[Server-devel] noob needs Poodle, Moodle, Drupal mentoring

2008-04-15 Thread Yama Ploskonka
To prepare to run a LAN during a translation / content fest hopefully 
soon to be announced I need to learn how to set up a server running at 
least Poodle and either or both Moodle and Drupal.
I have been hanging out in this list and even posting, hiding the fact 
that I have no idea on how to accomplish such a basic server task, so 
now you know, and, guess what, this gives you a chance to help me 
straighten up my act.

Please, do not point me to a web page, unless it's made by someone who 
has the limitations of us lowly noobs at heart, as to usability.  I 
tried to set up Moodle a while back, failed.

If you happen to be in the Austin area I can feed you a mean homemade 
pizza, in recognition.  I mean _deep_ crust.

Yama
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] [sugar] sugar roadmap

2008-04-15 Thread Benj. Mako Hill

> Adding Mako to the thread, as I recall he is a big ion fan as well.

Absolutely.

> On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 10:02 PM, Martin Langhoff
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >  | Anyhow, speaking as someone who has only very recently gotten involved
> >  >  | with the project, I can say that the Sugar interface was one of the
> >  >  | most appealing things to me. I'm sure there are other  potential
> >  >  | contributors out there who would be attracted for the same reasons.
> >  >
> >  >  Me too.  The project was vaguely interesting until I ran Sugar in Qemu, 
> > at
> >  >  which point it became compelling.
> >
> >  Personally, I have been dreaming of a mix between ion3 and Sugar's
> >  4-zoom-stages. Talking with some hard-core ion3 friends, they seemed
> >  to be convinced that it was doable as a special configuration, binding
> >  the F1-F3 keys to full screen apps, and having a nested X in F4.

Yes. This would be pretty simple. I'd be happy to help someone hack
this up. Ion3 is extensible in Lua and a little bit of Lua will get
tihs up and running pretty quickly.

Regards,
Mako


-- 
Benjamin Mako Hill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mako.cc/

Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so far
as society is free to use the results. --GNU Manifesto
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] [sugar] sugar roadmap

2008-04-15 Thread Bruno Coudoin

Le dimanche 13 avril 2008 à 20:44 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso a écrit :
> >  A good
> >  case in point is GCompris which addresses a critical need of millions
> >  (basic math and English) but has very few contributors from what I can
> >  tell. Contrast this w/ something like git or the gnu utilities. I
> >  believe that Sugar will need longterm financial support to be viable.
> >  Perhaps that could come from some of the more enlightened pilot
> >  countries once they are heavily invested in Sugar.
> 
> Yes, but Sugar/OLPC could get much more public exposure than GCompris,
> and that may influence things. But I agree with you in that the
> biggest contributions may come in the medium term from deployers,
> rather than hobbyists. But if OLPC fulfills its aims to deploy really
> massively at the global scale and Sugar is in there, we would see lots
> of contributions from users, and that should outgrow deployers'
> contributions.

There is no point to argue on whether GCompris or Sugar/OLPC will get
the most exposure. The question itself is not relevant as GCompris is an
application and Sugar/OLPC a platform. By the way, GCompris runs on
Sugar/OLPC, and many other platform.

> >  Another option would be to create a version of Sugar that appeals to
> >  programmers. But I can't imagine creating such a version that wouldn't
> >  require a lot of programming resources.
> 
> Regardless the resources needed for that, do you have any rough idea
> of how that would look? (sorry for asking this question when you are
> so busy with the Nepal pilot).
> 

IMHO, we should make sure that content developers can create software
that will work fine on any platform. Beside core applications and
hardware related one, high level software application should be platform
independent.

When I started GCompris, I had the feeling that we needed to provide a
consistent engine for simple activities. This ensure there is a
consistant user interface of course, but most important in the long run
it makes it easier to maintain. Moving to another platform is about
porting the engine, not the activities.

-- 
Bruno Coudoin
http://gcompris.net Free educational software for kids
http://toulibre.org Logiciel Libre à Toulouse

___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] [sugar] sugar roadmap

2008-04-15 Thread Patrick Dubroy
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
>  True, I'm afraid too that at the short and medium term hackers won't
>  be scratching their itches in Sugar. But is also true that for many
>  people, making education more accessible is one of the main itches in
>  their lives. Those people are there, but will take time to pick them
>  from the crowd.

Has there been any thought in trying to position Sugar as a more
general-purpose desktop? I don't see it as being particularly
child-specific. It might also appeal to people who are looking for a
simple, no-nonsense interface, especially to install on older machines
or some of these new sub-notebooks that are getting popular.

>  >  Another option would be to create a version of Sugar that appeals to
>  >  programmers. But I can't imagine creating such a version that wouldn't
>  >  require a lot of programming resources.

So here's another question: are any of the Sugar developers using it
as their desktop shell? I was thinking of giving that try. If all the
Sugar developer were eating their own dogfood, I'll bet you'd get a
programmer-friendly system in a hurry. In fact, I don't see why it
would be considered to be programmer-friendly already -- it's got
terminal and a text editor, what more do you need? ;-)

Anyhow, speaking as someone who has only very recently gotten involved
with the project, I can say that the Sugar interface was one of the
most appealing things to me. I'm sure there are other  potential
contributors out there who would be attracted for the same reasons.

Pat
--
Patrick Dubroy
http://dubroy.com/blog - on programming, usability, and hci
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] Mesh connectivity from regular WiFi gear

2008-04-15 Thread John Watlington

On Apr 15, 2008, at 3:54 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:32 PM, John Watlington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
> wrote:
>>  It works fine if using the AA to connect to an AP.
>
> Interesting... Tell me more about this... would it work to have the XS
> with a conventional AP on its LAN connection, and a couple of AAs
> installed further away to extend the reach?  Will that scale well?  
> IOWs
> how smart are the AAs in their behaviour as repeaters?

Theoretically, that could be done.   Practically, it will never happen
as the 5m USB cable limitation means that AA have to be near
the server.

> Am I understanding your comment right?

No.  If it gets repeated, it is mesh traffic.

> cheers,
>
>
>
> m
> -- 
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- School Server Architect
>  - ask interesting questions
>  - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
>  - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff

___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] AP association, and mesh behaviour

2008-04-15 Thread John Watlington

This is a known UI problem.   If you wait until it is done searching
for a mesh portal the first time, it shouldn't happen.

You are wrong about its behavior with known APs.   The laptop always
searches for mesh portals.  If it doesn't find any, it then looks for
APs that it knows about.  If it finds one, it selects it.

I didn't find a trac ticket for this problem, and haven't
entered one.  I've still got a backlog of more severe
problems I'm trying to get entered...

wad

On Apr 15, 2008, at 2:02 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:

> Hi list, Michail,
>
> here in Lima we are looking a behaviour of the network association UI
> that I am not sure whether is intended...
>
> The versions are:
>  -  image 703
>  -  Q2D14
>
> Process:
>
> 1 - the laptop boots and does not associate immediately to an AP or
> active antenna
> 2 - user selects an AP in the networks UI pane - the laptop associates
> successfully
> 3 - while the WAN is accessible through the AP, the network pane shows
> the 3 meshes blinking (in turns) as if the laptop was trying to
> associate
>
> Expected outcome: that the laptop would settle with an AP, and not
> bother searching for AAs. Why? Because in some scenarios we are
> considering deploying APs as the main or only means of network
> connectivity with the XS.
>
> Here I am assuming that the blinking on the UI actually correlates
> with what the antenna is doing. Perhaps at a lower level the
> connection has settled on the AP. In any case, olpc-netstatus doesn't
> show anything interesting.
>
> Two related observations:
>
>  - If the latop associates to the AP straight away at boot time
> (because it was the last antenna seen), then the laptop does not seem
> to be searching for AAs
>  - an earlier build (653 with fw Q2D07) does not show the behaviour
> discussed earlier - once an AP is selected, scanning for meshes seems
> to stop
>
> cheers,
>
>
>
> martin
> -- 
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- School Server Architect
>  - ask interesting questions
>  - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
>  - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
> ___
> Server-devel mailing list
> Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel

___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] Mesh connectivity from regular WiFi gear

2008-04-15 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:32 PM, John Watlington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  It works fine if using the AA to connect to an AP.

Interesting... Tell me more about this... would it work to have the XS
with a conventional AP on its LAN connection, and a couple of AAs
installed further away to extend the reach? Will that scale well? IOWs
how smart are the AAs in their behaviour as repeaters?

Am I understanding your comment right?

cheers,



m
-- 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] Mesh connectivity from regular WiFi gear

2008-04-15 Thread John Watlington

It works fine if using the AA to connect to an AP.
The other way around (using the AA as an AP) isn't
supported yet.

wad

On Apr 15, 2008, at 1:11 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:

> Michail, Wad,
>
> what do we know about the possibility of connecting to our active
> antennaes with regular WiFi hardware, perhaps from OTS laptops using
> linux?
>
> cheers,
>
>
> martin
> -- 
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- School Server Architect
>  - ask interesting questions
>  - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
>  - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff

___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


[Server-devel] AP association, and mesh behaviour

2008-04-15 Thread Martin Langhoff
Hi list, Michail,

here in Lima we are looking a behaviour of the network association UI
that I am not sure whether is intended...

The versions are:
 -  image 703
 -  Q2D14

Process:

1 - the laptop boots and does not associate immediately to an AP or
active antenna
2 - user selects an AP in the networks UI pane - the laptop associates
successfully
3 - while the WAN is accessible through the AP, the network pane shows
the 3 meshes blinking (in turns) as if the laptop was trying to
associate

Expected outcome: that the laptop would settle with an AP, and not
bother searching for AAs. Why? Because in some scenarios we are
considering deploying APs as the main or only means of network
connectivity with the XS.

Here I am assuming that the blinking on the UI actually correlates
with what the antenna is doing. Perhaps at a lower level the
connection has settled on the AP. In any case, olpc-netstatus doesn't
show anything interesting.

Two related observations:

 - If the latop associates to the AP straight away at boot time
(because it was the last antenna seen), then the laptop does not seem
to be searching for AAs
 - an earlier build (653 with fw Q2D07) does not show the behaviour
discussed earlier - once an AP is selected, scanning for meshes seems
to stop

cheers,



martin
-- 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


[Server-devel] Mesh connectivity from regular WiFi gear

2008-04-15 Thread Martin Langhoff
Michail, Wad,

what do we know about the possibility of connecting to our active
antennaes with regular WiFi hardware, perhaps from OTS laptops using
linux?

cheers,


martin
-- 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel