[Samba] sendfile as true by default

[Pacher Dragos]

Dear list,

Is there a reason for not having "use sendfile= true" in default
configuration for 3.6 or 4.0 ?


Regards,

Dragos
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] domain provision error

[Pacher Dragos]

Did samba build with acl support ?


On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Gregory Sloop  wrote:

>
> GK>> it's not only your file system supporting ACL's - also some
> GK>> devel packages must be around during the build.
> GK>> See https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_4/OS_Requirements
>
> GS> Thanks, but I do have all the ACL packages etc, described in the reqs.
>
> GS> [I followed, exactly, the Deb/Ubuntu instructions.]
>
> One more follow-up to this.
>
> I see there were some other file-system reqs [I initially didn't think
> that section applied to Ubuntu.]
>
> However, I went back and edited fstab as required, and did the ACL
> tests. All appears good.
>
> So I re-ran the "domain provision" again. Same failure.
> So, as far as I can tell, it's not an actual ACL problem.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba 3 master browser on two networks plus WINS

[Pacher Dragos]

This seems more a routing issue to me than samba.

Packets cannot move between different networks without a route.

You need to define a static route between your networks and then it will
work.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] File update detection

[Pacher Dragos]

There are too many possible causes to tell with only these details.

I would try inotify on the samba box to determine what is the process
causing the change.

If its the samba process that is doing the change I would look at the
Windows box process list.
Procmon might help you
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896645.aspx


Regards,


On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Dennis Verspuij - SpuyMore <
den...@spuymore.nl> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I run Samba 4.0.0-168.fc18.rc5.x86_64 on my Linux box. I use an editor on
> my Windows box to edit files on one of the Samba shares and that editor has
> a file update detection mechanism, polling every x seconds for changes to
> file modification timestamp. And around every 12 to 14 seconds it pops up
> the files have been changed while they aren't. Any idea what may cause this?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Dennis Verspuij
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  
> https://lists.samba.org/**mailman/options/samba
>
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba3 and Office 2010

[Pacher Dragos]

Besides what Jeremy suggested I think it can be solved on the client side
with:

Word Options -> Trust Center -> Trust Center Settings ->
1. Trusted locations: Check "Allow trusted locations.."
2. Trusted documents: Check "Allow documents on a network to be trusted"
3. Protected view: Uncheck fist 2.

These should do it.

Ps: At point 1 you might need to define your network location though it
should
work since point 2.

Dragos

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Jeremy Allison  wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:46:55AM +0400, Андрей Гребенников wrote:
> > Hi there people! I'd like someone to help me with samba shares and
> > Office 2010. Whe a user opens a file from a share, msword or excel
> > tells him that the file was got from internet and if you like to
> > edit it you should push the button "allow". How could I solve the
> > issue from samba side?"
>
> It's almost certainly the alternate data stream with "Internet Zone"
> being required. Try using the streams_xattr module on the share.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba with pam_group.so: add group on log in

[Pacher Dragos]

In order for all PAM management types to be used you need to disable
encryption on both Samba server and client.

Dragos

On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Arokux B.  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am using pam_group.so to add some additional groups to the users.
> However, although Samba obeys pam restrictions, it obeys only
> "session" type of management. pam_group.so, however can be used only
> with auth. That's why if a user logs in through Samba it won't have a
> particular group added and so not enough permissions to work with a
> share.
>
> How else can I add a group to a user account on the fly just after Samba
> log in?
>
> Thanks
> Arokux
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] Solaris 11 ZFS - acl_xattr still needed ?

[Pacher Dragos]

Then POSIX ACLs are still the way to go for the moment, though ZFS ACL's
seems pretty robust.

Volker, may I ask what is the trend now: are people switching to ACEs now or
still stick with POSIX ?

Dragos

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Volker Lendecke
wrote:

> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 02:12:02PM +0300, Pacher Dragos wrote:
> > Seems resonable, zfsacl stores the ACE's natively compared to acl_xattr
> > that makes
> > use of extended attributes.
> >
> > It seems that the big players (Oracle, IBM) made their own tools.
> >
> > Any idea of the strict mapping completeness among zfsacl and acl_xattr ?
>
> Closer than posix acls, but depending on your requirements
> still pretty bad for some aspects of ACLs. In particular
> inheritance based things are not covered properly, and chown
> operations have very different semantics.
>
> Volker
>
> --
> SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
> phone: +49-551-37-0, fax: +49-551-37-9
> AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
> http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kont...@sernet.de
>
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] Solaris 11 ZFS - acl_xattr still needed ?

[Pacher Dragos]

Seems resonable, zfsacl stores the ACE's natively compared to acl_xattr
that makes
use of extended attributes.

It seems that the big players (Oracle, IBM) made their own tools.

Any idea of the strict mapping completeness among zfsacl and acl_xattr ?

Is samba4 any breakthrough regarding this issue ?

Dragos


On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Jonathan Buzzard
wrote:

>
> On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 12:34 +0300, Pacher Dragos wrote:
> > Thanks Jonathan,
> >
> >
> > I missed that.
> >
> >
> > So, zfsacl is provided by Oracle.
> >
>
> I have no idea as I don't use Solaris


> >
> > Should I favor acl_xattr besides zfsacl ?
> >
>
> I would have thought that zfsacl which stores the ACL's as native NFSv4
> ACL's would be preferable. My personal experience is with vfs_gpfs and
> GPFS to store the Windows ACL's as native NFSv4 ACL's in GPFS.
>
> JAB.
>
> --
> Jonathan A. Buzzard Email: jonathan (at) buzzard.me.uk
> Fife, United Kingdom.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] Solaris 11 ZFS - acl_xattr still needed ?

[Pacher Dragos]

Thanks Jonathan,

I missed that.

So, zfsacl is provided by Oracle.

Should I favor acl_xattr besides zfsacl ?

Dragos

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:

>
> On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 09:18 +0300, Pacher Dragos wrote:
> > Dear list,
> >
> > Setup is: Solaris 11 ZFS + Samba 3.5.10
> >
> > What is the recommended way nowadays of performing strict permissions
> > mapping between Samba and Windows NT 6.1 ?
> > And a more broader question: is it desirable ?
> >
> > As we know ZFS has native NFSv4 ACL's and this would mean that
> permissions
> > applied on Windows side should have an exact match
> > on the ZFS side.
> >
> > Is it acl_xattr module still needed ?
> >
> > Example:
> > [samba]
> >  path=/export/home/samba
> >  writable=yes
> >  vfs objects=acl_xattr
> >
> > By the way: acl_xattr is production ready now if I am not mistaken ?
> >
>
> I would imagine that you want to be using the vfs_zfsacl module if you
> are running on Solaris with ZFS. Note that NFSv4 ACL's don't exactly
> match Windows ACL's either, though they are a close match.
>
>
> JAB.
>
> --
> Jonathan A. Buzzard Email: jonathan (at) buzzard.me.uk
> Fife, United Kingdom.
>
>
>
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

[Samba] Solaris 11 ZFS - acl_xattr still needed ?

[Pacher Dragos]

Dear list,

Setup is: Solaris 11 ZFS + Samba 3.5.10

What is the recommended way nowadays of performing strict permissions
mapping between Samba and Windows NT 6.1 ?
And a more broader question: is it desirable ?

As we know ZFS has native NFSv4 ACL's and this would mean that permissions
applied on Windows side should have an exact match
on the ZFS side.

Is it acl_xattr module still needed ?

Example:
[samba]
 path=/export/home/samba
 writable=yes
 vfs objects=acl_xattr

By the way: acl_xattr is production ready now if I am not mistaken ?


Dragos
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba