Re: CSusing microwave parts
High voltage DC or AC is a different animal. I have made it successfully but it would take as long as LVDC CS. Increase the electrode size on LVDC and it would make allot faster. Using 2 1 ounce silver bars will produce a gallon every 2 hours under the right conditions. Other people on this list know more on using a using microwave transformers and capacitors etc to make CS that can help you if you chose to go that way. Unless you have the knowledge of taking a non working microwave oven apart and fixing it I would not attempt to do this. If you do ,gor for it. Sam L. On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Pierre Genton topie...@gmail.com wrote: Hi- I am new to the group here. I was referred to this list by a fellow who says there was some experience here amongst your ranks using microwave transformers and capacitors etc to make CS using high voltage DC. I wanted to go to the archives to have a look around but that section is not functioning at the moment and so I thought I'd just ask the group instead. I have been using low dc Volt system for making a fine quality CS for 5 years already. Because of demand from family and friends I need to increase my production. I found some instructions on the internet from a kind fellow on how to connect the microwave components together to create such a system but not much more details then that unfortunately. I tried it and the initial results are encouraging. I only have a TDS meter on hand and so am not really sure about the quality of the product. Also I only had wire type of electrodes and did not have the wider pieces of silver and so I fear I am making too large of particles. Has anybody here used this type of system and if so have they had their product analyzed for true ppm, particle size and % of ionic/colloid content etc. ? any information on this will be appreciated. best regards, PG50 -- A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have.
Re: CSTesting Effectivity of CS in the Labratory
The body isn't agar. Have him test it in a liquid medium. Or actually flood the sample with dilute CS that would mimic being washed with body fluids. What he demonstrated is why CS doesn't kill the flora in the gut. Ode At 09:09 AM 7/27/2009 -0500, you wrote: I gave some Colloidal Silver solution to an old friend of mine that I met at a reunion who happens to be a microbiologist. I happened to have some CS with me and he was intrigued with it and said he was willing to do some tests of it's effectivity. I have included his response below. If anyone has some suggestions on how to test it properly, please let me know. Also, any relevant reference as well. He says: I tested the colloidal silver solution using the methodology that we use in the lab to test standardized antibiotics. I created a lawn of bacteria of known density on agar plates, and then placed a drop of the silver solution in the center of the plate, which then diffused through the bacteria and into the agar medium. None of the 9 most commonly encountered organisms showed any zone of inhibition. The organisms I used in this experiment were E. coli, E. coli (ESBL), Staph. aureus and MRSA, Enterococcus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Moraxella cattarrhalis, Group A beta Strep, and Streptococcus pneumoniae. I have to google the subject as I am surprised that there was no inhibitory effect what so ever at the dosage level direct from the bottle you provided. I am wondering whether in vivo there is another mechanism utilized that is not demonstrated by my plate technique. I'm interested in knowing more, so if you have some references please pass them on. Thanks, Dan -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
Re: CSTesting Effectivity of CS in the Labratory
If you have dire rear, the contents of the intestine are no longer a semi solid. Ode At 06:28 PM 7/27/2009 +0100, you wrote: what is broths please? and if CS doesn't kill anything in the intestines, how come it helps with dogs with sickness and diarrhoea (and people)? dee On 27 Jul 2009, at 16:51, Marshall Dudley wrote: Dorothy Fitzpatrick wrote: t Those tests were run by me back in 1999, and reported to this list 10 years ago. The tests are correct, CS will not kill anything on agar plates. This is a known fact, and is how we realized WHY CS has little or no effect on bacteria in the intestines. We ran tests on broths, and agar plates. There was 100% kills on the broths and 0% kill on the agar. The reason is simple, colloidal silver has to be mobile to find and kill pathogens, on the agar plates it becomes fixed and immobile, and thus is unable to contact or kill anything. This is not new news, but simply confirmation of what we already know. Marshall -- -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
Re: CSTesting Effectivity of CS in the Labratory
Does this imply that CS is not good for hard surface sterilization? Sorry, I'm just coming in on the conversation. -Ken Bagwell From: Ode Coyote odecoy...@windstream.net To: silver-list@eskimo.com Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 1:43:51 AM Subject: Re: CSTesting Effectivity of CS in the Labratory If you have dire rear, the contents of the intestine are no longer a semi solid. Ode At 06:28 PM 7/27/2009 +0100, you wrote: what is broths please? and if CS doesn't kill anything in the intestines, how come it helps with dogs with sickness and diarrhoea (and people)? dee On 27 Jul 2009, at 16:51, Marshall Dudley wrote: Dorothy Fitzpatrick wrote: t Those tests were run by me back in 1999, and reported to this list 10 years ago. The tests are correct, CS will not kill anything on agar plates. This is a known fact, and is how we realized WHY CS has little or no effect on bacteria in the intestines. We ran tests on broths, and agar plates. There was 100% kills on the broths and 0% kill on the agar. The reason is simple, colloidal silver has to be mobile to find and kill pathogens, on the agar plates it becomes fixed and immobile, and thus is unable to contact or kill anything. This is not new news, but simply confirmation of what we already know. Marshall -- -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
Re: [Fwd: Re: CS[Fwd: [ silvermedicine.org ] ASAP Tested against Probiotics...]]
Thank you Marshall. dee On 27 Jul 2009, at 19:54, Marshall Dudley wrote: Dorothy Fitzpatrick wrote: what is agar? dee On 27 Jul 2009, at 17:43, Marshall Dudley wrote:
Re: CSTesting Effectivity of CS in the Labratory
why would this be different please? I would have thought both liquids would be static. dee On 27 Jul 2009, at 20:39, cking...@nycap.rr.com wrote: Boil, simmer chicken bones, carcass... The liquid is a broth. Chuck Ham and Eggs. Just a day's work for a chicken but a lifetime commitment for a pig.
Re: CSTesting Effectivity of CS in the Labratory
thanks Marshall, that has made it much clearer and I will save it for future reference. dee On 27 Jul 2009, at 21:36, Marshall Dudley wrote: We have to go through this every year or so. 1. CS must have mobility to come in contact with pathogens and kill them. If there is no contact, there is no action. 2. CS will therefore have very limited killing power in any medium which is solid, or semisolid. This includes such things as gelatin and a healthy stool. 3. CS kills both aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms, there generally are no Good vs Bad microorganisms, only misplaced organisms. IE. yeast in your bread or beer is good, in your intestines, vagina or blood stream is bad. Likewise E coli is good in your intestines, but bad in your blood or vagina. When people say that CS does not kill good bacteria because it generally does not wipe out the good flora in the intestines, they are mistaken, it is not because the bacteria are good and CS somehow has this magical capability to tell if the bacteria is good or bad in that environment, but rather the medium is semisolid so the CS has no mobility.
Re: CSwater distiller
Sorry sol, I should have said Cell Food, but I have used the Bioplasma cell salts as well. dee On 28 Jul 2009, at 05:26, sol wrote: Oh, I see now. Not the same thing at all. Mine are homeopathic cell salts in the Hyland's brand called bioplasma. http://www.iherb.com/Hyland-s-Bioplasma-1000-Tablets/4977?at=0 sol Dorothy Fitzpatrick wrote: Mine are the ones that were causing a bit of controversy here on the list last week! They are called Cell Salts by NuScience --
Re: CSTesting Effectivity of CS in the Labratory
Dorothy Fitzpatrick wrote: why would this be different please? I would have thought both liquids would be static. dee On 27 Jul 2009, at 20:39, cking...@nycap.rr.com mailto:cking...@nycap.rr.com wrote: Boil, simmer chicken bones, carcass... The liquid is a broth. Chuck Ham and Eggs. Just a day's work for a chicken but a lifetime commitment for a pig. No, liquids are never static. Look up Browning movement. Marshall -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
Re: CSTesting Effectivity of CS in the Labratory
Ken Nancy Bagwell wrote: Does this imply that CS is not good for hard surface sterilization? No, CS when applied to a hard surface is liquid, and as long as the pathogen is on the surface, it can get to it. Marshall Sorry, I'm just coming in on the conversation. -Ken Bagwell *From:* Ode Coyote odecoy...@windstream.net *To:* silver-list@eskimo.com *Sent:* Tuesday, July 28, 2009 1:43:51 AM *Subject:* Re: CSTesting Effectivity of CS in the Labratory If you have dire rear, the contents of the intestine are no longer a semi solid. Ode At 06:28 PM 7/27/2009 +0100, you wrote: what is broths please? and if CS doesn't kill anything in the intestines, how come it helps with dogs with sickness and diarrhoea (and people)? dee On 27 Jul 2009, at 16:51, Marshall Dudley wrote: Dorothy Fitzpatrick wrote: t Those tests were run by me back in 1999, and reported to this list 10 years ago. The tests are correct, CS will not kill anything on agar plates. This is a known fact, and is how we realized WHY CS has little or no effect on bacteria in the intestines. We ran tests on broths, and agar plates. There was 100% kills on the broths and 0% kill on the agar. The reason is simple, colloidal silver has to be mobile to find and kill pathogens, on the agar plates it becomes fixed and immobile, and thus is unable to contact or kill anything. This is not new news, but simply confirmation of what we already know. Marshall -- -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com mailto:silver-list@eskimo.com Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com
Re: CShealing hands Spiritual Healing Sanctuary in England
I once had a guy use muscle testing on me to see which supplements were right for me. I'm not convinced it's an effective method, but I have an open mind. Is this something I can do on myself? Any suggested references where I can learn more? Alan On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Marshall Dudley mdud...@king-cart.comwrote: Superb idea. Or maybe muscle testing. That is asking at the soul level, which is definitely acceptable. Marshall -- Alan Jones
Re: CSKidney Stones...Prevention???
About Kidney stones from Mercola... http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/07/25/Information-You-Need-to-Know-About-Kidney-Stones.aspx What Causes Kidney Stones? In the U.S., about 10-15 percent of adults will be diagnosed with a kidney stone in their lifetime. Roughly 1 million Americans develop kidney stones each year. Once you have had one kidney stone attack, your chance of recurrence is about 70 to 80 percent, and the younger you are when you have your first attack, the greater your risk of recurrence. Typically, a kidney stone is the result of a super-saturation of minerals and acid salts in your urine, such as calcium and uric acid, which then crystallize and form solid masses. This can happen if you don’t drink enough fluids, and if your urine is highly acidic or highly alkaline. Certain drugs can also promote kidney stones, such as Lasix (furosemide), Topomax (topiramate), and Xenical, among others. Most kidney stones contain crystals of various types, with calcium as the key ingredient. However, usually one type of crystals predominates, and determining the type helps you identify the underlying cause. The most common type is calcium oxalate stones, comprising about 75 percent of all cases. Oxalate is found in some fruits and vegetables, but your liver actually produces most of your oxalate. You’d think one of the solutions for avoiding kidney stones would be to eliminate or radically reduce your intake of calcium, because calcium is part of the stone, but that is actually NOT a wise strategy. This is because, normally, the calcium in your diet binds to the oxalate, and helps you excrete it in other ways than through your urine. Other types of stones, and their underlying causes, include: Struvite stones: Found more often in women, these are almost always the result of urinary tract infections. Uric acid stones: These are a byproduct of protein metabolism. They’re commonly seen with gout, and may result from certain genetic factors and disorders of your blood-producing tissues. Cystine stones: Represent a very small percentage of kidney stones. These are the result of a hereditary disorder that causes your kidneys to excrete massive amounts of certain amino acids (cystinuria). Two risk factors that elevate your chances of developing kidney stones include high blood pressure and digestive problems. Signs and Symptoms of Kidney Stones Most likely you’ll never know you have a stone until it moves into your ureter—the tube connecting your kidney to your bladder. At that point, common symptoms include: Pain in your side and back, below your ribs Episodes of pain lasting 20 to 60 minutes, of varying intensity Pain “waves” radiating from your side and back, to your lower abdomen and groin Bloody, cloudy or foul-smelling urine Pain with urination Nausea and vomiting “Urgency” (persistent urge to urinate) Fever and chills (indicates an infection is also present) The pain you feel is a result of distention of the tissues above the stone, since it is blocking the passage of urine, rather than from the pressure of the stone itself. To diagnose a kidney stone you can collect the kidney stone and have it analyzed for a definitive answer, or you can do a 24-hour urine test. This is a useful strategy to ascertain any imbalances in your urine that contribute and predispose you to develop stones. Watch What You Eat if You Have Kidney Stones There are a number of strategies you can use to treat this condition. If you suffer mainly from calcium oxalate stones, you’ll want to minimize the amount of oxalates in your body (as opposed to reducing your calcium intake). Two foods in particular contribute to creating oxalates, namely soy, and beer. If you’ve read my newsletter for any amount of time, you already know I warn against unfermented soy products for a number of reasons, but preventing the formation of kidney stones is yet another. Other foods that contain high levels of oxalate that you’ll want to avoid include: Spinach Rhubarb Chocolate Parsley Beetroot Strawberries Wheat flour Pepper Nuts A diet high in sugar can also set you up for stones, since sugar upsets the mineral relationships in your body by interfering with calcium and magnesium absorption. Diets high in processed salt are also bad news as salt increases the amount of calcium and oxalate in your urine. Processed foods have notoriously high salt content and should therefore be avoided as much as possible. Keep in mind that the salt referenced here is processed salt, like your regular table salt, not high quality, unprocessed salts that contain numerous essential minerals that your body actually needs for optimal health. Naturally, eating fresh, whole foods according to your nutritional type is the best way to ensure you’re eating what your body needs for optimal performance, regardless of what health conditions you seek to avoid or improve. Prevent and Treat Kidney Stones with Plain Water Probably the
CSBacteria a day to keep colds away
*Bacteria a Day Could Keep Kids' Colds Away* Bacteria that are present in the body naturally and sometimes are added to food or dietary supplements might help ward off children's colds, researchers say. A study done in China found that small children who drank a mixture of such bacteria — known as probiotics — in milk twice a day during the winter and spring had fewer colds, needed fewer antibiotics, and missed fewer days of school than children who drank plain milk. Researchers have shown in some studies that probiotics can benefit those who are already ill with various conditions, and the bacteria are thought to boost the immune system's response to invaders. Whether they were effective at preventing sickness, however, was unclear. The study in China involved 326 children, ages 3 to 5, who were assigned randomly to three groups: one given milk with a bacterium called Lactobacillus acidophilus mixed in, another that received the same organism along with a strain of another bacterium, Bifidobacterium animalis, and a third that received just milk with placebo. In the journal Pediatrics, the researchers report that the Lactobacillus group had 53 percent fewer fevers, 41 percent fewer cough episodes, and 28 percent fewer runny noses than the placebo group. The Lactobacillus/Bifidobacterium group had even larger reductions in symptom rates: 72 percent fewer fevers, 62 percent fewer coughs, and 59 percent fewer runny noses. Furthermore, when children in the test groups did get fevers, coughs or runny noses, they recovered significantly faster. Compared with the placebo group, the length of illness was decreased by 32 percent with Lactobacillus and by 48 percent with Lactobacillus/Bifidobacterium. The investigators also noted that antibiotic use was 68 percent lower in the Lactobacillus group and 84 percent lower in the Lactobacillus/Bifidobacterium group, compared to the placebo group. Finally, they said, children who received the probiotics were absent from day care 28 to 32 percent less often than children in the placebo group. SOURCE: Pediatrics, August 2009. -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
Re: CSTesting Effectivity of CS in the Labratory
Spray and wipe. Cover the surface with CS. Chuck If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough --Mario Andretti On 7/28/2009 6:37:26 AM, Ken Nancy Bagwell (kenancy2...@yahoo.com) wrote: Does this imply that CS is not good for hard surface sterilization? Sorry, I'm just coming in on the conversation. -Ken Bagwell - From: Ode Coyote odecoy...@windstream.net To: silver-list@eskimo.com Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 1:43:51 AM Subject: Re: CSTesting Effectivity of CS in the Labratory If you have dire rear, the contents of the intestine are no longer a semi solid. Ode At 06:28 PM 7/27/2009 +0100, you wrote: what is broths please? and if CS doesn't kill anything in the intestines, how come it helps with dogs with sickness and diarrhoea (and people)? dee On 27 Jul 2009, at 16:51, Marshall Dudley wrote: Dorothy Fitzpatrick wrote: t Those tests were run by me back in 1999, and reported to this list 10 years ago. The tests are correct, CS will not kill anything on agar plates. This is a known fact, and is how we realized WHY CS has little or no effect on bacteria in the intestines. We ran tests on broths, and agar plates. There was 100% kills No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.34/2268 - Release Date: 07/28/09 06:00:00
Re: CSTesting Effectivity of CS in the Labratory
Different from what? What do you mean by static? Do you not cook? A broth is a kind of soup or soup base. It's a liquid, therefore anything placed in it, such as CS, disperses through out. Agar is jellylike. CS would stay near where it was placed, not disperse, therefore not be effective. Chuck Careful. We don't want to learn from this. - Calvin Hobbes On 7/28/2009 7:23:48 AM, Dorothy Fitzpatrick (d...@deetroy.org) wrote: why would this be different please? I would have thought both liquids would be static. dee On 27 Jul 2009, at 20:39, cking...@nycap.rr.com wrote: Boil, simmer chicken bones, carcass... The liquid is a broth. Chuck Ham and Eggs. Just a day's work for a chicken but a lifetime commitment for a pig. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.34/2268 - Release Date: 07/28/09 06:00:00
Re: CSTesting Effectivity of CS in the Labratory
Static as in still, unmoving, opposite; kinetic as in motion, movement Annie cking...@nycap.rr.com wrote: Different from what? What do you mean by static? Do you not cook? A broth is a kind of soup or soup base. It's a liquid, therefore anything placed in it, such as CS, disperses through out. Agar is jellylike. CS would stay near where it was placed, not disperse, therefore not be effective. Chuck Careful. We don't want to learn from this. - Calvin Hobbes On 7/28/2009 7:23:48 AM, Dorothy Fitzpatrick (d...@deetroy.org) wrote: why would this be different please? I would have thought both liquids would be static. dee On 27 Jul 2009, at 20:39, cking...@nycap.rr.com wrote: Boil, simmer chicken bones, carcass... The liquid is a broth. Chuck Ham and Eggs. Just a day's work for a chicken but a lifetime commitment for a pig. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.34/2268 - Release Date: 07/28/09 06:00:00 -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
Re: CSBacteria a day to keep colds away
This is wonderful- and what many moms know from experience. I could not locate the original study, though- do you have a link? Thanks, Kathryn On Jul 28, 2009, at 3:11 PM, Marshall Dudley wrote: *Bacteria a Day Could Keep Kids' Colds Away* Bacteria that are present in the body naturally and sometimes are added to food or dietary supplements might help ward off children's colds, researchers say. A study done in China found that small children who drank a mixture of such bacteria — known as probiotics — in milk twice a day during the winter and spring had fewer colds, needed fewer antibiotics, and missed fewer days of school than children who drank plain milk. Researchers have shown in some studies that probiotics can benefit those who are already ill with various conditions, and the bacteria are thought to boost the immune system's response to invaders. Whether they were effective at preventing sickness, however, was unclear. The study in China involved 326 children, ages 3 to 5, who were assigned randomly to three groups: one given milk with a bacterium called Lactobacillus acidophilus mixed in, another that received the same organism along with a strain of another bacterium, Bifidobacterium animalis, and a third that received just milk with placebo. In the journal Pediatrics, the researchers report that the Lactobacillus group had 53 percent fewer fevers, 41 percent fewer cough episodes, and 28 percent fewer runny noses than the placebo group. The Lactobacillus/Bifidobacterium group had even larger reductions in symptom rates: 72 percent fewer fevers, 62 percent fewer coughs, and 59 percent fewer runny noses. Furthermore, when children in the test groups did get fevers, coughs or runny noses, they recovered significantly faster. Compared with the placebo group, the length of illness was decreased by 32 percent with Lactobacillus and by 48 percent with Lactobacillus/Bifidobacterium. The investigators also noted that antibiotic use was 68 percent lower in the Lactobacillus group and 84 percent lower in the Lactobacillus/Bifidobacterium group, compared to the placebo group. Finally, they said, children who received the probiotics were absent from day care 28 to 32 percent less often than children in the placebo group. SOURCE: Pediatrics, August 2009. -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
RE: CShealing hands Spiritual Healing Sanctuary in England
Yes ye can! I know a person (muscle test spectator) who even tests the prices in supermarkets that way. Question is: what should one's level be? F S F Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:00:35 -0500 Subject: Re: CShealing hands Spiritual Healing Sanctuary in England From: alanmjo...@gmail.com To: silver-list@eskimo.com I once had a guy use muscle testing on me to see which supplements were right for me. I'm not convinced it's an effective method, but I have an open mind. Is this something I can do on myself? Any suggested references where I can learn more? Alan On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Marshall Dudley mdud...@king-cart.com wrote: Superb idea. Or maybe muscle testing. That is asking at the soul level, which is definitely acceptable. Marshall -- Alan Jones _ Explore the seven wonders of the world http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=7+wonders+worldmkt=en-USform=QBRE
Re: CSSwine flu could hit up to 40 percent in US
Hi Sandee Sorry for the delay but I have been very busy. The swine flu is currently circulating the globe.It is very common for flu viruses to mutate as they circle the earth. The swine flu we have in the US now most likely will not be the same that arrives this coming winter. The flu virus is just a very small piece (about 1/100th the size of bacteria) of DNA or RNA with a set of instructions on it. It can exchange the set of instructions with another type of flu virus. Lets say a person in China happens to catch 2 different types of flu, the virus will exchange infomation and instruction and a new flu virus is formed. This is what scares me, a new flu virus has been introduced in our world with the capability of mutatting into a very deadly virus that can kill people very quickly. Time will tell but I would rather be prepared than unprepared and the thing is it doesnt cost allot of money to be prepared for this. Sam L. On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Sandee George oha...@juno.com wrote: Hi There Sam are you saying that they have not as yet gotten it right - this I would tend to agree with - however as you say, let us see what happens with time - maybe they have a time release aspect built into the virus which will allow it to spread slowly gathering speed with time ! Those poor souls who had to deal with the black plague in the days of yore did not have the time release factor to work with so they died like flies Life on planet earth is certainly a wonderful thing while humans are let loose thereon Regards Sandee -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com -- A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have.
Re: CSSwine flu could hit up to 40 percent in US
I can't remember if anyone posted that CS will protect us from the vaccination. Has that been covered? I suspect that it would. Mike in Sacramento From: Sam L. one...@gmail.com To: silver-list@eskimo.com Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 9:39:13 PM Subject: Re: CSSwine flu could hit up to 40 percent in US Hi Sandee Sorry for the delay but I have been very busy. The swine flu is currently circulating the globe.It is very common for flu viruses to mutate as they circle the earth. The swine flu we have in the US now most likely will not be the same that arrives this coming winter. The flu virus is just a very small piece (about 1/100th the size of bacteria) of DNA or RNA with a set of instructions on it. It can exchange the set of instructions with another type of flu virus. Lets say a person in China happens to catch 2 different types of flu, the virus will exchange infomation and instruction and a new flu virus is formed. This is what scares me, a new flu virus has been introduced in our world with the capability of mutatting into a very deadly virus that can kill people very quickly. Time will tell but I would rather be prepared than unprepared and the thing is it doesnt cost allot of money to be prepared for this. Sam L.
