[sage-devel] Re: zn_poly status?
El viernes, 7 de septiembre de 2018, 15:53:43 (UTC+2), Erik Bray escribió: > > Hi all, > > Does anyone know what that current status is of the upstream zn_poly > package? According to its website > http://cims.nyu.edu/~harvey/zn_poly/ it is "no longer maintained", > though it has been re-released under a BSD-compatible license. > > Given that the library has been unmaintained for years, has someone looked into whether its functionality can be provided by some other library nowadays? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [sage-devel] zn_poly status?
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 6:59 PM Timo Kaufmann wrote: > > Great! Please let us know on sage-packaging once you put out a new release > and switch sage over. Yes, definitely. I will also update the relevant SPKG.txt. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [sage-devel] zn_poly status?
Great! Please let us know on sage-packaging once you put out a new release and switch sage over. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [sage-devel] zn_poly status?
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 4:13 PM David Roe wrote: > > I've CCed David Harvey, but I think that creating a github repo for it sounds > great. > David Thanks! Pending some response from David Harvey, I've just gone ahead and done it: https://gitlab.com/sagemath/zn_poly All previous releases of zn_poly can be found in the repository's tags. I've gone ahead and incorporated all the existing patches from Sage, the patch I need for Cygwin, and a couple other small patches for now. Will also add some documentation updates a bit later if and when a release is made from this repository. > On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 9:53 AM Erik Bray wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Does anyone know what that current status is of the upstream zn_poly >> package? According to its website >> http://cims.nyu.edu/~harvey/zn_poly/ it is "no longer maintained", >> though it has been re-released under a BSD-compatible license. >> >> Since its last upstream release the package for it in Sage has >> accumulated a number of patches as well, and I believe I may need to >> add one more patch to it for building properly on Cygwin :( See >> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26050 >> >> If it's alright, I would propose creating a new repository for it >> under the sagemath gitlab organization (or GitHub) which would become >> the new "upstream" for zn_poly. Then we can merge in all these >> patches; maybe even implement a new, more standard build system (I >> would be happy to do this). In fact the current "build system" is >> going to have problems long-term, as it currently consists primarily >> of a Python script that will not work, as written, on Python 3. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "sage-devel" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. >> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [sage-devel] Re: zn_poly status?
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 6:27 PM Timo Kaufmann wrote: > > > > Am Freitag, 7. September 2018 17:56:04 UTC+2 schrieb Erik Bray: >> >> On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 5:29 PM Timo Kaufmann wrote: >> > >> > For what its worth, we currently don't apply any patches in nix and at >> > least the sage doctests pass. A more standard build would still be nice >> > though. And since upstream is officially dead, I think giving it a new >> > home would be very good. +1 from me. >> >> Most of the patches are build-related and test-related fixes, many of >> which seem to stem from issues on OSX. > > > We build it on OSX too. We only run `make check` though, not `make test`. I > can't verify if that would pass on darwin since I don't own a mac. Well, a lot of these patches are pretty old too. Who knows if they're still really relevant. Most of them seem harmless enough so I've gone ahead and applied them. I also applied the patches I need to build correctly on Cygwin. A bit later I will work on autotoolizing it, but in the short term I might go ahead and make a release based on the patches applied above, as I really need it for the Cygwin fixes which are a release blocker. >> >> >> >> > Am Freitag, 7. September 2018 15:53:43 UTC+2 schrieb Erik Bray: >> >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> Does anyone know what that current status is of the upstream zn_poly >> >> package? According to its website >> >> http://cims.nyu.edu/~harvey/zn_poly/ it is "no longer maintained", >> >> though it has been re-released under a BSD-compatible license. >> >> >> >> Since its last upstream release the package for it in Sage has >> >> accumulated a number of patches as well, and I believe I may need to >> >> add one more patch to it for building properly on Cygwin :( See >> >> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26050 >> >> >> >> If it's alright, I would propose creating a new repository for it >> >> under the sagemath gitlab organization (or GitHub) which would become >> >> the new "upstream" for zn_poly. Then we can merge in all these >> >> patches; maybe even implement a new, more standard build system (I >> >> would be happy to do this). In fact the current "build system" is >> >> going to have problems long-term, as it currently consists primarily >> >> of a Python script that will not work, as written, on Python 3. >> > >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> > "sage-devel" group. >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> > email to sage-devel+...@googlegroups.com. >> > To post to this group, send email to sage-...@googlegroups.com. >> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [sage-devel] Re: zn_poly status?
Am Freitag, 7. September 2018 17:56:04 UTC+2 schrieb Erik Bray: > > On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 5:29 PM Timo Kaufmann > wrote: > > > > For what its worth, we currently don't apply any patches in nix and at > least the sage doctests pass. A more standard build would still be nice > though. And since upstream is officially dead, I think giving it a new > home would be very good. +1 from me. > > Most of the patches are build-related and test-related fixes, many of > which seem to stem from issues on OSX. > We build it on OSX too. We only run `make check` though, not `make test`. I can't verify if that would pass on darwin since I don't own a mac. > > > > Am Freitag, 7. September 2018 15:53:43 UTC+2 schrieb Erik Bray: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Does anyone know what that current status is of the upstream zn_poly > >> package? According to its website > >> http://cims.nyu.edu/~harvey/zn_poly/ it is "no longer maintained", > >> though it has been re-released under a BSD-compatible license. > >> > >> Since its last upstream release the package for it in Sage has > >> accumulated a number of patches as well, and I believe I may need to > >> add one more patch to it for building properly on Cygwin :( See > >> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26050 > >> > >> If it's alright, I would propose creating a new repository for it > >> under the sagemath gitlab organization (or GitHub) which would become > >> the new "upstream" for zn_poly. Then we can merge in all these > >> patches; maybe even implement a new, more standard build system (I > >> would be happy to do this). In fact the current "build system" is > >> going to have problems long-term, as it currently consists primarily > >> of a Python script that will not work, as written, on Python 3. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "sage-devel" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to sage-devel+...@googlegroups.com . > > To post to this group, send email to sage-...@googlegroups.com > . > > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [sage-devel] Re: zn_poly status?
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 5:29 PM Timo Kaufmann wrote: > > For what its worth, we currently don't apply any patches in nix and at least > the sage doctests pass. A more standard build would still be nice though. > And since upstream is officially dead, I think giving it a new home would be > very good. +1 from me. Most of the patches are build-related and test-related fixes, many of which seem to stem from issues on OSX. > Am Freitag, 7. September 2018 15:53:43 UTC+2 schrieb Erik Bray: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Does anyone know what that current status is of the upstream zn_poly >> package? According to its website >> http://cims.nyu.edu/~harvey/zn_poly/ it is "no longer maintained", >> though it has been re-released under a BSD-compatible license. >> >> Since its last upstream release the package for it in Sage has >> accumulated a number of patches as well, and I believe I may need to >> add one more patch to it for building properly on Cygwin :( See >> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26050 >> >> If it's alright, I would propose creating a new repository for it >> under the sagemath gitlab organization (or GitHub) which would become >> the new "upstream" for zn_poly. Then we can merge in all these >> patches; maybe even implement a new, more standard build system (I >> would be happy to do this). In fact the current "build system" is >> going to have problems long-term, as it currently consists primarily >> of a Python script that will not work, as written, on Python 3. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[sage-devel] Re: zn_poly status?
For what its worth, we currently don't apply any patches in nix and at least the sage doctests pass. A more standard build would still be nice though. And since upstream is officially dead, I think giving it a new home would be very good. +1 from me. Am Freitag, 7. September 2018 15:53:43 UTC+2 schrieb Erik Bray: > > Hi all, > > Does anyone know what that current status is of the upstream zn_poly > package? According to its website > http://cims.nyu.edu/~harvey/zn_poly/ it is "no longer maintained", > though it has been re-released under a BSD-compatible license. > > Since its last upstream release the package for it in Sage has > accumulated a number of patches as well, and I believe I may need to > add one more patch to it for building properly on Cygwin :( See > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26050 > > If it's alright, I would propose creating a new repository for it > under the sagemath gitlab organization (or GitHub) which would become > the new "upstream" for zn_poly. Then we can merge in all these > patches; maybe even implement a new, more standard build system (I > would be happy to do this). In fact the current "build system" is > going to have problems long-term, as it currently consists primarily > of a Python script that will not work, as written, on Python 3. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [sage-devel] Discussion about Sage packaging status
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 5:04 AM, Samuel Lelièvre wrote: > Dear sage-devel, > > A tentative "status of Sage packaging and distribution" posted on the > sage-packaging mailing list is resulting in an interesting discussion at: > > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-packaging/ZJmJZi1Tawo/discussion > > Pointing to it here so that anybody interested in the subject can join > that mailing list if they haven't yet, or just follow the discussion. Thanks for posting. I didn't even know about the sage-packaging mailing list! William > > Samuel > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- William (http://wstein.org) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [sage-devel] zn_poly status?
gitlab sounds even better :-) Le 07/09/2018 à 10:13, David Roe a écrit : I've CCed David Harvey, but I think that creating a github repo for it sounds great. David On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 9:53 AM Erik Bray wrote: Hi all, Does anyone know what that current status is of the upstream zn_poly package? According to its website http://cims.nyu.edu/~harvey/zn_poly/ it is "no longer maintained", though it has been re-released under a BSD-compatible license. Since its last upstream release the package for it in Sage has accumulated a number of patches as well, and I believe I may need to add one more patch to it for building properly on Cygwin :( See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26050 If it's alright, I would propose creating a new repository for it under the sagemath gitlab organization (or GitHub) which would become the new "upstream" for zn_poly. Then we can merge in all these patches; maybe even implement a new, more standard build system (I would be happy to do this). In fact the current "build system" is going to have problems long-term, as it currently consists primarily of a Python script that will not work, as written, on Python 3. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [sage-devel] zn_poly status?
I've CCed David Harvey, but I think that creating a github repo for it sounds great. David On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 9:53 AM Erik Bray wrote: > Hi all, > > Does anyone know what that current status is of the upstream zn_poly > package? According to its website > http://cims.nyu.edu/~harvey/zn_poly/ it is "no longer maintained", > though it has been re-released under a BSD-compatible license. > > Since its last upstream release the package for it in Sage has > accumulated a number of patches as well, and I believe I may need to > add one more patch to it for building properly on Cygwin :( See > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26050 > > If it's alright, I would propose creating a new repository for it > under the sagemath gitlab organization (or GitHub) which would become > the new "upstream" for zn_poly. Then we can merge in all these > patches; maybe even implement a new, more standard build system (I > would be happy to do this). In fact the current "build system" is > going to have problems long-term, as it currently consists primarily > of a Python script that will not work, as written, on Python 3. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[sage-devel] zn_poly status?
Hi all, Does anyone know what that current status is of the upstream zn_poly package? According to its website http://cims.nyu.edu/~harvey/zn_poly/ it is "no longer maintained", though it has been re-released under a BSD-compatible license. Since its last upstream release the package for it in Sage has accumulated a number of patches as well, and I believe I may need to add one more patch to it for building properly on Cygwin :( See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26050 If it's alright, I would propose creating a new repository for it under the sagemath gitlab organization (or GitHub) which would become the new "upstream" for zn_poly. Then we can merge in all these patches; maybe even implement a new, more standard build system (I would be happy to do this). In fact the current "build system" is going to have problems long-term, as it currently consists primarily of a Python script that will not work, as written, on Python 3. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [sage-devel] Re: Py3, sorting vertices of graph
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 11:40 AM David Coudert wrote: > > Comparisons like u < v are used in many places in the code of graphs. > We can try to use hash(u) < hash(v) instead, but this is certainly not the > smartest solution. I have a long-outstanding proposal for a SafeSortable utility that would help with these cases. I would prefer a solution like this (with the exact details negotiable): https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25981 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[sage-devel] Discussion about Sage packaging status
Dear sage-devel, A tentative "status of Sage packaging and distribution" posted on the sage-packaging mailing list is resulting in an interesting discussion at: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-packaging/ZJmJZi1Tawo/discussion Pointing to it here so that anybody interested in the subject can join that mailing list if they haven't yet, or just follow the discussion. Samuel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
