[SLUG] Ubuntu kernel source and binary packages

2005-06-07 Thread John Clarke
Hi all,

I installed Ubuntu Hoary last week -- my first installation of anything
other than Redhat for close to ten years -- and I'm having trouble
finding matching kernel source and binary packages.

apt-get-install linux-686-smp gave me a kernel which says it's
v2.6.10-5.

apt-get-install linux-tree gave me source which says it's v2.6.10-34.1.

I've searched but can't find source for 2.6.10-5, or binaries for
2.6.10-34.1.  Do either of these exist, and if so, how do I get them?


Thanks,

John
-- 
>>See? I'm deep, I am.
It's all relative, Jim; if you turn to the side, you're thick instead.
-- David P. Murphy
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] IPSEC expert wanted

2005-06-07 Thread Grant Parnell - EverythingLinux
Need to get hold of someone who's experienced at setting up IPSEC, 
especially with Sonicwall firewalls. This is for a small job, and includes 
training me what's involved.

The platform they'll be using is Debian and I'm suggesting using the 
latest release (as of this week) as soon as we've downloaded enough of it. 
We'll be selling CD/DVD boxes of it as soon as we can get the images and 
send it off to be pressed in bulk.

Currently they have one Debian unstable on X86-64 which is causing grief 
with package dependencies so they'll re-image with the 32 bit. The other 
is a RedHat AS 2.1 box which they're reluctant to let us touch.

-- 
-- 
Grant Parnell - senior consultant
EverythingLinux services - the consultant's backup & tech support.
Web: http://www.everythinglinux.com.au/support.php
We're also busybits.com.au and linuxhelp.com.au and elx.com.au.
Phone 02 8756 3522 to book service or discuss your needs.

ELX or its employees participate in the following:-
OSIA (Open Source Industry Australia) - http://www.osia.net.au
AUUG (Australian Unix Users Group) - http://www.auug.org.au
SLUG (Sydney Linux Users Group) - http://www.slug.org.au 
LA (Linux Australia) - http://www.linux.org.au

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Uninstalling a distribution preparatory to re-installing it

2005-06-07 Thread Matthew Hannigan
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:26:07PM +1000, O Plameras wrote:
> 
> #rpm -Uvh 
> http://atrpms.net/dist/fc3/atrpms-kickstart/atrpms-kickstart-25-1.rhfc3.at.i386.rpm
> 
> Then,
> 
> #apt-get update
> #apt-get dist-upgrade
> #apt-get install kernel=2.6.10-1.770_14.rhfc3.at (There is a 2.6.11.XXX 
> but has problems).
> 
> Then,  re-boot your linux to the above kernel.
> Then you may install/upgrade any development module you like, e.g.,
> #apt-get install gcc (or the like).


You've lost me here.  Why does he need to install a new (non-standard) kernel?

To use apt or to use gcc?!



Matt

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Uninstalling a distribution preparatory to re-installing it

2005-06-07 Thread Matthew Hannigan
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 07:10:04PM +1000, Leslie Katz wrote:
> I have been trying to compile a Linux webcam driver (my first attempt at 
> compiling anything). However, I discovered that the FC3 installation type 
> I'd chosen did not include a compiler, so I tried to install one. When I 
> tried, I was told it couldn't be done because I needed other files to be 
> installed first. [ ... ]

Do, as root:

yum install gcc

and it will do the necessary for you.

Easy eh?


You should use yum (or apt) anyway, just to keep up to date.

Have a read of the 'Keeping up to date' doc
at http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/updates/

If you're feeling adventurous, you can setup your own yum repos.
'Yam', from http://dag.wieers.com/ might help.

Matt

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] ADSL connection advice

2005-06-07 Thread Phil Scarratt

Steven O'Reilly wrote:

Hi All

I have recently got a broadband connection with iprimus with an
external modem/router (Netcomm NB5).

I am running Ubuntu and have tried using some of the adsl
configuration tools (pppoeconfig and roaroing penguin) this was
unsucessfull (unable to find aggregator was the message - I think).

I got it working;

using DCHP the ethernet card gets a local  IP address from the modem
and I can ping outside IP adresses.

logging into the modem/router and noting the assigned DNS servers and
enter these in my resolve.conf file. I am able to get e-mail do web
browsing etc.

Is this a reasonable way to set it up? It seems too simple compared to
what I've read.  I assume the modem/router is doing all the
connecting.

I am concerned that this may be an insecure way to connect and I want
to automatically connect when the computer turns on.

Any advice or comments would be appreciated.


Steven O'Reilly


It boils down the what sort of firewall/protection the Netcomm has built 
it. It most likely has something, but may not be as secure as you want 
it. Scan your external IP address and see what is open/closed/filtered.


Fil
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] ADSL connection advice

2005-06-07 Thread Jon Austin
On 6/8/05, Steven O'Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All
> 
> I have recently got a broadband connection with iprimus with an
> external modem/router (Netcomm NB5).

Hi Steve,

The modem handles the PPPoE side of things. Make sure you have your
modems LAN address set as your default route.

It's just like connecting to any vanilla network.

Regards,

Jon
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] ADSL connection advice

2005-06-07 Thread Steven O'Reilly
Hi All

I have recently got a broadband connection with iprimus with an
external modem/router (Netcomm NB5).

I am running Ubuntu and have tried using some of the adsl
configuration tools (pppoeconfig and roaroing penguin) this was
unsucessfull (unable to find aggregator was the message - I think).

I got it working;

using DCHP the ethernet card gets a local  IP address from the modem
and I can ping outside IP adresses.

logging into the modem/router and noting the assigned DNS servers and
enter these in my resolve.conf file. I am able to get e-mail do web
browsing etc.

Is this a reasonable way to set it up? It seems too simple compared to
what I've read.  I assume the modem/router is doing all the
connecting.

I am concerned that this may be an insecure way to connect and I want
to automatically connect when the computer turns on.

Any advice or comments would be appreciated.


Steven O'Reilly
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] OT: Bigpond blocking port 25

2005-06-07 Thread Voytek
whilst OT on Telstra/BigPond, I have another OT/OT item:

I was pleasantly surprised to find Telstra/BigPond no longer sends MS Word
docs, but, text documents with ther applications/conditions, certainly a
step in the right direction


-- 
Voytek
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] SQL Brain teaser...

2005-06-07 Thread Grant Parnell - slug
My god... there's some good ideas there. For now I opted for processing 
outside of SQL by basically breaking the day into 1 minute time slots and 
looking at how many orders were currently being processed in each time 
slot. Next I iterated again and counted up the minutes for each order such 
that for each real minute the attributed time was t/n where n was the 
number of current orders being processed. Then I simply averaged the 
attributed times for each order.
I can get away with this approach because the data set is pretty small and 
it's only twice through the data.

Essentially we agree on only looking at times of the day where packing 
activity is occurring. The jury is out on whether you can assume the 
orders were processed sequentially based on docketdate.

We'll never know, based on this data, how long each specific order took 
but then I don't care - baring exceptional cases (eg 2 hours).

Still, I'll try implimenting your approach for comparison's sake. It'll 
certainly be interesting.

On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, James Gregory wrote:

> On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 19:59 +1000, Grant Parnell - EverythingLinux
> wrote:
> > I'm trying to do some metrics on how long it takes to process an order in 
> > our system based on time between printing the picking slip and bagging the 
> > goods for dispatch. The aim is to determin the maximum performance if we 
> > were to have one guy do nothing but pick & pack orders.
> 
> > +---+-+-+--+
> > | ordno | pickslip_printed| docketdate  | packmins |
> > +---+-+-+--+
> > | ordno | 2005-06-01 14:32:16 | 2005-06-01 14:34:47 |3 |
> 
> So the issue is cases like this one where three orders are processed in
> parallel:
> 
> > | ordno | 2005-06-01 15:12:27 | 2005-06-01 15:27:26 |   15 |
> > | ordno | 2005-06-01 15:12:28 | 2005-06-01 15:30:25 |   18 |
> > | ordno | 2005-06-01 15:12:29 | 2005-06-01 15:21:53 |9 |
> 
> So, if we want to consider the time each order actually takes to
> process, and we're allowing parallel packing we need to make some
> assumptions about what's going on with that parallel processing. Let's
> make this assumption: in overlapped time periods, it is acceptable to
> use the docketdate to demarcate time spent on different orders.
> 
> So the analysis you're looking for then is not how much time can
> directly be attributed to each order, but rather how much time is spent
> on each order, without necessarily knowing which order took that time
> (you don't have enough data there to do direct attributions even if you
> wanted to).
> 
> If we can assume that then you can make some headway on the problem --
> you can flatten your data-structure to a time-line of events and measure
> the time between events. Further, you can also ask the database to
> ignore time when no order processing is occurring.
> 
> (excuse my SQL here, it's been a few months)
> 
> select eventdate, eventname, eventdiff from 
>   (select pickslip_printed, 'printed', 1 from orders)
>  union all
>   (select docketdate, 'docketed', -1 from orders)
> order by eventdate asc;
> 
> Which discards the relationship of times to specific orders, and allows
> analysis of just the time elapsed between events. In addition, the
> eventdiff column will allow you to work out how many orders are
> outstanding at any point in the timeline.
> 
> I'd make that into a view, and then build another view that evaluates
> the sum of the eventdiff column up to that row for every row. Whereever
> that sum is > 0, there are orders being worked on. Once you get to that
> point, the elapsed time on an order will be the difference between some
> of the adjacent rows, which is similarly easily calculated.
> 
> I say "some of", because of course the one second that elapsed between
> those orders being "printed" does not represent packing time. If you
> think about it, you can solve that problem but that gets a bit fiddly
> (you'd need to differentiate between print-print, print-docket and
> docket-docket scenarios. The latter two would represent order processing
> time, which is doable, but you need to keep inter-row state, which is
> slightly tricky in SQL), so you're probably better off employing some
> kind of heuristic given what you know about the data (eg that you don't
> believe an order could be packed in < 30 seconds or similar).
> 
> Not bullet-proof, but it's a start.
> 
> HTH,
> 
> James.
> (recovering SQL abuser)
> 
> 

-- 
-- 
Grant Parnell - SLUG President
EverythingLinux services - the consultant's backup & tech support.
Web: http://www.elx.com.au/support.php
We're also busybits.com.au and linuxhelp.com.au and everythinglinux.com.au.
Phone 02 8756 3522 to book service or discuss your needs 
or email us at paidsupport at elx.com.au

ELX or its employees participate in the following:-
OSIA (Open Source Industry Austra

[SLUG] Re: swap problem

2005-06-07 Thread ashley maher
To those who responded on-off list thanks.

I completely underestimated how memory hungry Evolution is, also
Firefox, between them I'm using over 350 Meg!

Then fire up vmware and it is cpu hungry. At 4 years old I think a new
box maybe sooner rather than later.

Now i"m watching closely I go to 512 meg ram used and 912 meg swap
yesterday, no wonder this thing slows down! I'm being very careful what
I have open now.

Regards,

Ashley

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] basic VoIP home/small office system

2005-06-07 Thread Gonzalo Servat
On 6/8/05, Howard Lowndes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..snip..] 
> You can buy Digium cards in AU at http://www.austechpartnerships.com/atp/

If you are referring to this news item:

" ...The Digium TE110P has now been fully certified (A-ticked) for
connection to the PSTN."

(quoted from the site pasted above)

The TE110P card, as far as I know, is only for connecting to a ISDN
10-30 service, not plain PSTN (FXO). The TE110P is advertised for $670
by ATP. The FXO module on the ATP site says "This module is undergoing
A-Tick certification". If the FXO module only (for the TDM400P) is
advertised for $123 now, I would imagine it'll jump to over $300 once
it is A-Tick certified, though there's been rumours the FXO would get
A-Tick certified for over a year. I wouldn't hold my breath.

Regards,
Gonzalo
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] OT: Bigpond blocking port 25

2005-06-07 Thread Howard Lowndes



James Gray wrote:

On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 02:04 pm, Howard Lowndes wrote:


James Gray wrote:


During this work-around though, it was let slip (by a BigPond support
dude) that dynamic customers could apply for a static IP and then they
could use what ever ports they want - both inbound and outbound
(dialup/DSL/cable - all deliveries covered).  I guess with a static IP
tracking virused users becomes a hell of a lot easier.  The application
process wasn't an approval/disapproval process but more "if you ask for
one, you'll get one". Maybe your customer can contact BigPong and ask
them for a static IP and then everything (should) be back to normal :)


For a little consideration of $10/month, of course.



Really?  At the time the tech I spoke to said it was $0 thing because the 
ACCC would get upset if they started filtering internet access (like port 
25) then charged extra to get the original service back.  Or has the ACCC 
done its usual "too hard" trick and decided to roll over for the big 
players?


No, thats for the fixed IP.



Gah - glad I'm not with Telstra for internet anymore.

James


--
Howard.
LANNet Computing Associates - Your Linux people 
--
When you just want a system that works, you choose Linux;
When you want a system that just works, you choose Microsoft.
--
Flatter government, not fatter government;
Get rid of the Australian states.
begin:vcard
fn:Howard Lowndes
n:Lowndes;Howard
org:LANNet Computing Associates
adr:;;PO Box 1174;Lavington;NSW;2641;Australia
email;internet:howard [AT] lowndes [DOT] name
tel;work:+61 (0)2 6040 0222 (access code 9, if prompted)
tel;fax:+61 (0)2 6040 0222
tel;cell:+61 (0)419 464 430
note:If you want to phone me, you will need to ensure that your phone presents Caller Line ID, or use access code 9 when prompted.
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.lannet.com.au
version:2.1
end:vcard

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Re: [SLUG] basic VoIP home/small office system

2005-06-07 Thread Howard Lowndes



Michael Fox wrote:

On 6/7/05, Gonzalo Servat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


There is also the #asterisk IRC channel on irc.freenode.net where you
can occasionally get some good help from the guys. Always check the
voip-info.org wiki, lots of good info on there.




Speaking of which, any list members currently very traversed in asterisk?


Hand up here.  My whole office system runs on Asterisk.

--
Howard.
LANNet Computing Associates - Your Linux people 
--
When you just want a system that works, you choose Linux;
When you want a system that just works, you choose Microsoft.
--
Flatter government, not fatter government;
Get rid of the Australian states.
begin:vcard
fn:Howard Lowndes
n:Lowndes;Howard
org:LANNet Computing Associates
adr:;;PO Box 1174;Lavington;NSW;2641;Australia
email;internet:howard [AT] lowndes [DOT] name
tel;work:+61 (0)2 6040 0222 (access code 9, if prompted)
tel;fax:+61 (0)2 6040 0222
tel;cell:+61 (0)419 464 430
note:If you want to phone me, you will need to ensure that your phone presents Caller Line ID, or use access code 9 when prompted.
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.lannet.com.au
version:2.1
end:vcard

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Re: [SLUG] basic VoIP home/small office system

2005-06-07 Thread Howard Lowndes



Gonzalo Servat wrote:

On 6/7/05, Julio Cesar Ody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Hello all,

I'm thinking about doing a few VoIP experiments. I know I need an
analog telephone adaptor if I have any plans to connect my current
telephone lines to my Linux box:



[... snip ...]

Another great source of VoIP info is (funnily enough):

http://www.voip-info.org

It really depends on what you want to achieve. If you just want to
experiment and see how it works, you can get away with using a
software VoIP client, like iaxComm (for Linux/Win/others), X-Ten's
X-Lite (www.xten.com), Firefly, and of course there are many more
floating around.

The Digium cards will help you if you want to receive and make calls
through your PSTN line (I'm talking about the FXO cards here),
however, they are not A-Tick certified so you couldn't use them in
Australia (legally).


You can buy Digium cards in AU at http://www.austechpartnerships.com/atp/



You will also find a bunch of VoIP providers around Australia that
will give you a direct indial number for a low monthly fee (such as
$10/month) so you can receive calls to a number provided by them to
your Asterisk server. This is pretty cool and costs less than the
monthly rental from [insert telco]!

There is also the #asterisk IRC channel on irc.freenode.net where you
can occasionally get some good help from the guys. Always check the
voip-info.org wiki, lots of good info on there.

Good luck and hope this helps!

Regards,
Gonzalo


--
Howard.
LANNet Computing Associates - Your Linux people 
--
When you just want a system that works, you choose Linux;
When you want a system that just works, you choose Microsoft.
--
Flatter government, not fatter government;
Get rid of the Australian states.
begin:vcard
fn:Howard Lowndes
n:Lowndes;Howard
org:LANNet Computing Associates
adr:;;PO Box 1174;Lavington;NSW;2641;Australia
email;internet:howard [AT] lowndes [DOT] name
tel;work:+61 (0)2 6040 0222 (access code 9, if prompted)
tel;fax:+61 (0)2 6040 0222
tel;cell:+61 (0)419 464 430
note:If you want to phone me, you will need to ensure that your phone presents Caller Line ID, or use access code 9 when prompted.
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.lannet.com.au
version:2.1
end:vcard

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Re: [SLUG] basic VoIP home/small office system

2005-06-07 Thread Gonzalo Servat
On 6/7/05, Julio Cesar Ody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks a lot.

Another option you have is to get ISDN (2 lines) and the AVM Fritz!PCI
Card which *is* A-Tick certified. Only problem is it costs about 400%
more than the real cost of the card, since it has the glorious A-Tick
stamp on the card. Last time I checked they were going for AU$300 odd.
Check:

http://www.avm.de/en/partners/distributors/AUS/index.php

> You said they're not A-Tick certified and therefore not legal to be
> used in Australia. So that means to say I cannot have my standard
> phone line calls over IP just by signing up with a provider and having
> my own asterisk server configured to route them? (stardard hard lines
> == PSTN ?)

I'm not quite sure what you mean by this. I'll explain what I meant by
this: If you want to plug in your standard PSTN line into your system
to receive and make landline calls through Asterisk, you will need a
FXO card and the Digium card, at least, is not A-Tick certified (last
time I checked anyway). If you just want to make calls through VoIP,
you can just use a VoIP provider like Freshtel and receive calls
through VoIP via a DID provider and you'll have no need for a FXO card
at all. There are providers around, such as www.atp.org.au, that offer
flat rate local and STD calls as well as DID numbers for a low cost,
making the need for a FXO card unnecessary, more so if you're just
experimenting.

> Thanks for your time. I'll dig into the sources you pointed. Most helpful.

You're welcome. Good luck!

Regards,
Gonzalo
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Uninstalling a distribution preparatory to re-installing it

2005-06-07 Thread O Plameras

Leslie Katz wrote:

I had one hard disk in my computer, with Windows XP on it. I installed 
a second hard disk and put Fedora Core 3 on it. I choose between the 
two OSs at bootup via the Windows bootloader, called (I believe) NTLDR.


I have been trying to compile a Linux webcam driver (my first attempt 
at compiling anything). However, I discovered that the FC3 
installation type I'd chosen did not include a compiler, so I tried to 
install one. When I tried, I was told it couldn't be done because I 
needed other files to be installed first. I therefore downloaded the 
other named files and tried to install them. That was not permitted, 
because, as I was informed, they were already installed. I then tried 
again to install the compiler, only to be told again that the files 
were not installed. I'm in an endless loop, it appears.


It seems to me that the only way forward is for me to uninstall FC3 
and then re-install it, selecting the installation type that includes 
the necessary compiling files from the outset.


However, I can't find any straightforward instructions on how to 
uninstall FC3.


Can anyone tell me whether there's an easy way to do it?

Also, I'm assuming that, when FC3's been uninstalled, I'll still be 
able to boot into Windows.  I can't see why I wouldn't, since the 
bootloader's set up to default into Windows.


However, if anyone thinks it would be a problem, I'd be grateful to be 
told why.




Hi Leslie,

Providing you have broadband connection to the Internet - faster the 
better - no need to re-install.
I am using Fedora's and Redhat's and have save me lot's of headaches 
with installations.


Just try, the following procedures:

As root do this one first if you have not done yet:
#rpm -Uvh 
http://atrpms.net/dist/fc3/atrpms-kickstart/atrpms-kickstart-25-1.rhfc3.at.i386.rpm


Then,

#apt-get update
#apt-get dist-upgrade
#apt-get install kernel=2.6.10-1.770_14.rhfc3.at (There is a 2.6.11.XXX 
but has problems).


Then,  re-boot your linux to the above kernel.
Then you may install/upgrade any development module you like, e.g.,
#apt-get install gcc (or the like).

'apt-get install' is a smart user-tool that knows dependencies and will
install them when required. No need to figure out yourself. If you
are not familiar with 'rpm' command it is usefull to read up on it.

Hope this helps.

O Plameras



--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] Uninstalling a distribution preparatory to re-installing it

2005-06-07 Thread Leslie Katz
I had one hard disk in my computer, with Windows XP on it. I installed a 
second hard disk and put Fedora Core 3 on it. I choose between the two OSs 
at bootup via the Windows bootloader, called (I believe) NTLDR.


I have been trying to compile a Linux webcam driver (my first attempt at 
compiling anything). However, I discovered that the FC3 installation type 
I'd chosen did not include a compiler, so I tried to install one. When I 
tried, I was told it couldn't be done because I needed other files to be 
installed first. I therefore downloaded the other named files and tried to 
install them. That was not permitted, because, as I was informed, they were 
already installed. I then tried again to install the compiler, only to be 
told again that the files were not installed. I'm in an endless loop, it 
appears.


It seems to me that the only way forward is for me to uninstall FC3 and 
then re-install it, selecting the installation type that includes the 
necessary compiling files from the outset.


However, I can't find any straightforward instructions on how to uninstall FC3.

Can anyone tell me whether there's an easy way to do it?

Also, I'm assuming that, when FC3's been uninstalled, I'll still be able to 
boot into Windows.  I can't see why I wouldn't, since the bootloader's set 
up to default into Windows.


However, if anyone thinks it would be a problem, I'd be grateful to be told why.

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html