Re: [sisuite-users] FATAL : Kernel too old

2007-09-14 Thread Andrea Righi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I just attempted to PXE boot a HP Proliant  ML370 G2 with systemimager
 3.9.6 and
 received the following kernel panic :
 
 Freeing unused kernel memory : 164k freed
 FATAL: Kernel too old
 Kernel panic : Attempting to kill init !
 

That's because the glibc into the initrd.img are build using the linux-2.6
headers (our build machine is a Ubuntu 7.04 host), that means your 2.4 kernel is
not compatible.

See also:
http://www.busybox.net/lists/busybox/2005-January/013500.html

To resolve you should build systemimager from source using your 2.4 machine, in
order to have a compatible version of glibc in your initrd.img.

For us this is a very difficult issue to resolve: first of all we should find 2
build machines for each arch (one with 2.4 kernel and another with a 2.6
kernel), and then we should build 2 different versions for each arch of the
packages systemimager-initrd_template and systemimager-boot-standard...

-Andrea

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
sisuite-users mailing list
sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users


Re: [sisuite-users] FATAL : Kernel too old

2007-09-14 Thread Andrea Righi
Andrea Righi wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I just attempted to PXE boot a HP Proliant  ML370 G2 with systemimager
 3.9.6 and
 received the following kernel panic :

 Freeing unused kernel memory : 164k freed
 FATAL: Kernel too old
 Kernel panic : Attempting to kill init !

 
 That's because the glibc into the initrd.img are build using the linux-2.6
 headers (our build machine is a Ubuntu 7.04 host), that means your 2.4 kernel 
 is
 not compatible.
 
 See also:
 http://www.busybox.net/lists/busybox/2005-January/013500.html
 
 To resolve you should build systemimager from source using your 2.4 machine, 
 in
 order to have a compatible version of glibc in your initrd.img.
 
 For us this is a very difficult issue to resolve: first of all we should find 
 2
 build machines for each arch (one with 2.4 kernel and another with a 2.6
 kernel), and then we should build 2 different versions for each arch of the
 packages systemimager-initrd_template and systemimager-boot-standard...
 

Added a comment in the troubleshooting guide:
http://wiki.systemimager.org/index.php/Troubleshooting#FATAL:_Kernel_too_old

For now this is the best we can do...

-Andrea

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
sisuite-users mailing list
sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users


Re: [sisuite-users] 3.8.2 for ia64

2007-09-14 Thread Andrea Righi
Roger Chevalier wrote:
 Thanks for the reply Andrea.
 
 Works better with the ramdisk_size parameter, but the generic
 kernel/initrd it did not recognize the scsi card (sym53c8xx module) I
 did not invetigate why currently (may be you can tell me where to look at?)
 
 So I use UYOK, and it works ! I managed to restore a debian etch with
 LVM2 build on a software RAID1. (3.8.2 si version)
 I will try a few more configuration.
 
 I don't know if someone is interested in the rpm build on ia64 (mostly
 the boot packages) ?
 I currently have access to a ia64 server, I will try also to build the
 3.9.6, I let you know any feedback.
 

Very good! waiting your feedback...

Thanks,
-Andrea

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
sisuite-users mailing list
sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users


Re: [sisuite-users] FATAL : Kernel too old

2007-09-14 Thread David . Livingstone
Andrea,

 Thanks for the reply.

 What options do I have ?

- Try and boot using the standard(included) kernel ?
- Try an boot using a uyok from a similar machine using a 2.6 kernel. Will 
this
   work ?
- Build from source on the 2.4 machine. This looks like the cleanest 
solution. I have
  downloaded the 3.9.6 tar source however I'm not sure how to build the 
rpm's. I have 
  looked at the online docs  rpmbuild -ta tarball however after looking 
at the Makefile
  I see a rpm target which does a rpmbuild -tb. Also my machines are 
behind a 
  firewall and can only connect to the internet via a proxy.

Wouldn't virtulization allow you to build both glibc versions on the same 
platform ?

Thanks



David K Livingstone
CN Signals and Communications
10229 127 Avenue floor 2
Edmonton, AB, T5E 0B9
Ph  : 780 472-3959 Fax : 780 472-3050
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



Andrea Righi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2007/09/14 02:31
Please respond to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Please respond to
sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net


To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject
Re: [sisuite-users] FATAL : Kernel too old






Andrea Righi wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I just attempted to PXE boot a HP Proliant  ML370 G2 with systemimager
 3.9.6 and
 received the following kernel panic :

 Freeing unused kernel memory : 164k freed
 FATAL: Kernel too old
 Kernel panic : Attempting to kill init !


 That's because the glibc into the initrd.img are build using the 
linux-2.6
 headers (our build machine is a Ubuntu 7.04 host), that means your 2.4 
kernel is
 not compatible.

 See also:
 http://www.busybox.net/lists/busybox/2005-January/013500.html

 To resolve you should build systemimager from source using your 2.4 
machine, in
 order to have a compatible version of glibc in your initrd.img.

 For us this is a very difficult issue to resolve: first of all we should 
find 2
 build machines for each arch (one with 2.4 kernel and another with a 2.6
 kernel), and then we should build 2 different versions for each arch of 
the
 packages systemimager-initrd_template and systemimager-boot-standard...


Added a comment in the troubleshooting guide:
http://wiki.systemimager.org/index.php/Troubleshooting#FATAL:_Kernel_too_old


For now this is the best we can do...

-Andrea

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
sisuite-users mailing list
sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___
sisuite-users mailing list
sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users


[sisuite-users] systemconfigurator and bogus sc-initrd

2007-09-14 Thread Steven A. DuChene
I am trying to install some nodes using an image captured from a pre-existing
system and during the install systemconfigurator keeps creating an initrd
file called sc-initrd-2.6.9-55.ELsmp.gz and this does not work out because
the correct modules do not get included in this initrd and the resulting
system does not boot.

I have an initrd file that does work but everytime I edit the grub.conf
or menu.lst files in the image, it seems like systemconfigurator overwrites
the grub.conf file to reference this bogus sc-initrd-2.6.9-55.ELsmp.gz file
instead.

How do I get one of two things to happen:

1. how to get systemconfigurator to STOP rewriting my grub.conf file

or

2. how to get systemconfigurator to create a CORRECT initrd file containing
the appropriate modules needed for this platform?

I am in the process of creating a hardware.lst file but the documentation
that talks about that file does not mention how to get systemconfigurator
to include modules for things like lvm.

Any assistance, information, pointers to docs or other suggestions are most
welcome.
--
Steven DuChene



-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
sisuite-users mailing list
sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users


Re: [sisuite-users] systemconfigurator and bogus sc-initrd

2007-09-14 Thread Steven A. DuChene
Thanks for the suggestion Ted.
I was able to look through the sample.cfg file that is provided
with systemconfigurator and get an idea of how to override the
creation and use of the sc-initrd thing.

-Original Message-
From: Ted Arden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sep 14, 2007 10:07 AM
To: Steven A. DuChene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [sisuite-users] systemconfigurator and bogus sc-initrd


d00de.. just write a post-install script that
copies over a known good working grub.conf
file as the last thing to do after imaging??
i have had to do a coupla work arounds with
sysimager in the past.. some post processing.
if you have the vanilla grub.conf file, you may
as well just put that into the image via post-process?

=ted=

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Steven A. DuChene wrote:

 I am trying to install some nodes using an image captured from a pre-existing
 system and during the install systemconfigurator keeps creating an initrd
 file called sc-initrd-2.6.9-55.ELsmp.gz and this does not work out because
 the correct modules do not get included in this initrd and the resulting
 system does not boot.

 I have an initrd file that does work but everytime I edit the grub.conf
 or menu.lst files in the image, it seems like systemconfigurator overwrites
 the grub.conf file to reference this bogus sc-initrd-2.6.9-55.ELsmp.gz file
 instead.

 How do I get one of two things to happen:

 1. how to get systemconfigurator to STOP rewriting my grub.conf file

 or

 2. how to get systemconfigurator to create a CORRECT initrd file containing
 the appropriate modules needed for this platform?

 I am in the process of creating a hardware.lst file but the documentation
 that talks about that file does not mention how to get systemconfigurator
 to include modules for things like lvm.

 Any assistance, information, pointers to docs or other suggestions are most
 welcome.
 --
 Steven DuChene



 -
 This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
 Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
 http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
 ___
 sisuite-users mailing list
 sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users






-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
sisuite-users mailing list
sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users