[rt-users] Scrip ordering

2011-02-16 Thread Bernard McCormack
I am extracting custom values from emails using
RT-Extension-ExtractCustomFieldValues and I want to use the value in the
next step to decide the format of the email sent to the users.

The transactions according to the logs are both firing in the correct
order in Transaction Create

I am accessing the cf using:

$Ticket-FirstCustomFieldValue('Priority')

This works on another transaction but when chained together it doesn't
have the value set.

Any help would be appreciated.

 

 



[rt-users] Can't create or change users and tickets

2011-02-16 Thread Алексей Малов
Hello! I've installed request-tracker-3.8.8 on Debian with apache2,
postgresql-8.4 and mod-perl. When I try to create a ticket, or change
user, or create new user I receive error:
Couldn't load user '' (/usr/share/request-tracker3.8/html/Elements/Error:82)
or
Couldn't load queue ''.
In debug log i have this:
[Wed Feb 16 13:37:41 2011] [error]: WebRT: ÐU+009Dевозможно
загÑU+0080ÑU+0083зиÑU+0082ÑU+008C
 оÑU+0087еÑU+0080едÑU+008C
(/usr/share/request-tracker3.8/html/Elements/Error:82)
Trace begun at /usr/share/request-tracker3.8/lib/RT.pm line 302
Log::Dispatch::__ANON__('Log::Dispatch=HASH(0x7f7d37e82150)', 'WebRT:
M-PM-^]M-PM-5M-PM-2M-PM-M-PM-7M-PM-M-PM-M-PM
-6M-PM-=M-PM- M-PM-7M-PM-0M-PM-3M-QM-^@M-QM-^CM-PM-7M-PM-8M-QM-^BM-QM-^L
M-PM-M-QM-^GM-PM-5M-QM-^@M-PM-5M-PM-4M-QM-
^L') called at /usr/share/request-tracker3.8/html/Elements/Error line 82
HTML::Mason::Commands::__ANON__('Why', 'Невозможно загрузить очередь')
called at /usr/share/perl5/HTML/Mason/Componen
t.pm line 135
HTML::Mason::Component::run('HTML::Mason::Component::FileBased=HASH(0x7f7d36d32ae8)',
'Why', 'Невозможно загрузить оч
ередь') called at /usr/share/perl5/HTML/Mason/Request.pm line 1278
eval {...} at /usr/share/perl5/HTML/Mason/Request.pm line 1268
HTML::Mason::Request::comp(undef, undef, 'Why', 'Невозможно загрузить
очередь') called at /usr/share/request-tracker3
.8/lib/RT/Interface/Web.pm line 863
HTML::Mason::Commands::Abort('Невозможно загрузить очередь') called at
/usr/share/request-tracker3.8/html/Ticket/Create.html line 337
HTML::Mason::Commands::__ANON__ at
/usr/share/perl5/HTML/Mason/Component.pm line 135
HTML::Mason::Component::run('HTML::Mason::Component::FileBased=HASH(0x7f7d35bbea10)')
called at /usr/share/perl5/HTML/Mason/Request.pm line 1278
eval {...} at /usr/share/perl5/HTML/Mason/Request.pm line 1268
HTML::Mason::Request::comp(undef, undef, undef) called at
/usr/share/request-tracker3.8/lib/RT/Interface/Web.pm line 320
RT::Interface::Web::ShowRequestedPage('HASH(0x7f7d35bc1ae0)') called
at /usr/share/request-tracker3.8/lib/RT/Interface/Web.pm line 224
RT::Interface::Web::HandleRequest('HASH(0x7f7d35bc1ae0)') called at
/usr/share/request-tracker3.8/html/autohandler line 53
HTML::Mason::Commands::__ANON__ at
/usr/share/perl5/HTML/Mason/Component.pm line 135
HTML::Mason::Component::run('HTML::Mason::Component::FileBased=HASH(0x7f7d35bc1fa8)')
called at /usr/share/perl5/HTML/Mason/Request.pm line 1273
eval {...} at /usr/share/perl5/HTML/Mason/Request.pm line 1268
HTML::Mason::Request::comp(undef, undef, undef) called at
/usr/share/perl5/HTML/Mason/Request.pm line 467
eval {...} at /usr/share/perl5/HTML/Mason/Request.pm line 467
eval {...} at /usr/share/perl5/HTML/Mason/Request.pm line 419
HTML::Mason::Request::exec('RT::Interface::Web::Request=HASH(0x7f7d35ba14d8)')
called at /usr/share/perl5/HTML/Mason/ApacheHandler.pm line 165
HTML::Mason::Request::ApacheHandler::exec('RT::Interface::Web::Request=HASH(0x7f7d35ba14d8)')
called at /usr/share/perl5/HTML/Mason/ApacheHandler.pm line 831
HTML::Mason::ApacheHandler::handle_request('HTML::Mason::ApacheHandler=HASH(0x7f7d3887fbc8)',
'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x7f7d366a3e20)') called at
/usr/share/request-tracker3.8/libexec/webmux.pl line 78
eval {...} at /usr/share/request-tracker3.8/libexec/webmux.pl line 78
RT::Mason::handler('Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x7f7d366a3e20)')
called at -e line 0
eval {...} at -e line 0

Why does this happen?
-- 
Alexey Malov


[rt-users] upgrade issue from 3.6.1 to 3.8.8

2011-02-16 Thread Nicolas GUIOT
Hi,

I just upgraded from a 3.6.1 tarball version, to 3.8.8 (debian squeeze package).

It's a brand new server, I moved the DB, ran the upgrade scripts, etc... 
Everything is almost perfect but : 

I have a scrip that sends an email when a tickect is resolved.

The problem, is that this scrip is also triggered when a ticket is closed : it 
sends the email ticket is closed AND the email ticket is rejected.

Where should I start investigating the issue ?

Thanks for your help
Nicolas




Re: [rt-users] dumpfile-to-rt-3.0 failed (2.0.14 - 3.8.8)

2011-02-16 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 09:32:33PM +0100, Daniel Schwager wrote:
 Hi,
 
 a) I started the import now by erasing the predefined database:
 
 This helps me to track down other issues e.g. the imported tickets has
 no assigned owner.
 May this could be a small note in your dumpfile-to-rt-3.0-README .

The upgrader assumes a clean DB (since it is a conversion tool).
If you want to merge into an existing 3.x system, check the MERGING
section.  Patches against the git repo to improve the documentation
are appreciated.

  Importing links
  l[Tue Feb 15 20:12:28 2011] [warning]: Use of uninitialized value in
 concatenation (.) or string at /usr/bin/dumpfile-to-rt-3.0 line 434.
 (/usr/bin/dumpfile-to-rt-3.0:434)
  [Tue Feb 15 20:12:28 2011] [warning]: Use of uninitialized value in
 concatenation (.) or string at /usr/bin/dumpfile-to-rt-3.0 line 440.
 (/usr/bin/dumpfile-to-rt-3.0:440)
 ..
  Skipping link creation (21 4 MemberOf) because duplicate of 2 detected
  Skipping link creation (30 30 MergedInto) because duplicate of 9
 detected
 
 What are exactly the Links ? So, may they are not important for the
 migration ?

Links are merges, parent/child, etc
They're important if you use those features
This still implies that you have incorrect link structures in your rt2
database since the cache isn't being populated.

 c) Import of tickets
 Concerning the normal ticket import, I got this kind of warning for each
 ticket:
 
 t-35437: [Tue Feb 15 20:09:42 2011] [warning]: Use of uninitialized
 value in hash element at /usr/bin/dumpfile-to-rt-3.0 line 667.
 (/usr/bin/dumpfile-to-rt-3.0:667)
   line 667:  $ticket-{'Owner'} = $user_map-{
 $ticket-{'Owner'} };
 
 wta[Tue Feb 15 20:09:42 2011] [warning]: Use of uninitialized value in
 string eq at /usr/bin/dumpfile-to-rt-3.0 line 891.
 (/usr/bin/dumpfile-to-rt-3.0:891)
   line: 891:if ( $content_type =~
 qr{(text/|message/rfc822)}i )
 
 [Tue Feb 15 20:09:42 2011] [warning]: Use of uninitialized value in
 length at /opt/rt3/lib/RT/Record.pm line 753.
 (/opt/rt3/lib/RT/Record.pm:753)
   line: 753   #if the attachment is larger than the
 maximum size
 
   if ( ($MaxSize) and ( $MaxSize 
 length($Body) ) ) {
 
 [Tue Feb 15 20:09:42 2011] [warning]: Use of uninitialized value in
 string eq at /usr/bin/dumpfile-to-rt-3.0 line 970.
 (/usr/bin/dumpfile-to-rt-3.0:970)
 aat
   line 970:if ($a-{ContentEncoding} eq
 'base64'

You may wish to try the current git version and see if any of the
unreleased patches help.

-kevin


pgp8fkRHmdZCj.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [rt-users] upgrade issue from 3.6.1 to 3.8.8

2011-02-16 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 02:53:11PM +0100, Nicolas GUIOT wrote:
 I just upgraded from a 3.6.1 tarball version, to 3.8.8 (debian squeeze 
 package).
 
 It's a brand new server, I moved the DB, ran the upgrade scripts, etc... 
 Everything is almost perfect but : 
 
 I have a scrip that sends an email when a tickect is resolved.
 
 The problem, is that this scrip is also triggered when a ticket is closed : 
 it sends the email ticket is closed AND the email ticket is rejected.
 
 Where should I start investigating the issue ?

Start at Configuration - Global - Scrips


pgpVUkbbiCpMo.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [rt-users] upgrade issue from 3.6.1 to 3.8.8

2011-02-16 Thread Nicolas GUIOT
OK, that's what I did...

Is there a way to export my scrip, to show you all of them, maybe someone can 
point to the mistake ?

I'm going through all of them right now, and everything (that I understand) 
seems logical. 

Some scrips did not have any description, I think somewhere during the upgrade 
they were automagically created, using the Condition, action and template, but 
they seem to be concictent with was existed before.

help someone ?

On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:36:06 -0500
Kevin Falcone wrote:

 On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 02:53:11PM +0100, Nicolas GUIOT wrote:
  I just upgraded from a 3.6.1 tarball version, to 3.8.8 (debian
  squeeze package).
  
  It's a brand new server, I moved the DB, ran the upgrade scripts,
  etc... Everything is almost perfect but : 
  
  I have a scrip that sends an email when a tickect is resolved.
  
  The problem, is that this scrip is also triggered when a ticket is
  closed : it sends the email ticket is closed AND the email
  ticket is rejected.
  
  Where should I start investigating the issue ?
 
 Start at Configuration - Global - Scrips


Re: [rt-users] Stripping copied parts of email before saving as comment or reply

2011-02-16 Thread Paul D. O'Rorke
Hi, 

I'm running 3.8.4. We use RT to track software bugs that go to a software 
development team. 

I want to stick with RT (getting pressure to change) because once proven we 
wish to expand it's scope to include customer support request tracking. Much of 
what I want in a customer support ticket should never make it's way into a bug 
report. The biggest issue I have with using RT for the customer support is the 
history that is in each email making the tickets large and unwieldy. This 
appears to be addressed with the proposed extension I found referred to in the 
email below. I found this while searching the mailing list archives. 

I'd rather try this now than wait for 4.0 because unless I can show RT 
effectively doing what we want the decision will be taken out of my hands and 
we'll get lumped with some proprietary cr@? I cannot simply trim the emails, 
this has to work with email message/reply. 

So is it possible to get the trim/hide extension below or is it already 
available and I'm just missing it? 

Regards 

On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 10:41:59AM -0800, Laura Grella wrote: 


 
 
 If you want to see the core version, it is now live on 
 issues.bestpractical.com. The plugin for 3.8 will hopefully get 
 released this week, but we're busy trying to release lots of things. 
 
 
 Thanks - I've never installed an extension for RT. Would be able to point me 
 the right direction for instructions? I rather install it for 3.8 than wait 
 for 4.0. 
« [ hide part of quote ] 
« [ hide part of quote ] You should read the README once the extension has been 
released. It 
covers installation of plugins. 

-kevin 

  We have an extension to do this that we're working to get released. 
  (And it's already built in to 4.0) 
  - Show quoted text - 



-- 
Paul O'Rorke 

p...@paulororke.net 
Home .: +1 (250) 483 1456 
Mobile.: +1 (250) 709 7740 


Re: [rt-users] upgrade issue from 3.6.1 to 3.8.8

2011-02-16 Thread Nicolas GUIOT
OK, I dug a bit further : I have some other scrip that don't work :
When the owner of the ticket is changed (either taken or stolen), no email is 
sent, while we have the 2 followinf scrips : 

Description : Pec   
Stage : TransactionCreate   
Condition : On Owner Change 
Action : Notify Owner, Requestors, Ccs and AdminCcs 
Template : PEC

Desc : On Owner Change Notify Owner 
Stage : TransactionCreate   
Condition On Owner Change
Action : Notify Owner   
Template : Transaction

 and I  have the following in rt.log : 

[Wed Feb 16 15:29:33 2011] [error]: error:couldn't parse head; error near:
Bonjour, (/usr/share/request-tracker3.8/lib/RT/Template_Overlay.pm:356)

Which is the beginning ot the PEC template : 
Subject: PEC: {$Ticket-Subject}
Bonjour,

Nous vous informons que le traitement de ce ticket a été pris en charge par 
{$Ticket-OwnerObj-RealName}.

Merci.

If necesssary, I can give you more info on my stup, but it seems to be a 
strange behaviour...



On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:46:05 +0100
Nicolas GUIOT wrote:

 OK, that's what I did...
 
 Is there a way to export my scrip, to show you all of them, maybe
 someone can point to the mistake ?
 
 I'm going through all of them right now, and everything (that I
 understand) seems logical. 
 
 Some scrips did not have any description, I think somewhere during
 the upgrade they were automagically created, using the Condition,
 action and template, but they seem to be concictent with was existed
 before.
 
 help someone ?
 
 On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:36:06 -0500
 Kevin Falcone wrote:
 
  On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 02:53:11PM +0100, Nicolas GUIOT wrote:
   I just upgraded from a 3.6.1 tarball version, to 3.8.8 (debian
   squeeze package).
   
   It's a brand new server, I moved the DB, ran the upgrade scripts,
   etc... Everything is almost perfect but : 
   
   I have a scrip that sends an email when a tickect is resolved.
   
   The problem, is that this scrip is also triggered when a ticket is
   closed : it sends the email ticket is closed AND the email
   ticket is rejected.
   
   Where should I start investigating the issue ?
  
  Start at Configuration - Global - Scrips



Re: [rt-users] upgrade issue from 3.6.1 to 3.8.8

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Sibley
On 16 Feb 2011 10:40, Nicolas GUIOT wrote:
  and I  have the following in rt.log : 
 
 [Wed Feb 16 15:29:33 2011] [error]: error:couldn't parse head; error near:
 Bonjour, (/usr/share/request-tracker3.8/lib/RT/Template_Overlay.pm:356)
 
 Which is the beginning ot the PEC template : 
 Subject: PEC: {$Ticket-Subject}
 Bonjour,
 
 Nous vous informons que le traitement de ce ticket a été pris en charge par 
 {$Ticket-OwnerObj-RealName}.
 
 Merci.

The template headers need to be separated from the body by a blank line.
 So put a blank line between the Subject: line and Bonjour.

Thomas


Re: [rt-users] Scrip ordering

2011-02-16 Thread Kenneth Crocker
Bernard,

Are you using TransactionBatch?

Kenn
LBNL

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Bernard McCormack
bmccorm...@nextjump.comwrote:

 I am extracting custom values from emails using
 RT-Extension-ExtractCustomFieldValues and I want to use the value in the
 next step to decide the format of the email sent to the users.

 The transactions according to the logs are both firing in the correct order
 in Transaction Create

 I am accessing the cf using:

 $Ticket-FirstCustomFieldValue('Priority')

 This works on another transaction but when chained together it doesn’t have
 the value set.

 Any help would be appreciated.







[rt-users] Change Language to French for specific queue

2011-02-16 Thread Jay Pat

Hi All,

I'm using RT 3.8.1 on CentOS with Perl v5.8.8 and Apache v2.04.

I have several queues in the RT but I just need to configure one queue with 
French language. In other words the reply, from, date, month, day, text 
(auto-reply and other scrips) to show up in french by default to all the 
requestors and administrators.

Please let me know if this is possible.

Thank you all.
  

Re: [rt-users] Scrip ordering

2011-02-16 Thread Ruslan Zakirov
Change condition for autoreply to custom. You need something close to on
create and all required fields are set or on field change and all other
fields are set.

Regards, Ruslan. From phone.
16.02.2011 13:50 пользователь Bernard McCormack bmccorm...@nextjump.com
написал:
 I am extracting custom values from emails using
 RT-Extension-ExtractCustomFieldValues and I want to use the value in the
 next step to decide the format of the email sent to the users.

 The transactions according to the logs are both firing in the correct
 order in Transaction Create

 I am accessing the cf using:

 $Ticket-FirstCustomFieldValue('Priority')

 This works on another transaction but when chained together it doesn't
 have the value set.

 Any help would be appreciated.







Re: [rt-users] Change Language to French for specific queue

2011-02-16 Thread Ruslan Zakirov
Create templates specific to the queue with the names as global templates
and translate them. Language of the web interface picked from browser or
from user preferences if those are set.

Regards, Ruslan. From phone.
17.02.2011 0:04 пользователь Jay Pat glamorous_gu...@hotmail.com
написал:

 Hi All,

 I'm using RT 3.8.1 on CentOS with Perl v5.8.8 and Apache v2.04.

 I have several queues in the RT but I just need to configure one queue
with French language. In other words the reply, from, date, month, day, text
(auto-reply and other scrips) to show up in french by default to all the
requestors and administrators.

 Please let me know if this is possible.

 Thank you all.



[rt-users] [Rt-announce] RT 3.8.9 Released

2011-02-16 Thread Kevin Falcone
We are happy to announce that RT 3.8.9 is now available. You can
download it from:

http://download.bestpractical.com/pub/rt/release/rt-3.8.9.tar.gz
http://download.bestpractical.com/pub/rt/release/rt-3.8.9.tar.gz.sig

This release of RT contains 9 months of small improvements and bug fixes. It
includes a fix for the security issue announced here:

http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2011-January/000185.html

If you have previously installed RT-Extension-SaltedPasswords, it will
automatically disable itself after the upgrade. You may then safely
remove it from @Plugins.

Important upgrade notes:

In addition to the normal /opt/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database upgrade step,
there are a few standalone upgrade scripts you should run. You can find
full details in the UPGRADING file in the distribution.  Please review
'UPGRADING FROM 3.8.8 and earlier' and ensure you follow each of the
steps.

A list of changes is below.

-kevin

SHA1 sums

4dc78880220ccc8bf7b49b2c4efca0eeb3372133  rt-3.8.9.tar.gz
95dc126acaba7b5069f83bf042c31e6857e7397f  rt-3.8.9.tar.gz.sig

SECURITY

 * Move to a SHA-256 based password hashing scheme
 * Redirect users to their desired pages after login.
This prevents possible back button attacks after a user logs out.
 * Clone Scrip's TicketObj since we change the CurrentUser and it can leak
information (Custom field values, etc)

INSTALLATION

 * Fixes to the RH Layout in config.layout

ACCESS CONTROL

 * New AdminCustomFieldValues right that allows user to add/remove CF values, 
but not edit the CF

CONFIGURATION

 * Add ResolveDefaultUpdateType to choose between Comment or Correspond on 
Resolve
 * When using Set($MailCommand, 'testfile') log all mail to the same tmpfile
 * Add a callback to allow extensions to redirect a user to an external auth 
logout URL using RT's logout button. This ensures that the user's RT session is 
cleared
 * Add SuppressAutoOpenOnUpdate preference

DOCUMENTATION

 * Clean up README
 * Update UPGRADING.mysql documentation for users of older mysql
 * Flag that Let this user be granted rights means Privileged
 * Fix rt-crontool examples to use a real Condition
 * Undocument SenderMustExistInExternalDatabase since the code was never merged
 * Better document SetOutgoingMailFrom
 * Better document shrink_cgm_table.pl


DATABASE

 * Add support for Postgres 9
 * No longer record transactions for ACL Equivalence Groups
 * Don't delete all RT MySQL ACLs before invoke GRANT
 * Quote database name for GRANT on MySQL
 * Insert extensions' schema and acl files as the DBA
 * Fix searches for empty Attachments on Oracle

EMAIL

 * Better handling of mail generated by Outlook
 * When RT's SendmailCommand fails, record it in ticket history
 * New GPG tests and bugfixes for corner cases
 * use EmailOutputEncoding for Content-Type.charset
 * Handle failures in MIME Encoding better
 * Small bugfixes for text/html templates
 * Fix MIME decoding on ticket subjects
 * Remove stray colons and whitespace in the default Admin Comment template

USER INTERFACE

 * Fix an infinite loop when using the 3.4-compat theme
 * Fixes to CollectionList sorting
 * css positioning tweaks for page menus
 * Fixes for Bulk Update when users click 'Add More Files'
 * Skip all watchers when offering to add CCs as Watchers
 * Fix ahah.js to handle more than one CF 'Include page' link
 * Ensure that Nobody is always at the front of the Select Owner list
 * Link Basics in SelfService to the Update page
 * Fix toggling js to only run once
 * Ensure signatures are included in Jumbo edits
 * Better identify (in the UI) a misconfigured GPG setup
 * GPG key management UI updates
 * Add classes/ids to the Custom Field Editing pages
 * CSS Fixes for preferences widgets
 * Fix truncated top values on Charts
 * Wording and layout changes for the 'update password' widget
 * Ensure that we keep Anchor tags on redirects
 * Fix loading a new search on the Chart/Graph pages
 * Change Attachment size label from Bytes to Megabytes
 * Respect timezones in timestamps in /Approvals/
 * Charset fixes for Ticket Attachment downloads
 * Bar graph fixes for large numbers of bars
 * Allow a callback on QuickCreate to pass a default Status
 * Fix Approvals to make one search for approval tickets that distincts and 
orders them
 * Link from Group Membership lists to User admin pages
 * New callbacks (autohandler, default queue, aborting ticket updates, after 
requestor on create)
 * Fix non-local local links and add t: syntax
 * Editing Transaction custom fields now shows errors inline
 * Use the ShowUser element more consistently across the UI

TOOLS

 * Improvements to extract-message-catalog (translation tool)
 * Let shrink_cgm_table and shrink_transactions display percent complete
 * Added a simple script to naively generate a RTAddressRegexp
 * Install rt-attributes-viewer originally shipped with 3.8.8
 * bin/rt now searches for global configs in LOCAL_ETC_PATH also

OTHER BUG FIXES

 * No longer refuse to 

[rt-users] ModifyTicket/Steal/Take privileges

2011-02-16 Thread Jon Baker
I am trying to set up a group in a queue that has the ability to change the 
status but not the owner; i.e. can't steal/take it (a different group is 
assigning tickets to them and they're not allowed to get out of it) but they 
need to be able to resolve their own tickets.

It seems to me that Steal and Take are subsets of ModifyTicket (i.e, if you 
have ModifyTicket you implicitly have Steal and Take) but I can't figure out 
how to separate ownership changes from status changes.  Is this possible?

Thanks -
-- 
Jon Baker
Systems Administrator
Church on the Move
1003 N 129th E Ave
Tulsa OK 74116
(918) 234-5656




CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This transmission may be confidential and subject to 
legal privilege.  If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you 
may not review, disclose, print, copy or disseminate this information. If you 
have received this in error, please reply and notify the sender (only) and 
delete the message. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of 
federal criminal law.


[rt-users] Filter Tickets on LastUpdatedBy InternalUser

2011-02-16 Thread Lee Hughes
I've seen lots of requests for this in the archives but couldn't find  
an easy solution. I'm looking for the TicketSQL syntax to only show  
tickets where the LastUpdatedBy is not an RT user; i.e., the ticket  
has been updated by an external party and therefore needs our attention.


Any help or ideas are greatly appreciated.

Thanks-

Lee




Re: [rt-users] ModifyTicket/Steal/Take privileges

2011-02-16 Thread Kenneth Crocker
Jon,

Remove the right to OwnTicket as well as Steal and Take. You can grant
the ModifyTicket to that group as well as ShowTicket and that way they
can See tickets in a Queue, Modify them, but not Own them.

Kenn
LBNL

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Jon Baker jba...@wgm.us wrote:

 I am trying to set up a group in a queue that has the ability to change the
 status but not the owner; i.e. can't steal/take it (a different group is
 assigning tickets to them and they're not allowed to get out of it) but they
 need to be able to resolve their own tickets.

 It seems to me that Steal and Take are subsets of ModifyTicket (i.e, if you
 have ModifyTicket you implicitly have Steal and Take) but I can't figure out
 how to separate ownership changes from status changes.  Is this possible?

 Thanks -
 --
 Jon Baker
 Systems Administrator
 Church on the Move
 1003 N 129th E Ave
 Tulsa OK 74116
 (918) 234-5656




 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This transmission may be confidential and subject
 to legal privilege.  If you are not the intended recipient of this message,
 you may not review, disclose, print, copy or disseminate this information.
 If you have received this in error, please reply and notify the sender
 (only) and delete the message. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a
 violation of federal criminal law.



[rt-users] Custom Fields: Deleting Values

2011-02-16 Thread Joanne Keown
Hi,

I am having the devil of a job deleting values from Custom Fields.  Sometimes 
it works and other times I can select the value to be deleted many, many times 
and it just won't activate.

The custom field has been set up per the below:

[cid:image002.jpg@01CBCE9A.456D7D80]

And the values I am working with look like the below:

[cid:image003.jpg@01CBCE9A.456D7D80]

Is there a bug with this function or is there some trick to it?  Looking 
forward to some insight if others have had this issue before.

Kind regards

Jo





This email and any attachments are confidential and intended for use by the 
addressee only.  If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and 
destroy any copies.
 
No part of this email may be reproduced, adapted or transmitted without the 
written permission of the owner of the copyright or other intellectual property 
in it.
 
COLORADO group does not accept liability for loss or damage caused by this 
email, for example by a computer virus or arising from data corruption, delay, 
interruption, unauthorised access or any other thing.


inline: image002.jpginline: image003.jpg

Re: [rt-users] Custom Fields: Deleting Values

2011-02-16 Thread Joanne Keown
Hi Dennis,

Yes, I left the sort field all blank (or maybe 0 default).  This means the sort 
is by alpha-name, not the sort field.

This is a list-of-values that will change regularly, I don't want to be 
re-numbering up to 450 of sort values each time new ones are added and/or 
closing ones are deleted.

Jo

From: Dennis [mailto:daoden...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 17 February 2011 12:13 PM
To: Joanne Keown
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Custom Fields: Deleting Values

Are the sort values really both 0?


Re: [rt-users] Custom Fields: Deleting Values

2011-02-16 Thread Joanne Keown
Oh, by the way - the version of RT is 3.8.7.


From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com 
[mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Joanne Keown
Sent: Thursday, 17 February 2011 12:17 PM
To: RT-Users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Custom Fields: Deleting Values
Importance: High

Hi Dennis,

Yes, I left the sort field all blank (or maybe 0 default).  This means the sort 
is by alpha-name, not the sort field.

This is a list-of-values that will change regularly, I don't want to be 
re-numbering up to 450 of sort values each time new ones are added and/or 
closing ones are deleted.

Jo

From: Dennis [mailto:daoden...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 17 February 2011 12:13 PM
To: Joanne Keown
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Custom Fields: Deleting Values

Are the sort values really both 0?


Re: [rt-users] Scrip ordering

2011-02-16 Thread Bernard McCormack
I tried transaction create with the descriptions set to define the
order, I tried transaction batch and I tried the read on transaction
create  and then the displaying of the value in the transaction batch.
The value is getting set but it appears unset during the execution
chain.

 

From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Kenneth
Crocker
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 12:18 PM
To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Scrip ordering

 

Bernard,

Are you using TransactionBatch?

Kenn
LBNL

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Bernard McCormack
bmccorm...@nextjump.com wrote:

I am extracting custom values from emails using
RT-Extension-ExtractCustomFieldValues and I want to use the value in the
next step to decide the format of the email sent to the users.

The transactions according to the logs are both firing in the correct
order in Transaction Create

I am accessing the cf using:

$Ticket-FirstCustomFieldValue('Priority')

This works on another transaction but when chained together it doesn't
have the value set.

Any help would be appreciated.

 

 

 



Re: [rt-users] Scrip ordering

2011-02-16 Thread Ruslan Zakirov
Put extraction into transaction create stage and notification into
batch stage. This should work.

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Bernard McCormack
bmccorm...@nextjump.com wrote:
 I tried transaction create with the descriptions set to define the order, I
 tried transaction batch and I tried the read on transaction create  and then
 the displaying of the value in the transaction batch. The value is getting
 set but it appears unset during the execution chain.



 From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
 [mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Kenneth
 Crocker
 Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 12:18 PM
 To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
 Subject: Re: [rt-users] Scrip ordering



 Bernard,

 Are you using TransactionBatch?

 Kenn
 LBNL

 On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Bernard McCormack bmccorm...@nextjump.com
 wrote:

 I am extracting custom values from emails using
 RT-Extension-ExtractCustomFieldValues and I want to use the value in the
 next step to decide the format of the email sent to the users.

 The transactions according to the logs are both firing in the correct order
 in Transaction Create

 I am accessing the cf using:

 $Ticket-FirstCustomFieldValue('Priority')

 This works on another transaction but when chained together it doesn’t have
 the value set.

 Any help would be appreciated.









-- 
Best regards, Ruslan.


[rt-users] How best to allow anyone to access, create tickets and respond to their own tickets

2011-02-16 Thread Adrian Stel
Hi,


The only remaining question is how best to allow anyone to access,
create tickets and respond to their own tickets.  Do you happen to
know if RT supports an auto account creating feature?  If so, how does
it work?



Solution this  is not good:

Anyone can view the public queues and tickets by logging in as the
'guest' user with the password 'readonly'.

:)

Best Regards
Adrian