Re: [sidr] WG Adoption: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases
Hi wg, On Jan 10, 2014, at 9:33 PM, Murphy, Sandra sandra.mur...@parsons.com wrote: Can others please look at this and speak up as to whether you do or do not support adoption? +1, support discussing this in a document Regards, Tim ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
Re: [sidr] WG Adoption: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Murphy, Sandra sandra.mur...@parsons.com wrote: There were four responses to this adoption call, all positive. But four is not a strong indication of wg wishes here. Can others please look at this and speak up as to whether you do or do not support adoption? I responded back on 11/27 supporting adoption. Wanted to make sure that my vote still counts... W Recall: silence does not indicate interest. We give this another two weeks (for people who are taking a Christmas present holiday in some warm climate). Repond by 24 Jan 2014. Please. --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair From: Chris Morrow [morr...@ops-netman.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:39 PM To: sidr-cha...@tools.ietf.org; sidr wg list Subject: WG Adoption: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases Howdy gentle WG folks, The authors of: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases-00 are interested in starting a WG Adoption call for this piece of scribed text. It would be good if other folk also agreed about the adoption. The abstract says: There are a number of critical circumstances where a localized routing domain needs to augment or modify the Global RPKI. This document attempts to outline a few of them. Please consider this a 'WG Adoption' call, and let's attempt to close this out by: 12/9/2013 or 9/12/2013 or Ninth December Twenty-Thirteen or ... you get the point, see you in 2 weeks with (hopefully) clear direction from the folks behind the emailz. -chris co-chair ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
Re: [sidr] WG Adoption: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases
Support adoption. Regards, Keyur On 1/10/14 12:33 PM, Murphy, Sandra sandra.mur...@parsons.com wrote: There were four responses to this adoption call, all positive. But four is not a strong indication of wg wishes here. Can others please look at this and speak up as to whether you do or do not support adoption? Recall: silence does not indicate interest. We give this another two weeks (for people who are taking a Christmas present holiday in some warm climate). Repond by 24 Jan 2014. Please. --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair From: Chris Morrow [morr...@ops-netman.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:39 PM To: sidr-cha...@tools.ietf.org; sidr wg list Subject: WG Adoption: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases Howdy gentle WG folks, The authors of: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases-00 are interested in starting a WG Adoption call for this piece of scribed text. It would be good if other folk also agreed about the adoption. The abstract says: There are a number of critical circumstances where a localized routing domain needs to augment or modify the Global RPKI. This document attempts to outline a few of them. Please consider this a 'WG Adoption' call, and let's attempt to close this out by: 12/9/2013 or 9/12/2013 or Ninth December Twenty-Thirteen or ... you get the point, see you in 2 weeks with (hopefully) clear direction from the folks behind the emailz. -chris co-chair ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
Re: [sidr] WG Adoption: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases
support adoption -Bhavani On 1/13/14 5:41 AM, Murphy, Sandra wrote: On Fri, 10 Jan 2014, Randy Bush said: There were four responses to this adoption call, all positive. But four is not a strong indication of wg wishes here. note that the wg meeting in berlin asked for a requirements draft I hear you, and I heard the comments. But the wg is supposed to speak on the list. Perhaps those who spoke up in the meeting about this could type a word or two into a message to the list. --Sandy. speaking as wg co-chair ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
Re: [sidr] WG Adoption: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases
I support adoption. I think it is important work. Roque On Jan 10, 2014, at 9:33 PM, Murphy, Sandra sandra.mur...@parsons.com wrote: There were four responses to this adoption call, all positive. But four is not a strong indication of wg wishes here. Can others please look at this and speak up as to whether you do or do not support adoption? Recall: silence does not indicate interest. We give this another two weeks (for people who are taking a Christmas present holiday in some warm climate). Repond by 24 Jan 2014. Please. --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair From: Chris Morrow [morr...@ops-netman.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:39 PM To: sidr-cha...@tools.ietf.org; sidr wg list Subject: WG Adoption: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases Howdy gentle WG folks, The authors of: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases-00 are interested in starting a WG Adoption call for this piece of scribed text. It would be good if other folk also agreed about the adoption. The abstract says: There are a number of critical circumstances where a localized routing domain needs to augment or modify the Global RPKI. This document attempts to outline a few of them. Please consider this a 'WG Adoption' call, and let's attempt to close this out by: 12/9/2013 or 9/12/2013 or Ninth December Twenty-Thirteen or ... you get the point, see you in 2 weeks with (hopefully) clear direction from the folks behind the emailz. -chris co-chair ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
Re: [sidr] WG Adoption: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014, Randy Bush said: There were four responses to this adoption call, all positive. But four is not a strong indication of wg wishes here. note that the wg meeting in berlin asked for a requirements draft I hear you, and I heard the comments. But the wg is supposed to speak on the list. Perhaps those who spoke up in the meeting about this could type a word or two into a message to the list. --Sandy. speaking as wg co-chair ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
Re: [sidr] WG Adoption: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases
I don't recall if I responded before, but I will now. I support development of a requirements/use cases doc, so we might as well begin with this one. Steve ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
Re: [sidr] WG Adoption: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases
There were four responses to this adoption call, all positive. But four is not a strong indication of wg wishes here. note that the wg meeting in berlin asked for a requirements draft randy pgp_l4NC6UrXQ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
Re: [sidr] WG Adoption: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases
Yes, support adoption. I'm willing to review and provide feedback. Sriram Howdy gentle WG folks, The authors of: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases-00 are interested in starting a WG Adoption call for this piece of scribed text. It would be good if other folk also agreed about the adoption. ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
Re: [sidr] WG Adoption: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases
+1, support adoption of the requirements document On 11/26/13, 7:39 PM, Chris Morrow wrote: Howdy gentle WG folks, The authors of: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases-00 are interested in starting a WG Adoption call for this piece of scribed text. It would be good if other folk also agreed about the adoption. The abstract says: There are a number of critical circumstances where a localized routing domain needs to augment or modify the Global RPKI. This document attempts to outline a few of them. Please consider this a 'WG Adoption' call, and let's attempt to close this out by: 12/9/2013 or 9/12/2013 or Ninth December Twenty-Thirteen or ... you get the point, see you in 2 weeks with (hopefully) clear direction from the folks behind the emailz. -chris co-chair ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
Re: [sidr] WG Adoption: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases
On Nov 26, 2013, at 8:39 PM, Chris Morrow morr...@ops-netman.net wrote: Howdy gentle WG folks, The authors of: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases-00 are interested in starting a WG Adoption call for this piece of scribed text. It would be good if other folk also agreed about the adoption. The abstract says: There are a number of critical circumstances where a localized routing domain needs to augment or modify the Global RPKI. This document attempts to outline a few of them. Please consider this a 'WG Adoption' call, and let's attempt to close this out by: 12/9/2013 or 9/12/2013 or Ninth December Twenty-Thirteen or ... you get the point, see you in 2 weeks with (hopefully) clear direction from the folks behind the emails. Yah. Support adoption, and volunteer to review. Still think that there is work to be done on the draft -- adopting it allows us to do the work… W -chris co-chair ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr -- Never criticize a man till you've walked a mile in his shoes. Then if he didn't like what you've said, he's a mile away and barefoot. ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
Re: [sidr] WG Adoption: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases
Still think that there is work to be done on the draft you betcha. send edit(s). [ fwiw: i have discoovered an undocumented secret (thanks to sam and henrik) that the Related Work section on the sidr web page is not under control of the chairs. docs are automatically added if the third segment of their name is the name of the wg. as in draft-foo-sidr-bar.txt ] randy ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
[sidr] WG Adoption: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases
Howdy gentle WG folks, The authors of: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases-00 are interested in starting a WG Adoption call for this piece of scribed text. It would be good if other folk also agreed about the adoption. The abstract says: There are a number of critical circumstances where a localized routing domain needs to augment or modify the Global RPKI. This document attempts to outline a few of them. Please consider this a 'WG Adoption' call, and let's attempt to close this out by: 12/9/2013 or 9/12/2013 or Ninth December Twenty-Thirteen or ... you get the point, see you in 2 weeks with (hopefully) clear direction from the folks behind the emailz. -chris co-chair ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
Re: [sidr] WG Adoption: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases
note that this draft was written in response to the wg meeting in berlin asking for requirements before entering the forest of steve kent's multiple proposals. randy ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
