Re: Install the whole TeX/LaTeX distribution
Thanks Jeff for the link. I will take a look at it. Hopefully 2012 is on its way. -Daniel. On 22 May 2013 02:41, Jeffrey Anderson jdander...@lbl.gov wrote: Somewhere along the line they broke out the packages into many subpackages, so you'll probably need many of them, but not necessarily all. To add the repo to your system do this: rpm -Uvh http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2011.el6.noarch.rpm Then you should be able to just 'yum install' what you need. I'd start with yum install texlive-2011 then see what else you need. As I mentioned, I haven't done this myself on SL6. Jeff On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:36 AM, W K Daniel PUN danielw...@gmail.comwrote: Thanks Jeff. It seems that the link you provided contains the whole distribution of texlive (over hundred texlive*). My system only has 19 texlive* as below. # rpm -aq | grep --colour=always texlive* texlive-2007-57.el6_2.x86_64 texlive-context-2007-57.el6_2.x86_64 texlive-texmf-xetex-2007-38.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-latex-2007-38.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-errata-2007-7.1.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-errata-dvips-2007-7.1.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-errata-latex-2007-7.1.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-errata-context-2007-7.1.el6.noarch texlive-dvips-2007-57.el6_2.x86_64 texlive-texmf-dvips-2007-38.el6.noarch texlive-utils-2007-57.el6_2.x86_64 texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-38.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-2007-38.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-errata-fonts-2007-7.1.el6.noarch texlive-xetex-2007-57.el6_2.x86_64 texlive-latex-2007-57.el6_2.x86_64 texlive-texmf-errata-xetex-2007-7.1.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-context-2007-38.el6.noarch May not be a good idea to download them one by one. How do update the whole distribution? Also, should remove the texlive-2007 before update to texlive-2011? -Daniel. On 21 May 2013 02:12, Jeffrey Anderson jdander...@lbl.gov wrote: SL6 ships with texlive 2007. As you have found this is somewhat old, but it's what TUV provides, so it's what we get. I notice that the fedora texlive yum repo has EL6 packages for texlive 2011. You may want to try that, though I have not tested them myself. You can find the packages here: http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/packages.el6/ I have installed packages from this site to upgrade the native texlive on fedora, but haven't tried the el6 packages. Jeff On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 7:34 AM, W K Daniel PUN danielw...@gmail.comwrote: Thank you very much for all those who have replied my query. I did install TeX support when I installed SL 6.4., but have found that the LaTeX system has not been completely installed. What I mean is that some style files *.sty or *.dtx are missing or out of date. I need to get them from ctan.org or somewhere else. For example, I recently compiled a package that needs to use hyperref, but I got a lot of errors, because the hyerref is the system is old version (2007/02/07 v6.75r), I need to obtain a new version (2012/11/06 v6.83m) from ctan.org and installed it. After installing the new version of hyperref, I got a lot of style file missing. It took me a while to work out what I need is the oberdiek package. I am not sure how the LaTeX community works, but assume that when all new packages, style files, *.ins *.dtx, new version files are stored in ctan.org. There should be a way to install/update a complete (with all existing packages, new packages, and new version packages) TeX distribution on SL. It seems other platforms can do that. For example, hyperref ctan.or On 19 May 2013 04:09, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 9:12 PM, W K Daniel PUN danielw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I haven't been able to find a way to install the whole comprehensive TeX/LaTeX distribution on Scientific Linux. Does anyone have a clue? Thanks. -Daniel. Start with the tetex components in the yum repository? If those aren't complete, you can also look at the tetex and tetex-tex4ht SRPM's and see what packages are listed in their .spec files, or build them and see what you get. -- -- Jeffrey Anderson| jdander...@lbl.gov Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory | Office: 50A-5104E | Mailstop 50A-5101 Phone: 510 486-4208 | Fax: 510 486-4204 -- -- Jeffrey Anderson| jdander...@lbl.gov Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory | Office: 50A-5104E | Mailstop 50A-5101 Phone: 510 486-4208 | Fax: 510 486-4204
Re: Install the whole TeX/LaTeX distribution
Thanks Robert. Just a few questions: 1. Do you know how often will the ISO image be updated, once a year? 2. Have you tried to install the ISO image on SL? 3. Should all texlive packages be removed from the current system before the installation is started? Thanks, -Daniel. On 22 May 2013 03:47, Robert Lopez rlopez...@gmail.com wrote: Have you looked at http://www.tug.org/texlive/acquire-iso.html ? On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:36 AM, W K Daniel PUN danielw...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Jeff. It seems that the link you provided contains the whole distribution of texlive (over hundred texlive*). My system only has 19 texlive* as below. # rpm -aq | grep --colour=always texlive* texlive-2007-57.el6_2.x86_64 texlive-context-2007-57.el6_2.x86_64 texlive-texmf-xetex-2007-38.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-latex-2007-38.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-errata-2007-7.1.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-errata-dvips-2007-7.1.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-errata-latex-2007-7.1.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-errata-context-2007-7.1.el6.noarch texlive-dvips-2007-57.el6_2.x86_64 texlive-texmf-dvips-2007-38.el6.noarch texlive-utils-2007-57.el6_2.x86_64 texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-38.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-2007-38.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-errata-fonts-2007-7.1.el6.noarch texlive-xetex-2007-57.el6_2.x86_64 texlive-latex-2007-57.el6_2.x86_64 texlive-texmf-errata-xetex-2007-7.1.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-context-2007-38.el6.noarch May not be a good idea to download them one by one. How do update the whole distribution? Also, should remove the texlive-2007 before update to texlive-2011? -Daniel. On 21 May 2013 02:12, Jeffrey Anderson jdander...@lbl.gov wrote: SL6 ships with texlive 2007. As you have found this is somewhat old, but it's what TUV provides, so it's what we get. I notice that the fedora texlive yum repo has EL6 packages for texlive 2011. You may want to try that, though I have not tested them myself. You can find the packages here: http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/packages.el6/ I have installed packages from this site to upgrade the native texlive on fedora, but haven't tried the el6 packages. Jeff On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 7:34 AM, W K Daniel PUN danielw...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you very much for all those who have replied my query. I did install TeX support when I installed SL 6.4., but have found that the LaTeX system has not been completely installed. What I mean is that some style files *.sty or *.dtx are missing or out of date. I need to get them from ctan.org or somewhere else. For example, I recently compiled a package that needs to use hyperref, but I got a lot of errors, because the hyerref is the system is old version (2007/02/07 v6.75r), I need to obtain a new version (2012/11/06 v6.83m) from ctan.org and installed it. After installing the new version of hyperref, I got a lot of style file missing. It took me a while to work out what I need is the oberdiek package. I am not sure how the LaTeX community works, but assume that when all new packages, style files, *.ins *.dtx, new version files are stored in ctan.org. There should be a way to install/update a complete (with all existing packages, new packages, and new version packages) TeX distribution on SL. It seems other platforms can do that. For example, hyperref ctan.or On 19 May 2013 04:09, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 9:12 PM, W K Daniel PUN danielw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I haven't been able to find a way to install the whole comprehensive TeX/LaTeX distribution on Scientific Linux. Does anyone have a clue? Thanks. -Daniel. Start with the tetex components in the yum repository? If those aren't complete, you can also look at the tetex and tetex-tex4ht SRPM's and see what packages are listed in their .spec files, or build them and see what you get. -- -- Jeffrey Anderson| jdander...@lbl.gov Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory | Office: 50A-5104E | Mailstop 50A-5101 Phone: 510 486-4208 | Fax: 510 486-4204 -- Robert Lopez Unix Systems Administrator Central New Mexico Community College (CNM) 525 Buena Vista SE Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106
Re: Install the whole TeX/LaTeX distribution
Okay. I know what you mean. I didn't realise that I need to install texlive-release-2011.el6.noarch.rpmhttp://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2011.el6.noarch.rpm, but should texlive 2007 be removed first? Also, have you tried the texlive2012-20120701.iso? Thanks, -Daniel. On 23 May 2013 23:25, Horst Hettrich horst.hettr...@eus.uni-saarland.dewrote: But you installed this package? http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2011.el6.noarch.rpm Do you use yum-plugin-priorities, which could block the new repository? If jou have a look in /etc/yum.repos.d/texlive-release.repo you should find the baseurl=http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/packages.el6/ If you follow this link and search for texlive-scheme you can find the packages which are part of this repository. Therefore I think there must be something else in your yum config which could block the repo. Best regards, Horst On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:12:01PM +1000, W K Daniel PUN wrote: Which repository are you using for texlive-scheme? No Matches found was returned when I triggered yum search texlive-scheme. Thanks, -Daniel. On 22 May 2013 16:39, Horst Hettrich horst.hettr...@eus.uni-saarland.de wrote: In the texlive-2011 repo each texlive-package is packaged as its own rpm-package. (Each default texlive-2007 packages which is distributed with SL6 contains a set of various texlive packages.) In order to install the full texlive distribution just use yum install texlive-scheme-full There are also other schemes defined, cf. yum search texlive-scheme I'm using this repository in my SL6.4 installation and it works pretty well. It just needs a lot of time to install, because you have a lot of rpm packages which need to be installed. Best regards, Horst On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 09:41:36AM -0700, Jeffrey Anderson wrote: Somewhere along the line they broke out the packages into many subpackages, so you'll probably need many of them, but not necessarily all. To add the repo to your system do this: rpm -Uvh http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2011.el6.noarch.rpm Then you should be able to just 'yum install' what you need. I'd start with yum install texlive-2011 then see what else you need. As I mentioned, I haven't done this myself on SL6. Jeff On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:36 AM, W K Daniel PUN danielw...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Jeff. It seems that the link you provided contains the whole distribution of texlive (over hundred texlive*). My system only has 19 texlive* as below. # rpm -aq | grep --colour=always texlive* texlive-2007-57.el6_2.x86_64 texlive-context-2007-57.el6_2.x86_64 texlive-texmf-xetex-2007-38.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-latex-2007-38.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-errata-2007-7.1.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-errata-dvips-2007-7.1.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-errata-latex-2007-7.1.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-errata-context-2007-7.1.el6.noarch texlive-dvips-2007-57.el6_2.x86_64 texlive-texmf-dvips-2007-38.el6.noarch texlive-utils-2007-57.el6_2.x86_64 texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-38.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-2007-38.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-errata-fonts-2007-7.1.el6.noarch texlive-xetex-2007-57.el6_2.x86_64 texlive-latex-2007-57.el6_2.x86_64 texlive-texmf-errata-xetex-2007-7.1.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-context-2007-38.el6.noarch May not be a good idea to download them one by one. How do update the whole distribution? Also, should remove the texlive-2007 before update to texlive-2011? -Daniel. On 21 May 2013 02:12, Jeffrey Anderson jdander...@lbl.gov wrote: SL6 ships with texlive 2007. As you have found this is somewhat old, but it's what TUV provides, so it's what we get. I notice that the fedora texlive yum repo has EL6 packages for texlive 2011. You may want to try that, though I have not tested them myself. You can find the packages here: http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/packages.el6/ I have installed packages from this site to upgrade the native texlive on fedora, but haven't tried the el6 packages. Jeff On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 7:34 AM, W K Daniel PUN danielw...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you very much for all those who have replied my query. I did install TeX support when I installed SL 6.4., but have found that the LaTeX system has not been completely installed. What I mean is that some style files *.sty or *.dtx are missing or out of date. I need to get them from ctan.org or somewhere else. For example, I recently compiled a package that needs to use hyperref, but I got a lot of errors
Re: Install the whole TeX/LaTeX distribution
Thanks Jeff. It seems that the link you provided contains the whole distribution of texlive (over hundred texlive*). My system only has 19 texlive* as below. # rpm -aq | grep --colour=always texlive* texlive-2007-57.el6_2.x86_64 texlive-context-2007-57.el6_2.x86_64 texlive-texmf-xetex-2007-38.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-latex-2007-38.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-errata-2007-7.1.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-errata-dvips-2007-7.1.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-errata-latex-2007-7.1.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-errata-context-2007-7.1.el6.noarch texlive-dvips-2007-57.el6_2.x86_64 texlive-texmf-dvips-2007-38.el6.noarch texlive-utils-2007-57.el6_2.x86_64 texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-38.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-2007-38.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-errata-fonts-2007-7.1.el6.noarch texlive-xetex-2007-57.el6_2.x86_64 texlive-latex-2007-57.el6_2.x86_64 texlive-texmf-errata-xetex-2007-7.1.el6.noarch texlive-texmf-context-2007-38.el6.noarch May not be a good idea to download them one by one. How do update the whole distribution? Also, should remove the texlive-2007 before update to texlive-2011? -Daniel. On 21 May 2013 02:12, Jeffrey Anderson jdander...@lbl.gov wrote: SL6 ships with texlive 2007. As you have found this is somewhat old, but it's what TUV provides, so it's what we get. I notice that the fedora texlive yum repo has EL6 packages for texlive 2011. You may want to try that, though I have not tested them myself. You can find the packages here: http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/packages.el6/ I have installed packages from this site to upgrade the native texlive on fedora, but haven't tried the el6 packages. Jeff On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 7:34 AM, W K Daniel PUN danielw...@gmail.comwrote: Thank you very much for all those who have replied my query. I did install TeX support when I installed SL 6.4., but have found that the LaTeX system has not been completely installed. What I mean is that some style files *.sty or *.dtx are missing or out of date. I need to get them from ctan.org or somewhere else. For example, I recently compiled a package that needs to use hyperref, but I got a lot of errors, because the hyerref is the system is old version (2007/02/07 v6.75r), I need to obtain a new version (2012/11/06 v6.83m) from ctan.org and installed it. After installing the new version of hyperref, I got a lot of style file missing. It took me a while to work out what I need is the oberdiek package. I am not sure how the LaTeX community works, but assume that when all new packages, style files, *.ins *.dtx, new version files are stored in ctan.org. There should be a way to install/update a complete (with all existing packages, new packages, and new version packages) TeX distribution on SL. It seems other platforms can do that. For example, hyperref ctan.or On 19 May 2013 04:09, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 9:12 PM, W K Daniel PUN danielw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I haven't been able to find a way to install the whole comprehensive TeX/LaTeX distribution on Scientific Linux. Does anyone have a clue? Thanks. -Daniel. Start with the tetex components in the yum repository? If those aren't complete, you can also look at the tetex and tetex-tex4ht SRPM's and see what packages are listed in their .spec files, or build them and see what you get. -- -- Jeffrey Anderson| jdander...@lbl.gov Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory | Office: 50A-5104E | Mailstop 50A-5101 Phone: 510 486-4208 | Fax: 510 486-4204
Re: Install the whole TeX/LaTeX distribution
Thank you very much for all those who have replied my query. I did install TeX support when I installed SL 6.4., but have found that the LaTeX system has not been completely installed. What I mean is that some style files *.sty or *.dtx are missing or out of date. I need to get them from ctan.org or somewhere else. For example, I recently compiled a package that needs to use hyperref, but I got a lot of errors, because the hyerref is the system is old version (2007/02/07 v6.75r), I need to obtain a new version (2012/11/06 v6.83m) from ctan.org and installed it. After installing the new version of hyperref, I got a lot of style file missing. It took me a while to work out what I need is the oberdiek package. I am not sure how the LaTeX community works, but assume that when all new packages, style files, *.ins *.dtx, new version files are stored in ctan.org. There should be a way to install/update a complete (with all existing packages, new packages, and new version packages) TeX distribution on SL. It seems other platforms can do that. For example, hyperref ctan.or On 19 May 2013 04:09, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 9:12 PM, W K Daniel PUN danielw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I haven't been able to find a way to install the whole comprehensive TeX/LaTeX distribution on Scientific Linux. Does anyone have a clue? Thanks. -Daniel. Start with the tetex components in the yum repository? If those aren't complete, you can also look at the tetex and tetex-tex4ht SRPM's and see what packages are listed in their .spec files, or build them and see what you get.
Re: Failed Messages from Booting
I'd better to leave it like that then. It just feels a bit supernatural when a system complains something and you don't know the scene behind. Thank you very much for your expertise. I now know how to avoid the failures, but do not know what make the connection attempt on boot fail. The wireless device is present and on, and not out of range (only about two metres distance between the wireless device and my computer). After the system boot up and I log into the system, the connection attempt is made successfully. Is it something in the system (software) or in my computer (hardware) not ready yet during the connection attempt on boot? -Daniel. On 30 April 2013 12:14, zxq9 z...@zxq9.com wrote: On 04/29/2013 09:58 PM, W K Daniel PUN wrote: I do not have network problem. Once I log in after booting up, I can have the wireless wifi connection with CQURoam or cherub7, and they are not out of range. I am wondering why the system could not detect the wireless device during the booting and gave a FAILED message. Is there any settings that can be changed in order to avoid this detection (because it fails anyway) or get it right? It is set to connect automatically, which means that ONBOOT=yes is set in its config file in /etc/sysconfig/network-**scripts/ifcfg-[device]. To prevent a connection attempt on boot you would change that to no in the config file or uncheck connect automatically under edit connections from the desktop network manager widget. If you do this you will need to manually select a wireless network to connect to after you log in -- not really a big deal, but this appears to be another Network Manager wart which prevents the boot time from being dependent on wireless negotiation (which can take a while sometimes). In any case, things seem to be working as intended.
Adobe Reader gets Gtk-WARNIKNG
Hi all, I like to use Adobe Reader to view PDF files on SL 6.4 and have installed the version 9.5.4. When I use it to open a PDF with the command line below: acroread foo.pdf I got a lot (acroread:5362): Gtk-WARNING **: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: clearlooks, and I still can read the PDF without any problems. The Gtk-WARNING could means that Adobe Reader has selected a theme that uses the theme engine clearlooks, which is not installed on the system. Some suggests to install gtk-theme-engine-clearlooks, but it is not in the list when I did yum list gtk* Some suggests to install gtk2-engines.i686, but I already have gtk2-engines-2.18.4-5.el6.x86_64 on SL6.4. Should gtk2-engines.i686 be installed? Any suggestions? -Daniel.
Re: vlc repo
On 22 April 2013 22:40, W K Daniel PUN danielw...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks John. I didn't realise that I have already got a mixed set of packages. What I tried to do now is that I remove the vlc package and then reinstall it with sudo yum --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=atrpms install vlc The installation is okay, but the Security update message still come. Extensible Binary Meta Language library libebml-1.2.1-1.el6 (x86_64) Open audio/video container format library libmatroska-1.2.0-1.el6 (x86_64) Modplug mod music file format library libmodplug-1:0.8.8.3-2.el6 (x86_64) Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) SDK libupnp-1.6.18-2.el6 (x86_64) When click on update, I got No packages to update None of the slected packages could be updated. More details vlc-2.0.5-6.el6.x86_64 requires libthreadutil.so.2()(64bit) vlc-2.0.5-6.el6.x86_64 requires libupnp.so.3()(64bit) vlc-2.0.5-6.el6.x86_64 requires libebml.so.2()(64bit) vlc-2.0.5-6.el6.x86_64 requires libmodplug.so.0()(64bit) vlc-2.0.5-6.el6.x86_64 requires libmatroska.so.2()(64bit) : Success - empty transaction How can these 4 updates be stopped? Thanks, -Daniel. On 22 April 2013 17:45, John Pilkington j.p...@tesco.net wrote: On 22/04/13 06:47, W K Daniel PUN wrote: Hi John, other, Thank you very much for your reply. I did try to use atrpms. After installing vlc, the system keep asking me to update a few libs and when I did it and got following errors. The vlc is working fine with my system at the moment. I don't want to remove the repos epel and rpmforge from my system. Do I really need to get these updates done? If don't, how can these update messages be stopped coming? Or, should --skip-broken be used to work around as suggested? Thanks, -Daniel. You now have a mixed set of packages; I warned you about that. I don't think you need to remove the other repos, but you ought to try disabling them during the installation process. Todd's script looks as if it will do that - although you might now need to reinstall rather than upgrade - but other conflicts may emerge. I shall probably be working with variants of that script to reconfigure my Fedora box, but my experience of mixing these repos is limited. John P
Re: vlc repo
Hi John, other, Thank you very much for your reply. I did try to use atrpms. After installing vlc, the system keep asking me to update a few libs and when I did it and got following errors. The vlc is working fine with my system at the moment. I don't want to remove the repos epel and rpmforge from my system. Do I really need to get these updates done? If don't, how can these update messages be stopped coming? Or, should --skip-broken be used to work around as suggested? Thanks, -Daniel. ** Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package libebml.x86_64 0:1.0.0-1.el6.rf will be updated -- Processing Dependency: libebml.so.2()(64bit) for package: vlc-2.0.5-6.el6.x86_64 --- Package libebml.x86_64 0:1.2.1-1.el6 will be an update --- Package libmatroska.x86_64 0:1.0.0-1.el6.rf will be updated -- Processing Dependency: libmatroska.so.2()(64bit) for package: vlc-2.0.5-6.el6.x86_64 --- Package libmatroska.x86_64 0:1.2.0-1.el6 will be an update --- Package libmodplug.x86_64 1:0.8.7-2.el6 will be updated -- Processing Dependency: libmodplug.so.0()(64bit) for package: vlc-2.0.5-6.el6.x86_64 --- Package libmodplug.x86_64 1:0.8.8.3-2.el6 will be an update --- Package libupnp.x86_64 0:1.6.6-3.el6 will be updated -- Processing Dependency: libthreadutil.so.2()(64bit) for package: vlc-2.0.5-6.el6.x86_64 -- Processing Dependency: libupnp.so.3()(64bit) for package: vlc-2.0.5-6.el6.x86_64 --- Package libupnp.x86_64 0:1.6.18-2.el6 will be an update -- Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: vlc-2.0.5-6.el6.x86_64 (@atrpms) Requires: libthreadutil.so.2()(64bit) Removing: libupnp-1.6.6-3.el6.x86_64 (@atrpms) libthreadutil.so.2()(64bit) Updated By: libupnp-1.6.18-2.el6.x86_64 (epel) Not found Available: libupnp-1.6.6-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge) libthreadutil.so.2()(64bit) Error: Package: vlc-2.0.5-6.el6.x86_64 (@atrpms) Requires: libupnp.so.3()(64bit) Removing: libupnp-1.6.6-3.el6.x86_64 (@atrpms) libupnp.so.3()(64bit) Updated By: libupnp-1.6.18-2.el6.x86_64 (epel) Not found Available: libupnp-1.6.6-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge) libupnp.so.3()(64bit) Error: Package: vlc-2.0.5-6.el6.x86_64 (@atrpms) Requires: libmodplug.so.0()(64bit) Removing: 1:libmodplug-0.8.7-2.el6.x86_64 (@atrpms) libmodplug.so.0()(64bit) Updated By: 1:libmodplug-0.8.8.3-2.el6.x86_64 (epel) Not found Available: libmodplug-0.8.7-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge) libmodplug.so.0()(64bit) Error: Package: vlc-2.0.5-6.el6.x86_64 (@atrpms) Requires: libebml.so.2()(64bit) Removing: libebml-1.0.0-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (@rpmforge) libebml.so.2()(64bit) Updated By: libebml-1.2.1-1.el6.x86_64 (epel) Not found Available: libebml-1.0.0-1.el6.x86_64 (atrpms) libebml.so.2()(64bit) Available: libebml-0.7.8-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge) Not found Available: libebml-0.7.8-3.el6.x86_64 (atrpms) Not found Error: Package: vlc-2.0.5-6.el6.x86_64 (@atrpms) Requires: libmatroska.so.2()(64bit) Removing: libmatroska-1.0.0-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (@rpmforge) libmatroska.so.2()(64bit) Updated By: libmatroska-1.2.0-1.el6.x86_64 (epel) Not found Available: libmatroska-1.0.0-1.el6.x86_64 (atrpms) libmatroska.so.2()(64bit) Available: libmatroska-0.8.1-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge) Not found Available: libmatroska-0.8.1-5.el6.x86_64 (atrpms) Not found You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest *** On 21 April 2013 05:00, John Pilkington j.p...@tesco.net wrote: On 20/04/13 19:30, W K Daniel PUN wrote: Hi all, vlc can be installed from rpmforge and atrpms. I am wondering which one is better to use or get better support. Thanks, -Daniel. I have used both, and both work well. I've used ATrpms for more than 8 years, but at present there is little activity there, and I don't know if that is likely to change. It's much more of a one-man show than rpmfusion - which I suppose you meant - although the vlc builds are an exception. There are many dependencies, which would normally be satisfied by packages from the matching repo. A mix is likely to give trouble. John P
vlc repo
Hi all, vlc can be installed from rpmforge and atrpms. I am wondering which one is better to use or get better support. Thanks, -Daniel.
