Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : [singularity] Quantum resonance btw DNA strands?

2008-02-17 Thread Bruno Frandemiche
bonjour à tous
for info
http://xxx.lanl.gov/ftp/arxiv/papers/0802/0802.1835.pdf

http://xxx.lanl.gov/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0711/0711.1366v1.pdf

cordialement votre
bruno

- Message d'origine 
De : Ben Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
À : singularity@v2.listbox.com
Envoyé le : Mercredi, 6 Février 2008, 5h48mn 03s
Objet : Re: Re : Re : Re : Re : [singularity] Quantum resonance btw DNA strands?

Hi Bruno,

 effectively,my commentary is very short so excuse-my(i drive my pc with my
 eyes
 because i am a a.l.s with tracheo and gastro and i was a speaker,not a
 writer and it's difficult)

Well that is certainly a good reason for your commentaries being short!

 hello ben
 ok ,i stop,no problem
 i am thinking mcfadden'theory was possible right because of
 wave-matter-structure and
 no-particle-matter-structure

Certainly the wave nature of matter is a necessary prerequisite for
McFadden's theory to be correct -- but that's already built into quantum
mechanics, right?

The question is whether proteins really function as macroscopic quantum
systems, in the way that McFadden suggests.  They may or may not, but I
don't think the answer is obvious from the wave nature of matter...

-- Ben

-
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?;


  
_ 
Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail 
http://mail.yahoo.fr

---
singularity
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/11983/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/11983/
Modify Your Subscription: 
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604id_secret=96140713-a54b2b
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Re: Re : Re : Re : [singularity] Quantum resonance btw DNA strands?

2008-02-05 Thread Ben Goertzel
Bruno,

Posting these links without any comprehensible commentary is not very
useful ... so I think you should stop ...

If you have some discussion about the information being pointed to,
and its relevance to this thread or other possibly
Singularity-relevant issues, that would be welcome...

thanks
Ben Goertzel
List Owner

On Feb 5, 2008 4:36 PM, Bruno Frandemiche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 hello,too me(stop me if you have the thue,i am very open)
 http://www.spaceandmotion.com/wave-structure-matter-theorists.htm
 cordialement votre
 bruno


 - Message d'origine 
 De : Bruno Frandemiche [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 À : singularity@v2.listbox.com
 Envoyé le : Mardi, 5 Février 2008, 21h42mn 07s
 Objet : Re : Re : [singularity] Quantum resonance btw DNA strands?




 hell-o
 http://freespace.virgin.net/ch.thompson1/
 inquiry,reflexion,judgement:yes
 heating knowledge:no
 the true is always subjectif,contextuel or intersubjectif and therefore
 social
 cordialement votre
 bruno



 - Message d'origine 
 De : Bruno Frandemiche [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 À : singularity@v2.listbox.com
 Envoyé le : Mardi, 5 Février 2008, 20h52mn 03s
 Objet : Re : [singularity] Quantum resonance btw DNA strands?



 hello (i am a poor little computer-man but honest and i want to know before
 out)
 http://www.glafreniere.com/matter.htm
 ether:yes
 wave:yes
 lorentz:yes
 poincaré:yes
 compton:yes
 cabala:yes
 lafreniere:yes
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process_Physics
 http://myprofile.cos.com/mammoth
 http://web.petrsu.ru/~alexk/
 cahill:yes
 kirilyuk:yes
 kaivarainen:yes
 particule:no
 eiinstein:no (excuse-my)(or excuse his)
 fuller:yes
 synergetics:yes
 darwin:little
 symbiose(wave and evolution):YES YES YES YES
 mcfadden:possible(because wave)
 bohr:little(because epistemic)(excuse-my)
 heisenberg:no(excuse-my)
 schrodinger:yes(but no particle and ether)
 descarte:yes(i am french but i feel non-dual dual rationalism)
 agi:yes(attention for worker)
 good french polemic
 cordialement votre
 bruno

 - Message d'origine 
 De : Ben Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 À : singularity@v2.listbox.com
 Envoyé le : Mardi, 5 Février 2008, 17h32mn 47s
 Objet : [singularity] Quantum resonance btw DNA strands?

 This article

 http://www.physorg.com/news120735315.html

 made me think of Johnjoe McFadden's theory
 that quantum nonlocality plays a role in protein-folding

 http://www.surrey.ac.uk/qe/quantumevolution.htm

 H...

 ben



 --
 Ben Goertzel, PhD
 CEO, Novamente LLC and Biomind LLC
 Director of Research, SIAI
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 If men cease to believe that they will one day become gods then they
 will surely become worms.
 -- Henry Miller

 -
 This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
 To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?;


  
  Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo!
 Mail This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
 To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?;


  
  Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo!
 Mail This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
 To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?;


  
  Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo!
 Mail 
  This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
 To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?;



-- 
Ben Goertzel, PhD
CEO, Novamente LLC and Biomind LLC
Director of Research, SIAI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

If men cease to believe that they will one day become gods then they
will surely become worms.
-- Henry Miller

-
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604id_secret=93974413-c8d738

Re: Re : Re : Re : Re : [singularity] Quantum resonance btw DNA strands?

2008-02-05 Thread Ben Goertzel
Hi Bruno,

 effectively,my commentary is very short so excuse-my(i drive my pc with my
 eyes
 because i am a a.l.s with tracheo and gastro and i was a speaker,not a
 writer and it's difficult)

Well that is certainly a good reason for your commentaries being short!

 hello ben
 ok ,i stop,no problem
 i am thinking mcfadden'theory was possible right because of
 wave-matter-structure and
 no-particle-matter-structure

Certainly the wave nature of matter is a necessary prerequisite for
McFadden's theory to be correct -- but that's already built into quantum
mechanics, right?

The question is whether proteins really function as macroscopic quantum
systems, in the way that McFadden suggests.  They may or may not, but I
don't think the answer is obvious from the wave nature of matter...

-- Ben

-
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604id_secret=94096411-d20c12