[sage-devel] Re: 2.8.15.alpha1 released
On Dec 2, 2:30 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 1, 2007, at 17:16 , mabshoff wrote: > > > On Dec 2, 2:11 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Dec 1, 2007, at 15:58 , mabshoff wrote: > > >>> On Dec 2, 12:52 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 1, 2007, at 12:04 , mabshoff wrote: > >> [snip] > Built on Mac OS X, 10.4.11 (Dual Xeon, -j6) and 10.5.1 (Core Duo, - > j2). Here are the tails of the logs (AKA the bottom line(s) :-}): > > >>> Thank you, grand old Unix wizard ;) > > >> Whaddya mean 'old'? :-} > > > How about we settle on "revered elder Unix Wizard" - that is certainly > > true in relative terms ;) > > I can live with 'revered' :-} > > >> Turns out there are no relevant bits. The logs (both 10.4 and 10.5) > >> are clean. Could be the crashes are "tests working correctly"? > > > Nope. I just got the logs from William from a 10.5.1 box and those are > > clean. So maybe you get a rogue gmp or other library pulled in > > (again)? > > Just to be clear, my logs *are* clean. All tests claim to have > passed, it's just that I see a bunch of crash reports that cropped up > during the execution of "make test". Does WAS see this? Nope, I watched the log, and then I rerun all mwrank test manually on the commad line again: Total time for all tests: 2.8 seconds bsd:sage-2.8.14-moved mabshoff$ ./sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/libs/ mwrank/all.py sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/libs/mwrank/all.py [1.4 s] -- All tests passed! Total time for all tests: 1.4 seconds bsd:sage-2.8.14-moved mabshoff$ ./sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/libs/ mwrank/interface.py sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/libs/mwrank/interface.py [3.1 s] -- All tests passed! Total time for all tests: 3.1 seconds bsd:sage-2.8.14-moved mabshoff$ ./sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/libs/ mwrank/mwrank.pyx sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/libs/mwrank/mwrank.pyx [2.8 s] -- All tests passed! Total time for all tests: 2.8 seconds bsd:sage-2.8.14-moved mabshoff$ ./sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/ interfaces/mwrank.py sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/mwrank.py [1.6 s] No crashes. So maybe wonky hardware/phase of the moon/the wrath of Steve on your end? > Also, on the 10.5 system, I only see "/usr/local/libintl", as William > reported. ok. > >> I'll poke around to see if I can find anything remotely resembling > >> light... > > > Alpha2 should happen fairly soon - I am waiting on some patch reviews, > > so there is your next chance to break stuff. > > Oh, goodie. Maybe another hour or two ;) Cheers, Michael > Justin > > -- > They said it couldn't be done, but sometimes, > it doesn't work out that way. >- Casey Stengel > -- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: 2.8.15.alpha1 released
On Dec 1, 2007, at 17:16 , mabshoff wrote: > On Dec 2, 2:11 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Dec 1, 2007, at 15:58 , mabshoff wrote: >> >>> On Dec 2, 12:52 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Dec 1, 2007, at 12:04 , mabshoff wrote: >> [snip] Built on Mac OS X, 10.4.11 (Dual Xeon, -j6) and 10.5.1 (Core Duo, - j2). Here are the tails of the logs (AKA the bottom line(s) :-}): >> >>> Thank you, grand old Unix wizard ;) >> >> Whaddya mean 'old'? :-} > > How about we settle on "revered elder Unix Wizard" - that is certainly > true in relative terms ;) I can live with 'revered' :-} >> Turns out there are no relevant bits. The logs (both 10.4 and 10.5) >> are clean. Could be the crashes are "tests working correctly"? > > Nope. I just got the logs from William from a 10.5.1 box and those are > clean. So maybe you get a rogue gmp or other library pulled in > (again)? Just to be clear, my logs *are* clean. All tests claim to have passed, it's just that I see a bunch of crash reports that cropped up during the execution of "make test". Does WAS see this? Also, on the 10.5 system, I only see "/usr/local/libintl", as William reported. >> I'll poke around to see if I can find anything remotely resembling >> light... > > Alpha2 should happen fairly soon - I am waiting on some patch reviews, > so there is your next chance to break stuff. Oh, goodie. Justin -- They said it couldn't be done, but sometimes, it doesn't work out that way. - Casey Stengel -- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: 2.8.15.alpha1 released
On Dec 2, 2:11 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 1, 2007, at 15:58 , mabshoff wrote: > > > On Dec 2, 12:52 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Dec 1, 2007, at 12:04 , mabshoff wrote: > [snip] > >> Built on Mac OS X, 10.4.11 (Dual Xeon, -j6) and 10.5.1 (Core Duo, - > >> j2). Here are the tails of the logs (AKA the bottom line(s) :-}): > > > Thank you, grand old Unix wizard ;) > > Whaddya mean 'old'? :-} How about we settle on "revered elder Unix Wizard" - that is certainly true in relative terms ;) > >> BTW, the crash reporting in 10.5 seems "improved", and I have a boat- > >> load of mwrank crashes and one genus2reduction crash recorded. The > >> test log seems blithely unconcerned. I assume it's expected, but I > >> thought I'd mention it. > > > I have made similar experiences, i.e. that doctest failures do not > > necessarily mean that the doctest is reported failing. Could you cut > > the relevant bits out of the logs and post them or if it is very long > > link it somewhere. Opening a ticket is also a good idea. Am I correct > > that this is a 10.5 problem only? > > Turns out there are no relevant bits. The logs (both 10.4 and 10.5) > are clean. Could be the crashes are "tests working correctly"? Nope. I just got the logs from William from a 10.5.1 box and those are clean. So maybe you get a rogue gmp or other library pulled in (again)? > I'll poke around to see if I can find anything remotely resembling > light... Alpha2 should happen fairly soon - I am waiting on some patch reviews, so there is your next chance to break stuff. > Justin Cheers, Michael > > -- > They said it couldn't be done, but sometimes, > it doesn't work out that way. >- Casey Stengel > -- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: 2.8.15.alpha1 released
On Dec 1, 2007, at 15:58 , mabshoff wrote: > On Dec 2, 12:52 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Dec 1, 2007, at 12:04 , mabshoff wrote: [snip] >> Built on Mac OS X, 10.4.11 (Dual Xeon, -j6) and 10.5.1 (Core Duo, - >> j2). Here are the tails of the logs (AKA the bottom line(s) :-}): > > Thank you, grand old Unix wizard ;) Whaddya mean 'old'? :-} >> BTW, the crash reporting in 10.5 seems "improved", and I have a boat- >> load of mwrank crashes and one genus2reduction crash recorded. The >> test log seems blithely unconcerned. I assume it's expected, but I >> thought I'd mention it. > > I have made similar experiences, i.e. that doctest failures do not > necessarily mean that the doctest is reported failing. Could you cut > the relevant bits out of the logs and post them or if it is very long > link it somewhere. Opening a ticket is also a good idea. Am I correct > that this is a 10.5 problem only? Turns out there are no relevant bits. The logs (both 10.4 and 10.5) are clean. Could be the crashes are "tests working correctly"? I'll poke around to see if I can find anything remotely resembling light... Justin -- They said it couldn't be done, but sometimes, it doesn't work out that way. - Casey Stengel -- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: 2.8.15.alpha1 released
On Dec 2, 12:52 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 1, 2007, at 12:04 , mabshoff wrote: > > > > > [So Jaap doesn't have to sit around idle we are doing another > > release :)] > > > Alpha 1 is much better compared to alpha0, tarball is at > > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/sage-2.8.15.alpha1.tar > > [166 MB] > > Built on Mac OS X, 10.4.11 (Dual Xeon, -j6) and 10.5.1 (Core Duo, - > j2). Here are the tails of the logs (AKA the bottom line(s) :-}): Thank you, grand old Unix wizard ;) > 10.4.11: > > real62m19.149s > user47m22.732s > sys 24m38.714s > > All tests passed! > Total time for all tests: 2338.2 seconds > > 10.5.1: > real98m54.928s > user75m40.591s > sys 17m56.736s > > All tests passed! > Total time for all tests: 2580.9 seconds > > BTW, the crash reporting in 10.5 seems "improved", and I have a boat- > load of mwrank crashes and one genus2reduction crash recorded. The > test log seems blithely unconcerned. I assume it's expected, but I > thought I'd mention it. I have made similar experiences, i.e. that doctest failures do not necessarily mean that the doctest is reported failing. Could you cut the relevant bits out of the logs and post them or if it is very long link it somewhere. Opening a ticket is also a good idea. Am I correct that this is a 10.5 problem only? > Justin Cheers, Michael > > -- > Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large > Institute for the Absorption of Federal Funds > > Men are from Earth. > Women are from Earth. > Deal with it. > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: 2.8.15.alpha1 released
On Dec 1, 2007, at 12:04 , mabshoff wrote: > > [So Jaap doesn't have to sit around idle we are doing another > release :)] > > Alpha 1 is much better compared to alpha0, tarball is at > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/sage-2.8.15.alpha1.tar > [166 MB] Built on Mac OS X, 10.4.11 (Dual Xeon, -j6) and 10.5.1 (Core Duo, - j2). Here are the tails of the logs (AKA the bottom line(s) :-}): 10.4.11: real62m19.149s user47m22.732s sys 24m38.714s All tests passed! Total time for all tests: 2338.2 seconds 10.5.1: real98m54.928s user75m40.591s sys 17m56.736s All tests passed! Total time for all tests: 2580.9 seconds BTW, the crash reporting in 10.5 seems "improved", and I have a boat- load of mwrank crashes and one genus2reduction crash recorded. The test log seems blithely unconcerned. I assume it's expected, but I thought I'd mention it. Justin -- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large Institute for the Absorption of Federal Funds Men are from Earth. Women are from Earth. Deal with it. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: 2.8.15.alpha1 released
mabshoff wrote: > [So Jaap doesn't have to sit around idle we are doing another > release :)] > > Alpha 1 is much better compared to alpha0, tarball is at > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/sage-2.8.15.alpha1.tar > [166 MB] > -- All tests passed! Total time for all tests: 2288.6 seconds On Fedora 7/8 Jaap --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: 2.8.15.alpha1 released
mabshoff wrote: > [So Jaap doesn't have to sit around idle we are doing another > release :)] > Thanks! > Alpha 1 is much better compared to alpha0, tarball is at > Jaap > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/sage-2.8.15.alpha1.tar > [166 MB] > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
