Re: [SLUG] Re: cfengine

2001-04-09 Thread Herbert Xu

James Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Erm, how does a package one one system get the configuration from
> another to respect said sanctity of the package?  It looks like i can

You can put all the configuration files into a local package and make
sure that it is always the first to be upgraded.
-- 
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email:  Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Re: cfengine

2001-04-09 Thread James Wilkinson

This one time, at band camp, Herbert Xu said:
>Angus Lees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> i've used cfengine for exactly that purpose for quite a while, and
>> have been intending to give a talk on it for ~8months now.
>
>Personally I prefer a layered "meta" package approach.  Now if only every
>Debian package repsected the sanctity of configuration files as they must...

Erm, how does a package one one system get the configuration from
another to respect said sanctity of the package?  It looks like i can
deploy configurations from the cfengine master, and that is what I am
looking for; rather than sshing to n machines and editing the same line
on all of them manually.

-- 
jamesw

Always two there are; a Bastard, and a PFY.

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Re: cfengine

2001-04-09 Thread Herbert Xu

Angus Lees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> i've used cfengine for exactly that purpose for quite a while, and
> have been intending to give a talk on it for ~8months now.

Personally I prefer a layered "meta" package approach.  Now if only every
Debian package repsected the sanctity of configuration files as they must...
-- 
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email:  Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Re: cfengine

2001-04-08 Thread Jeff Waugh



> since you're about the 7th SLUG person to ask about cfengine, am i allowed
> to give this talk this month?

NetFilter *and* cfengine? Dastardly combo.

> (or are we still trying to get non-committee members to give at least one
> talk?)

Not this month... A newbie and an oldie. ;)

> (oops, did i say that out loud? ;)

Dropping hints like anvils, Gus.

- Jeff

-- 
For a list of points detailing how technology has failed to improve 
 our lives, please press 3. 

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



[SLUG] Re: cfengine

2001-04-08 Thread Angus Lees

\begin{James Wilkinson}
> Ok, who's used/using cfengine?  Got any configs/urls to configs that are
> nicely explained so that I can work out how to use it?  I've got 5 or so
> Debian machines that really want to be managed nicely; actually, I've
> got one lazy admin (me) who wants to easily manage these 5 machines.
> 
> I've read the stuff in the cfengine-doc package, but it's still not
> crystal clear yet.

i've used cfengine for exactly that purpose for quite a while, and
have been intending to give a talk on it for ~8months now.

since you're about the 7th SLUG person to ask about cfengine, am i
allowed to give this talk this month?  (or are we still trying to get
non-committee members to give at least one talk?)
(oops, did i say that out loud? ;)

-- 
 - Gus

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug