Re: [Samba] 20 second delays when accessing Samba on Fedora 11
Thanks Jeremy. No Ipv6 enabled. This problem even occurs if I use "\\192.168.0.254" (IP of my samba server) rather than a netbios name. I'm not running a local DNS server. I'm really pulling my hair out on this one. Are there any forums you might suggest I ask this question on, in addition to here? Thanks for your time. I can make the wireshark trace available, if interested. ... Altan On 8/7/2009 4:33 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 07:59:34PM -0400, Altan (aol.com) wrote: I had samba running fine on a Fedora 6 machine. I've upgraded to Fedora 11 and I'm getting huge delays when first accessing a folder. With Fedora 11 I'm ussing samba-3.3.2-0.33.fc11.i586. I'm getting about 60+ second delays before being requested to enter my username/password. I've used WireShark and can see 1) Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE 2) 20 seconds pass 3) Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_AUTH, User: xxx/yyy from my PC 4) 20 seconds passes 5) Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_AUTH, User: xxx/yyy from my PC 6) again, 20 sec 7) Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_AUTH, User: xxx/yyy from my PC Then it asks me for username/password and I can access the share. There isn't anything unique in my smb.conf compared to before (when it worked well with Fedora 6). Highlights are below. H. Name resolution lookup timeouts ? Possibly IPv6 related (just a guess). Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] re reading config
On 08/07/2009 07:48 PM, Miguel Medalha wrote: > You can force it without restarting with the following commands: > > For smbd > smbcontrol smbd reload-config > > For nmbd: > smbcontrol nmbd reload-config > > For winbind: > smbcontrol winbindd reload-config > > The process number can also be used instead of the daemon's name. > > For samba version > 3.3 you can force all 3 daemon's to reload > configuration with the following command: > > smbcontrol all reload-config > Miguel, Thanks for pointing that out. Now its in the archive we can hope that people will find it. - John T. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] re reading config
You can force it without restarting with the following commands: For smbd smbcontrol smbd reload-config For nmbd: smbcontrol nmbd reload-config For winbind: smbcontrol winbindd reload-config The process number can also be used instead of the daemon's name. For samba version > 3.3 you can force all 3 daemon's to reload configuration with the following command: smbcontrol all reload-config -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] re reading config
On 08/07/2009 07:05 PM, smb2...@gmail.com wrote: > Ryan Novosielski wrote: >> Terry wrote: >>> Hi I am using freebsd 6.2-RELEASE with Samba version 3.0.24 out of >>> interest does it read the config periodically on its own with out >>> restarting it ? >> >> Pretty sure it does, but I never wait. > > I was troubleshooting some issues today and reading the "HowTo" book. In > one location it warned about editing the .conf file on a running system, > since it DOES re-read it on each new connection or at approx 60 second > intervals. Then in another chapter made an apparently conflicting > statement about "remember to restart after the changes." From what I saw > today on 3.3.x it did reconfig itself on the fly. > > -RW Ryan, It may seem conflicting on the surface. Really, if you make changes to the smb.conf file that affects the way Samba works then smbd, nmbd, and/or winbind must be restarted. Consider for example, a change of: security = user to security = ads In the above case, the operating mode must be reset, and that happens only on restarting the Samba daemons. On the other hand, consider what happens when changing share stanza from: path = /somewhere/deep to path = /somewhereelse/notsodeep Any connections that existed prior to a connection being set up will remain in effect with the previous setting while any new connection will use the new setting. I hope that helps to clarify. Cheers, John T. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Samba 3 PDC > 3.3.4 broken with Win 7 RTM
I just installed Win 7 RTM (Release to Manufacturing), not RC nor Beta. After searching the archives I modified the required registry settings listed in other emails. I upgraded my Samba from the stock Centos 5.3 version to 3.3.7. Joining the domain worked, but I was unable to log in. I would get a 'Trust relationship denied' type error when trying to log in as a user of the domain. Everything works with XP/Vista. I downgraded to 3.3.4 and it worked. I do not know if bug 6099 which says it was rolled into version 3.3.5 and relates to Microsoft/Samba interoperability actually broke stuff with the RTM or what. The error message from 3.3.7 I noticed with debug logging was: [2009/08/07 19:05:40, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:_netr_ServerAuthenticate2(555) _netr_ServerAuthenticate2: netlogon_creds_server_check failed. Rejecting auth request from client XX-PC machine account XX-PC$ netr_ServerAuthenticate2: struct netr_ServerAuthenticate2 out: struct netr_ServerAuthenticate2 return_credentials : * return_credentials: struct netr_Credential data : negotiate_flags : * negotiate_flags : 0x400041ff (1073758719) 1: NETLOGON_NEG_ACCOUNT_LOCKOUT 1: NETLOGON_NEG_PERSISTENT_SAMREPL 1: NETLOGON_NEG_ARCFOUR 1: NETLOGON_NEG_PROMOTION_COUNT 1: NETLOGON_NEG_CHANGELOG_BDC 1: NETLOGON_NEG_FULL_SYNC_REPL 1: NETLOGON_NEG_MULTIPLE_SIDS 1: NETLOGON_NEG_REDO 1: NETLOGON_NEG_PASSWORD_CHANGE_REFUSAL 0: NETLOGON_NEG_SEND_PASSWORD_INFO_PDC 0: NETLOGON_NEG_GENERIC_PASSTHROUGH 0: NETLOGON_NEG_CONCURRENT_RPC 0: NETLOGON_NEG_AVOID_ACCOUNT_DB_REPL 0: NETLOGON_NEG_AVOID_SECURITYAUTH_DB_REPL 1: NETLOGON_NEG_128BIT 0: NETLOGON_NEG_TRANSITIVE_TRUSTS 0: NETLOGON_NEG_DNS_DOMAIN_TRUSTS 0: NETLOGON_NEG_PASSWORD_SET2 0: NETLOGON_NEG_GETDOMAININFO 0: NETLOGON_NEG_CROSS_FOREST_TRUSTS 0: NETLOGON_NEG_NEUTRALIZE_NT4_EMULATION 0: NETLOGON_NEG_RODC_PASSTHROUGH 0: NETLOGON_NEG_AUTHENTICATED_RPC_LSASS 1: NETLOGON_NEG_SCHANNEL result : NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] re reading config
Ryan Novosielski wrote: Terry wrote: Hi I am using freebsd 6.2-RELEASE with Samba version 3.0.24 out of interest does it read the config periodically on its own with out restarting it ? Pretty sure it does, but I never wait. I was troubleshooting some issues today and reading the "HowTo" book. In one location it warned about editing the .conf file on a running system, since it DOES re-read it on each new connection or at approx 60 second intervals. Then in another chapter made an apparently conflicting statement about "remember to restart after the changes." From what I saw today on 3.3.x it did reconfig itself on the fly. -RW -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba permission problem
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 11:24:41PM +0200, Marco Lovadina wrote: > Hi, > > I have an Ubuntu server acting as PDC on a LAN whose client > have WIN Xp professional installed. > > Domain's users are divided into different groups. Let's > focus on only two of them, say group1 and group2. > > Now I havea share defined in smb.conf as follows: > > > > [shareName] > > comment = shareName > > path = /home/ut/shareName > > read only = No > > guest ok = no > > create mask = 0665 > > directory mask = 0770 > > force group = group1 > > > > Access rights for shareName are : rwxrwxr-x. > > There's a subdir of shareName whose access rights are: > rwxrwx--- > > > > I'd like that no one not belonging to group1 could access to this subdir. > > Unfotunately, accessing from a win xp client, users belonging to group2 > could visit and listing the subdir. > > Surprisingly, this doesn't occurs if I modify the subdir's access rights so > that they become: rwx---r-x. > > It seems like group access specification were swapped with others access > ones, but I can't understand why. > > Of course I'd like to have a more consistent behaviour. Is there something > I'm missing? > > Otherwise, how can I do to fix what looks like a mistake? Need more info. What are the ownerships on those directories ? FYI. PLEASE DON'T JUST REPLY TO ME. Please reply to the list. Many people send emails directly to me once I've replied on-list, and I don't have any bandwidth to do a private conversation and summarize on list. Thanks, Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] This is happening during config
checking sys/mount.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: sys/mount.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: sys/mount.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: sys/mount.h: see the Autoconf documentation configure: WARNING: sys/mount.h: section "Present But Cannot Be Compiled" configure: WARNING: sys/mount.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result configure: WARNING: sys/mount.h: in the future, the compiler will take precedence configure: WARNING: ## ## configure: WARNING: ## Report this to samba-techni...@samba.org ## configure: WARNING: ## ## Can anyone help? Chris Lavin -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] samba 3.4.0 upgrade on Suse 11.1
Hello, I want to upgrade samba 3.3.4 on SuSE 11.1 to 3.4. Has anyone encountered and problems with the new release, for example, authenticating against a windows AD? Thanks in advance, James -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba Team Blog.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: > The Samba Team has started a blog to try and This is outstanding (the idea, and the first entry). I look forward to future updates. -David -- David Eisner http://cradle.brokenglass.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Samba Team Blog.
Hi All, The Samba Team has started a blog to try and keep people up to date about what is going in in the fast moving world of Samba development :-). The first edition is available here: http://news.samba.org/developers/Samba_Team_Blog_1/ Yes, I know we have no comments available yet, we're bugging people to get this added (mentioning no names :-). If you want to comment please do so on the mailing lists, I'm sure no one will be shy :-). Let us know what you think ! We'll try and keep this updated every few weeks or so (or sooner if we have anything exciting going on). Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Samba permission problem
Hi, I have an Ubuntu server acting as PDC on a LAN whose client have WIN Xp professional installed. Domain's users are divided into different groups. Let's focus on only two of them, say group1 and group2. Now I havea share defined in smb.conf as follows: [shareName] comment = shareName path = /home/ut/shareName read only = No guest ok = no create mask = 0665 directory mask = 0770 force group = group1 Access rights for shareName are : rwxrwxr-x. There's a subdir of shareName whose access rights are: rwxrwx--- I'd like that no one not belonging to group1 could access to this subdir. Unfotunately, accessing from a win xp client, users belonging to group2 could visit and listing the subdir. Surprisingly, this doesn't occurs if I modify the subdir's access rights so that they become: rwx---r-x. It seems like group access specification were swapped with others access ones, but I can't understand why. Of course I'd like to have a more consistent behaviour. Is there something I'm missing? Otherwise, how can I do to fix what looks like a mistake? Thanks in advance Marco -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] re reading config
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Terry wrote: > Hi I am using freebsd 6.2-RELEASE with Samba version 3.0.24 out of > interest does it read the config periodically on its own with out > restarting it ? Pretty sure it does, but I never wait. - -- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novosielski - Systems Programmer II |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| |novos...@umdnj.edu - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent.|IST/CST - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkp8mwEACgkQmb+gadEcsb4xoACgqjOaG55DJDqdN6mu+pLoK54U 2PQAnRPAyaaNSYb0W4NrFMWRGj6I/oI2 =Vp5O -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] re reading config
Hi I am using freebsd 6.2-RELEASE with Samba version 3.0.24 out of interest does it read the config periodically on its own with out restarting it ? Cheers -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] sharepoint services 3.0 and samba?
I'm not really sure where to ask this, so please, no flames! Has anyone been able to get microsoft sharepoint services 3.0 to work with authenticating my samba users that are in openldap? I have SPS 3.0 installed on a Windows 2003 Server that is joined to my samba domain and working ok, NT domain users can log into windows 2003 fine, but I can't get http://sharepoint to authenticate the users. i've tried ADMIN\awilliam and just awilliam with my password, but it kicks me out with an "Access Denied" error after a few tries. I'm not really sure if my problem lies with getting IIS to authenticate against samba/openldap, or if its a setting in sharepoint services, or what? I've google'd but haven't came across anything helpful. Any ideas? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] 20 second delays when accessing Samba on Fedora 11
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 07:59:34PM -0400, Altan (aol.com) wrote: >> I had samba running fine on a Fedora 6 machine. I've upgraded to Fedora >> 11 and I'm getting huge delays when first accessing a folder. With >> Fedora 11 I'm ussing samba-3.3.2-0.33.fc11.i586. >> >> I'm getting about 60+ second delays before being requested to enter my >> username/password. >> >> I've used WireShark and can see >> >> 1) Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE >> 2) 20 seconds pass >> 3) Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_AUTH, User: xxx/yyy from my PC >> 4) 20 seconds passes >> 5) Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_AUTH, User: xxx/yyy from my PC >> 6) again, 20 sec >> 7) Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_AUTH, User: xxx/yyy from my PC >> >> Then it asks me for username/password and I can access the share. >> >> There isn't anything unique in my smb.conf compared to before (when it >> worked well with Fedora 6). Highlights are below. > > H. Name resolution lookup timeouts ? Possibly IPv6 related > (just a guess). I had a similar odd situation on RedHat at one point (old stuff, probably 9.x) where for some reason, the upon connecting to the machine, it would try to contact a former IP address it had for a really long time, eventually time out, and then connect to the right address. I never did figure out why it was doing that. - -- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novosielski - Systems Programmer II |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| |novos...@umdnj.edu - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent.|IST/CST - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkp8kcEACgkQmb+gadEcsb6WyQCfZCyANeKlHbqT5uQT+vB0GKa1 CxUAn0WdtECMtXPGbtMS8SGzj2Ym2nVB =0/6n -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] 20 second delays when accessing Samba on Fedora 11
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 07:59:34PM -0400, Altan (aol.com) wrote: > I had samba running fine on a Fedora 6 machine. I've upgraded to Fedora > 11 and I'm getting huge delays when first accessing a folder. With > Fedora 11 I'm ussing samba-3.3.2-0.33.fc11.i586. > > I'm getting about 60+ second delays before being requested to enter my > username/password. > > I've used WireShark and can see > > 1) Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE > 2) 20 seconds pass > 3) Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_AUTH, User: xxx/yyy from my PC > 4) 20 seconds passes > 5) Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_AUTH, User: xxx/yyy from my PC > 6) again, 20 sec > 7) Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_AUTH, User: xxx/yyy from my PC > > Then it asks me for username/password and I can access the share. > > There isn't anything unique in my smb.conf compared to before (when it > worked well with Fedora 6). Highlights are below. H. Name resolution lookup timeouts ? Possibly IPv6 related (just a guess). Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Reverse Veto Files - let's try again!
On 8/7/2009, Jeremy Allison (j...@samba.org) wrote: > I know, but I've had a lot of experience on this, and > I really don't want to change that code unless there > is a known bug. Well, thats the last word then, as I certainly won't question or second guess you on something like that... :) Adding Allow Files will accomplish the same thing anyway... -- Best regards, Charles -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Reverse Veto Files - let's try again!
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 06:21:13AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 8/6/2009, Jeremy Allison (j...@samba.org) wrote: > > Don't change the veto files semantics please. > > It wouldn't be 'changing' the semantics, it would be adding to them. Adding is a subset of "changing" :-). > I don't see any way adding this new 'semantic' could break any existing > installations. I know, but I've had a lot of experience on this, and I really don't want to change that code unless there is a known bug. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Samba HA Issue Fixed, need clarifications.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Turns out that the issue I was having regarding the inability to add computers to a domain in a fail over state using the backup PDC was a result of the computer(s) in question still having a record in LDAP. When I manually removed the computer record from LDAP (since removing it from the domain did not remove it from LDAP), failed over to the backup PDC and added it to the domain, it worked. Since samba is capable of adding a computer to LDAP when it is added to the domain, is it possible for it to automatically remove a computer from LDAP when it is removed from the domain? What mechanism is "broken" or not configured properly that would provide this? Does anyone have any idea what attribute(s) in a computer record in LDAP would cause the record to be "homed" to a particular PDC? I'd like to know for historical reasons if possible. Thanks. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkp8SDoACgkQ5B+8XEnAvqsylwCeLwhtgvXVqaAZuGxcyvb6WHho x18AnRvaRNhsJp2VXo6/Y7OwGHSbIxfj =Yt11 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Files loosing changes (Pipe broken error)
Hi, we are having some troubles at the office with the samba server. Sometimes, when someone is working with a file in the server (I/e an excel file) and save the changes, they doesnt save. Excel doesnt show any error, so, i presume that client machine receives an ok from the server. But if you see the logs, you can find an error for each file lost: [2009/08/06 17:01:56, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_data(534) read_data: read failure for 4 bytes to client 192.168.1.105. Error = No existe ninguna ruta hasta el `host' [2009/08/06 17:01:56, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(1230) monica (192.168.1.105) closed connection to service Recursos Compartidos [2009/08/06 17:01:56, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_data(562) write_data: write failure in writing to client 192.168.1.105. Error Tubería rota [2009/08/06 17:01:56, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(761) Error writing 75 bytes to client. -1. (Tubería rota) [2009/08/06 17:02:19, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_data(534) read_data: read failure for 4 bytes to client 192.168.1.108. Error = No existe ninguna ruta hasta el `host' [2009/08/06 17:02:19, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_data(562) write_data: write failure in writing to client 192.168.1.108. Error Tubería rota [2009/08/06 17:02:19, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(761) Error writing 75 bytes to client. -1. (Tubería rota) There are not to many errors of this in the log, this is only an ocassional issue. >> [r...@server samba]# smbcontrol --version >> Version 3.0.33-3.7.el5_3.1 Here the error strings in english: "No existe ninguna ruta hasta el `host'" = "No route to host" "Tubería rota = Pipe broken" How can i prevent this errors? Thank you! Germán -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] I am try to install samba on debian 2.6
Dear where On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Helmut Hullen wrote: > Hallo, Samantha, > > Du meintest am 06.08.09: > > > i am new to samba i want install PDC on debian2.6 with xp prop. > > Do you need a "PDC" (something like a Microsoft controller, with > Microsoft behaviour), or do you need a Samba server for Windows clients? > > PDC leads very quickly to LDAP, and that's another problem. If your > Samba server is the only SMB server in the LAN then > >security = user >passdb backend = tdbsam > > is a simple and well working solution. > > Viele Gruesse! > Helmut > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > -- http://linuxinterviews.blogspot.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] moving from nt4 to active directory
Dear Try to use winbind, that will map your Windows Ad users to linux, no need to maintain separate password. thanks On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:09 PM, jthrumston wrote: > > I have 2 AIX systems that run Samba. We are currently on an NT4 domain and > moving to Active directory. I am trying to find out what all would be > needed > to make that transition. > The only authenification is for users connecting to their shares. > I read one site via Google that states I need to create a user (Rocky) on > both Samba and the AD server with different passwords but this does not > seem > right. > My AIX servers are version 5.3 > I am running an older version of Samba 2.2.7-4 but could upgrade if needed. > The AD servers are Win2K3. > > I was just wondering if anyone else has done this and if maybe someone > could > shed some light on the procedure to do this. I am not well versed in Samba > (I can bang around but don't know all the ins and outs) > > Thanks > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/moving-from-nt4-to-active-directory-tp24834321p24834321.html > Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > -- http://linuxinterviews.blogspot.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] I am try to install samba on debian 2.6
Dear samatha You can samba as PDC in place of Windows AD. Clarify your requirement, do u want tdbsam to store your users and computer account information or ldap database for same. If you opt for ldap, other than samba you have to configure openldap server. If you are at initial stage i will recommend to use tdbsam. Thanks On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Samantha Bandara wrote: > i am new to samba i want install PDC on debian2.6 with xp prop. > please help me > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > -- http://linuxinterviews.blogspot.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] domain_client_validate error with Samba 3.2.13 on Debian Lenny
Hi, I have a big problem with Samba 3.2.13 on Debian Lenny. With Samba 3.0.x there was no problem: "domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user wolfgang in domain LIFEBOOKWR to Domain controller PDCALPI01. Error was NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER." Clients that are not a part of the domain cannot authenticate. The DC is a Windows 2003 SBS server (PDCALPI01 with ip 192.168.1.1), and I'm trying to authenticate to a Samba server (3.2.13) with security = domain setting. I have tried a downgrade to Samba 3.0.24, and there it works. That is my smb.conf file: [global] workgroup = alpi server string = lxarchiv wins server = 192.168.1.1 dns proxy = no log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 1000 syslog = 0 panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d security = domain encrypt passwords = true passdb backend = tdbsam obey pam restrictions = yes invalid users = root passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *Enter\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n *Retype\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n *password\supdated\ssuccessfully* . add user script = /usr/sbin/adduser --quiet --disabled-password --gecos "" %u --gid 1001 printing = bsd printcap name = /etc/printcap socket options = TCP_NODELAY domain master = auto TIA Wolfgang -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] mounting volumes : pammount vs gvfs
Hi list. First sorry for my poor english, so not easy for me to explain exactly my problem. My problem is that files/ directories created in my mounted volumes don't have the rights I expect. Here is my smb.conf : [...] [Docs] comment = Docs path = /home/Docs browseable = yes writeable = yes force group = docs create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 force create mode = 0770 force directory mode = 0770 [...] If I mount my volumes with gvfs, no problem : (testJL are files created directly in the mounted volume and testJLDirect ones are drag & drop from gnome panel) myserver:/home/Docs# ls -al |grep test drwxrwx--- 2 jean-luc docs 4096 aoû 6 17:22 testJL drwxrwx--- 2 jean-luc docs 4096 aoû 7 13:13 testJLDirect -rwxrwx--- 1 jean-luc docs 0 aoû 7 13:13 testJLDirect.txt -rwxrwx--- 1 jean-luc docs 0 aoû 6 17:22 testJL.txt But I want to use pam_mount, since all users under Ubuntu have "roaming profile", with their home mounted by nfs and data (samba) volumes with smbfs. In my /etc/security/pam_mount.conf.xml : fstype="cifs" /> And here the results : myserver:/home/Docs# ls -al |grep test drwxr-xr-w 2 jean-luc docs 4096 aoû 6 17:22 testJL drwxrwx--- 2 jean-luc docs 4096 aoû 7 13:13 testJLDirect -rw-r--r-- 1 jean-luc docs 0 aoû 7 13:13 testJLDirect.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 jean-luc docs 0 aoû 6 17:22 testJL.txt If I mount the volumes by hand in command line with : #mount.cifs //server/Docs /media/docs -o "user=jean-luc%passwd", same problems/ rights than above... Any ideas ? Thanks ! Manu -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Reverse Veto Files - let's try again!
On 8/6/2009, Jeremy Allison (j...@samba.org) wrote: > Don't change the veto files semantics please. It wouldn't be 'changing' the semantics, it would be adding to them. I don't see any way adding this new 'semantic' could break any existing installations. -- Best regards, Charles -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Samba 3.4 - merged-build
Hi! I want to try the samba3 & samba4 combination and downloaded samba 3.4.0 and compiled it with ./configure --enable-merged-build But after make install I do not find a samba4 daemon anywhere. There are some binaries named with ..4 (like smbtorture4) but after reading that franky wiki site there I am assuming that the 2 daemons should be started and running in parallel. How do I have to compile/configure/start the 3.4 samba to get samba 3 and samba 4 functionality? regards Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
