[SLUG] Reset Your LinkedIn Password

2009-08-25 Thread LinkedIn Password
LinkedIn



We have received your request to reset your LinkedIn password. Please use this 
secure URL to reset your password within 5 days:
https://www.linkedin.com/e/pwr/25443875/ihfRyfT7/

To reset your password, please enter your new password twice on the page that 
opens.

Thank you for using LinkedIn!

- The LinkedIn Team
http://www.linkedin.com/
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Reset Your LinkedIn Password

2009-08-25 Thread Jake Anderson

On 25/08/09 18:47, LinkedIn Password wrote:

LinkedIn



We have received your request to reset your LinkedIn password. Please use this 
secure URL to reset your password within 5 days:
https://www.linkedin.com/e/pwr/25443875/ihfRyfT7/

To reset your password, please enter your new password twice on the page that 
opens.

Thank you for using LinkedIn!

- The LinkedIn Team
http://www.linkedin.com/
   

no, I really shouldn't
really.

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] Re: 40 Years of Unix

2009-08-25 Thread elliott-brennan
LOL.
Thanks James for prefacing your comment with 
Loved it.
> jam 
wrote in 
> The GUI paradigism allows people who have not learned to talk to computers to 
> communicate using pictures.
> This picture mode is slow and cumbersome (imagine talking to a Russian, but 
> using pictures to convey your point)
> 
I know you were only using this as an analogy but:
Imagine talking to anyone when you don't share a
language. That'd be a perfect example of where
pictures would come in highly useful and would
speed up communication - writing would be sooo
slow :) Imagine being in Papua New Guinea
in the 1930s and trying to explain to a highlander
what a photograph was by writing to them :)  Oh,
what about describing Salvador Dali's genius
without a picture :)

However Daniel beat me to it.

> As an example, graphical image editing tools generally allow faster editing of
> pictures than command line tools generally, because some limited cases are
> faster on the command line, so even this isn't clear-cut.
> 

The ability of a GUI to provide immediate
reference points in an image, to show 'as you are
doing it' responses and to allow intricate detail
to be created cannot be surpassed. Weirdly, humans
are more oriented towards images than
text...though I do thank the Sumerian's etc for
their efforts.

All of this said, there are instances where the
CLI certainly provides an advantage over the GUI
for some actions in image management - I
occasionally us it for some video
editing/transcoding. However these advantages are
few relative to the multitude of instances wherein
a GUI is so much better - like painting a
moustache on the Mona Lisa, changing the colour of
someone's eyes, removing a complex pattern from a
picture, drawing a complex pattern and making
minor edits to it as you go.



Regards,

Patrick




-- 
http://lugnuts.wftl-lug.org/pg/blog/Patrick

www.youcantdothatinlinux.com

Registered GNU/Linux User 368634
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] August Monthly Meeting

2009-08-25 Thread Melissa Draper
== August Monthly Meeting ==

You can read the full version of this announcement at
http://slug.org.au/node/117

 
SLUG's monthly meeting. Meetings are open to the general public, and are
free of charge.

Where:
Our venue is now Google, Level 5, 48 Pirrama Road, Pyrmont.

It's across the road from Star City Casino. A map of the area can be
found here[1], and public transit directions are at [2]. Appropriate
signage and directions will be posted around the building.

You will need to sign-in to enter the venue. This can be performed when
you arrive, but to save time we recommend that you do so online
beforehand at Anyvite[3]. If you are unsure, please sign up as a
'maybe'. This allows us to organise adequate meeting space and
facilities. You do not need to create an account to indicate your
attendance.

We start at 18.30 but we ask that people arrive at least 15 minutes
early so we an all get into the building and start on time. Please do
not arrive before 18.00, as it may hinder business activities for our
host!

This month's sessions are:

General Talk
Mitchell Seaton: The OLPC Battleground

OLPC gears up during the rest of this year with the development of the
XO 1.5 laptop, SugarLabs pushes forth with the SoaS (Sugar on a Stick)
and Sugar v0.86, and deployments continue around the world. In this
talk, Mitchell will discuss the current state of play, future directions
and the world-wide support community at the heart of it all.

In-Depth Talk
TBA: TBA
TBA

SLUGlets

Mini-tutorial
Patrick Elliott-Brennan will be leading a discussion on video encoding
on Linux, with demonstrations!

General discussion and Q&A about Linux, free software and open source.

We have lots of space, so we can also break off into other smaller
discussions.

Hacker Space
We have heaps of room available to us at Google. If the talks do not
grab you, feel free to come along and hack away on your favourite
project in the designated Hacker Space. 

Meeting Schedule

See here[4] for an explanation of the segments.

* 18.15: Open Doors
* 18.30: Announcements, News, Introductions
* 18.45: General Talk
* 19.30: Intermission
* 19.45: Split into two groups for:
  o In-Depth Talk
  o SLUGlets
* 20.30: Dinner

Dinner this month will be held locally, Details will be announced on the
night. We will be taking numbers at the beginning of the meeting. If you
have any particular dietary requirements (e.g. vegetarian), let us know
beforehand. Dinner is a great way to socialise and learn in a relaxed
atmosphere :)

We hope to see you there!

[1] http://tinyurl.com/ParkingPyrmont
[2] http://wiki.slug.org.au/howtogetthere
[3] http://anyvite.com/events/home/n6wyhrrnrt
[4] http://www.slug.org.au/meetings/meetingformat

-- 
Melissa Draper
Sydney Linux Users Group | Secretary
http://slug.org.au

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] squid reverse proxy almost working - but only ever hitting default site

2009-08-25 Thread Ben Donohue

Hi all,

Just to get squid reverse proxy 2.6 working with two sites for now... it 
seems to be working in that the access.log is registering hits but only 
for the default site.

Default site is www.icafe.com.au
other site is www.pamphlets.org.au

If I bypass squid, I can port forward port 80 to both sites ok. DNS is 
working ok to both sites both internally and externally. So the problem 
must be with the squid config.


The firewall is port forwarding port 80 to port 3128 on squid.

Below is the squid.conf changes from default,

# INSERT YOUR OWN RULE(S) HERE TO ALLOW ACCESS FROM YOUR CLIENTS
http_port 3128 accel defaultsite=www.icafe.com.au
cache_peer 10.1.2.250 parent 80 0 no-query originserver name=myAccel
acl our_sites dstdomain .*.icafe.com.au .*.pamphlets.org.au 
www.icafe.com.au www.pamphlets.org.au

http_access allow our_sites
cache_peer_access myAccel allow our_sites
cache_peer_access myAccel deny all


Below is cache.log after a shutdown and restart of squid

2009/08/26 10:22:54| Preparing for shutdown after 0 requests
2009/08/26 10:22:54| Waiting 30 seconds for active connections to finish
2009/08/26 10:22:54| FD 13 Closing HTTP connection
2009/08/26 10:22:54| Shutting down...
2009/08/26 10:22:54| FD 14 Closing ICP connection
2009/08/26 10:22:54| Closing unlinkd pipe on FD 11
2009/08/26 10:22:54| storeDirWriteCleanLogs: Starting...
2009/08/26 10:22:54|   Finished.  Wrote 1 entries.
2009/08/26 10:22:54|   Took 0.0 seconds ( 961.5 entries/sec).
CPU Usage: 0.086 seconds = 0.047 user + 0.039 sys
Maximum Resident Size: 0 KB
Page faults with physical i/o: 0
Memory usage for squid via mallinfo():
   total space in arena:2508 KB
   Ordinary blocks: 2413 KB  4 blks
   Small blocks:   0 KB  5 blks
   Holding blocks:   244 KB  1 blks
   Free Small blocks:  0 KB
   Free Ordinary blocks:  94 KB
   Total in use:2657 KB 97%
   Total free:94 KB 3%
2009/08/26 10:22:54| Squid Cache (Version 2.6.STABLE21): Exiting normally.
2009/08/26 10:22:56| Starting Squid Cache version 2.6.STABLE21 for 
i686-redhat-linux-gnu...

2009/08/26 10:22:56| Process ID 24377
2009/08/26 10:22:56| With 1024 file descriptors available
2009/08/26 10:22:56| Using epoll for the IO loop
2009/08/26 10:22:56| DNS Socket created at 0.0.0.0, port 38979, FD 6
2009/08/26 10:22:56| Adding domain icafe.com.au from /etc/resolv.conf
2009/08/26 10:22:56| Adding nameserver 10.1.2.247 from /etc/resolv.conf
2009/08/26 10:22:56| Adding nameserver 10.1.2.253 from /etc/resolv.conf
2009/08/26 10:22:56| Adding nameserver 172.16.1.1 from /etc/resolv.conf
2009/08/26 10:22:56| Adding nameserver 203.12.160.35 from /etc/resolv.conf
2009/08/26 10:22:56| Adding nameserver 203.12.160.36 from /etc/resolv.conf
2009/08/26 10:22:56| User-Agent logging is disabled.
2009/08/26 10:22:56| Referer logging is disabled.
2009/08/26 10:22:56| Unlinkd pipe opened on FD 11
2009/08/26 10:22:56| Swap maxSize 102400 + 8192 KB, estimated 0 objects
2009/08/26 10:22:56| Target number of buckets: 425
2009/08/26 10:22:56| Using 8192 Store buckets
2009/08/26 10:22:56| Max Mem  size: 8192 KB
2009/08/26 10:22:56| Max Swap size: 102400 KB
2009/08/26 10:22:56| Local cache digest enabled; rebuild/rewrite every 
3600/3600 sec

2009/08/26 10:22:56| Rebuilding storage in /var/spool/squid (CLEAN)
2009/08/26 10:22:56| Using Least Load store dir selection
2009/08/26 10:22:56| Set Current Directory to /var/spool/squid
2009/08/26 10:22:56| Loaded Icons.
2009/08/26 10:22:57| Accepting accelerated HTTP connections at 0.0.0.0, 
port 3128, FD 13.

2009/08/26 10:22:57| Accepting ICP messages at 0.0.0.0, port 3130, FD 14.
2009/08/26 10:22:57| WCCP Disabled.
2009/08/26 10:22:57| Configuring Parent 10.1.2.250/80/0
2009/08/26 10:22:57| Ready to serve requests.
2009/08/26 10:22:57| Done reading /var/spool/squid swaplog (1 entries)
2009/08/26 10:22:57| Finished rebuilding storage from disk.
2009/08/26 10:22:57| 1 Entries scanned
2009/08/26 10:22:57| 0 Invalid entries.
2009/08/26 10:22:57| 0 With invalid flags.
2009/08/26 10:22:57| 1 Objects loaded.
2009/08/26 10:22:57| 0 Objects expired.
2009/08/26 10:22:57| 0 Objects cancelled.
2009/08/26 10:22:57| 0 Duplicate URLs purged.
2009/08/26 10:22:57| 0 Swapfile clashes avoided.
2009/08/26 10:22:57|   Took 0.3 seconds (   3.2 objects/sec).
2009/08/26 10:22:57| Beginning Validation Procedure
2009/08/26 10:22:57|   Completed Validation Procedure
2009/08/26 10:22:57|   Validated 1 Entries
2009/08/26 10:22:57|   store_swap_size = 4k
2009/08/26 10:22:57| storeLateRelease: released 0 objects


access.log after restart and trying from external for www.icafe.com.au
1251246323.410 55 172.16.1.1 TCP_REFRESH_MISS/200 1401 GET 
http://www.icafe.com.au/ - FIRST_UP_PARENT/myAccel text/html



access.log after restart and trying from external for www.pamphlets.org.au
1251246531.510 21 172.16.1.1 TCP_

[SLUG] Re: 40 Years of Unix

2009-08-25 Thread Malcolm Johnston
The point about shells has already been made, but some people have got a bit 
sidetracked.  Shells are command-interpreters; they mediate between the user 
and the kernel.  Applications in Unix, as has already been said, get to run 
because a shell is spawned by the fork() system process.  This is as true for 
GUI applications as for command-line text ones. 

KDE, which I am using now, gets going on my distro with a "startx" 
shell-script.  The name may vary from system to system, and you are encouraged 
to hack the basic script so as to customize it and have it run more smoothly.  
Without the shell-script, KDE would not run.

If you do a grep '#\!\/bin\/sh" of, say, "/usr/bin/" you will find:

a) Many shell-scripts (circa 200 on my system).

b) That the string is embedded in many more binary images, because  fork() 
spawns a shell by splitting to get the process going (roughly speaking).

Without a shell of some kind, therefore, a user of applications would be, 
effectively, dumb and blind.  You wouldn't even be able to access, on the fly, 
data produced by the kernel, which, to continue the metaphor, would be under a 
24-hour lock-down in an isolation cell.

Whether you use GUI applications or text-based ones is a matter of preference, 
and is determined by what you are trying to do.  I do a lot of writing up, and 
am quite happy using "emacs" in a virtual text terminal, since it's bigger than 
Xemacs.  I also do a lot of text-formatting, and for this I use the virtual 
terminal for the writing and markup, and "xdvi" or some PS/PDF viewer for 
looking at the results.  The virtual terminals in Linux suit this kind of 
operation perfectly.  Writing code is, I find, also easier on a command-line 
terminal, unless, of course, the code is for driving some kind of graphics 
interface; even then, first you've got to get the stuff to compile.

Anyway, Linux has both.  And arguments about Holden versus Ford don't tend to 
get you anywhere, unless the current model of one make is really off.

When I started using computers, electrical engineers in a university department 
that specialized, of all things, in image processing thought bitmap screens, in 
particular, and graphics, in general, were a bit of a joke.  In one sense, how 
wrong they were!  In another, their principal problem was how to process data 
from a radio telescope and displaying the results prettily was the least of 
their problems.

Cheers,
Malcolm Johnston
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Re: 40 Years of Unix

2009-08-25 Thread jam
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 10:00:06 slug-requ...@slug.org.au wrote:
> The point about shells has already been made, but some people have got a
> bit sidetracked.  Shells are command-interpreters; they mediate between the
> user and the kernel.  Applications in Unix, as has already been said, get
> to run because a shell is spawned by the fork() system process.  This is as
> true for GUI applications as for command-line text ones.
[snip]
 not with standing, not stupid, so I do know that opining that 
GUI s are slow and cumbersome compared to the CLI will provoke ummm response. 
What did surprise me was that the list of things GUIs *are* good at was not 
emphasized at all. Kinda like going to the YR12 ball in a F1 car rather than a 
stretch limo.
Hearking back to Marghanita's original query: shells are an important part of 
the system and Wine, Java etc are apps not shells.
Thanks for lively criticism :-)
James
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html