[Samba] Hide workgroup names in network neighborhood ?

2007-04-11 Thread Dr.Peer-Joachim Koch

Hi,

since we have have a working wins server all kind of
workgroups from private laptops, or from special devices
are visible in the network neighborhood in our institute.

Is it possible to hide or mask all of them ?

--
Bye,
Peer
_
Max-Planck-Institut fuer Biogeochemie
Dr. Peer-Joachim Koch
Hans-Knöll Str.10Telefon: ++49 3641 57-6705
D-07745 Jena Telefax: ++49 3641 57-7705
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Deleted files reappear after login

2007-04-11 Thread Rainer Traut

Hi,

problem is, if someone deletes files e.g. from Desktop in XP, logs out 
and logs in again, the files reappear.

They are not deleted in the profile on the server.

The profile is syncing so that changes to files and new files are ok.
Only deleting does not work.

am using:
Redhat EL4 U4, Samba 3.0.24-SerNet-RedHat, XP SP2 Clients.

smb.conf parts:

logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U
logon script = login.cmd %U %G
logon drive = h:

[netlogon]
comment = Network Logon Service
path = /etc/samba/netlogon
public = no
read only = yes
writeable = no
browseable = no
valid users = @xyz root

[profiles]
comment = Roaming profiles share
path = /shares/profiles
writeable = yes
create mask = 0660
directory mask = 0770
browsable = no
valid users = @xyz root
force user = %U
profile acls = yes
hide dot files = no
csc policy = disable

Any ideas?

Thx
Rainer

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Re: samba: offer public share to Windows 98 and writable share to Windows XP

2007-04-11 Thread Zhang Weiwu
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 14:40 +0100, Mark Adams wrote:
> Did you set a password for the music user with smbpasswd -a music ?

No. After done what you suggested everything's working the way expected.
I never heard of the command smbpasswd before. I am a new samba user.

> 
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:17:46PM +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 11:57 +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote:
> > > Dear List. My requirement is to set up a samba share named "music"
> > > that: 
> > >  I. it's read-only accessible from both Windows 98 and Windows
> > > 2000/XP not requiring password; 
> > > II. it's write-accessible from Windows XP protected by a password.
> > 
> > In my last email I forgot to mention my "uname -a" and my smb.conf
> > 
> > [global]
> >   server string = File Server Sappho %v
> >   log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
> >   map to guest = nobody
> >   hosts allow = 218.193.55.
> >   security = share
> >   encrypt passwords = no
> >   bind interfaces only = 218.193.55.205
> >   dos charset = 936
> >   unix charset = UTF-8
> > 
> > [music]
> >comment = /var/music
> >path = /var/music
> >guest ok = yes
> >read only = no
> > 
> > Later I am aware that Windows NT (including XP) probably doesn't work
> > with "encrypt passwords = no" so I removed that line, the result is,
> > Windows XP user can always map the share as user "music" but after
> > mounted the user still don't have permission to write to the share.
> > Sambe log shows the user is still "nobody" but not "music".
> > 
> > [2007/04/11 02:15:59, 1]
> > smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(693)
> >   218.193.55.233 (218.193.55.233) connect to service music 
> > initially as user nobody (uid=65534, gid=65534) (pid 15327)
> > 
> > my system information:
> > sappho ~ # equery which samba
> > /usr/portage/net-fs/samba/samba-3.0.24.ebuild
> > sappho ~ # uname -a
> > Linux sappho.realss.com 2.6.18-gentoo-r3 #23 Mon Apr 9 23:27:21 HKT 2007 
> > sparc64 sun4u TI UltraSparc IIi (Sabre) GNU/Linux
> > 
> > My latest smb.conf:
> > 
> > sappho ~ # cat /etc/samba/smb.conf
> > [global]
> >   server string = File Server Sappho %v
> >   log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
> >   map to guest = nobody
> >   hosts allow = 218.193.55.
> >   security = share
> >   bind interfaces only = 218.193.55.205
> >   dos charset = 936
> >   unix charset = UTF-8
> > 
> > [music]
> >comment = /var/music
> >path = /var/music
> >guest ok = yes
> >read only = no
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
Zhang Weiwu
Real Softservice
http://www.realss.com
+86 592 2091112

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Poor Quickbooks Performance

2007-04-11 Thread Ed Kasky

At 08:36 PM Monday, 4/9/2007, Ben wrote -=>

I am using Samba (3.0.23) on FreeBSD (5.4 and 6.0) to share a Quickbooks
2007 file, with poor performance relative to Windows XP filesharing (4-5x
worse).  The file is large (about 600MB), and I am aware of the differing
locking mechanisms versus Windows, but is there anything that can be done to
tweak this?


A quick Google of the key words produced this link:

http://www.edoceo.com/liber/network-samba-quickbooks.php

It works for me and we have a number of clients with files between 
200 and 700 mb.


Ed Kasky
~
Randomly Generated Quote (80 of 557):
"I do not take a single newspaper, nor read one a month, and I feel
myself infinitely the happier for it."   --Thomas Jefferson

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] WinME can't log immediately after restart (Samba as PDC).

2007-04-11 Thread Nicolás Conde

Hello list.
I use Slackware 10.2 with Samba 3.0.20 as PDC/WINS server in a LAN
with 6 more PCs running WinME (I'm not to blame, they were there when I
arrived).
I've followed step by step the HOW-TO in setting up Samba as a PDC
and a WINS server, but when I reboot one of the WinMEs I can't log on to
the domain immediately. I have to hit [Esc], enter MS-DOS and do

c:\> nbtstat -R
c:\> nbtstat -RR

and close the no user session. After that if I'm lucky I can log on. If
not lucky, I do it again and after the third time or so I get to log on.
I did

# tail -f samba.nmbd

and I got this in the samba.nmbd when trying to log on and get rejected:

Unique name registration for name ADMINISTRADOR<03> IP 192.168.0.10
Original client at IP 192.168.0.1 still wants the name
ADMINISTRADOR<03>. Rejecting registration request.
Unique name release for name ADMINISTRADOR<03> IP 192.168.0.10
Refusing request to release name name ADMINISTRADOR<03> as IP
192.168.0.10 is not one of the known IP's for this name.

The user called "Administrador" (me) was logged on the PC with IP
192.168.0.1, and was trying to log on into 192.168.0.10.
¿Does anybody have a clue on what I'm doing wrong? Attached goes my
smb.conf.
Thanks a lot in advance.

--
::   Nicolás Conde::

"...querer informarse sin esfuerzo es una ilusión que remite al mito 
publicitario antes que a la movilización cívica. Informarse fatiga. Ese 
es el precio que un ciudadano paga para tener el derecho de participar 
con inteligencia en la vida democrática."


Ignacio Ramonet (Le Monde Diplomatique, oct/93).


[global]
netbios name = Servidor
workgroup = ESTACION
server string = Samba %v en %L

# Primary Domain Controller y Domain Master Browser
domain logons = yes
domain master = yes
local master = yes
preferred master = yes
# Fin

# Inhabilitar perfiles itinerantes (roaming profiles)
logon home =
logon path =
# Fin

os level = 64
wins support = Yes
security = user
passdb backend = smbpasswd
encrypt passwords = No
 
log level = 3
log file = /var/log/samba.%m
max log size = 50
name resolve order = wins bcast host

[netlogon]
comment = Servicio netlogon
path = /export/samba/netlogon
read only = yes
browseable = no

[homes]
comment = Home Directories
read only = No
browseable = No

[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
printable = Yes
browseable = No

[bases]
comment = Bases de Combex
path = /export/samba/combex
browseable = Yes
read only = No
create mask = 0771
directory mask = 0775
veto oplock files = /*.dbf/*.ntx/

[alejandrawin]
path = /export/samba/alejandrawin
browseable = No
read only = No
create mask = 0600
directory mask = 0700
case sensitive = No
oplocks = No
level2 oplocks = No
fstype = FAT

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Hybrid Mode for Security

2007-04-11 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 02:52:21PM -0400, Bob Mauti wrote:
> 
> Our smb.conf file reads as of below:
> 
> # Samba config file created using SWAT
> # from 192.168.145.40 (192.168.145.40)
> # Date: 2007/04/10 13:32:58
> 
> # Global parameters
> [global]
> workgroup = FACS
> ldap ssl = no
> hosts allow = 192.168.145.
> 
> [homes]
> 
> [public]
> path = /public
> username = smbuser
> force user = smbuser
> read only = No
> guest ok = Yes
> 
> Any suggestion or additional reading will be helpful.

Use the following instead,

Jeremy.


# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from 192.168.145.40 (192.168.145.40)
# Date: 2007/04/10 13:32:58

# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = FACS
ldap ssl = no
hosts allow = 192.168.145.
map to guest = Bad Password

[homes]
guest ok = no

[public]
path = /public
force user = smbuser
read only = No
guest ok = Yes
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] w2k3 memberserver as terminal server in samba domain

2007-04-11 Thread Torsten Geile

Hi,

we are using a samba domain which is distrubuted by UCS 
(ww.univention.de). A w2k3 Server RC2 is configured as a memerserver. 
Authentication on its resources controlled by samba via ldap is 
functional. Right now we have the Problem of getting members to logon to 
that  server using terminal services . I created a group in which all 
domain users are gathered who should have access. This group is member 
of the local group "remote desktop users" on the terminal server, but 
when trying to connect with one of these account, access is denied. Only 
members of domain\domain admins are allowed to log on.


At this moment I am not quite sure if this is a samba problem, or a 
microsoft one. I have set level of security to the least on the terminal 
server and it does seem that there could be any restrictions preventing 
the tsuser group from logging on to that server. I am aware, that the 
domain controller is not a samba pdc with ldap out of the box. The 
server is based on Debian and the manufacturer of that product has made 
several changes to it. I have allready posted problem on their forum, 
but think that this mailing list might also a good start to gather some 
information on how to solve that problem.


Maybe somebody here could point me to the right path.

Regards, Torsten



--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Problems sharing HP Officejet 6210 Linux --> XP

2007-04-11 Thread 1arrybarnett

[cross-posted from www.tek-tips.com]

Dear samba forum,

I've now wasted most of a weekend on this issue, so now it's time to swallow
my pride and ask for help!

Background:

My main home computer died. I can't afford to replace it right now, so I'm
attempting to retread an old AMD PC into a linux print/file server. Clients
are a mixed bag of Windows XP home/professional PCs. The printer is an HP
Officejet 6210 multifunction print/scan/fax. I'm only attempting to get
basic printing working between Windows/Linux.

File shares to the PCs are working great. The printer is working locally via
cups and hplip. The printer is exported via Samba and is visible from the
windows boxes (i.e., you can see it in Network Neighborhood and get the
status of the print queue using the DOS 'net print' command). You can see my
smb.conf file at the bottom of this post.

Problem:

The basic catch-22 with this printer model is that the drivers aren't part
of the standard XP distro. The XP printer installation wizard expects the
drivers to be available from the print server. After searching the net, I
came across this basic installation method:

1. Temporarily plug the printer into the XP PC and install the drivers from
the Printer CD. Then plug the printer back into the linux server.

At this point 2 techniques were suggested, neither of which worked for me:

2a. Go back to the wizard and install the remote printer, using the correct
driver this time. This apparantly succeeds, but printint the test page fails
with an uninformative popup inviting me to go to the troubleshooting wizard
(which is equally unhelpful).

or

2b. Hack the local printer configuration by going to properties-->ports and
creating a Local port with the value \\\, as shared
by Samba. This step fails for me with error 66 "The network resource type is
not correct".

So that's it, I'm stuck. I would love to hear from anyone who has worked
through this problem already. Failing that, how can I pick apart this
problem to figure out what's failing?

Note: There was also some discussion in the forums about the print$ share
and loading drivers on the Linux box, but I never figured out if that was
relevant to my use case (Linux server/Windows client).

Many thanks in advance to those who reply.

Cheers,

Larry

My smb.conf

# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1)
# Date: 2007/04/08 18:33:12

[global]
workgroup = HOMENET
server string = Samba Server
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
max log size = 50
add machine script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g samba-clients
-s
/bin/false -M %u
os level = 65
preferred master = Yes
domain master = Yes
dns proxy = No
wins support = Yes
ldap ssl = no
cups options = raw

[homes]
comment = Home Directories
read only = No
create mask = 0664
directory mask = 0775
browseable = No

[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /usr/spool/samba
printable = Yes
browseable = No

[hp6210]
comment = The HP multifunction printer w. scan and fax capability
path = /usr/spool/samba
printer admin = root, lbarnett
read only = No
guest ok = Yes
min print space = 2000
printable = Yes
cups options =
printer name = hp6210
oplocks = No
share modes = No

[shared]
available = No

[print$]
comment = Samba print driver download area
path = /etc/samba/drivers
admin users = root, lbarnett
guest ok = Yes


-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Problems-sharing-HP-Officejet-6210-Linux---%3E-XP-tf3556303.html#a9930048
Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Hybrid Mode for Security

2007-04-11 Thread Bob Mauti
Good Afternoon,

We are trying to setup SAMBA to use the security set as user, but would like
to have one share setup as shared without any user logins or passwords.

We are trying to setup the standard homes share that requires a user name a
password to access the person home directory and a public share that will
share /public directory without a user login/password. We are unable to get
both types of security to work together.  The help note mentions hybrid
mode, but no information about setup or examplers with it.

Our smb.conf file reads as of below:

# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from 192.168.145.40 (192.168.145.40)
# Date: 2007/04/10 13:32:58

# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = FACS
ldap ssl = no
hosts allow = 192.168.145.

[homes]

[public]
path = /public
username = smbuser
force user = smbuser
read only = No
guest ok = Yes

Any suggestion or additional reading will be helpful.

Thanks
Bob Mauti
Support Supervisor
FACS Management

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.0.0/754 - Release Date: 4/9/2007
10:59 PM
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Poor Quickbooks Performance

2007-04-11 Thread Ben House
I am using Samba (3.0.23) on FreeBSD (5.4 and 6.0) to share a Quickbooks
2007 file, with poor performance relative to Windows XP filesharing (4-5x
worse).  The file is large (about 600MB), and I am aware of the differing
locking mechanisms versus Windows, but is there anything that can be done to
tweak this?

BH

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] samba problems

2007-04-11 Thread Jim Mills
I have a question about samba.
I found the smbmnt documentation but my fedora core 6 doesn't seem to
recognize the command. Is there something Else I need to check to see
why this is the case? The swat program seems to think things are OK.
Thanks Jim

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] ntprinters.tdb and ntdrivers.tdb

2007-04-11 Thread Guillaume RENARD

Hello,

I am trying to migrate a samba printing server (with cups). (3.0.10fc3) by
renaming it
localhost=drlinux=the test machine
newscribe=the production machine
I did the following operations :
1/ Install a basic samba and cups
2/ copy all the configuration files and other from our running samba to our
test server (including all tdb files ..)
3/ Adding the new server to the domain net rpc join -->OK
4/ I can see all the domain member (pdbedit -L)
5/ But when I do a " rpcclient -U'root%ingwie' -c 'enumdrivers' localhost" I
get nothing so I don't understand.

My question is " how can I get all the drivers installed on a samba server
to another ?"

Thanks in advance

--
Guillaume RENARD
http://glmrenard.fr
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] WinME can't log immediately after restart (Samba as PDC).

2007-04-11 Thread Nicolás Conde

   Hello list.
   I use Slackware 10.2 with Samba 3.0.20 as PDC/WINS server in a LAN 
with 6 more PCs running WinME (I'm not to blame, they were there when I 
arrived).
   I've followed step by step the HOW-TO in setting up Samba as a PDC 
and a WINS server, but when I reboot one of the WinMEs I can't log on to 
the domain immediately. I have to hit [Esc], enter MS-DOS and do


   c:\> nbtstat -R
   c:\> nbtstat -RR

and close the no user session. After that if I'm lucky I can log on. If 
not lucky, I do it again and after the third time or so I get to log on. 
I did


   # tail -f samba.nmbd

and I got this in the samba.nmbd when trying to log on and get rejected:

Unique name registration for name ADMINISTRADOR<03> IP 192.168.0.10
Original client at IP 192.168.0.1 still wants the name 
ADMINISTRADOR<03>. Rejecting registration request.

Unique name release for name ADMINISTRADOR<03> IP 192.168.0.10
Refusing request to release name name ADMINISTRADOR<03> as IP 
192.168.0.10 is not one of the known IP's for this name.


   The user called "Administrador" (me) was logged on the PC with IP 
192.168.0.1, and was trying to log on into 192.168.0.10.
   ¿Does anybody have a clue on what I'm doing wrong? Attached goes my 
smb.conf.

   Thanks a lot in advance.

--
::   Nicolás Conde::

"...querer informarse sin esfuerzo es una ilusión que remite al mito publicitario 
antes que a la movilización cívica. Informarse fatiga. Ese es el precio que un ciudadano 
paga para tener el derecho de participar con inteligencia en la vida democrática."

   Ignacio Ramonet (Le Monde Diplomatique, oct/93).

[global]
netbios name = Servidor
workgroup = ESTACION
server string = Samba %v en %L

# Primary Domain Controller y Domain Master Browser
domain logons = yes
domain master = yes
local master = yes
preferred master = yes
# Fin

# Inhabilitar perfiles itinerantes (roaming profiles)
logon home =
logon path =
# Fin

os level = 64
wins support = Yes
security = user
passdb backend = smbpasswd
encrypt passwords = No
 
log level = 3
log file = /var/log/samba.%m
max log size = 50
name resolve order = wins bcast host

[netlogon]
comment = Servicio netlogon
path = /export/samba/netlogon
read only = yes
browseable = no

[homes]
comment = Home Directories
read only = No
browseable = No

[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
printable = Yes
browseable = No

[bases]
comment = Bases de Combex
path = /export/samba/combex
browseable = Yes
read only = No
create mask = 0771
directory mask = 0775
veto oplock files = /*.dbf/*.ntx/

[alejandrawin]
path = /export/samba/alejandrawin
browseable = No
read only = No
create mask = 0600
directory mask = 0700
case sensitive = No
oplocks = No
level2 oplocks = No
fstype = FAT
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

RE: [Samba] Help with samba on Solaris 9

2007-04-11 Thread William Enestvedt
If you just applied a Sun patch cluster, it likely overwrote your
/etc/pam.conf file. (This can be confirmed by reading the CLEANUP file
left after the install_cluster script runs, but you have to remember to
save it if the file lived in volatile space like /tmp.)

- Will
--
Will Enestvedt
UNIX System Administrator
Providence, RI
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] env-entry problem in Pluto portal

2007-04-11 Thread Denis Tuchin
Hi, Kurt.

 

I have same problem as you on my Pluto portal ("...element "env-entry"
occurs more than once.")

I have read your solution with help of
pluto.war/WEB-INF/data/xml/servletdefinitionmapping.xml.

But I need solution which allow me deploy portlet on Pluto portal and on
Sun Java Portal. Have you any other solutions of this problem or may be
advices.

Thanks

 

Best Regards,
Denis Tuchin

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] SMB Signature verification failed when establish trust with win2003 domain

2007-04-11 Thread Lin Li
I have a samba PDC (using samba 3.0.24). When I try to establish trust 
with a win2003 domain, I got signing error, see the log below. Trust 
with NT domain and win2000 domain works. Any help are appreciated.


Thanks,
Lin

[2007/04/04 17:00:13, 5] lib/debug.c:debug_dump_status(391)
 INFO: Current debug levels:
   all: True/10
   tdb: False/0
   printdrivers: False/0
   lanman: False/0
   smb: False/0
   rpc_parse: False/0
   rpc_srv: False/0
   rpc_cli: False/0
   passdb: False/0
   sam: False/0
   auth: False/0
   winbind: False/0
   vfs: False/0
   idmap: False/0
   quota: False/0
   acls: False/0
   locking: False/0
   msdfs: False/0
   dmapi: False/0
[2007/04/04 17:00:13, 3] param/loadparm.c:lp_load(4953)
 lp_load: refreshing parameters
[2007/04/04 17:00:13, 3] param/loadparm.c:init_globals(1418)
 Initialising global parameters
[2007/04/04 17:00:13, 3] param/params.c:pm_process(572)
 params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file 
"/etc/samba/smb.conf"

[2007/04/04 17:00:13, 3] param/loadparm.c:do_section(3695)
 Processing section "[global]"
 doing parameter admin users = XANSMB+administrator @XANSMB+admins
 doing parameter add machine script = /opt/xandros/bin/dvaddcomputer %u
 doing parameter client use spnego = no
 doing parameter display charset = UTF8
[2007/04/04 17:00:13, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(105)
 Attempting to register new charset UCS-2LE
[2007/04/04 17:00:13, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(113)
 Registered charset UCS-2LE
[2007/04/04 17:00:13, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(105)
 Attempting to register new charset UTF-16LE
[2007/04/04 17:00:13, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(113)
 Registered charset UTF-16LE
[2007/04/04 17:00:13, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(105)
 Attempting to register new charset UCS-2BE
[2007/04/04 17:00:13, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(113)
 Registered charset UCS-2BE
[2007/04/04 17:00:13, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(105)
 Attempting to register new charset UTF-16BE
[2007/04/04 17:00:13, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(113)
 Registered charset UTF-16BE
[2007/04/04 17:00:13, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(105)
 Attempting to register new charset UTF8
[2007/04/04 17:00:13, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(113)
 Registered charset UTF8
[2007/04/04 17:00:13, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(105)
 Attempting to register new charset UTF-8
[2007/04/04 17:00:13, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(113)
 Registered charset UTF-8
[2007/04/04 17:00:13, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(105)
 Attempting to register new charset ASCII
[2007/04/04 17:00:13, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(113)
 Registered charset ASCII
[2007/04/04 17:00:13, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(105)
 Attempting to register new charset 646
[2007/04/04 17:00:13, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(113)
 Registered charset 646
[2007/04/04 17:00:13, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(105)
 Attempting to register new charset ISO-8859-1
[2007/04/04 17:00:13, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(113)
 Registered charset ISO-8859-1
[2007/04/04 17:00:13, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(105)
 Attempting to register new charset UCS2-HEX
[2007/04/04 17:00:13, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(113)
 Registered charset UCS2-HEX
 doing parameter dns proxy = no
 doing parameter domain logons = yes
 doing parameter domain master = yes
 doing parameter dos filetimes = yes
 doing parameter encrypt passwords = yes
 doing parameter idmap gid = 1-2
 doing parameter idmap uid = 1-2
 doing parameter invalid users = root
 doing parameter ldap admin dn = "cn=admin,dc=xpassdb,dc=xsmb"
 doing parameter ldap delete dn = yes
 doing parameter ldap group suffix = ou=Groups
 doing parameter ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers
 doing parameter ldap suffix = dc=xpassdb,dc=xsmb
 doing parameter ldap user suffix = ou=People
 doing parameter load printers = no
 doing parameter local master = yes
 doing parameter log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
 doing parameter logon drive = Z:
 doing parameter logon home = \\%N\%U
 doing parameter logon path = \\%N\profiles\%U
 doing parameter map to guest = Bad User
 doing parameter max log size = 1000
 doing parameter name resolve order = lmhosts host wins bcast
 doing parameter obey pam restrictions = yes
 doing parameter os level = 65
 doing parameter panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d
 doing parameter passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1:4389
 doing parameter passwd chat = *Enter\snew\spassword:* %n\n .
 doing parameter passwd program = /opt/xandros/bin/gumpasswdsync %u
 doing parameter password server = *
 doing parameter preferred master = yes
 doing parameter printcap name = cups
 doing parameter printing = cups
 doing parameter security = USER
 doing parameter server string = %h (Xandros Server)
 doing parameter socket options = TCP_NODELAY
 doing parameter syslog = 0
 doing parameter template shell = /bin/bash
 doing parameter unix charset = UTF8
 doing parameter unix password sync

[Samba] NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT

2007-04-11 Thread Allan, Gordon R
Samba occasionally fails with the following. I have seen many questions
regarding this but no answers unfortunately. I am wondering what the
setting is where I can increase this time out value of 1
milliseconds in case that specific request is just slow. This is called
many times a day and only just occasionally fails.
 
I have looked through the entire manual for smb.conf and can't find a
relevant parameters.
 
Many Thanks
 
rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:rpc_api_pipe(785)

rpc_api_pipe: Remote machine DCServer01 pipe \NETLOGON fnum
0xc005returned critical error. Error was Call timed out: server did not
respond after 1 milliseconds
[2007/03/19 15:56:07, 0] auth/auth_domain.c:domain_client_validate(238)
domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user
ProcessManager in domain SLAC to Domain controller DCServer01. Error was
NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT.
[2007/03/19 15:56:07, 0] libsmb/clientgen.c:cli_rpc_pipe_close(369)
cli_rpc_pipe_close: cli_close failed on pipe \NETLOGON, fnum 0xc005 to
machine DCServer01. Error was Call timed out: server did not respond
after 1 milliseconds
[2007/03/19 15:56:07, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(315)
check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [ProcessManager] ->
[ProcessManager] FAILED with error NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT

 
Gordon Allan


 

The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee and access to this e-mail by anyone 
else is unauthorised. 

If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or 
any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may 
be unlawful. 

At present the integrity of e-mail across the Internet cannot be guaranteed and 
messages sent via this medium are potentially at risk. Therefore we will not 
accept liability for any claims arising as a result of the use of this medium 
to transmit messages by or to the Royal London Group. 

All incoming and outgoing e-mail communications are scanned automatically by 
software designed to quarantine e-mails containing material which is in 
contravention of our Company e-mail usage policy.

The Royal London Mutual Insurance Society Limited for life and pension products
Registered in England and Wales No. 99604. 
Registered Office: 55 Gracechurch Street, London, EC3V 0RL

Royal London Asset Management Limited for investment management services
Registered in England and Wales No. 2244297. 
Registered Office: 55 Gracechurch Street, London EC3V 0UF

Royal London Savings Limited for Individual Savings Accounts
Registered in England and Wales No. 3642633. 
Registered Office: 55 Gracechurch Street, London, EC3V 0RL

Royal London Unit Trust Managers Limited for unit trusts
Registered in England and Wales No. 2372439. 
Registered Office: 55 Gracechurch Street, London, EC3V 0UF

Royal London Marketing Limited acting as an insurance intermediary for general 
insurance products 
Registered in England and Wales No. 4414137. 
Registered Office 55 Gracechurch Street, London, EC3V 0RL.

All the above Royal London group companies are authorised and regulated by The 
Financial Services Authority.

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT

2007-04-11 Thread Allan, Gordon R
Samba occasionally fails with the following. I have seen many questions
regarding this but no answers unfortunately. I am wondering what the
setting is where I can increase this time out value of 1
milliseconds in case that specific request is just slow. This is called
many times a day and only just occasionally fails.
 
I have looked through the entire manual for smb.conf and can't find a
relevant parameters.
 
Many Thanks
 
rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:rpc_api_pipe(785)

rpc_api_pipe: Remote machine DCServer01 pipe \NETLOGON fnum
0xc005returned critical error. Error was Call timed out: server did not
respond after 1 milliseconds
[2007/03/19 15:56:07, 0] auth/auth_domain.c:domain_client_validate(238)
domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user
ProcessManager in domain SLAC to Domain controller DCServer01. Error was
NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT.
[2007/03/19 15:56:07, 0] libsmb/clientgen.c:cli_rpc_pipe_close(369)
cli_rpc_pipe_close: cli_close failed on pipe \NETLOGON, fnum 0xc005 to
machine DCServer01. Error was Call timed out: server did not respond
after 1 milliseconds
[2007/03/19 15:56:07, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(315)
check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [ProcessManager] ->
[ProcessManager] FAILED with error NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT

 
Gordon Allan


 

The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee and access to this e-mail by anyone 
else is unauthorised. 

If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or 
any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may 
be unlawful. 

At present the integrity of e-mail across the Internet cannot be guaranteed and 
messages sent via this medium are potentially at risk. Therefore we will not 
accept liability for any claims arising as a result of the use of this medium 
to transmit messages by or to the Royal London Group. 

All incoming and outgoing e-mail communications are scanned automatically by 
software designed to quarantine e-mails containing material which is in 
contravention of our Company e-mail usage policy.

The Royal London Mutual Insurance Society Limited for life and pension products
Registered in England and Wales No. 99604. 
Registered Office: 55 Gracechurch Street, London, EC3V 0RL

Royal London Asset Management Limited for investment management services
Registered in England and Wales No. 2244297. 
Registered Office: 55 Gracechurch Street, London EC3V 0UF

Royal London Savings Limited for Individual Savings Accounts
Registered in England and Wales No. 3642633. 
Registered Office: 55 Gracechurch Street, London, EC3V 0RL

Royal London Unit Trust Managers Limited for unit trusts
Registered in England and Wales No. 2372439. 
Registered Office: 55 Gracechurch Street, London, EC3V 0UF

Royal London Marketing Limited acting as an insurance intermediary for general 
insurance products 
Registered in England and Wales No. 4414137. 
Registered Office 55 Gracechurch Street, London, EC3V 0RL.

All the above Royal London group companies are authorised and regulated by The 
Financial Services Authority.

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] bind or samba configuration preventing browsing network

2007-04-11 Thread Chris Smith
On Wednesday 11 April 2007, Erik Anderson wrote:
> security = domain

start with "man smb.conf" and the "security =" parameter
the "how to" and examples at samba.org can clarify as well

Chris
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] SMB Signature verification failed when establish trust with win2003 domain

2007-04-11 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 01:18:17PM -0400, Lin Li wrote:
> I have a samba PDC (using samba 3.0.24). When I try to establish trust 
> with a win2003 domain, I got signing error, see the log below. Trust 
> with NT domain and win2000 domain works. Any help are appreciated.

Can you get me an ethereal/wireshark capture trace of this
please ? Looks like the server is simply reflecting back the
signature sent be the client, but I'd like to be sure.

Thanks,

Jeremy.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Any pointers for multiple subnets?

2007-04-11 Thread Mark Adams
Hi Nathan

> 
> Thanks for your interest. In reply to your question, the answer is
> yes. Both the linux machines are on both the LANs. Both are browseable
> from Windows clients in both networks by \\netbiosname and \\ipaddress

To confirm, You can connect across these subnets with netbios or ip, but
only browsing through "My Network Places" does not work? and the only
shares you are trying to browse for are the samba shares on your linux
box? if not do the windows based shares show?

Have you set the workgroup in the samba config? or are you choosing
'View Entire Network' when browsing through My network places?

> .
> 
> My intent is to have a client from 192.168.1.0/24 to browse
> 192.168.1.0/24 windows network (and vice versa) using my linux box as
> gateway. Is this possible?

This might interest you, I'm not sure how old it is.

http://brneurosci.org/linuxsetup38.html

> I'm also not sure if this is an iptables problem or a samba problem.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Nandan

Regards,
Mark

> 
> 
> On 4/11/07, Mark Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> With this setup, some things work as desired. I am able to connect to
> >> 192.168.0.10 (Email server) from 192.168.1.5 after setting my linux box
> >> as the gateway. Vice versa, I am able to connect to 192.168.1.6 (Email
> >> server) from 192.168.0.2 by setting 192.168.0.177 (my linux box's IP on
> >> outside LAN).
> >>
> >> I am beginning to think so far so good. But, Windows networking does
> >> not follow suit. I am not able to browse the network when these settings
> >> are active.
> >>
> >> What gives? My guess is I will be castigated for rushing with an email
> >> before reading the Archives.
> >>
> >> But hope springs eternal. Regards,
> >>
> >> Nandan
> >
> >Can you browse to \\ip.of.samba.box and see the shares?
> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> >> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Nandan Bhat
> 403 Kasturi Towers
> L.B.S. Marg, Naupada,
> Thane 400601 INDIA
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] bind or samba configuration preventing browsing network

2007-04-11 Thread Erik Anderson
I have a networking problem where I am not certain if the problem is 
samba or bind. I am still pretty much a nb at linux. The machine in 
question is running openSuSE 10.2 and is named rd1. I had samba working 
fine before I started to make it a WINS server and DNS host.


I have a small LAN with no real administration functionality. The 
network is used for simple file sharing and dial-up internet 
connectivity. The SuSE box is the only linux box on the network, and a 
fairly new addition. I am attempting to setup rd1 to handle DNS and WINS 
and participate in the network filesharing activities. The windows boxes 
are running XP. Internet access is on a XP computer located at 
192.168.0.1 and is hence setup as the gateway. rd1 is located at 
192.168.0.4 and I decided to use the m$ domain of mshome.net, but create 
a workgroup called radio


Using the following configuration, the XP boxes can see all the machines 
on the network. At times, the XP boxes can access rd1 (not not 
currently, as I must have broken something). rd1 cannot browse the 
“Windows Network” but, a cifs automount permits access to points mounted 
on 192.168.0.1


An nslookup performed on rd1 always works right (nslookup rd1 or 
nslookup rd1.mshome.net). An nslookup using full hostnames (e.g. 
nslookup rd1.mshome.net) works, but dropping the domain does not (e.g. 
nslookup rd1) on the XP box.
I have spent a bunch of time trying to resolve this. I am stuck. Where 
have I gone wrong? Thank you for your help...



-- smb.conf --


[global]
workgroup = RADIO
printing = cups
printcap name = cups
printcap cache time = 750
cups options = raw
map to guest = Bad User
include = /etc/samba/dhcp.conf
logon path = \\%L\profiles\.msprofile
logon home = \\%L\%U\.9xprofile
logon drive = P:
usershare allow guests = Yes
add machine script = /usr/sbin/useradd -c Machine -d /var/lib/nobody -s 
/bin/false %m$

netbios name = rd1
security = domain
usershare max shares = 100
server string = rd1
hosts allow = 192.168.0. 192.168.10.
local master = Yes
os level = 32
preferred master = Yes
domain master = Yes
wins support = Yes
name resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast hosts
dns proxy = yes
idmap gid = 1-2
idmap uid = 1-2
[export]
comment = All groups
path = /var/test
read only = No
create mask = 0777
directory mask = 0777
[netlogon]
comment = Network Logon Service
path = /var/lib/samba/netlogon
write list = root


# named.conf
options {
version "707070707070707070707 - A custom compile";
directory "/var/lib/named";
dump-file "/var/log/named_dump.db";
statistics-file "/var/log/named.stats";
listen-on port 53 { 127.0.0.1; 192.168.0.4; };
listen-on-v6 { 192.168.0.4; };
query-source address * port 53;
allow-query { 192.168.0.1/24; 127.0.0.1; };
notify no;
include "/etc/named.d/forwarders.conf";
hostname "mshome.net";
};


zone "localhost" in {
type master;
file "localhost.zone";
};

zone "0.0.127.in-addr.arpa" in {
type master;
file "127.0.0.zone";
};

zone "mshome.net" in {
allow-update {192.168.0.1/24; };
allow-transfer { none; };
file "master/mshome.netX";
type master;
};

zone "0.168.192.in-addr.arpa" in {
allow-transfer { none; };
file "master/0.168.192.in-addr.arpaX";
type master;
};

// RFC 3152 zone 
"1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.IP6.ARPA 
" { type master; file "master/localhost-v6.rev"; };;


// RFC 1886 -- deprecated zone 
"1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.IP6.INT 
" { type master; file "master/localhost-v6.rev"; };;


logging {
category queries { log_file; };
category xfer-in { log_file; };
category xfer-out { log_file; };
category default { log_file; };
channel log_file { file "/var/log/bind-dns" size 5M; };
};


-- master/mshome.netX --


$TTL 2d
@ IN SOA mshome.net. root.rd1.mshome.net. (
2007040900 ; serial
3h ; refresh
1h ; retry
1w ; expiry
1d ) ; minimum


@ IN NS 192.168.0.4
mshome.net. IN A 192.168.0.4
rd1 IN A 192.168.0.4
localhost IN A 127.0.0.1
inetlive IN A 192.168.0.1




--master/0.168.192.in-addr.arpaX --




$TTL 2d
@ IN SOA mshome.net. root.rd1.mshome.net. (
2007040900 ; serial
3h ; refresh
1h ; retry
1w ; expiry
1d ) ; minimum


@ IN NS mshome.net.
4 IN PTR mshome.net.




--log.nmbd --


[2007/04/11 13:30:51, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_browsesync.c:find_domain_master_name_query_fail(351)

find_domain_master_name_query_fail:
Unable to find the Domain Master Browser name RADIO<1b> for the 
workgroup RADIO.

Unable to sync browse lists in this workgroup.


-- bind-dns.log --
empty file




--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Fwd: machine authentication at Active Directory

2007-04-11 Thread Otto Fuchshuber Filho

Can anybody help me with this issue or tell me where I can get help?
Thanks
--
Otto Fuchshuber Filho
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- Forwarded message --
From: Otto Fuchshuber Filho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 10/04/2007 22:08
Subject: machine authentication at Active Directory
To: samba@lists.samba.org


On a 802.1X environment, it's possible to permit a windows
desktop gain access to the network by using only machine
authentication at the Active Directory (no need for login +
password).
Is it possible to do the same with a Linux desktop with samba?  I
mean a Linux desktop pass machine credentials to Active Directory
as windows do (SID), without any login and password.
--
Otto Fuchshuber Filho
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] net rpc vampire umlauts (äöüß) pro blem

2007-04-11 Thread Stefan Drees
I changed the charset to UTF8, but nothing changes.
Smbldap-usershow shows me the malformed umlauts,
with ldapsearch i get "displayname:: Qs19dnttIFRidKxlej==".

I tried to change unix charset to UTF8, ISO8859-1, ISO8850-15,
but the displayname doesn`t change.

I also changed the locales to UTF-8, [EMAIL PROTECTED], de_DE, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED],
but the displayname doesn´t change, too. net rpc vampire ignores the
settings.

Any other ideas?

Regards
S.Drees

Wolfgang Ratzka schrieb:
> Stefan Drees schrieb:
>
>   
>> Hi,
>> im using net rpc vampire to migrate users/ groups from nt4 to samba3
>> with ldap backend.
>> But the umlauts (äöüß) in the displayname are malformend.
>> Unix charset in smb.conf is set to ISO8859-1.
>>
>> Any hint how to correct this?
>>
>> Regards
>> S.Drees
>>
>> 
>
> Did you consider switching your unix charset from ISO8859-1 to UTF-8?
> Windows does allow unicode characters in file names and in other places.
> Translating them to ISO8859-1 will not always work.
>
> Kind regards
> Wolfgng Ratzka
>   

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Samba 3.0 and XP roaming profiles

2007-04-11 Thread Dennis McLeod
Here's my logon script (edited... This is just for mapping drives. I have
others that get called from here also.)(XP clients. Domain Members)
The ifmember part is optional. It checks for group membership and only maps
the drives that the user needs, based on his group membership.
I have a mixed environment so far. Migrating from a peer to peer workgroup
to a domain. Machines that are part of the domain run this when a user logs
on.
No roaming profiles for me, though. Public is read only, so everyone gets
that mapped.
Ifmember.exe is part of the W2K (or later) server resource kit. Ifmember.exe
only exists in the netlogon share.



net time \\server /set /yes

:accts
\\server\netlogon\ifmember "domainname\acctsdep"
if not errorlevel 1 goto parts
net use j: \\server\accounts

:parts
\\server\netlogon\ifmember "domainname\partsdept"
if not errorlevel 1 goto service
net use k: \\server\parts

:service
\\server\netlogon\ifmember "domainname\servicedept"
if not errorlevel 1 goto sales
net use s: \\server\service

:sales
\\server\netlogon\ifmember "domainname\salesdept"
if not errorlevel 1 goto hr
net use l: \\server\sales

:hr
\\server\netlogon\ifmember "domainname\hr"
if not errorlevel 1 goto public
net use m: \\server\hr

:public
net use p: \\server\public




It's named logon.bat (you can name it whatever you want.)
It's in /var/lib/samba/netlogon/scripts
My smb.conf says:

[GLOBAL]
..
logon script = scripts\logon.bat (this has to match what you named the
above.)
.

[netlogon]
comment = Network Logon Service 
path = /var/lib/samba/netlogon  (path=/var/samba/netlogon/%U would have
a subfolder with each user name, and you could build a script for each user)
public = no
writeable = no
browsable = no

Hope this helps.
Dennis


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
contact_mahajan
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 1:06 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0 and XP roaming profiles



Thanks for the suggestion.
I havn't tried login scripts. I can create a login script and put it under
the base netlogon path which is /var/samba/netlogon in my case. But my
question is what shoudl be the name of this script so that every profile can
grab it. Moreover what permissions should be set on it so that every profile
can run it.
Also regarding my logon script, my smb.conf fille says like this:

[GLOBAL]
..
logon script = scripts\login.bat
.

[netlogon]
...
path= /var/samba/netlogon/%U


Actually this configuration was designed by an earlier admin and I dont know
why he put that "script\login.bat". I dont see any directory called scripts
on the server. My question is, that what should I put here so that all my
profiles can catch this script and what permissions should be set for the
script?

Thanks in advance,

Gigs



--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Samba-3.0-and-XP-roaming-profiles-tf3561201.html#a9947
378
Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0 and XP roaming profiles

2007-04-11 Thread contact_mahajan


Thanks for the suggestion.
I havn't tried login scripts. I can create a login script and put it under
the base netlogon path which is /var/samba/netlogon in my case. But my
question is what shoudl be the name of this script so that every profile can
grab it. Moreover what permissions should be set on it so that every profile
can run it.
Also regarding my logon script, my smb.conf fille says like this:

[GLOBAL]
..
logon script = scripts\login.bat
.

[netlogon]
...
path= /var/samba/netlogon/%U


Actually this configuration was designed by an earlier admin and I dont know
why he put that "script\login.bat". I dont see any directory called scripts
on the server. My question is, that what should I put here so that all my
profiles can catch this script and what permissions should be set for the
script?

Thanks in advance,

Gigs



-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Samba-3.0-and-XP-roaming-profiles-tf3561201.html#a9947378
Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0 and XP roaming profiles

2007-04-11 Thread Charles Marcus

contact_mahajan wrote:

Hello friends,

I am running Samba 3.0 on RHEL4 server. Around 200 roaming profiles are also
configured and they login to XP machines. Things are working for us except
in network rollout scenarios. We dont know how to roll out patches or some
global changes to all the profiles. We have to visit each and every profile
(loggin each of them) to do even the small changes. Today we have to map a
network share in all the profiles and we are stuck again.
I will appreciate if you can please suggest me something. I can script a
batch file to map the network drives. But dont know how my to automate this
at the logon for all the profiles. 


http://tinyurl.com/37htp3

--

Best regards,

Charles
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0 and XP roaming profiles

2007-04-11 Thread Wolfgang Ratzka
contact_mahajan schrieb:

> I will appreciate if you can please suggest me something. I can script a
> batch file to map the network drives. But dont know how my to automate this
> at the logon for all the profiles. 

Have you ever tried a login script?

Kind regards,
Wolfgang Ratzka
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Samba 3.0 and XP roaming profiles

2007-04-11 Thread contact_mahajan

Hello friends,

I am running Samba 3.0 on RHEL4 server. Around 200 roaming profiles are also
configured and they login to XP machines. Things are working for us except
in network rollout scenarios. We dont know how to roll out patches or some
global changes to all the profiles. We have to visit each and every profile
(loggin each of them) to do even the small changes. Today we have to map a
network share in all the profiles and we are stuck again.
I will appreciate if you can please suggest me something. I can script a
batch file to map the network drives. But dont know how my to automate this
at the logon for all the profiles. 
Please suggest.

Thanks,

Gigs
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Samba-3.0-and-XP-roaming-profiles-tf3561201.html#a9945615
Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: ham,Re: [Samba] Problem to start services nmbd and smbd

2007-04-11 Thread Dale Schroeder
Or to get the latest deb's from Samba and still be able to use apt, add 
to /etc/apt/sources.list something similar to:


deb http://us3.samba.org/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/Debian sarge samba

Dale

Mark Adams wrote:

Hi Rodrigo,

It is likely you are missing some dependancies.

Why is it that you did not use apt to install samba? I would recommend
you do this as apt will install all dependancies for you. A simple

apt-get install samba

should do the job.

Regards,
Mark

On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 08:45:33PM +0300, Rodrigo Hashimoto wrote:
  

Hi, I'm new in the Linux world, I've worked for about tree months with
Debian and I've a big problem to start the samba services (nmbd and smbd).

I downloaded the samba-latest.tar.gz from the www.samba.org and tried to
compile it. I didn't have problem with it, but I can't initialize the
services.

What can I do?

Thanks a lot.

--
Rodrigo Hashimoto
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Re: Win32 services management?

2007-04-11 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I'm moving this thread to the samba-technical list if anyone
wants to follow it there.


Danny Tylman wrote:

> I am facing some difficulties in implementing the parser function.
> Somehow - I keep getting a 'nca_s_fault_ndr' responses.
> 
> I guess this is due invalid parsing of parameters. I am counting on the
> IDL specified here:
> 
> http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/idl/svcctl.idl?rev=18639&view=markup
> 
> 
> And having couple of problems:
> 
>   1.
> 
>  svcctl_CreateServiceW defines [in,size_is(dependencies_size)] uint8
> *dependencies and [in] uint32 dependencies_size. Which are uint8 type -
> I think I can use a RPC_DATA_BLOB for that. This type appear in several
> places - including the username/pass combination for the service user.
> Looking at a Windows packet created with the CreateService() API, I can
> see the password is encrypted. I don't know how to resolve this issue.
> 
>   2. I am trying to create a simple service, ignoring all the
>  complicated issues, that is: passing 'null' at all places I don't
>  have to implement. But yet - all I am getting is a 'nca_s_fault_ndr'.
>   3. Questions:
> 1. How much should I count on the Samba4 IDL? How is it
>generated? I found no official documentation on that.
> 2. Looking at the SMB package data I see that the
>'Policy_handle' part is larger (in size) than the Windows
>counterpart, my function does the same as the others
>regarding this handle, so I am just ignoring this issue. Is
>it wise?
> 3. I don't quite understand if it matters to declare a pointer
>in the code (UNISTR2 *str) and then use the prs_pointer()
>function rather than declaring a variable (UNISTR2 str) and
>using the smb_io_unistr2() function. I saw the latter do
>some padding (prs_align()), but I keep getting gaps in my
>packets which I can't explain - no matter which function I use.
> 
> Regards, Danny.
> 
> Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
>  
 I am interested in implementing the 'createservice()' functionality
 using the RPC protocol. I need this functionality badly, and I
 understand it is not implemented.
 
> 
>  
 I understand vaguely how this should be working and found some
 documentation,
 here: http://www.hsc.fr/ressources/articles/win_net_srv/
 here:http://www.hsc.fr/ressources/articles/win_net_srv/
 well_known_named_pipes.html
 and here:
 http://www.hsc.fr/ressources/articles/win_net_srv/msrpc_srvsvc.html.
 
> 
> Also look at the svcctl.ild definition in SAMBA_4_0.
> 
> http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/idl/svcctl.idl?rev=18639&view=markup
> 
> 
>  
 I guess the issue here is to use the same method used in the 'net'
 command ('net.c' - util) and try to call
 the rpc-client with just different parameter as
 the above mentioned links state.

 I don't have much experience in samba programming and I need to know:
 (a) how complicate is that? should it be an easy task?
 (b) I need some starting point.

 (of course - if this is already implemented somewhere, i would be
 glad to know!)
 
> 
> It's not too hard.  Look at
> svn://svnanon.samba.org/samba/SAMBA_3_0/source/utils/net_rpc_service.c
> 
> You'll need to do a few things.
> 
> * Add request/reply  structures to include/rpc_svcctl.h
> * Add the parsing functions to rpc_parse/parse_svcctl
> * Add the client function to rpc_client/cli_svcctl.c
> * Add in the new command to net_rpc_service.c
> 
> Start by looking at how the existing service management
> calls are implemented and then start adapting that to the
> new call.  All make sure you have a current release of
> wireshark to anaylze the traffic and make sure that
> parsing functions are doing the right thing.  Might even be
> good idea to get comfortable with the trafiic between
> two windows servers while playing with the Service Control
> MMC plugin.
> 
> Hope this helps get you started.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> cheers, jerry
> =
> Samba--- http://www.samba.org
> Centeris ---  http://www.centeris.com
> "What man is a man who does not make the world better?"  --Balian

- --
=
Samba--- http://www.samba.org
Centeris ---  http://www.centeris.com
"What man is a man who does not make the world better?"  --Balian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGHRSgIR7qMdg1EfYRAhXPAKCv7SbL2f/r

Re: [Samba] Re: psexec for Linux and svcctl.idl changes

2007-04-11 Thread Danny Tylman
I am currently trying to implement a CreateService() call in Samba 3; 
this is all what's left for a writing a psexec clone.



Kinda stuck. will appreciate help though... :)


Danny.


David Fischer (DHL US) wrote:


On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 21:33 +, an unknown sender wrote:
  

On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:27:55PM +0200, Henrik Zagerholm wrote:

Hi and thanks AH for a very good initiative of building this kind of  
tool.
I just wonder if it would be possible to port this to the SAMBA 3  
branch?
  

Yes it would be quite easy, but AH needs to post his patch
to the list so we can work on it first.

Thanks,

Jeremy.


Question,

Has there been and further work on this or is it dead?

thanks


  


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Re: Win32 services management?

2007-04-11 Thread Danny Tylman

Hi,


I am facing some difficulties in implementing the parser function. 
Somehow - I keep getting a 'nca_s_fault_ndr' responses.


I guess this is due invalid parsing of parameters. I am counting on the 
IDL specified here:


http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/idl/svcctl.idl?rev=18639&view=markup

And having couple of problems:

  1.

 svcctl_CreateServiceW defines [in,size_is(dependencies_size)] uint8 
*dependencies and [in] uint32 dependencies_size. Which are uint8 type - I think 
I can use a RPC_DATA_BLOB for that. This type appear in several places - 
including the username/pass combination for the service user. Looking at a 
Windows packet created with the CreateService() API, I can see the password is 
encrypted. I don't know how to resolve this issue.

  2. I am trying to create a simple service, ignoring all the
 complicated issues, that is: passing 'null' at all places I don't
 have to implement. But yet - all I am getting is a 'nca_s_fault_ndr'.
  3. Questions:
1. How much should I count on the Samba4 IDL? How is it
   generated? I found no official documentation on that.
2. Looking at the SMB package data I see that the
   'Policy_handle' part is larger (in size) than the Windows
   counterpart, my function does the same as the others
   regarding this handle, so I am just ignoring this issue. Is
   it wise?
3. I don't quite understand if it matters to declare a pointer
   in the code (UNISTR2 *str) and then use the prs_pointer()
   function rather than declaring a variable (UNISTR2 str) and
   using the smb_io_unistr2() function. I saw the latter do
   some padding (prs_align()), but I keep getting gaps in my
   packets which I can't explain - no matter which function I use.

Regards, Danny.

Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  

I am interested in implementing the 'createservice()' functionality
using the RPC protocol. I need this functionality badly, and I
understand it is not implemented.



  
I understand vaguely how this should be working and found 
some documentation,

here: http://www.hsc.fr/ressources/articles/win_net_srv/
here:http://www.hsc.fr/ressources/articles/win_net_srv/
well_known_named_pipes.html
and here: http://www.hsc.fr/ressources/articles/win_net_srv/msrpc_srvsvc.html.



Also look at the svcctl.ild definition in SAMBA_4_0.

http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/idl/svcctl.idl?rev=18639&view=markup

  
I guess the issue here is to use the same method used 
in the 'net' command ('net.c' - util) and try to call

the rpc-client with just different parameter as
the above mentioned links state.

I don't have much experience in samba programming and I 
need to know:

(a) how complicate is that? should it be an easy task?
(b) I need some starting point.

(of course - if this is already implemented somewhere, i would 
be glad to know!)



It's not too hard.  Look at
svn://svnanon.samba.org/samba/SAMBA_3_0/source/utils/net_rpc_service.c

You'll need to do a few things.

* Add request/reply  structures to include/rpc_svcctl.h
* Add the parsing functions to rpc_parse/parse_svcctl
* Add the client function to rpc_client/cli_svcctl.c
* Add in the new command to net_rpc_service.c

Start by looking at how the existing service management
calls are implemented and then start adapting that to the
new call.  All make sure you have a current release of
wireshark to anaylze the traffic and make sure that
parsing functions are doing the right thing.  Might even be
good idea to get comfortable with the trafiic between
two windows servers while playing with the Service Control
MMC plugin.

Hope this helps get you started.




cheers, jerry
=
Samba--- http://www.samba.org
Centeris ---  http://www.centeris.com
"What man is a man who does not make the world better?"  --Balian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGFW2FIR7qMdg1EfYRAo5zAJ0YPqvjTdWsCPiUvCCoYmbFaC0BjgCgg2+n
pdRXnahzWjL6NzMUcr/sjyU=
=ShmY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
  


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Re: psexec for Linux and svcctl.idl changes

2007-04-11 Thread David Fischer \(DHL US\)
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 21:33 +, an unknown sender wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:27:55PM +0200, Henrik Zagerholm wrote:
> > Hi and thanks AH for a very good initiative of building this kind of  
> > tool.
> > I just wonder if it would be possible to port this to the SAMBA 3  
> > branch?
> 
> Yes it would be quite easy, but AH needs to post his patch
> to the list so we can work on it first.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>   Jeremy.
Question,

Has there been and further work on this or is it dead?

thanks


-- 
David R. Fischer
Sr Systems Support Engineer
DHL Information Services (Americas)
8701 East Hartford Drive
Scottsdale, Arizona 85255 USA

Contact: +1.480.375.6428 
Cell:+1.480.226.3779
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Drag and Drop and Crash

2007-04-11 Thread Jim Summers
Thought I would post this for Rhiannon.  As mentioned that patch can not be 
removed safely. When I tried to remove it, it listed four or five other 
patches that may not work correctly.  So I cancelled out.


I may try and do a windows repair and see if that will put a fresh copy of the 
 affected file(s) back on the machine.   The repair I mention is the repair 
option you get when the installer finds a copy of windows on the hd and then 
asks to repair or whatever.  Not the one where you use recovery console.


Ideas / Suggestions.

Many Thanks

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi,
I have tried to post this to the samba list a couple times but keeps
getting bounced back for some reason...anyway here's my response --
I am running samba version 3.0.23 on RHEL 4. Last week I had experienced
a similar problem with a couple samba users. The reboot would occur when
trying to perform a save or save as...from a Word or Excel file on the
samba share. What I discovered to be the problem is the recent MS patch,
KB925902. I tried uninstalling the patch but for whatever reason it does
not fully uninstall, so I had to reinstall WinXP SP2 to fix the issue.
If your users are trying to copy MS office files, I would check to see
if your users have this patch installed. 
Rhiannon


If this fixes the problem for you feel free to post to the list for me.
Thanks!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jim Summers
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 9:01 AM
To: Samba
Subject: Re: [Samba] Drag and Drop and Crash

New Update.

Went to the user machine this morning.  Using regedit I went through the

registry and removed any keys / values that contained the samba server
name.

Rebooted and then re-mapped a drive.  Still no joy.  Trying to do a
simple 
drag and drop copy form one location in the share to another location in
the 
same share causes the machine to reboot.


Ideas / suggestions?

Many Thanks

Jim Summers wrote:

More info.  I went the user's workstation and created a new user.
Then 

mapped  a drive to a different share.  Attempted to copy a file within



that share and boom, reboot.

H.

TIA

Jim Summers wrote:

Hello List,

I am running a 3.0.24 server on redhat EL4.  I have a user that has 
mapped a drive to his home directory on the server.  When he copies a



file from the share to a local disk location, desktop for example, it


goes just fine.  When he attempts to copy / move / cut and paste a 
file from one location on the share to another location in the same 
share, it will literally crash his local machine and it reboots.  
Other users can do the same no problems.  He can map to a different 
samba server and is able to copy a file within that share.


I am suspecting some corrupt file entry or possibly something strange



in the registry not sure.  I have looked in his home directory and do



not see any thing out of the ordinary.

Ideas / Suggestions?

Many Thanks




--
Jim Summers
School of Computer Science-University of Oklahoma
-
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Group Policy install MSI from Samba share

2007-04-11 Thread James A. Dinkel
I'm assigning this to the Computer Accounts, not publishing to
groups/users.  The only thing I could think of was to give permission to
the Domain Computers group, but that does not work.

James Dinkel

-Original Message-
From: Daniel Samson
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 2:32 AM

Is you samba server using the ldap database on the domain controller
for authentication? This sounds like an authentication problem. Try
telling samba to inherit the permissions of the directory that the MSI
file lives in. Then simply change the owner or group owner of that
directory and file to the group you wish it to apply to. Do this use
chmod and chown in konsole or alternatively right click the file (in
your linux/unix variant) and go to permissions.

Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Drag and Drop and Crash

2007-04-11 Thread Jim Summers

New Update.

Went to the user machine this morning.  Using regedit I went through the 
registry and removed any keys / values that contained the samba server name.


Rebooted and then re-mapped a drive.  Still no joy.  Trying to do a simple 
drag and drop copy form one location in the share to another location in the 
same share causes the machine to reboot.


Ideas / suggestions?

Many Thanks

Jim Summers wrote:
More info.  I went the user's workstation and created a new user.  Then 
mapped  a drive to a different share.  Attempted to copy a file within 
that share and boom, reboot.


H.

TIA

Jim Summers wrote:

Hello List,

I am running a 3.0.24 server on redhat EL4.  I have a user that has 
mapped a drive to his home directory on the server.  When he copies a 
file from the share to a local disk location, desktop for example, it 
goes just fine.  When he attempts to copy / move / cut and paste a 
file from one location on the share to another location in the same 
share, it will literally crash his local machine and it reboots.  
Other users can do the same no problems.  He can map to a different 
samba server and is able to copy a file within that share.


I am suspecting some corrupt file entry or possibly something strange 
in the registry not sure.  I have looked in his home directory and do 
not see any thing out of the ordinary.


Ideas / Suggestions?

Many Thanks




--
Jim Summers
School of Computer Science-University of Oklahoma
-
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] reset on zero vc, global parameter or not

2007-04-11 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> Schaefer Jr, Thomas R. wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Accoring to the smb.conf man page "reset on zero vc" can be specified
>>> for a share. It has (S) after it in the man page.
>>>
>>> I set it on 4 shares I want it enabled on.  Now when I run smbstatus the
>>> first 4 lines displayed are
>>>
>>> Global parameter reset on zero vc found in service section!
>>> Global parameter reset on zero vc found in service section!
>>> Global parameter reset on zero vc found in service section!
>>> Global parameter reset on zero vc found in service section!
>>>
>>> So, which is correct, smbstatus or the man page?
> 
> Code trumps docs in this case.

Docs have been updated.




cheers, jerry
=
Samba--- http://www.samba.org
Centeris ---  http://www.centeris.com
"What man is a man who does not make the world better?"  --Balian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGHPAHIR7qMdg1EfYRAh09AKCqAbcHUuwqDkNZX9UOXwy+8PU0kwCdGhIp
WBOXkgsEmdqwFgOcd9hvnUU=
=05sr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] reset on zero vc, global parameter or not

2007-04-11 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Schaefer Jr, Thomas R. wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Accoring to the smb.conf man page "reset on zero vc" can be specified
> for a share. It has (S) after it in the man page.
> 
> I set it on 4 shares I want it enabled on.  Now when I run smbstatus the
> first 4 lines displayed are
> 
> Global parameter reset on zero vc found in service section!
> Global parameter reset on zero vc found in service section!
> Global parameter reset on zero vc found in service section!
> Global parameter reset on zero vc found in service section!
> 
> So, which is correct, smbstatus or the man page?

Code trumps docs in this case.





cheers, jerry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGHO3FIR7qMdg1EfYRAhWGAKCOoootXNOXueH2CtW5gCbL/bqkQACeO251
7VMxamRYRvc4smNt5ax4OEs=
=eyMA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] reset on zero vc, global parameter or not

2007-04-11 Thread Schaefer Jr, Thomas R.
Hello,

Accoring to the smb.conf man page "reset on zero vc" can be specified
for a share. It has (S) after it in the man page.

I set it on 4 shares I want it enabled on.  Now when I run smbstatus the
first 4 lines displayed are

Global parameter reset on zero vc found in service section!
Global parameter reset on zero vc found in service section!
Global parameter reset on zero vc found in service section!
Global parameter reset on zero vc found in service section!

So, which is correct, smbstatus or the man page?

Thankyou,
Tom Schaefer
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Problem with subfolder permissions within share

2007-04-11 Thread Mark Adams
Further to the below, you will want to use

create mask = 774
directory mask = 2775 

> 
> Hi Jethro,
> 
> Please make sure when you reply to mailing list messages that you 'Reply
> All' as the information may be useful for other users if they have
> similar issues.
> 
> To answer your question, No i'm not talking about adding an extra entry
> in the smb.conf, as it is in the same container as your first share it
> would still be visible even if you did this.
> 
> I am talking about setting the folder permissions in linux. You can do
> what you are asking effectively using groups.
> 
> I suggest you do the following;
> 
> Create 2 groups on your linux server; group1 and group2
> 
> Add user1, user2, and user3 to group1.
> Add user1 and user3 to group2.
> 
> Change your smb.conf config for "test" so it has 
> 
> valid users = @group1
> 
> using the @ sign means it will allow the people in that group, rather
> than having to add multiple users
> 
> Then set the perms (chmod) on the "test" folder in the filesystem to 2774
> (the 2 is important as this sets "SGID or Set group id" this will
> ensure any files created in this folder, no matter by what user, will
> always set the group)
> 
> Change the group ownership (chgrp) recursively to group1 for "test"
> 
> cd in to "test" and change the group ownership of "subtest" to group2
> 
> Set the perms of 2774 for the "subtest" folder.
> 
> Once this is done it should work as you desire, if user1 or user3 logs
> in, they will have access to all folders. If user2 logs in, they will
> not have access to "subtest".
> 
> I would recommend you read a bit more about linux if you intend to use
> it. Especially about permissions, see the following link for more
> information;
> 
> http://www.zzee.com/solutions/linux-permissions.shtml
> 
> Regards,
> Mark
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Re: samba: offer public share to Windows 98 and writable share to Windows XP

2007-04-11 Thread Mark Adams
Did you set a password for the music user with smbpasswd -a music ?

On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:17:46PM +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 11:57 +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote:
> > Dear List. My requirement is to set up a samba share named "music"
> > that: 
> >  I. it's read-only accessible from both Windows 98 and Windows
> > 2000/XP not requiring password; 
> > II. it's write-accessible from Windows XP protected by a password.
> 
> In my last email I forgot to mention my "uname -a" and my smb.conf
> 
> [global]
>   server string = File Server Sappho %v
>   log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
>   map to guest = nobody
>   hosts allow = 218.193.55.
>   security = share
>   encrypt passwords = no
>   bind interfaces only = 218.193.55.205
>   dos charset = 936
>   unix charset = UTF-8
> 
> [music]
>comment = /var/music
>path = /var/music
>guest ok = yes
>read only = no
> 
> Later I am aware that Windows NT (including XP) probably doesn't work
> with "encrypt passwords = no" so I removed that line, the result is,
> Windows XP user can always map the share as user "music" but after
> mounted the user still don't have permission to write to the share.
> Sambe log shows the user is still "nobody" but not "music".
> 
> [2007/04/11 02:15:59, 1]
> smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(693)
>   218.193.55.233 (218.193.55.233) connect to service music initially 
> as user nobody (uid=65534, gid=65534) (pid 15327)
> 
> my system information:
> sappho ~ # equery which samba
> /usr/portage/net-fs/samba/samba-3.0.24.ebuild
> sappho ~ # uname -a
> Linux sappho.realss.com 2.6.18-gentoo-r3 #23 Mon Apr 9 23:27:21 HKT 2007 
> sparc64 sun4u TI UltraSparc IIi (Sabre) GNU/Linux
> 
> My latest smb.conf:
> 
> sappho ~ # cat /etc/samba/smb.conf
> [global]
>   server string = File Server Sappho %v
>   log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
>   map to guest = nobody
>   hosts allow = 218.193.55.
>   security = share
>   bind interfaces only = 218.193.55.205
>   dos charset = 936
>   unix charset = UTF-8
> 
> [music]
>comment = /var/music
>path = /var/music
>guest ok = yes
>read only = no
> 
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Summary from Tuesday's Bugzilla Day

2007-04-11 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

FYI

Thanks to all who reported and helped track down a few
annoying and visible bugs (compile failures, crashes, etc...)
in 3.0.25rc1.

I've add a short summary of the day's work at
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bugzilla_Day
(includes links to the list of 3.0.25 fixed bugs, current
patch file for 3.0.25rc1, and plans for 3.0.25rc2).





cheers, jerry
=
Samba--- http://www.samba.org
Centeris ---  http://www.centeris.com
"What man is a man who does not make the world better?"  --Balian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGHOUaIR7qMdg1EfYRArfCAKDZnBXgx0iT8X1gFlv09c1JBQzAuQCfX4pn
GGNnU55fjH130n3p1Yl73E4=
=gsos
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] SMB Signature verification failed when establish trust with win2003 domain

2007-04-11 Thread Lin Li
I found the solution. When the problem happens I set the "client use 
spnego" to no. If I set it to yes, the trust works.


Thanks,
Lin


Daniel Samson wrote:

Could you please send a copy of your configuration files to me so that
i can check if it is a configuration problem.

daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Problem with subfolder permissions within share

2007-04-11 Thread Mark Adams
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 10:14:49AM +0200, Jethro Hermans wrote:
> > > I want to do the following set-up but I don't succeed in it:
> > > 
> > > e.g.:
> > >
> > > users: user1
> > >user2
> > >user3
> > >
> > >share: "test" with access from user1,2 and 3
> > >
> > > Now I want to create a subfolder in "test" e.g. "subtest" but only with 
> > > access for user1 and 3 but I'm not able to do that.
> > > Is there a solution for this?
> 
> > I assume that all of these users are in a group e.g "group1" that has
> > read/write access, and you are allowing @group1 for the valid users =
> > access in smb.conf?
> >
> > To get what you want you could create another group "group2" that
> > allows read/write permission to "subtest" with only user1 and user3 in
> > the group.
>
> Jethro wrote privately
> Do you want to say that I have to create a second folder (as
> subfolder)
> in the smb.conf with only these users as valid? Is this the only
> right way to do this or is there maybe a way to do this in windows.
> Because I created the subfolder via windows so it would be more easy to
> manage the permissions and allowed users also that way.<

Hi Jethro,

Please make sure when you reply to mailing list messages that you 'Reply
All' as the information may be useful for other users if they have
similar issues.

To answer your question, No i'm not talking about adding an extra entry
in the smb.conf, as it is in the same container as your first share it
would still be visible even if you did this.

I am talking about setting the folder permissions in linux. You can do
what you are asking effectively using groups.

I suggest you do the following;

Create 2 groups on your linux server; group1 and group2

Add user1, user2, and user3 to group1.
Add user1 and user3 to group2.

Change your smb.conf config for "test" so it has 

valid users = @group1

using the @ sign means it will allow the people in that group, rather
than having to add multiple users

Then set the perms (chmod) on the "test" folder in the filesystem to 2774
(the 2 is important as this sets "SGID or Set group id" this will
ensure any files created in this folder, no matter by what user, will
always set the group)

Change the group ownership (chgrp) recursively to group1 for "test"

cd in to "test" and change the group ownership of "subtest" to group2

Set the perms of 2774 for the "subtest" folder.

Once this is done it should work as you desire, if user1 or user3 logs
in, they will have access to all folders. If user2 logs in, they will
not have access to "subtest".

I would recommend you read a bit more about linux if you intend to use
it. Especially about permissions, see the following link for more
information;

http://www.zzee.com/solutions/linux-permissions.shtml

Regards,
Mark
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] ldap password sync

2007-04-11 Thread David Pinkerton
>Ok, in this case you must look at pdb_nds
>Volker

worked a charm - many thanks.

I owe you a beer the next time your in Melbourne.

Regards,

David Pinkerton




The contents of this email may be privileged and confidential, any unauthorised 
use of the contents is expressly prohibited. If you are not the intended 
recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted 
to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. PLAN 
Australia is not liable for the proper and complete transmission of the 
information contained in this communication, nor for any delay in its receipt.
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Roaming Desktops with Linux Clients

2007-04-11 Thread Dave Ewart
On Wednesday, 11.04.2007 at 21:07 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:

> On Wednesday 11 April 2007 20:44, Dave Ewart wrote:
> > Well, we clearly have different opinions here.  I don't fancy
> > mounting /home (via NFS) on every Linux box.  That just strikes me
> > as the wrong way to do it: a local machine root compromise puts the
> > entirety of /home at risk.  pam_mount at least ensures that you only
> > get the home directory for the current logged-in user
> > remotely-mounted.
> 
> I wasn't thinking straight and was under the impression that local
> root would need special access to the LDAP server but that isn't
> necessary with the correct ACLs.
> 
> Yes, you're right :)

:-)

Yes, local root needs to be told to *trust* the LDAP server, as far as
authentication and users/groups are concerned, but no special access is
required.

Dave.
-- 
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager, Cancer Epidemiology Unit
Cancer Research UK / Oxford University
PGP: CC70 1883 BD92 E665 B840 118B 6E94 2CFD 694D E370
Get key from http://www.ceu.ox.ac.uk/~davee/davee-ceu-ox-ac-uk.asc
N 51.7518, W 1.2016


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Roaming Desktops with Linux Clients

2007-04-11 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Wednesday 11 April 2007 20:44, Dave Ewart wrote:
> Well, we clearly have different opinions here.  I don't fancy mounting
> /home (via NFS) on every Linux box.  That just strikes me as the wrong
> way to do it: a local machine root compromise puts the entirety of /home
> at risk.  pam_mount at least ensures that you only get the home
> directory for the current logged-in user remotely-mounted.

I wasn't thinking straight and was under the impression that local root would 
need special access to the LDAP server but that isn't necessary with the 
correct ACLs.

Yes, you're right :)

-- 
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C


pgp5iWGWEpqGX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] ldap password sync

2007-04-11 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 09:20:22PM +1000, David Pinkerton wrote:
> A little more background.
> LDAP directory is Novell eDirectory.  cn=admin,o=dhp is a
> "god" user.  R/W rights to every object.  The reason I
> need to sync the password is for the rollout of Zenworks.
> It uses the userPassword to authenticate the zen client.

Ok, in this case you must look at pdb_nds

Volker


pgp4ODUhXgtQK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Any pointers for multiple subnets?

2007-04-11 Thread Mark Adams
> With this setup, some things work as desired. I am able to connect to 
> 192.168.0.10 (Email server) from 192.168.1.5 after setting my linux box 
> as the gateway. Vice versa, I am able to connect to 192.168.1.6 (Email 
> server) from 192.168.0.2 by setting 192.168.0.177 (my linux box's IP on 
> outside LAN).
> 
> I am beginning to think so far so good. But, Windows networking does  
> not follow suit. I am not able to browse the network when these settings 
> are active.
> 
> What gives? My guess is I will be castigated for rushing with an email 
> before reading the Archives.
> 
> But hope springs eternal. Regards,
> 
> Nandan

Can you browse to \\ip.of.samba.box and see the shares?

> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] ldap password sync

2007-04-11 Thread David Pinkerton
Thank you to everyone who replied.

   workgroup = HOME
   netbios name = DHP

   security = user
   encrypt passwords = yes
   enable privileges = yes

   passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1

   log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
   utmp = yes
   max log size = 50
   log level = 1
   syslog = 0

   add user script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-useradd -m "%u"
   add machine script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-useradd -w "%u"

   add group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupadd -p "%g"

   add user to group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupmod -m "%u" "%g"
   delete user from group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupmod -x "%u" "%g"
   set primary group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-usermod -g "%g" "%u"

   domain logons = yes
   domain master = yes
   os level = 65
   preferred master = yes
   wins support = yes

   ldap admin dn = cn=admin,o=dhp
   ldap passwd sync = yes
   ldap delete dn = yes
   ldap suffix = o=dhp
   ldap machine suffix = ou=machine
   ldap user suffix = ou=staff
   ldap group suffix = ou=group
   ldap idmap suffix = ou=idmap

   idmap uid = 1-2
   idmap gid = 1-2


I removed the unix password syn and passwd program directive - no luck  :-(
It will still not sync the users password change to the userPassword attribute.

Again packet traces show NO modify request for userPassword, only the samba  
attributes.

A little more background.
LDAP directory is Novell eDirectory.  cn=admin,o=dhp is a "god" user.  R/W 
rights to every object.  The reason I need to sync the password is for the 
rollout of Zenworks.  It uses the userPassword to authenticate the zen client.

The /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-passwd scripts works when called from command line.


Has anyone ever had this working - can't find anyone who says they have, just 
lots of "should" work.  I'm beginning to think it is a samba myth.



Regard,

David Pinkerton





The contents of this email may be privileged and confidential, any unauthorised 
use of the contents is expressly prohibited. If you are not the intended 
recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted 
to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. PLAN 
Australia is not liable for the proper and complete transmission of the 
information contained in this communication, nor for any delay in its receipt.
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Roaming Desktops with Linux Clients

2007-04-11 Thread Dave Ewart
On Wednesday, 11.04.2007 at 20:35 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:

> On Wednesday 11 April 2007 19:40, Dave Ewart wrote:
> > > That combined with pam_winbind and nss_winbind should get you what
> > > you want.
> >
> > Seconded.
> >
> > We use direct LDAP authentication for the Linux workstations
> > (Windows PCs use LDAP via Samba) and pam_mount - works very nicely.
> 
> If I was using LDAP directly then I would just mount /home on each of
> the Linux machines.
> 
> IMO pam_mount is only useful if you don't trust root on the Linux
> boxes, or the master repository for files doesn't do NFS, or the home
> directories aren't available in a single directory.
> 
> (pam_mount seems more evil than using NFS like that IMO :)

Well, we clearly have different opinions here.  I don't fancy mounting
/home (via NFS) on every Linux box.  That just strikes me as the wrong
way to do it: a local machine root compromise puts the entirety of /home
at risk.  pam_mount at least ensures that you only get the home
directory for the current logged-in user remotely-mounted.

Dave.
-- 
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager, Cancer Epidemiology Unit
Cancer Research UK / Oxford University
PGP: CC70 1883 BD92 E665 B840 118B 6E94 2CFD 694D E370
Get key from http://www.ceu.ox.ac.uk/~davee/davee-ceu-ox-ac-uk.asc
N 51.7518, W 1.2016


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Any pointers for multiple subnets?

2007-04-11 Thread Nandan Bhat

Hi,

I am trying to have some routing done between two subnets. One is 
192.168.1.0/24 and has my LAN computers running a mix of Windows 98/XP 
clients. There are two linux machines on this network running Samba. 
Another is 192.168.0.0/24 and has the other LAN. Only my linux machines 
have two NICs, one for each LAN.


I am trying out one of these linux machines to be the gateway for both 
the LANs. My routing table is as follows


Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse 
Iface

192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth0
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth1
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0  00 eth1
0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG0  00 eth0

At present, I am testing my system, so I have adopted a VERY liberal 
iptables ruleset.  It has the following entries


#! /bin/sh
#
# definitions
IPTABLES=/sbin/iptables
DEPMOD=/sbin/depmod
MODPROBE=/sbin/modprobe
EXTIF="eth1"
INTIF="eth0"
UNIVERSE=0.0.0.0/0
#
# Load modules
$DEPMOD -a
$MODPROBE ip_tables
$MODPROBE ip_conntrack
$MODPROBE ip_conntrack_ftp
$MODPROBE ip_conntrack_irc
$MODPROBE iptable_nat
$MODPROBE ip_nat_ftp
$MODPROBE ip_nat_irc
#
# Enable IP forwarding
echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
#
# Begin iptables rules
$IPTABLES -P INPUT ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -F INPUT
$IPTABLES -P OUTPUT ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -F OUTPUT
$IPTABLES -P FORWARD ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -F FORWARD
$IPTABLES -t nat -F
#$IPTABLES -A INPUT -j ACCEPT
#$IPTABLES -A OUTPUT -j ACCEPT
#$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $EXTIF -o $INTIF -j ACCEPT
#$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $INTIF -o $EXTIF -j ACCEPT
#$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -j LOG
$IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o $EXTIF -j MASQUERADE
$IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o $INTIF -j MASQUERADE

With this setup, some things work as desired. I am able to connect to 
192.168.0.10 (Email server) from 192.168.1.5 after setting my linux box 
as the gateway. Vice versa, I am able to connect to 192.168.1.6 (Email 
server) from 192.168.0.2 by setting 192.168.0.177 (my linux box's IP on 
outside LAN).


I am beginning to think so far so good. But, Windows networking does  
not follow suit. I am not able to browse the network when these settings 
are active.


What gives? My guess is I will be castigated for rushing with an email 
before reading the Archives.


But hope springs eternal. Regards,

Nandan

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Problem with subfolder permissions within share

2007-04-11 Thread Mark Adams
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 10:14:49AM +0200, Jethro Hermans wrote:
> Dear,
> 
> I want to do the following set-up but I don't succeed in it:
> 
> e.g.:
> 
> users: user1
>  user2
>  user3
> 
> share: "test" with access from user1,2 and 3
> 
> Now I want to create a subfolder in "test" e.g. "subtest" but only with 
> access for user1 and 3 but I'm not able to do that.
> Is there a solution for this?

I assume that all of these users are in a group e.g "group1" that has
read/write access, and you are allowing @group1 for the valid users =
access in smb.conf?

To get what you want you could create another group "group2" that
allows read/write permission to "subtest" with only user1 and user3 in
the group.

> 
> Thank you,
> Jethro

Regards,
Mark
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Problem with subfolder permissions

2007-04-11 Thread Jethro Hermans

Dear,

I want to do the following set-up but I don't succeed in it:

e.g.:

users: user1
user2
user3

share: "test" with access from user1,2 and 3

Now I want to create a subfolder in "test" e.g. "subtest" but only with 
access for user1 and 3 but I'm not able to do that.

Is there a solution for this?

Thank you,
Jethro

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Roaming Desktops with Linux Clients

2007-04-11 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Wednesday 11 April 2007 19:40, Dave Ewart wrote:
> > That combined with pam_winbind and nss_winbind should get you what you
> > want.
>
> Seconded.
>
> We use direct LDAP authentication for the Linux workstations (Windows
> PCs use LDAP via Samba) and pam_mount - works very nicely.

If I was using LDAP directly then I would just mount /home on each of the 
Linux machines.

IMO pam_mount is only useful if you don't trust root on the Linux boxes, or 
the master repository for files doesn't do NFS, or the home directories 
aren't available in a single directory.

(pam_mount seems more evil than using NFS like that IMO :)

-- 
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C


pgpk2rgRkMbtW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Problem to start services nmbd and smbd

2007-04-11 Thread Mark Adams
Hi Rodrigo,

It is likely you are missing some dependancies.

Why is it that you did not use apt to install samba? I would recommend
you do this as apt will install all dependancies for you. A simple

apt-get install samba

should do the job.

Regards,
Mark

On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 08:45:33PM +0300, Rodrigo Hashimoto wrote:
> Hi, I'm new in the Linux world, I've worked for about tree months with
> Debian and I've a big problem to start the samba services (nmbd and smbd).
> 
> I downloaded the samba-latest.tar.gz from the www.samba.org and tried to
> compile it. I didn't have problem with it, but I can't initialize the
> services.
> 
> What can I do?
> 
> Thanks a lot.
> 
> -- 
> Rodrigo Hashimoto
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Roaming Desktops with Linux Clients

2007-04-11 Thread Dave Ewart
On Tuesday, 10.04.2007 at 22:03 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:

> On Wednesday 11 April 2007 06:55, Jimmy Perkins wrote:
> > I have Samba setup on a Debian server and have implemented roaming desktops
> > for the windows clients.  In this network, there
> > are also LINUX clients that i would like to use roaming desktops and the
> > users be able to access their home directory on the server
> > when they login to one of these linux clients.
> >
> > Is this possible using Samba?  And can anyone point me to a
> > website/tutorial or any information regarding this?  I have searched a lot
> > and have not found much related to my problem.
> 
> You could try pam_mount - http://pam-mount.sourceforge.net/
> 
> That combined with pam_winbind and nss_winbind should get you what you want.

Seconded.

We use direct LDAP authentication for the Linux workstations (Windows
PCs use LDAP via Samba) and pam_mount - works very nicely.

Dave.
-- 
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager, Cancer Epidemiology Unit
Cancer Research UK / Oxford University
PGP: CC70 1883 BD92 E665 B840 118B 6E94 2CFD 694D E370
Get key from http://www.ceu.ox.ac.uk/~davee/davee-ceu-ox-ac-uk.asc
N 51.7518, W 1.2016


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Problem with subfolder permissions within share

2007-04-11 Thread Jethro Hermans

Dear,

I want to do the following set-up but I don't succeed in it:

e.g.:

users: user1
  user2
  user3

share: "test" with access from user1,2 and 3

Now I want to create a subfolder in "test" e.g. "subtest" but only with 
access for user1 and 3 but I'm not able to do that.

Is there a solution for this?

Thank you,
Jethro


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Problem with subfolder permissions within share

2007-04-11 Thread Jethro Hermans

Dear,

I want to do the following set-up but I don't succeed in it:

e.g.:

users: user1
 user2
 user3

share: "test" with access from user1,2 and 3

Now I want to create a subfolder in "test" e.g. "subtest" but only with 
access for user1 and 3 but I'm not able to do that.

Is there a solution for this?

Thank you,
Jethro
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba