[sage-devel] Re: Build did not work 4.3.5 Ubuntu 9.10 (atlas-3.8.3.p12)

2010-04-17 Thread Bruce Cohen
Saturday morning update:
SUCCESS!

Installing the 64-bit Ubuntu did the trick.   Now if only I can get my
scanner to work ...

Sage is a truly great community.  Thanks.

-Bruce

On Apr 16, 10:16 am, Bruce Cohen math.co...@gmail.com wrote:
 A status report:

 Last yesterday's build died with ATLAS -- this time on a truly quiet
 machine.  I tried again with a

 make clean
 export SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes
 make

 but that also died with ATLAS.

 -Bruce

 On Apr 15, 10:40 am, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
 wrote:

  On Apr 15, 2010, at 9:28 AM, Bruce Cohen wrote:

   I now remember that I did have a 5 hour scp file transfer running that
   night.  It is a brand new machine, so I was bringing over a tar file
   from an old machine on my network.  I will try again tonight.  It is
   disappointing that that the new quad core i7 (purchased to do Sage
   work) could not handle two tasks.  We'll see.

  That would probably do it. It's probably not a question of being  
  overloaded so much as being inconsistently loaded, making the ATLAS  
  timing/tuning parameter graphs to erratic to optimize against. The  
  suggestions on this thread are good if you're not able to get it going  
  tonight.

  - Robert

 --
 To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
 sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
 URL:http://www.sagemath.org

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org


[sage-devel] Re: Build did not work 4.3.5 Ubuntu 9.10 (atlas-3.8.3.p12)

2010-04-16 Thread Bruce Cohen
A status report:

Last yesterday's build died with ATLAS -- this time on a truly quiet
machine.  I tried again with a

make clean
export SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes
make

but that also died with ATLAS.

-Bruce

On Apr 15, 10:40 am, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
 On Apr 15, 2010, at 9:28 AM, Bruce Cohen wrote:

  I now remember that I did have a 5 hour scp file transfer running that
  night.  It is a brand new machine, so I was bringing over a tar file
  from an old machine on my network.  I will try again tonight.  It is
  disappointing that that the new quad core i7 (purchased to do Sage
  work) could not handle two tasks.  We'll see.

 That would probably do it. It's probably not a question of being  
 overloaded so much as being inconsistently loaded, making the ATLAS  
 timing/tuning parameter graphs to erratic to optimize against. The  
 suggestions on this thread are good if you're not able to get it going  
 tonight.

 - Robert

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org


[sage-devel] Re: Build did not work 4.3.5 Ubuntu 9.10 (atlas-3.8.3.p12)

2010-04-16 Thread Jason Grout

On 04/16/2010 12:16 PM, Bruce Cohen wrote:

A status report:

Last yesterday's build died with ATLAS -- this time on a truly quiet
machine.  I tried again with a

make clean
export SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes
make

but that also died with ATLAS.

-Bruce


Here are two other things to try:

1. Download the latest ATLAS 
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/math-atlas/) and try building it.  Does 
it succeed?


Note to everyone: the newest version of atlas is 3.9.23, while our 
version is 3.8.3 (p12).  On the surface, it looks like our ATLAS is way 
out of date.  Maybe we should upgrade anyway?  Does anyone know of 
problems with upgrading?


2. Try just installing the ATLAS spkg, using sage -i -s ATLAS SPKG 
FILE.  This will leave your build directory there.  You'll notice in 
the build messages you posted that there is an error file created:



tar cf error_UNKNOWNx8632SSE3.tar Make.inc bin/INSTALL_LOG/*
gzip --best error_UNKNOWNx8632SSE3.tar
mv error_UNKNOWNx8632SSE3.tar.gz error_UNKNOWNx8632SSE3.tgz
make[6]: Leaving directory `/home/bic/src/sage-4.3.5/spkg/build/
atlas-3.8.3.p12/ATLAS-build'
make[5]: Leaving directory `/home/bic/src/sage-4.3.5/spkg/build/
atlas-3.8.3.p12/ATLAS-build'
make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/bic/src/sage-4.3.5/spkg/build/
atlas-3.8.3.p12/ATLAS-build/bin'
Error report error_ARCH.tgz has been created in your top-level ATLAS
directory.  Be sure to include this file in any help request.


Doing sage -i -s should leave this error file around, and it might 
illuminate the problem better.


What kind of i7 do you have?  I have a quad core i7 920 that I compile 
Sage on just fine.  I'm running 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10, though.


Thanks,

Jason

--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org


[sage-devel] Re: Build did not work 4.3.5 Ubuntu 9.10 (atlas-3.8.3.p12)

2010-04-16 Thread Jason Grout

On 04/16/2010 12:50 PM, Jason Grout wrote:


Note to everyone: the newest version of atlas is 3.9.23, while our
version is 3.8.3 (p12). On the surface, it looks like our ATLAS is way
out of date. Maybe we should upgrade anyway? Does anyone know of
problems with upgrading?



Never mind.  I see now that the latest *stable* release is 3.8.3, so 
apparently we are up to date.  The unstable release is 3.9.23.


Thanks,

Jason

--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org


[sage-devel] Re: Build did not work 4.3.5 Ubuntu 9.10 (atlas-3.8.3.p12)

2010-04-16 Thread Bruce Cohen


On Apr 16, 10:50 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:

 What kind of i7 do you have?  I have a quad core i7 920 that I compile
 Sage on just fine.  I'm running 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10, though.

I have a quad core i7 860.   I had been hesitant to try 64-bit because
of problems with Java when I last tried 64 bit in 8.04, but I will try
this over the weekend.

Thanks

-Bruce

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org


[sage-devel] Re: Build did not work 4.3.5 Ubuntu 9.10 (atlas-3.8.3.p12)

2010-04-16 Thread Jason Grout

On 04/16/2010 01:14 PM, Bruce Cohen wrote:



On Apr 16, 10:50 am, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com  wrote:


What kind of i7 do you have?  I have a quad core i7 920 that I compile
Sage on just fine.  I'm running 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10, though.


I have a quad core i7 860.   I had been hesitant to try 64-bit because
of problems with Java when I last tried 64 bit in 8.04, but I will try
this over the weekend.



FYI, jmol and 3d plots seem to work just fine for me, if that's what 
you're worried about.


I still have problems with flash videos, though.  One of these days, 
I'll figure that out.


Thanks,

Jason

--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org


[sage-devel] Re: Build did not work 4.3.5 Ubuntu 9.10 (atlas-3.8.3.p12)

2010-04-15 Thread Bruce Cohen
The job ran overnight and nothing else was going on.   Perhaps I
should try again tonight.

-Bruce

On Apr 14, 11:18 pm, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
 On Apr 14, 2010, at 11:12 PM, Bruce Cohen wrote:

  I have a new machine with Ubuntu 9.10 (32 bit).   My first build of
  Sage (4.3.5) did not work.  Here is a 100 line (maybe too many lines,
  maybe too little) of install.log.

  Thanks for your help.

  -Bruce

 How loaded is your machine?



  make[3]: *** [build] Error 255
  make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/bic/src/sage-4.3.5/spkg/build/
  atlas-3.8.3.p12/ATLAS-build'
  make[2]: *** [build] Error 2
  make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/bic/src/sage-4.3.5/spkg/build/
  atlas-3.8.3.p12/ATLAS-build'
  Failed to build ATLAS.
  ATLAS failed to build for the 1-th time, possibly because of a
  loaded system, so we will automatically try again up to 4 more times.
  Waiting 9 minutes...
  ATLAS failed to build for the 2-th time, possibly because of a
  loaded system, so we will automatically try again up to 3 more times.
  Waiting 10 minutes...
  ATLAS failed to build for the 3-th time, possibly because of a
  loaded system, so we will automatically try again up to 2 more times.
  Waiting 10 minutes...
  ATLAS failed to build for the 4-th time, possibly because of a
  loaded system, so we will automatically try again up to 1 more times.
  Waiting 7 minutes...
  Too many failures to build ATLAS.  Giving up!

 ATLAS seems to be having issues getting reliable timings for its tuning.

 - Robert

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

To unsubscribe, reply using remove me as the subject.


[sage-devel] Re: Build did not work 4.3.5 Ubuntu 9.10 (atlas-3.8.3.p12)

2010-04-15 Thread Bruce Cohen
I now remember that I did have a 5 hour scp file transfer running that
night.  It is a brand new machine, so I was bringing over a tar file
from an old machine on my network.  I will try again tonight.  It is
disappointing that that the new quad core i7 (purchased to do Sage
work) could not handle two tasks.  We'll see.

-Bruce

On Apr 15, 7:51 am, Bruce Cohen math.co...@gmail.com wrote:
 The job ran overnight and nothing else was going on.   Perhaps I
 should try again tonight.

 -Bruce

 On Apr 14, 11:18 pm, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
 wrote:



  On Apr 14, 2010, at 11:12 PM, Bruce Cohen wrote:

   I have a new machine with Ubuntu 9.10 (32 bit).   My first build of
   Sage (4.3.5) did not work.  Here is a 100 line (maybe too many lines,
   maybe too little) of install.log.

   Thanks for your help.

   -Bruce

  How loaded is your machine?

   make[3]: *** [build] Error 255
   make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/bic/src/sage-4.3.5/spkg/build/
   atlas-3.8.3.p12/ATLAS-build'
   make[2]: *** [build] Error 2
   make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/bic/src/sage-4.3.5/spkg/build/
   atlas-3.8.3.p12/ATLAS-build'
   Failed to build ATLAS.
   ATLAS failed to build for the 1-th time, possibly because of a
   loaded system, so we will automatically try again up to 4 more times.
   Waiting 9 minutes...
   ATLAS failed to build for the 2-th time, possibly because of a
   loaded system, so we will automatically try again up to 3 more times.
   Waiting 10 minutes...
   ATLAS failed to build for the 3-th time, possibly because of a
   loaded system, so we will automatically try again up to 2 more times.
   Waiting 10 minutes...
   ATLAS failed to build for the 4-th time, possibly because of a
   loaded system, so we will automatically try again up to 1 more times.
   Waiting 7 minutes...
   Too many failures to build ATLAS.  Giving up!

  ATLAS seems to be having issues getting reliable timings for its tuning.

  - Robert

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

To unsubscribe, reply using remove me as the subject.


Re: [sage-devel] Re: Build did not work 4.3.5 Ubuntu 9.10 (atlas-3.8.3.p12)

2010-04-15 Thread John Cremona
Atlas is supposed to find out what sort of processor your machine has
automatically and then use tuning data for that.  But it is not
perfect at detecting the processor type, so then it goess of to do
this tuning stuff which takes hours.  The same happened to me when I
got a new laptop in 2008.  Until Sage upgraded Atlas the only was I
found to stop this (very) time-consuming step happening for every Sage
build (often unsuccessfully) was to keep the previous successful
build.

Once you have a good build of Atlas, take a copy of SAGE_ROOT/local;
and set SAGE_ATLAS to point to that copied directory.  then when you
build Sage it will use that copy of Atlas instead of rebuilding it.

John

On 15 April 2010 17:28, Bruce Cohen math.co...@gmail.com wrote:
 I now remember that I did have a 5 hour scp file transfer running that
 night.  It is a brand new machine, so I was bringing over a tar file
 from an old machine on my network.  I will try again tonight.  It is
 disappointing that that the new quad core i7 (purchased to do Sage
 work) could not handle two tasks.  We'll see.

 -Bruce

 On Apr 15, 7:51 am, Bruce Cohen math.co...@gmail.com wrote:
 The job ran overnight and nothing else was going on.   Perhaps I
 should try again tonight.

 -Bruce

 On Apr 14, 11:18 pm, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
 wrote:



  On Apr 14, 2010, at 11:12 PM, Bruce Cohen wrote:

   I have a new machine with Ubuntu 9.10 (32 bit).   My first build of
   Sage (4.3.5) did not work.  Here is a 100 line (maybe too many lines,
   maybe too little) of install.log.

   Thanks for your help.

   -Bruce

  How loaded is your machine?

   make[3]: *** [build] Error 255
   make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/bic/src/sage-4.3.5/spkg/build/
   atlas-3.8.3.p12/ATLAS-build'
   make[2]: *** [build] Error 2
   make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/bic/src/sage-4.3.5/spkg/build/
   atlas-3.8.3.p12/ATLAS-build'
   Failed to build ATLAS.
   ATLAS failed to build for the 1-th time, possibly because of a
   loaded system, so we will automatically try again up to 4 more times.
   Waiting 9 minutes...
   ATLAS failed to build for the 2-th time, possibly because of a
   loaded system, so we will automatically try again up to 3 more times.
   Waiting 10 minutes...
   ATLAS failed to build for the 3-th time, possibly because of a
   loaded system, so we will automatically try again up to 2 more times.
   Waiting 10 minutes...
   ATLAS failed to build for the 4-th time, possibly because of a
   loaded system, so we will automatically try again up to 1 more times.
   Waiting 7 minutes...
   Too many failures to build ATLAS.  Giving up!

  ATLAS seems to be having issues getting reliable timings for its tuning.

  - Robert

 --
 To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
 sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
 URL: http://www.sagemath.org

 To unsubscribe, reply using remove me as the subject.


-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org


Re: [sage-devel] Re: Build did not work 4.3.5 Ubuntu 9.10 (atlas-3.8.3.p12)

2010-04-15 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:37 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
 Atlas is supposed to find out what sort of processor your machine has
 automatically and then use tuning data for that.  But it is not
 perfect at detecting the processor type, so then it goess of to do
 this tuning stuff which takes hours.  The same happened to me when I
 got a new laptop in 2008.  Until Sage upgraded Atlas the only was I
 found to stop this (very) time-consuming step happening for every Sage
 build (often unsuccessfully) was to keep the previous successful
 build.

 Once you have a good build of Atlas, take a copy of SAGE_ROOT/local;
 and set SAGE_ATLAS to point to that copied directory.  then when you
 build Sage it will use that copy of Atlas instead of rebuilding it.

 John

 On 15 April 2010 17:28, Bruce Cohen math.co...@gmail.com wrote:
 I now remember that I did have a 5 hour scp file transfer running that
 night.  It is a brand new machine, so I was bringing over a tar file
 from an old machine on my network.  I will try again tonight.  It is
 disappointing that that the new quad core i7 (purchased to do Sage
 work) could not handle two tasks.  We'll see.

If that doesn't work, you might try building after first typing

   export SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes

This will result in a Sage that is non-optimal at numerical linear
algebra computations.  But ATLAS will I think be much more likely to
build, since it just uses some minimal default configuration.

William

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

To unsubscribe, reply using remove me as the subject.


Re: [sage-devel] Re: Build did not work 4.3.5 Ubuntu 9.10 (atlas-3.8.3.p12)

2010-04-15 Thread Robert Bradshaw

On Apr 15, 2010, at 9:28 AM, Bruce Cohen wrote:


I now remember that I did have a 5 hour scp file transfer running that
night.  It is a brand new machine, so I was bringing over a tar file
from an old machine on my network.  I will try again tonight.  It is
disappointing that that the new quad core i7 (purchased to do Sage
work) could not handle two tasks.  We'll see.


That would probably do it. It's probably not a question of being  
overloaded so much as being inconsistently loaded, making the ATLAS  
timing/tuning parameter graphs to erratic to optimize against. The  
suggestions on this thread are good if you're not able to get it going  
tonight.


- Robert

--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

To unsubscribe, reply using remove me as the subject.