Re: [Scons-dev] Tests on Fedora 17
Russel, one of the Buildslaves is a Fedora 17 system, so I wonder why you still get so many fails. I added some notes about which packages I installed, to http://scons.org/wiki/InstallingBuildbotSlaves . Maybe you can have a look and compare what's needed. If things still don't work out, bug #2872 is still open. If you could attach a full error log there (containing all the stdout and stderr outputs) I'd be able to take a crack at it. Regards, Dirk On 21.10.2012 02:53, William Deegan wrote: Russel, Do you have any development tools installed on that system? -Bill On Oct 20, 2012, at 4:11 AM, Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk wrote: On a new Fedora 17 install, I got the following test errors: src/engine/SCons/SConfTests.py [...] test/symlink/VariantDir.py -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] Tests on Fedora 17
On Sat, 2012-10-20 at 17:53 -0700, William Deegan wrote: Russel, Do you have any development tools installed on that system? I doubt it. I replaced Ubuntu with Fedora as the alternate boot on my Debian machines since having Debian and Ubuntu seemed like a waste of time (especially given the parlous state of Unity). Having done the initial install I ensured I had access to all the filestores and then discovered that the Fedora TeXLive is 2007 whereas Debian has 2012. SO that was the end of me trying to use Fedora. Thus it is basically a vanilla new install, effectively unused. This was its first outing. -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] Tests on Fedora 17
On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 12:15 +0200, Dirk Bächle wrote: Russel, one of the Buildslaves is a Fedora 17 system, so I wonder why you still get so many fails. I added some notes about which packages I installed, to http://scons.org/wiki/InstallingBuildbotSlaves . Maybe you can have a look and compare what's needed. If things still don't work out, bug #2872 is still open. If you could attach a full error log there (containing all the stdout and stderr outputs) I'd be able to take a crack at it. Until Fedora gets it's TeXLive act together I won't be using it in anger, just as an occasional RPM building machine and CI. So I can do tests of SCons tests in this no real use dark corner? I suspect all the issues are to do with lack of infrastructure as Bill surmised. I'll try and fulfil the request later today. -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] Tests on Fedora 17
Russel, On Oct 21, 2012, at 6:14 AM, Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk wrote: On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 12:15 +0200, Dirk Bächle wrote: Russel, one of the Buildslaves is a Fedora 17 system, so I wonder why you still get so many fails. I added some notes about which packages I installed, to http://scons.org/wiki/InstallingBuildbotSlaves . Maybe you can have a look and compare what's needed. If things still don't work out, bug #2872 is still open. If you could attach a full error log there (containing all the stdout and stderr outputs) I'd be able to take a crack at it. Until Fedora gets it's TeXLive act together I won't be using it in anger, just as an occasional RPM building machine and CI. So I can do tests of SCons tests in this no real use dark corner? I suspect all the issues are to do with lack of infrastructure as Bill surmised. I'll try and fulfil the request later today. In theory the tests shouldn't fail in the case where you do the base install as you have. I'll try to do a base FC17 install on a VM and see if I can sort some (or all) of it out. -Bill ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] Bug #2849 is not fixed (64-bit MS Windows 7 fails to build with 32-bit Visual Express C++ 2010).
Edward,
On Oct 18, 2012, at 7:03 AM, Edward d'Auvergne edw...@nmr-relax.com wrote:
Hi,
I have tested out Scons 2.2.0 and have noticed that bug #2849
(http://scons.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2849) is still
present. I can see this also from the code:
https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/src/8764000345e06e326ef68fd0acf9366c1f3eb885/src/engine/SCons/Tool/MSCommon/vc.py?at=default
in the lines:
try_target_archs = [target_platform]
if not req_target_platform and target_platform in ('amd64','x86_64'):
try_target_archs.append('x86')
The suggestion by Kyle Strand was to change to code from:
try_target_archs = [target_platform]
if not req_target_platform and target_platform=='amd64'
try_target_archs.append('x86')
to:
try_target_archs = [target_platform]
if target_platform in ('amd64','x86_64'):
try_target_archs.append('x86')
The key problem is that in this case is that 'req_target_platform' is
set to 'x86_64' when 32-bit C++ is used on 64-bit Windows (and no
64-bit compiler is present). Taking out the 'req_target_platform'
check fixes the problem for Scons 2.2.0.
Can you post your SConstruct/SConscript?
env['TARGET_ARCH'] shouldn't have any default setting, this is what provides a
value to req_target_platform.
So in the case that a user explicitly requests a platform, we do not add any
other platforms to be searched for.
As far as I can tell that is the way the code is behaving.
If you have an example showing a bug where TARGET_ARCH is not set, and it's not
also trying 32bit, please let me know.
Thanks,
Bill
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
