible to process
normally.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647

Richard  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||4


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4
[Bug 4] Tracker: Accepted packages.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647

--- Comment #27 from Richard  ---
Yes, I was just trying to get something to work for now :) I'll see about
implementing your method.

I was trying to think of a way that if a new arch is added that it will cause
the build to fail so I can address it. I'll think on that one some more.

Thanks for the review!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: gstreamer maintainer needed for freeworld packages

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 15-03-18 17:56, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:

2018-03-01 11:13 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede :

Hi,

On 28-02-18 18:40, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:


Hi there,

There is a need to find a new maintainer(s) for the gstreamer packages
provided by us.
Leigh  indicated that he's not willing to work on them anymore for a
reason of its own.

Please respond to this thread and/or ask for ACL on pkgdb:
https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/packages/gstreamer%2A/

Right now there is a need to update to 1.13 in rawhide/f28, but there
is a delay since theses packages aren't published yet (fedora infra
has repository compose issue for branched/rawhide).
There will be a need to adapt the split between plugin that have moved
to fedora proper. So this need to be carefully tested.

Thx for your help in this area. And please forward the request
everywhere relevant.


PS: If there is no volunteer by Fedora 28 Beta release, I'm afraid
that those packages will be removed from our repo.



If no one steps up I can start maintaining these again, the main reason
I stopped doing so is because Leigh was doing a good job at maintaining
these.


Hi Hans, Rex,

Thx for volunteering to maintain gstreamer in RPM Fusion, you are
still welcomed to do so for the coming gstreamer-1.13.91 release.
That been said, as I know you might be busy contributors. I will
re-send an invite for any other packager to maintain gstreamer in RPM
Fusion.


Yes ideally (from my pov) these would find a new maintainer with less
on his/her plate. Anyways if you (or Rex) ever need some help with this
please drop me a mail (at my gmail address please), these packages are
too important to go unmaintained.

Regards,

Hans
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

[Bug 4647] Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #26 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  ---
(In reply to Richard from comment #25)
> SPEC: https://www.dropbox.com/s/a3fy23xaw163ap5/unifi.spec?dl=0
> SRPM: https://www.dropbox.com/s/q6vi2pfpv5wgkbi/unifi-5.7.20-1.fc27.src.rpm
> 
> * Thu Mar 08 2018 Richard Shaw  - 5.7.20-1
> - Update to 5.7.20.
> - Add new webrtc target aarch64.
> 
> I also split the noarch stuff into a data subpackage...

Nice. One final nitpick:
[...]
%ifarch x86_64
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/unifi/lib/native/Linux/x86_64
mv Linux/x86_64/libubnt_webrtc_jni.so %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/
ln -sr %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libubnt_webrtc_jni.so \
   %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/unifi/lib/native/Linux/x86_64/
%endif
%ifarch armv7hl
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/unifi/lib/native/Linux/armv7
mv Linux/armv7/libubnt_webrtc_jni.so %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/
ln -sr %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libubnt_webrtc_jni.so \
   %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/unifi/lib/native/Linux/armv7/
%endif
%ifarch aarch64
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/unifi/lib/native/Linux/aarch64
mv Linux/aarch64/libubnt_webrtc_jni.so %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/
ln -sr %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libubnt_webrtc_jni.so \
   %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/unifi/lib/native/Linux/aarch64/
%endif
[...]

This looks overly repetitive and could be handled better, for example:
%ifarch aarch64 armv7hl x86_64
%ifarch armv7hl
%global unifi_arch armv7
%else
%global unifi_arch %{_target_cpu}
%endif
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/unifi/lib/native/Linux/%{unifi_arch}
mv Linux/%{unifi_arch}/libubnt_webrtc_jni.so %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/
ln -sr %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libubnt_webrtc_jni.so \
   %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/unifi/lib/native/Linux/%{unifi_arch}/
%endif

Regardless, the package is APPROVED and you can do the above after importing.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: LiVES 2.8.9 relesed

[Nicolas Chauvet]

2018-03-15 18:18 GMT+01:00 Antonio Trande :
>  Forwarded Message 
> Subject:LiVES 2.8.9 relesed
> Date:   Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:46:45 -0300
> From:   salsaman 
> To: João Luís Marques Pinto , Alessio Treglia
> , enc...@users.sourceforge.net, Glen MacArthur
> , concombres fraises ,
> lu_z...@gentoo.org, Vasiliy Glazov , Ulisses Leitão
> , sagit...@fedoraproject.org
>
>
>
> IMPORTANT: LiVES version 2.8.8 (released 10 Mar 2018) contained a
> serious dataloss issue.
> Please do not create production builds from it. Use this version (2.8.9)
> instead.
Thx for the notice.

I've untagged the 2.8.8 release from updates so it will not hit stable
on the next push.
Only the 2.8.9 release will be pushed to testing.


-- 
-

Nicolas (kwizart)
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Fwd: LiVES 2.8.9 relesed

[Antonio Trande]

 Forwarded Message 
Subject:LiVES 2.8.9 relesed
Date:   Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:46:45 -0300
From:   salsaman 
To: João Luís Marques Pinto , Alessio Treglia
, enc...@users.sourceforge.net, Glen MacArthur
, concombres fraises ,
lu_z...@gentoo.org, Vasiliy Glazov , Ulisses Leitão
, sagit...@fedoraproject.org



IMPORTANT: LiVES version 2.8.8 (released 10 Mar 2018) contained a
serious dataloss issue.
Please do not create production builds from it. Use this version (2.8.9)
instead.

This message is intended for packagers of LiVES (http://lives-video.com
). Please forward as appropriate. Please let me
know if any addresses should be added to or removed from this list.


Hi all,
first of all apologies. It turns out there was a dataloss issue with
version 2.8.8 which I have now fixed. In case anybody opened any Sets
with version 2.8.8 you will need to follow the procedure outlined in the
Release Notes here: http://lives-video.com/index.php?do=downloads


Another old issue to do with GUI timing reared it's ugly head again in
2.8.8. This could cause a crash when reloading Sets or recovering files.
I believe I now have the definitive fix for this, and it is included in
2.8.9. If anybody still experiences a crash with the text
"Gtk:ERROR:/build/gtk+3.0-2Ut_nl/gtk+3.0-3.18.9/./gtk/gtkprogressbar.c:611:tick_cb:
assertion failed: (priv->pulse2 > priv->pulse1)" or similar please let
me know.



Changelog for 2.8.9
-
Fix dataloss and crash issues from 2.8.8.

URLS:

http://lives-video.com/releases/LiVES-2.8.9.tar.bz2

(source bzip2, 3.9 MB)

http://lives-video.com/releases/LiVES-2.8.9.tar.gz

(source gzip, 5.3 MB)



shasums:

sha1sums:

3df6f59110d6b3b5cbd5fe9d07636620ed83bef8  LiVES-2.8.9.tar.bz2
f2c55fe2340c8aaeaa56d4213e535fd100316ae7  LiVES-2.8.9.tar.gz


sha256sums:

c9c205bbfa1b900a88974fd7f04f00c222fc536264b0ba4c902babb6d0f0997d
LiVES-2.8.9.tar.bz2
b8e5e5ccc0798a1d4f70e26e470eba6950d84fb795cd814fcfac291cedf38785
LiVES-2.8.9.tar.gz

gpg key fingerprint can be found at
http://lives-video.com/index.php?do=contact


Gabriel.

http://lives-video.com
https://www.openhub.net/accounts/salsaman




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: ppc64le builder down until tomorrow

[Sérgio Basto]

On Wed, 2018-03-14 at 08:01 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2018-03-13 0:40 GMT+01:00 Nicolas Chauvet :
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Due to a scheduled migration , an unexpected issue occurred on the
> > ppc64le.
> > The server will be offline mostly today. Please hold your build if
> > possible.
> > (and do some review...)
> > noarch build will be okay along with build that doesn't support
> > ppc64le already.
> 
> New estimation for the ppc64le back is later today...

They are back in business , isn't it ? 



-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: gstreamer maintainer needed for freeworld packages

[Nicolas Chauvet]

2018-03-01 11:13 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede :
> Hi,
>
> On 28-02-18 18:40, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> There is a need to find a new maintainer(s) for the gstreamer packages
>> provided by us.
>> Leigh  indicated that he's not willing to work on them anymore for a
>> reason of its own.
>>
>> Please respond to this thread and/or ask for ACL on pkgdb:
>> https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/packages/gstreamer%2A/
>>
>> Right now there is a need to update to 1.13 in rawhide/f28, but there
>> is a delay since theses packages aren't published yet (fedora infra
>> has repository compose issue for branched/rawhide).
>> There will be a need to adapt the split between plugin that have moved
>> to fedora proper. So this need to be carefully tested.
>>
>> Thx for your help in this area. And please forward the request
>> everywhere relevant.
>>
>>
>> PS: If there is no volunteer by Fedora 28 Beta release, I'm afraid
>> that those packages will be removed from our repo.
>
>
> If no one steps up I can start maintaining these again, the main reason
> I stopped doing so is because Leigh was doing a good job at maintaining
> these.

Hi Hans, Rex,

Thx for volunteering to maintain gstreamer in RPM Fusion, you are
still welcomed to do so for the coming gstreamer-1.13.91 release.
That been said, as I know you might be busy contributors. I will
re-send an invite for any other packager to maintain gstreamer in RPM
Fusion.

As Leigh mentioned, the gstreamer packages are already in override...
Thx to forward where's appropriate.

-- 
-

Nicolas (kwizart)
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Request more than one module from Review Request?

[Richard Shaw]

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 8:00 AM, Nicolas Chauvet  wrote:

> Why it a lts version really needed after all ? you can just build the
> lts in EL7 and use the latest version in fedora ?
> Is there version compatibility issue that would requires to have the
> two in parallel if needed ?
>

Some users may not be interested in the frequent updates and updating of
device firmware that occurs in the standard package. They may not care
about new features, but only bug fixes. I don't think this is really a
LTS->EL Latest->Fedora type situation. Only one or the other would be
installed, not both.


The way you will introduce any unifi-lts alternative package is
> questionable anyway. Does the two packages will conflict ?
> Is there a way they can install along ?
>

Yes, they would conflict with one another.



> A possible workaround would be to have the lts version in stable
> updates, and the normal version in updates-testing.
> But it may lead to issue if you need to issue a bugfix for a stable
> fedora release and the git has already moved to a non-lts version...


I don't think this is very practical.

One option would be to open a new review request for unifi-lts but
reference the review from the unifi review request and have the same
reviewer approve both requests.

Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Request more than one module from Review Request?

[Nicolas Chauvet]

2018-03-15 13:51 GMT+01:00 Richard Shaw :
> Just yesterday Ubiquity announced a LTS version of their Unifi controller
> software currently under review for the RF Non-free repository.
>
> When the review is approved I would like to request both a "unifi" and
> "unifi-lts" module in pkgdb. The packages will be identical other than the
> version of the software.
>
> Does anyone see a problem with this? A second Review Request seems overkill
> for this situation.

We {{cannot}} introduce a package without a proper review ticket and
approved packager as a reviewer.
This is simply not possible to bypass from the infra side using the
normal level tooling. Same as Fedora.

Why it a lts version really needed after all ? you can just build the
lts in EL7 and use the latest version in fedora ?
Is there version compatibility issue that would requires to have the
two in parallel if needed ?

The way you will introduce any unifi-lts alternative package is
questionable anyway. Does the two packages will conflict ?
Is there a way they can install along ?

A possible workaround would be to have the lts version in stable
updates, and the normal version in updates-testing.
But it may lead to issue if you need to issue a bugfix for a stable
fedora release and the git has already moved to a non-lts version...





-- 
-

Nicolas (kwizart)
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Request more than one module from Review Request?

[Richard Shaw]

Just yesterday Ubiquity announced a LTS version of their Unifi controller
software currently under review for the RF Non-free repository.

When the review is approved I would like to request both a "unifi" and
"unifi-lts" module in pkgdb. The packages will be identical other than the
version of the software.

Does anyone see a problem with this? A second Review Request seems overkill
for this situation.

Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: gstreamer maintainer needed for freeworld packages

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

--- Begin Message ---
I have added a buildroot override for gstreamer1*-1.13.91
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
--- End Message ---