[RCSE] Re: HLG optimization

2000-06-10 Thread Gliderscum

In a message dated 00-06-09 15:12:56 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 What about high aspect ratio? Your latest design did not converge to a 
 Spectre
  like planform - did Don S. make a mistake (unlikely) or did you use 
 different objectives/assumptions/etc?

While I can't comment on the aerodynamics or assumptions behind the
Shpectre, I did observe that it's performance in flight was nearly as good
as any other "latest  greatest" ship at the IHLGF.
However (a BIG however) the SpectreVR fails spectacularly in the practical
department.  Strength and durability are it's downfall in a contest.
Several failure modes manifested themselves under normal contest abuse.
Wing skin delamination around the aileron servos.
Wing seperation/breakage from aileron root diagonally forward.
Wing flex and flutter under full power launches, particularly in wind (even 
after
liberal stiffening with carbon cloth/epoxy at weak areas)
These comments based on two seperate planes and pilots with identical
problems and similar time in service, but also consider that this service
was in a very grueling contest (the Handlaunch World Champs!).
To DJ Aerotech's credit, the problems are easily fixable.

Mark Navarre

-
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Winch Times

2000-06-10 Thread HIILAWE

Aloha

We on Maui have finally got a winch "Little Big Winch" thanks to Tom 
Nakagawa. The only problem is we don't know how to use it as we handlaunch 
everything. Well I have a Hollayday Upstart that we have used on the past 
three weekends. "Great Stuff"

We now have to put tow hooks on our ships, but most of the fliers on Maui are 
concerned about the structual integrity of their fuses. They don't want to 
drill a hole in it because it might weaken their airframe and say it looks 
weird.

But thanks to some of the Oahu guys who will be coming down next week for our 
Maluhia Big Bird Fun Fly. Names like Dave Hill of Predator fame and Peter 
Schubert two time state champ, and Keith McCllean, From Hawaiian Soaring 
Leauge. They can show us how to use a winch. Should be a fun and learning 
exprience for us on Maui.

Anyone coming down to Maui are more than welcome to come and fly with us if 
you're down here for vacation. If you don't have anything to fly you can use 
my stuff.

 Aloha, Gerald F. Club 
Miso
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Re: HLG optimization (VERY LONG)

2000-06-10 Thread Joe Jan Wurts

  From: Joe  Jan Wurts  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Somewhere around the beginning of the year, I set out to do
some
systems design, analysis, and optimization work on the...

Joe,
could you please elaborate a little more on your optimization approach?

Oleg, great questions.  These questions indicate that you at least
understand
much of the challenges, if not also how to solve these problems.

In short, my analysis tools were: Excel, a vortex lattice code, and an
airfoil
design and analysis tool that is highly regarded in the aero industry.

I used some custom Excel stuff that is formulated to help out in digesting
the
results from the vortex lattice and airfoil tools.  Not very difficult to
put together,
just the typical eqns, along with some macros and VB.  Not anything that is
terribly user friendly, but enough for me to do the job.

As you probably know, setting up the constraints, and the objective
evaluation
functions is really the difficult task.  All else is just math.

As for the piece parts, the wing planform design is optimized considering
spanwise lift distribution to get good handling qualities, along with good
overall total lift and drag efficiency.  This is somewhat intuitive in
nature,
one has to look at the local lift coefficients along the span in order to
arrive
at the "handling qualities" part of it.  The rest of the stuff is more
objective.

In addition to the handling qualities, one needs to get a good e (Oswalds
efficiency) out of the planform, along with a high useful total lift
coefficient
(total wing Cl/local Cl).  The latter is somewhat in opposition to the
handling
qualities, but manageable.  Also, one should be taking into account the
varying local reynolds number along the span in formulating the total aero
characteristics of the wing (lift and drag).

Also included in the wing optimization process was the weight of the wing.
As a first order approximation, the wing weight is a function of the area
(skin
weight at minimum gage), volume (foam cores for vacuum bagging), along
with a second order influence due to total thickness (thin high aspect ratio
wings need more spar structure).  The spar structure is really not as much
of a driver for HLG as one would think, but should be included.

As for the tails, a simple trade on tail boom length vs. tail size was made,
with a simplistic boom length vs weight eqn, along with tail area vs tail
weight eqn.

Functional goals included optimizing the minimum sink, mid-range cruise
speed L/D, and very low Cl profile drag.  Defining a useful objective
function
here is not a trivial task, and will be left up to the reader.

Variables that were traded for the optimization include:
planform
airfoil(s)
wing area
tail boom length
TE angle as applicable
TE length as applicable

Fixed values include:
Radio gear weight (2ch differing from 4 ch)
wing span
tail volumes
nose pod weight

Qualitative ratings include:
spanwise local lift distribution
cl - cd bucket width with TE deflections

Constraints include:
airfoil thickness (at servo and and TE)

The process is highly iterative in nature.  I started off with using an
Encore
type HLG to get me the scaled Re's along the wing.  After getting this, I
started whacking at the airfoil development.

After developing a few candidate airfoils for evaluation, the planform was
brought into consideration for a round of optimization.  With the
"optimized"
airfoil, I did a planform optimization using the developed airfoils.  In the
case
of the poly ship, I ended up doing another round of airfoil optimization, as
the optimal aspect ratio increased, driving down the wing area which
pushed for another bout of airfoil optimization.

This design/analysis/optimization loop is fairly straightforward for the
poly ship, but grew some hair for the 4 ch ship.  The additional variable of
TE deflections added considerably to the design cycle.  Also, it made for
more qualitative evaluations.  Airfoil 1 might produce a better peak
efficiency, but airfoil 2 might produce a wider "bucket".  Which is better?
And how wide should that bucket be to be considered optimal?

There is a reason why nobody is selling a program that has an optimal
airplane design button.  There are just too many qualitative judgments that
go into a realistically constrained design.

After the first few orbits around the design loop, I tossed in the tail boom
optimization as well, and went for another orbit.  The result, the toys that
I flew at Poway.  The poly ship did not get the tail boom iterated, and the
4 ch ship was a bit shorter compared to the optimal, but the min
sink sensitivity was really flat between the chosen length and the optimal
length.  Note:  optimal really should have quotes around it.  It was optimal
by my evaluations, objective functions, and constraints, but might not be
optimal by anothers evaluation.


Now, you ask my opinions on some of the "skinny" type platforms that are
showing up out there.  First, I'll make a 

[RCSE] RE: [FAIsoaring] F3J USA JUNIOR TRAM AUCTION

2000-06-10 Thread Klaus K Weiss

What's a wallet??  Oh. That is where people keep their money.  What's
money???

Klaus Weiss.

  -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 8:15 AM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]; soaring@airage; FAI Soaring List; F3J 
 F3B List
 Subject:  RE: [FAIsoaring] F3J USA JUNIOR TRAM AUCTION
 
 Rumor has it BIG RED SOARING MACHINE has scared Gordy's wallet in to
 hiding. Come on Gordy it's for the FUTURE OF SOARING!!
 
 Smooth Thermals,
 Karlton "MrMPX" Spindle
 http://www.MultiplexRC.com 
 
-Original Message-
   From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent:   Wednesday, June 07, 2000 7:31 AM
   To: soaring@airage; FAI Soaring List; F3J  F3B List
   Subject:[FAIsoaring] F3J USA JUNIOR TRAM AUCTION
 
   ONLY 13 HOURS LEFT ON THE VOLZ SERVOS, LOOKS LIKE MR. MPX is the TOP
 BIDDER ON BIG BLUE
   will this madness ever end, GORDY where are you?.
 
   http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=347260482

 winmail.dat


[RCSE] At last - if works!

2000-06-10 Thread Tord

I have for a while battled with a Graupner electric ducted fan pod,
Graupner # 1374, that is designed for 600 motors (like the Graupner Speed 600 BB),
and have previously tested a similar fan (Graupner # 1379) which is designed
for 400s.

I modified one of my 400 fans for one of my Aveox 1114/4Ys, just needing to
drill out the collet to take the slightly thicker shaft of the Aveox. Worked
OK, but I figured out that fitting such a motor to the 600 size would be a much
better idea. The design is neat, made out of CF epoxy with a 5 blade rotor and 
a four blade stator (seven stator blades on the 400 size). Rotor diameter is 58 mm
for the 400 and 75 mm for the bigger unit - the smaller weighs just over an oz and
the bigger less than two! The motors are fitted to an aluminium 'lid' that screws into
the centre of the rotor, and the cables are supposed to go out at the sidem but
I run mine out the back (three power cables, plus the five for the control electronics,
takes quite some room)! I sawed a slit in the nacelle and the centre body so I
can run the cables out behind each other in an orderly and low-drag fashion.

With eight 500AR cells and the smaller one consumed about 12A, while the bigger
has not yet been tested with an amp meter, but the static pull is amazing! With
more cells it would run even better, but I'm afraid it might desintegrate! I first
used one of the microprocessor-controlled ESC, but nothing happened, it blinked one
with its red LED and that was that, so I now use an oldfashioned one, twice as big and
much heavier!

The 600 fan fits to the 1114/4Y very well, but you have to drill new holes for the
securing bolts in the aluminium 'lid' and do the previous mentioned cut for the cables!
Glory to Dremel cut-off wheels! And a slight enlargement of the lid's centre hole to
fit the front bearing housing on the 1114/4Y - I think the 1000 series would fit as is 
-
but I have none to try on! The advantage with using a thinner motor is that cooling air
has ample access thrpugh the cooling holes in the lid and similar holes the rotor's 
centre :-)! Very well though out! I'll test it later with a Kyosho car motor!

If the ordinary cansized Aveoxes had a 3.2 mm axle I would try those, but alas, there 
is no chance that the fan-securing collet of the bigger can be drilled out that much!

So one duff Aveox L60 ESC ... But a great fan! Will be test flown on a Zagi THL and 
then
migrate to a Mongo Jr, together with the other one! And the batteries will be 2.5 Ah 
Nimhs 
or RC2000s - much better endurance!

This will be fun!

Eventually the powerplants - together with the ESCs the Mongo Jr, et cetera, will 
become 
part of a Beriev Albatross (Be-40 ?) or Be-200, semilscale flying boat :-)!

Tord,
Sweden

-- 
If reply difficulties - use [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Tord S. Eriksson, Ovralidsg.25:5, S-422 47 Hisings Backa, Sweden

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Sirius

2000-06-10 Thread Tord

On Fri 09 Jun, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 In a message dated 6/9/00 7:12:46 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  
  Needs Sirius' URL, ph., and address, please :-)!
   
 
 Try:   www.siriuselectronics.com/   Rich
 PS, you may not need the /

  Thanks, everyone who assisted me :-)!

Tord,
Sweden

-- 
If reply difficulties - use [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Tord S. Eriksson, Ovralidsg.25:5, S-422 47 Hisings Backa, Sweden

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Bring Some Money for stuff at the Midsouth Store

2000-06-10 Thread GordySoar

Hi Guys!

We will have an area at the Midsouth where vendors like Planes Wings and 
Things, SoaringStufff, Tim McCann and others have sent inventory 'for sale' 
at Event pricing.

Hinge tape, skegs, Flashy tape, Carbon Horns, Carbon Bell cranks, Nose Skegs, 
Servo hole flashy tape covers, etc.  I am hoping that Volz will be able to 
send some servos too!  But not sure

So bring some cash to pick up those 'goodies' you always need right away but 
have to send away for... :)

Gordy
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]