Re: [rules-users] Drools Fusion: expiration
This quote is from the current version of Fusion: The above example declares an expiration offset of 30 minutes for StockTick events. After that time, assuming no rule still needs the event, the engine will expire and remove the event from the session automatically. The catch is, as you may have noticed, the clause: assuming no rule still needs the event. Whatever this means... An educated guess for interpretation for a rule needs an event would be a partially or fully completed activation of a rule holds a reference to an event. But, since the author hasn't added this explanation, it might be something else. -W On 28/05/2012, Matteo Cusmai cusmaimat...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, i have noticed a strange behavior, but i am not sure that i depend on drools or depend by my bad knowledge of it. I am using drools fusion and i have a lot of classes with role event. I have put them the expiration value to 5 minutes. From my understanding, if i use explicit expiration, as i do, when it pass 5 minutes and that event is out of scope of all my rules, that event is deleted. But, i noticed that the last event hasn't retracted after 5 minutes and this behavior makes the system no stable, because it works differently after some minutes. If i don't use explicit expiration, the system seems to work fine, so i am however happy, but i would like to understand the issue. Thanks a lot, Matteo. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Drools Fusion: expiration
So, from documentation, does the explicit expiration work when we don't use time operator. Thanks, Matteo Cusmai Il giorno 29/mag/2012 08:20, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com ha scritto: This quote is from the current version of Fusion: The above example declares an expiration offset of 30 minutes for StockTick events. After that time, assuming no rule still needs the event, the engine will expire and remove the event from the session automatically. The catch is, as you may have noticed, the clause: assuming no rule still needs the event. Whatever this means... An educated guess for interpretation for a rule needs an event would be a partially or fully completed activation of a rule holds a reference to an event. But, since the author hasn't added this explanation, it might be something else. -W On 28/05/2012, Matteo Cusmai cusmaimat...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, i have noticed a strange behavior, but i am not sure that i depend on drools or depend by my bad knowledge of it. I am using drools fusion and i have a lot of classes with role event. I have put them the expiration value to 5 minutes. From my understanding, if i use explicit expiration, as i do, when it pass 5 minutes and that event is out of scope of all my rules, that event is deleted. But, i noticed that the last event hasn't retracted after 5 minutes and this behavior makes the system no stable, because it works differently after some minutes. If i don't use explicit expiration, the system seems to work fine, so i am however happy, but i would like to understand the issue. Thanks a lot, Matteo. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Drools Fusion: expiration
Hi all, i have noticed a strange behavior, but i am not sure that i depend on drools or depend by my bad knowledge of it. I am using drools fusion and i have a lot of classes with role event. I have put them the expiration value to 5 minutes. From my understanding, if i use explicit expiration, as i do, when it pass 5 minutes and that event is out of scope of all my rules, that event is deleted. But, i noticed that the last event hasn't retracted after 5 minutes and this behavior makes the system no stable, because it works differently after some minutes. If i don't use explicit expiration, the system seems to work fine, so i am however happy, but i would like to understand the issue. Thanks a lot, Matteo. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
