Re: [sisuite-users] 4.1.99 install trouble?

2011-05-18 Thread Tom Yue
So I found the reason it was giving me the "kernel too old" message: 
when running the line

chroot /a/ systemconfigurator --version

from the master script, chroot fails with that message. It seems to be 
related to different glibc versions on the BOEL root and the chrooted 
environment. On the BOEL root, glibc exists in the /lib folder:

/lib # ./libc.so.6
GNU C Library stable release version 2.12
(snipped for brevity)

however, on /a/ it only exists in /a/lib64/. Trying to run 
/a/lib64/libc.so.6 (to check the version) results in the following message:

/a/lib64 # ./libc.so.6
./libc.so.6: relocation error: ./libc.so.6: symbol _dl_starting_up, 
version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 with link time 
reference

On my golden client, running ./libc.so.6 succeeds:

[root@test bin]$ /lib64/libc.so.6
GNU C Library development release version 2.13.90, by Roland McGrath et al.

So there is a version mismatch going on here, although that must be 
common, so I'm not sure how to proceed.

Thanks,

Tom Yue

On 5/18/2011 2:20 PM, Tom Yue wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to use SystemImager 4.1.99 (the SVN copy that Bernard
> currently has in his folder) to deploy a Fedora 15 beta golden client to
> a node. The following packages are installed on the golden client:
>
> perl-AppConfig-1.66-10.fc15.noarch
> systemconfigurator-2.2.11-1.noarch
> systemimager-common-4.1.99.svn4556_bli-1.noarch
> systemimager-client-4.1.99.svn4556_bli-1.noarch
> systemimager-x86_64initrd_template-4.1.99.svn4556_bli-1.noarch
>
> and the following packages are installed on the image server, running
> Fedora 14:
>
> perl-AppConfig-1.66-8.fc14.noarch
> systemconfigurator-2.2.11-1.noarch
> systemimager-common-4.1.99.svn4556_bli-1.noarch
> systemimager-server-4.1.99.svn4556_bli-1.noarch
> systemimager-x86_64boot-standard-4.1.99.svn4556_bli-1.noarch
>
> The image server, the golden client and the node are all running the
> same spec, which is a fairly modern SuperMicro 2U server with Intel Xeon
> E5620, 8 gigs of RAM, 1TB HDD and a network interface that uses the
> e1000e driver (which is why I couldn't use the SystemImager 4.0.2
> distribution, as that version of BOEL doesn't have the e1000e module
> built into the kernel). The golden client kernel version is
>
> 2.6.38.6-27.fc15.x86_64
>
> I've gotten netboot setup to use the standard (BOEL) install
> environment. Installation proceeds normally, partitions the HDD, grabs
> files through rsync then halts here:
>
> mount /dev /a/dev -o bind || shellout
> Using pci-automod to generate hardware.lst (this may take a long time):
> done
> sort: standard output: Invalid argument
> Detecting systemconfigurator:
> ---
> FATAL: kernel too old
> WARNING: systemconfigurator was not found in the image fedora15
> ---
> FATAL: kernel too old
> Killing off running processes.
>
> write_variables
> (then the standard "installation failed" message.)
>
> I cannot use UYOK for some reason as it fails to detect /proc (emits a
> "cannot copy /proc/mounts -- is /proc mounted?" message then dies).
>
> Is there anything I overlooked?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Tom Yue


--
What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its 
next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran 
developers boost performance applications - including clusters. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
___
sisuite-users mailing list
sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users


Re: [sisuite-users] Problem applying image to node

2011-05-18 Thread Bernard Li
Best way to get around the issue is to use UYOK instead of the BOEL
kernel (which comes with the release).

Cheers,

Bernard

On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Chris Pepper  wrote:
> Kamil,
>
>        I am going to guess your NIC is too new to be supported by your version
> of System Imager. You may be able to use a newer (pre-release) version
> to get support. I found HP DL160 nodes were not supported by either of
> the 'release' versions, and SI failed over to the loopback interface,
> which obviously fails to get a DHCP lease...
>
> Chris
>
> On 5/18/11 11:49 AM, Kamil Marcinkowski wrote:
>> I am using system imager on ubuntu 10.4.
>> I have installed the image server and client.
>> I can create the image and pull it onto the image server
>>
>> When I try to image the test node that was the original source golden image
>> the following happens:
>>
>> The client to be imaged gets the dhcp address from dhcpd running on the
>> image server
>> The kernel and the initrd are loaded.
>>
>> Then it tries to bring the network up again, and get dhcpd to give an
>> address to lo???
>>
>>         IP Address not set with pre-boot settings
>>         ...
>>         Listening on LPF/lo/
>>         Sending on LPF/lo/
>>         Sending on Socket/fallback/fallback-net
>>         DHCPDISCOVER on lo to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 8
>>
>>
>> I don't understand why there is a problem here it should be using eth0
>> which has already successfully received dhcp address (needed to load
>> kernel and initrd)
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Kamil
>> --
>> Kamil Marcinkowski                   Westgrid System Administrator
>> ka...@ualberta.ca 
>> University of Alberta site
>> Tel.780 492-0354                       Research Computing Support
>> Fax.780 492-1729                      Academic ICT
>> Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA     University of Alberta
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
>> Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its
>> next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran
>> developers boost performance applications - including clusters.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> sisuite-users mailing list
>> sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users
>
> --
> What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
> Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its
> next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran
> developers boost performance applications - including clusters.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
> ___
> sisuite-users mailing list
> sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users
>

--
What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its 
next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran 
developers boost performance applications - including clusters. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
___
sisuite-users mailing list
sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users


[sisuite-users] 4.1.99 install trouble?

2011-05-18 Thread Tom Yue
Hi all,

I'm trying to use SystemImager 4.1.99 (the SVN copy that Bernard 
currently has in his folder) to deploy a Fedora 15 beta golden client to 
a node. The following packages are installed on the golden client:

perl-AppConfig-1.66-10.fc15.noarch
systemconfigurator-2.2.11-1.noarch
systemimager-common-4.1.99.svn4556_bli-1.noarch
systemimager-client-4.1.99.svn4556_bli-1.noarch
systemimager-x86_64initrd_template-4.1.99.svn4556_bli-1.noarch

and the following packages are installed on the image server, running 
Fedora 14:

perl-AppConfig-1.66-8.fc14.noarch
systemconfigurator-2.2.11-1.noarch
systemimager-common-4.1.99.svn4556_bli-1.noarch
systemimager-server-4.1.99.svn4556_bli-1.noarch
systemimager-x86_64boot-standard-4.1.99.svn4556_bli-1.noarch

The image server, the golden client and the node are all running the 
same spec, which is a fairly modern SuperMicro 2U server with Intel Xeon 
E5620, 8 gigs of RAM, 1TB HDD and a network interface that uses the 
e1000e driver (which is why I couldn't use the SystemImager 4.0.2 
distribution, as that version of BOEL doesn't have the e1000e module 
built into the kernel). The golden client kernel version is

2.6.38.6-27.fc15.x86_64

I've gotten netboot setup to use the standard (BOEL) install 
environment. Installation proceeds normally, partitions the HDD, grabs 
files through rsync then halts here:

mount /dev /a/dev -o bind || shellout
Using pci-automod to generate hardware.lst (this may take a long time): done
sort: standard output: Invalid argument
Detecting systemconfigurator:
---
FATAL: kernel too old
WARNING: systemconfigurator was not found in the image fedora15
---
FATAL: kernel too old
Killing off running processes.

write_variables
(then the standard "installation failed" message.)

I cannot use UYOK for some reason as it fails to detect /proc (emits a 
"cannot copy /proc/mounts -- is /proc mounted?" message then dies).

Is there anything I overlooked?

Thanks!

Tom Yue

--
What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its 
next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran 
developers boost performance applications - including clusters. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
___
sisuite-users mailing list
sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users


Re: [sisuite-users] Problem applying image to node

2011-05-18 Thread Chris Pepper
Kamil,

I am going to guess your NIC is too new to be supported by your version 
of System Imager. You may be able to use a newer (pre-release) version 
to get support. I found HP DL160 nodes were not supported by either of 
the 'release' versions, and SI failed over to the loopback interface, 
which obviously fails to get a DHCP lease...

Chris

On 5/18/11 11:49 AM, Kamil Marcinkowski wrote:
> I am using system imager on ubuntu 10.4.
> I have installed the image server and client.
> I can create the image and pull it onto the image server
>
> When I try to image the test node that was the original source golden image
> the following happens:
>
> The client to be imaged gets the dhcp address from dhcpd running on the
> image server
> The kernel and the initrd are loaded.
>
> Then it tries to bring the network up again, and get dhcpd to give an
> address to lo???
>
> IP Address not set with pre-boot settings
> ...
> Listening on LPF/lo/
> Sending on LPF/lo/
> Sending on Socket/fallback/fallback-net
> DHCPDISCOVER on lo to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 8
>
>
> I don't understand why there is a problem here it should be using eth0
> which has already successfully received dhcp address (needed to load
> kernel and initrd)
>
> Thanks
>
> Kamil
> --
> Kamil Marcinkowski   Westgrid System Administrator
> ka...@ualberta.ca 
> University of Alberta site
> Tel.780 492-0354   Research Computing Support
> Fax.780 492-1729  Academic ICT
> Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA University of Alberta
>
>
>
> --
> What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
> Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its
> next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran
> developers boost performance applications - including clusters.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
>
>
>
> ___
> sisuite-users mailing list
> sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users

--
What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its 
next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran 
developers boost performance applications - including clusters. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
___
sisuite-users mailing list
sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users


[sisuite-users] Problem applying image to node

2011-05-18 Thread Kamil Marcinkowski
I am using system imager on ubuntu 10.4.
I have installed the image server and client.
I can create the image and pull it onto the image server

When I try to image the test node that was the original source golden image
the following happens:

The client to be imaged gets the dhcp address from dhcpd running on the
image server
The kernel and the initrd are loaded.

Then it tries to bring the network up again, and get dhcpd to give an
address to lo???

   IP Address not set with pre-boot settings
   ...
   Listening on LPF/lo/
   Sending on LPF/lo/
   Sending on Socket/fallback/fallback-net
   DHCPDISCOVER on lo to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 8


I don't understand why there is a problem here it should be using eth0
which has already successfully received dhcp address (needed to load kernel
and initrd)

Thanks

Kamil
-- 
Kamil Marcinkowski   Westgrid System Administrator
ka...@ualberta.ca University of Alberta site
Tel.780 492-0354   Research Computing Support
Fax.780 492-1729  Academic ICT
Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA University of Alberta
--
What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its 
next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran 
developers boost performance applications - including clusters. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay___
sisuite-users mailing list
sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users