Re: EPEL Download
Seems like someone reported a bug for it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506445 Hope it gets fixed soon. On 10/30/2017 04:28 PM, Maarten wrote: > Was able to fix it for now by disabling spf checking for incoming mail. > > On 2017-10-30 16:25, Maarten wrote: >> Just a question related to EPEL. Anyone know how active the epel user >> mailinglist is? >> Last weekend a spf package from epel was updated on my mail server via >> yum-cron. Since >> then my mailserver has not received any mail outside of my trusted >> networks. Just >> found that out today. Signed up for the epel-user lists and wrote a >> message, but no >> one has responded yet. >> >> >> >> On 2017-10-30 03:30, Bill Maidment wrote: >>> I've found a new directory in x86_64 called Packages which seems to be >>> a duplicate of the x86_64 directory >>> So it now takes up twice the space. >>> >>> -Original message- >>>> From:Steven C Timm <t...@fnal.gov> >>>> Sent: Monday 30th October 2017 13:06 >>>> To: Bill Maidment <b...@maidment.me>; ~Stack~ >>>> <i.am.st...@gmail.com>; scientific-linux-users >>>> <scientific-linux-users@fnal.gov> >>>> Subject: Re: EPEL Download >>>> >>>> I see the a/b/c/ and so forth in the 7 directories but not in the 6 >>>> directories. >>> >>>> Can't tell you if the 7 directories always were that way or not. >>>> >>> >>>> Steve Timm >>>> --- >>>> From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov >>>> <owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov> on behalf of Bill >>>> Maidment <b...@maidment.me> >>> >>>> Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 8:24:07 PM >>> >>>> To: ~Stack~; scientific-linux-users >>> >>>> Subject: RE: EPEL Download >>> >>>> It looks like they deleted everything and added an extra level 2 3 >>>> 4 a b c etc or has it always been like that? >>> >>>> I only mirror 6/7 x64 >>> >>>> Cheers >>> >>>> Bill >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> -Original message- >>> >>>> > From:~Stack~ <i.am.st...@gmail.com> >>> >>>> > Sent: Monday 30th October 2017 12:08 >>> >>>> > To: SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@FNAL.GOV >>> >>>> > Subject: Re: EPEL Download >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > On 10/29/2017 07:49 PM, Bill Maidment wrote: >>> >>>> > > Hi >>> >>>> > > Today I found out that EPEL had reorganized their repository >>>> structure without warning. >>> >>>> > > A 26 GB download ensued. Ouch. That's a quarter of my monthly >>>> quota. >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > I too mirror for my site, but I only mirror x86_64 for 6/7. I >>>> haven't >>> >>>> > checked yet my mirror yet...what changed? I don't see anything >>>> obvious >>> >>>> > looking at my upstream mirror. >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > ~Stack~ >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> >
Re: EPEL Download
Was able to fix it for now by disabling spf checking for incoming mail. On 2017-10-30 16:25, Maarten wrote: Just a question related to EPEL. Anyone know how active the epel user mailinglist is? Last weekend a spf package from epel was updated on my mail server via yum-cron. Since then my mailserver has not received any mail outside of my trusted networks. Just found that out today. Signed up for the epel-user lists and wrote a message, but no one has responded yet. On 2017-10-30 03:30, Bill Maidment wrote: I've found a new directory in x86_64 called Packages which seems to be a duplicate of the x86_64 directory So it now takes up twice the space. -Original message- From:Steven C Timm <t...@fnal.gov> Sent: Monday 30th October 2017 13:06 To: Bill Maidment <b...@maidment.me>; ~Stack~ <i.am.st...@gmail.com>; scientific-linux-users <scientific-linux-users@fnal.gov> Subject: Re: EPEL Download I see the a/b/c/ and so forth in the 7 directories but not in the 6 directories. Can't tell you if the 7 directories always were that way or not. Steve Timm --- From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov <owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov> on behalf of Bill Maidment <b...@maidment.me> Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 8:24:07 PM To: ~Stack~; scientific-linux-users Subject: RE: EPEL Download It looks like they deleted everything and added an extra level 2 3 4 a b c etc or has it always been like that? I only mirror 6/7 x64 Cheers Bill -Original message- > From:~Stack~ <i.am.st...@gmail.com> > Sent: Monday 30th October 2017 12:08 > To: SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@FNAL.GOV > Subject: Re: EPEL Download > > On 10/29/2017 07:49 PM, Bill Maidment wrote: > > Hi > > Today I found out that EPEL had reorganized their repository structure without warning. > > A 26 GB download ensued. Ouch. That's a quarter of my monthly quota. > > I too mirror for my site, but I only mirror x86_64 for 6/7. I haven't > checked yet my mirror yet...what changed? I don't see anything obvious > looking at my upstream mirror. > > ~Stack~ > >
Re: EPEL Download
Just a question related to EPEL. Anyone know how active the epel user mailinglist is? Last weekend a spf package from epel was updated on my mail server via yum-cron. Since then my mailserver has not received any mail outside of my trusted networks. Just found that out today. Signed up for the epel-user lists and wrote a message, but no one has responded yet. On 2017-10-30 03:30, Bill Maidment wrote: I've found a new directory in x86_64 called Packages which seems to be a duplicate of the x86_64 directory So it now takes up twice the space. -Original message- From:Steven C Timm <t...@fnal.gov> Sent: Monday 30th October 2017 13:06 To: Bill Maidment <b...@maidment.me>; ~Stack~ <i.am.st...@gmail.com>; scientific-linux-users <scientific-linux-users@fnal.gov> Subject: Re: EPEL Download I see the a/b/c/ and so forth in the 7 directories but not in the 6 directories. Can't tell you if the 7 directories always were that way or not. Steve Timm --- From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov <owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov> on behalf of Bill Maidment <b...@maidment.me> Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 8:24:07 PM To: ~Stack~; scientific-linux-users Subject: RE: EPEL Download It looks like they deleted everything and added an extra level 2 3 4 a b c etc or has it always been like that? I only mirror 6/7 x64 Cheers Bill -Original message- > From:~Stack~ <i.am.st...@gmail.com> > Sent: Monday 30th October 2017 12:08 > To: SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@FNAL.GOV > Subject: Re: EPEL Download > > On 10/29/2017 07:49 PM, Bill Maidment wrote: > > Hi > > Today I found out that EPEL had reorganized their repository structure without warning. > > A 26 GB download ensued. Ouch. That's a quarter of my monthly quota. > > I too mirror for my site, but I only mirror x86_64 for 6/7. I haven't > checked yet my mirror yet...what changed? I don't see anything obvious > looking at my upstream mirror. > > ~Stack~ > >
RE: EPEL Download
I've found a new directory in x86_64 called Packages which seems to be a duplicate of the x86_64 directory So it now takes up twice the space. -Original message- > From:Steven C Timm <t...@fnal.gov> > Sent: Monday 30th October 2017 13:06 > To: Bill Maidment <b...@maidment.me>; ~Stack~ <i.am.st...@gmail.com>; > scientific-linux-users <scientific-linux-users@fnal.gov> > Subject: Re: EPEL Download > > I see the a/b/c/ and so forth in the 7 directories but not in the 6 > directories. > Can't tell you if the 7 directories always were that way or not. > > Steve Timm > --- > From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov > <owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov> on behalf of Bill Maidment > <b...@maidment.me> > Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 8:24:07 PM > To: ~Stack~; scientific-linux-users > Subject: RE: EPEL Download > It looks like they deleted everything and added an extra level 2 3 4 a b c > etc or has it always been like that? > I only mirror 6/7 x64 > Cheers > Bill > > > -Original message- > > From:~Stack~ <i.am.st...@gmail.com> > > Sent: Monday 30th October 2017 12:08 > > To: SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@FNAL.GOV > > Subject: Re: EPEL Download > > > > On 10/29/2017 07:49 PM, Bill Maidment wrote: > > > Hi > > > Today I found out that EPEL had reorganized their repository structure > > > without warning. > > > A 26 GB download ensued. Ouch. That's a quarter of my monthly quota. > > > > I too mirror for my site, but I only mirror x86_64 for 6/7. I haven't > > checked yet my mirror yet...what changed? I don't see anything obvious > > looking at my upstream mirror. > > > > ~Stack~ > > > >
Re: EPEL Download
I see the a/b/c/ and so forth in the 7 directories but not in the 6 directories. Can't tell you if the 7 directories always were that way or not. Steve Timm From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov <owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov> on behalf of Bill Maidment <b...@maidment.me> Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 8:24:07 PM To: ~Stack~; scientific-linux-users Subject: RE: EPEL Download It looks like they deleted everything and added an extra level 2 3 4 a b c etc or has it always been like that? I only mirror 6/7 x64 Cheers Bill -Original message- > From:~Stack~ <i.am.st...@gmail.com> > Sent: Monday 30th October 2017 12:08 > To: SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@FNAL.GOV > Subject: Re: EPEL Download > > On 10/29/2017 07:49 PM, Bill Maidment wrote: > > Hi > > Today I found out that EPEL had reorganized their repository structure > > without warning. > > A 26 GB download ensued. Ouch. That's a quarter of my monthly quota. > > I too mirror for my site, but I only mirror x86_64 for 6/7. I haven't > checked yet my mirror yet...what changed? I don't see anything obvious > looking at my upstream mirror. > > ~Stack~ > >
RE: EPEL Download
It looks like they deleted everything and added an extra level 2 3 4 a b c etc or has it always been like that? I only mirror 6/7 x64 Cheers Bill -Original message- > From:~Stack~ <i.am.st...@gmail.com> > Sent: Monday 30th October 2017 12:08 > To: SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@FNAL.GOV > Subject: Re: EPEL Download > > On 10/29/2017 07:49 PM, Bill Maidment wrote: > > Hi > > Today I found out that EPEL had reorganized their repository structure > > without warning. > > A 26 GB download ensued. Ouch. That's a quarter of my monthly quota. > > I too mirror for my site, but I only mirror x86_64 for 6/7. I haven't > checked yet my mirror yet...what changed? I don't see anything obvious > looking at my upstream mirror. > > ~Stack~ > >
EPEL Download
Hi Today I found out that EPEL had reorganized their repository structure without warning. A 26 GB download ensued. Ouch. That's a quarter of my monthly quota. Cheers Bill Maidment
