CS>HCV/hepC interferon/ribavirin/new drugs Tx ... compatible with drinking EIS/CS ???

[bob Larson]

the only thing i can find in my silverlist files about using CS concurrently
with combo Tx for hepC is this post below.
encouraging, but i'd like to find a few more encouraging stories etc before
i chance it.
 
does anyone know, or has anyone observed over recent times, where folks have
used CS concurrently with the Tx and how did it go?
 
i stopped swallowing CS the day before starting Tx.  i'm concerned that the
silver might work to detriment the drugs somehow... don't want to go through
it all and turn out to have shot myself in the foot so to speak.  i'll be
starting Boceprevir at week 4 if i respond to inf/riba by then.
 
i have dental infections needing silver until the dentist can intervene.
rinsing mouth isn't good enough.  i want my CS waaah!!!  other issues
that the silver keeps away are now arising, like slight sciatica... keeping
up CS would certainly help with the ride.
 
bob Larson


  _  

From: Scott [mailto:scottie592...@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 9:37 PM
To: Silver List
Subject: CS>CS and HCV - UNDETECTABLE


I wanted to update you on the young man that I mentioned a couple of days
ago who said he had "cleared virus" which usually means that the patient
responded to  the interferon treatment (chemo) and it has gone dormant.  

Well, I asked this 26 year old whether or not he had "cleared virus" or was
it undetectable.  He said he wasn't sure but the got said he had no trace of
it.  I asked  the patient to get his most recent lab work and ask his doctor
if he meant that the virus was dormant (indicative of a "responder" to chemo
treatment) or was it undetectable.  He returned from seeing the doctor
yesterday and reported to me that the doctor said the Hepatitis C Virus is
"UNDETECTABLE" meaning that it appears as if he had never had Hep C.  Well,
unbeknownst to the doctor, the patient had taken approximately 16oz of
colloidal silver for about 3-4 weeks with his last dose of CS being about 2
weeks ago - he drank about 1 liter in two days.  This was done during weeks
6 thru 10 of the chemo.  Go figure, this kid was a borderline stage 3-4
liver disease with only about 25-30% of his liver functioning.  Well, as far
as we know, the liver is still damaged but the virus is GONE  This is
phenomenal seeing how  approximately 95% of our clients are HCV+.  Now there
really is hope for those who suffer from viral hepatitis and probably HIV.
This is great!!!  Anyhow, I want to thank Terry Chamberlain for his
suggestions and support.  I hope and pray that this is something that people
start paying attention to so that others have this same opportunity.

This young man, who is grateful beyond words, has a renewed hope that he can
live another day and tell others his story.  He has a wife and two young
children who are gleaming with joy!  God bless!

In His Service,
Scott Young<><




  _  

Bored   stiff?
Loosen up...
Download and  
play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.

Re: CS>On the FDA's Apparant Lack of Objectivity in Evaluating New Drugs

[Ted Windsor]

The next time your in court, ask this question, which entity are you charging,
the legal fiction entity ( if they respond to this one, tell the court that the
legal fiction is not here) or the natural flesh and blood human being ( man or
woman)? I will be very supprised if any court will deal with this as they do not
want people to know there are two entities.  One that is real (YOU) and one that
has been created by government. Which entity do you choose to be?
Blessings
Ted

rogalt...@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 7/2/01 11:56:32 AM EST, mdud...@execonn.com writes:
>
> << Gee if courts used that logic, than anyone taking the 5th would never get
>  convicted of anything.
>
>  Marshall >>
>
> Marshall: The fact is people who take the Fifth DO get convicted all the time
> while being subject to DUE PROCESS which what we call a trial. It's the DUE
> PROCESS that's important, not any particular form of defense which may or may
> not include invoking the right not to be a witness against oneself. Roger
>
> --
> The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
>
> To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to:
> silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com  -or-  silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com
> with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.
>
> To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
> Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
> List maintainer: Mike Devour 

--
Ted
Helping Hand Consulting
http://www.helpinghandconsulting.com

Re: CS>On the FDA's Apparant Lack of Objectivity in Evaluating New Drugs

[ROGALTMAN]

In a message dated 7/2/01 11:56:32 AM EST, mdud...@execonn.com writes:

<< Gee if courts used that logic, than anyone taking the 5th would never get
 convicted of anything.
 
 Marshall >>

Marshall: The fact is people who take the Fifth DO get convicted all the time 
while being subject to DUE PROCESS which what we call a trial. It's the DUE 
PROCESS that's important, not any particular form of defense which may or may 
not include invoking the right not to be a witness against oneself. Roger 


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: 
silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com  -or-  silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com
with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour 

Re: CS>On the FDA's Apparant Lack of Objectivity in Evaluating New Drugs

[Marshall Dudley]

rogalt...@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 7/1/01 8:35:04 AM EST, so...@neo.rr.com writes:
>
> << Subj: CS>Straight from the horse's mouth.
>  Date:  7/1/01 8:35:04 AM EST
>  From:  so...@neo.rr.com (Solar)
>  Reply-to:  so...@neo.rr.com (Solar)
>  To:silver-list@eskimo.com (silver list)
>
>  Hello List,
>
>
>  Delving a little deeper into the conflict-of-interest that exists in
>  the FDA and the CDC, I find the following..
>
>  http://www.house.gov/reform/press/00.08.23.htm
>
>  Please note that this is straight from the horse's mouth. From the
>  Committee On Government Reform, dated August 23, 2000. It describes in
>  some detail the crookedness that exists within the CDC and FDA
>  approval processes.
>   >>
>
> First, I would like to thank Solar for providing exceptionally good factual
> information as the basis for his argument that the FDA is putting the public
> at unacceptable risk with regard to the way they are implementing their drug
> approval procedure.
>
> After reading these references it's difficult, if not impossible, to come up
> with any rational explanation that could explain how the benefits outweigh
> the risks of having recognized experts act as consultants for the FDA to
> evaluate drugs that have been submitted by the very same companies that are
> paying THEM for their professional services.
>
> If Solar wants to characterize this information as "proof" there are few of
> us who would argue with him, particularly from a practical point of view.
> >From my perspective, however, I prefer to use the term "evidence" since the
> FDA has not been heard in their own defense. The fact that they have chosen
> to remain essentially silent on this issue further condemns them in the court
> of public opinion. Nevertheless, since the FDA has not presented a detailed
> defense of their actions it seems that "due process" has not been served. So
> until they present their defense, and that defense has been considered and
> ruled upon by an appropriate and impartial tribunal (if one, in fact,
> exists), I'm more comfortable with the term "evidence" than I am with
> "proof." A small point? Perhaps, but one consistent with my political views.

Gee if courts used that logic, than anyone taking the 5th would never get
convicted of anything.

Marshall


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: 
silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com  -or-  silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com
with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour 

Re: CS>On the FDA's Apparant Lack of Objectivity in Evaluating New Drugs

[ROGALTMAN]

In a message dated 7/2/01 6:45:22 AM EST, b...@utopiatexas.com writes:

<< Subj: Re: CS>On the FDA's Apparant Lack of Objectivity in Evaluating 
New Drugs
 Date:  7/2/01 6:45:22 AM EST
 From:  b...@utopiatexas.com (Bill Fernald)
 To:rogalt...@aol.com
 
 Roger
 I'll know where not to go if I want to get a lynch mob together. Your
 fairness is striking. I commend you.
 Bill >>

Bill: Thanks. I'm glad you wrote that BEFORE reading my John Stossel post 
about the FDA. It's always fun to change hats (arbitrator to advocate?) 
often, don't you think? Keeps the brain cells stimulated. Roger


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: 
silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com  -or-  silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com
with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour 

CS>On the FDA's Apparant Lack of Objectivity in Evaluating New Drugs

[ROGALTMAN]

In a message dated 7/1/01 8:35:04 AM EST, so...@neo.rr.com writes:

<< Subj: CS>Straight from the horse's mouth.
 Date:  7/1/01 8:35:04 AM EST
 From:  so...@neo.rr.com (Solar)
 Reply-to:  so...@neo.rr.com (Solar)
 To:silver-list@eskimo.com (silver list)
 
 Hello List,
 
 
 Delving a little deeper into the conflict-of-interest that exists in
 the FDA and the CDC, I find the following..
 
 http://www.house.gov/reform/press/00.08.23.htm
 
 Please note that this is straight from the horse's mouth. From the
 Committee On Government Reform, dated August 23, 2000. It describes in
 some detail the crookedness that exists within the CDC and FDA
 approval processes.
  >>

First, I would like to thank Solar for providing exceptionally good factual 
information as the basis for his argument that the FDA is putting the public 
at unacceptable risk with regard to the way they are implementing their drug 
approval procedure.

After reading these references it's difficult, if not impossible, to come up 
with any rational explanation that could explain how the benefits outweigh 
the risks of having recognized experts act as consultants for the FDA to 
evaluate drugs that have been submitted by the very same companies that are 
paying THEM for their professional services.

If Solar wants to characterize this information as "proof" there are few of 
us who would argue with him, particularly from a practical point of view. 
>From my perspective, however, I prefer to use the term "evidence" since the 
FDA has not been heard in their own defense. The fact that they have chosen 
to remain essentially silent on this issue further condemns them in the court 
of public opinion. Nevertheless, since the FDA has not presented a detailed 
defense of their actions it seems that "due process" has not been served. So 
until they present their defense, and that defense has been considered and 
ruled upon by an appropriate and impartial tribunal (if one, in fact, 
exists), I'm more comfortable with the term "evidence" than I am with 
"proof." A small point? Perhaps, but one consistent with my political views. 
Roger


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: 
silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com  -or-  silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com
with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour 

new drugs

[Tai-Pan]

Hi list,
  Some new humor on this grand holiday. Enjoy.

  Subject: Viagra
  Date: Fri,8 May 1998 02:34:31 -0700
  X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8)

  With Viagra such a hit, Pfizer Labs is bringing forth a whole line of
drugs oriented towards improving the performance of men in today`s
society

DIRECTRA - A dose of this drug given to men before leaving on a car trip
caused 72% of them to stop and ask directions when they got
lost,compared to a control group of 0.2 percent.

PROJECTRA - Men given this experimental new drug were far more likely to
actually finish a household repair project before starting a new one.

CHILDAGRA - Men taking this drug reported a sudden over-whelming urge to
perform more child-care tasks, especially cleaning up spills and "little
accidents".

COMLIMENTRA - In clinical trials, 82% of middle-aged men administered
this drug noticed that their wives had a new hairstyle. Currently being
tested to see if its effects extend to noticing new clothing.

BUYAGRA - Married and otherwise attached men reported a sudden urge to
buy their sweeties expensive jewelry and gifts after taking this drug
for only two days. Still to be seen: Whether the drug can be continued
for a period longer than the store`s return policy limit.

NEGA-VIAGRA - Has the opposite effect of Viagra. Currently undergoing
clinical trials on over sexed politicians.

NEGA-SPORTAGRA - This drug had the strange effect of making men want to
turn off televised sports and converse with other family members about
current events and family things.

FLATULAGRA - This complex drug converts a person`s noxious intestinal
gases back into food solids. Special effect is it can be overdosed for
long car trips. A problem side effect is the occurance of constipation
in some people.  

FLYAGRA - This drug has been showing great promise in treating men with
OFD (open fly disorder). Especially useful for men on Viagra and other
treatments for memory loss. 

PRYAGRA - About to fail its clinical trial, this drug gave men in the
test group an irresistable urge to dig into the personal sffairs of
other people. An apparent over-dose turned three test subjects into "
special prosecutors" and some into peeping toms. 

LIAGRA - This drug causes some people to be less than truthful when
being asked about their sexual affairs. Women seem to be more sensitive
to it than men. Comes in three strengths,Regular, Strong and
Presidential.

  

  Bless you all,   Bob  Lee
-- 
oozing on the muggy shore of the gulf coast
  l...@fbtc.net


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: 
silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com  -or-  silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com
with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the subject: line.

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

List maintainer: Mike Devour