Re: [RCSE] RCSD question

2001-07-10 Thread Scott Hewett



Steven Meyer wrote:

> Jeez,
>
> What's so hard about writing a check and dropping it in an
> envelope?  Cost 0.34 plus check.

Right on Dude.  My sentiments exactly, EXCEPT, is it ~soaring related~
to post such an answer on RCSE?  I guess we'll have to check with
Charlotte, or Louisville, or Atlanta, or Lake Michigan, or Filthia to
find out if it is relevant...
Now then, just so this is NOT interpreted as a flame, I humbly asked
for Gordy's opinion on an article/review I wrote recently for RCSD
regarding Bowman's Hobbies "JW".I feel so good about the people at
RCSD (Jerry & Judy Slates), that not only do I give them the article
for free, but I enclose my personal check for the subscription, AND I
spend the extra 34 cents to get my check to them.  This is one point
that Gordy and I agree on (I think)it is kinda like giving back to
the hobby a little bit that we've gained.  One thing is for
certainyou'll never see anything from me that is technical..
but, technically we're all having fun, and THAT is what counts.
I would recommend RCSD to anyone for the knowledge and experience
you'll gain from the many contributors (myself not included).  If
people want to buy pretty pictures and all the glossy advertisements,
there are many publications they can throw your money at (and they
accept VISA).   But, at the end of the year, look to which source you
really got your value/knowledge.
Scott
(I accept propane, butane, kerosene, gasoline, methanol, vegetable
oil, WD-90, Spud-Gun 'Breck' Hairsprayanything that supports
combustion (flames).
Fire away.




>
>

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] RCSD question

2001-07-10 Thread Wwing

In a message dated 07/10/2001 11:05:36 PM Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> Jeez,
>  
>  What's so hard about writing a check and dropping it in an envelope?  Cost 
>  0.34 plus check.
>  

The tough part is getting the checkbook out of the bosses purse without 
having to listen to a running tally of how much money you've spent on your 
hobby, feigning concern about the rest of the budget having gone to hell :) 
At least with a credit card, you can do the dirty deed, and then mysteriously 
take the little lady out for dinner "just because I love you"

Bill Wingstedt

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] RCSD question

2001-07-10 Thread Steven Meyer

At 08:26 PM 7/10/2001 -0700, Dick Barker wrote:
They would have a lot more
subscribers including me if they took visa. :-)
-- 
Dick Barker
Seattle, WA
- Turning HLG Around -

>What is the going opinion of the RC Soaring Digest which currently
has an
>annual subscription rate of $30 in the US.
>Thanks,
>Dave

Jeez, 

What's so hard about writing a check and dropping it in an
envelope?  Cost 0.34 plus check.




Re: [RCSE] Finishing a glass wing??

2001-07-10 Thread Tuffpuppy

Yes, capping the ailerons with ply and the subtrailing edges with thickened 
epoxy will definitely add some strength to the wing. This will also keep 
moisture out which can cause the wing to de-laminate. This is the way to go 
if your going to be flying slope.

Dave

In a message dated 7/10/01 7:24:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< I would like to hear some of the pros and cons about
whether or not the edges of the ailerons / flaps &
back side of wing should be finished or left as open
foam.
It seems to me that if edges are sealed with
(glass-epoxy or?? )it would structurally be a stronger
wing and would help to stop any twist. I see a lot of
wings unfinished.  HELP!!! LEE
 >>

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [RCSE] RCSD question

2001-07-10 Thread John Ensoll

And me too

Regards,
John Ensoll.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LSF 1383 Level II
Builder, Flier, Flyfisherman, in retirement.
http://www.canterburysailplanes.co.nz

-Original Message-
From: Dick Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 3:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RCSE] RCSD question


They would have a lot more subscribers including me if they took visa. :-)
--
Dick Barker
Seattle, WA
- Turning HLG Around -

>What is the going opinion of the RC Soaring Digest which currently has an
>annual subscription rate of $30 in the US.
>Thanks,
>Dave


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Futaba Vs Profi: Yet another data point.

2001-07-10 Thread Bill Johns

At 11:02 AM 7/9/2001 -0700, Karlton Spindle wrote:
>Try it and report to the group if you would be so kind.

OK, I suppose.  I'm sure this will start some sorta flame war.  Whatever.

I took both my Futaba Super 8 and my Profi 3030 both fully charged and on 
trickle and a fully charged battery in a fuse.  The fuse was aligned 
pointing directly away from me, i.e., I was looking at the end of the 
antenna wire.  I walked back until the person helping noted that the rudder 
started twitching.  I went back and forth to find the spot as best I 
could.  I then paced  off the distance to the fuse.  I did this with the 
Futaba antenna collapsed, with the Profi 3030 without an antenna (Karlton 
said it wouldn't hurt the Profi to use it without the antenna screwed in) 
and with the antenna screwed in, but collapsed.  In all chases the antenna 
was pointed at the fuse.  The numbers are (a drum roll someone):

Futaba   136 paces
Profi 3030 without the antenna screwed in   29 paces
Profi 3030 with the antenna screwed in  144 paces.

I suppose what surprises me is the range that you can get without having 
the antenna out with either Tx.  I have no idea if these data represent any 
sort of meaningful difference.

So there.

Bill

--
Nobody cares if you can't dance well. Just get up and dance.

Bill Johns
Pullman, WA

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] RCSD question

2001-07-10 Thread Dick Barker

They would have a lot more subscribers including me if they took visa. :-)
-- 
Dick Barker
Seattle, WA
- Turning HLG Around -

>What is the going opinion of the RC Soaring Digest which currently has an
>annual subscription rate of $30 in the US.
>Thanks,
>Dave


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Wait till you see the JUNE issue of RC Soaring Digest!

2001-07-10 Thread Steven Meyer

I beg to differ.

Jim is well revered in SOAR.  Jim flies and practices a lot. 
Our club has many great pilots.
If he's not a club great he will soon be one.

At 10:12 PM 7/10/2001 -0500, James V. Bacus wrote:
At 08:30 PM 7/10/2001,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 things
I have observed from 
watching National Class soaring greats like Jim Bacus of Chicago
area
No I am not.  I am not even a local club great.

Jim


Steve Meyer 
http://SOARchicago.com/stmeyer/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
S.O.A.R. Web Page
http://SOARchicago.com/




Re: [RCSE] Finishing a glass wing??

2001-07-10 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

I've seen lots unfinished. Don't think it is a structural issue. I have
always sealed the raw edges on my wings mostly for protection from
moisture. Flying contests you may get caught in the rain. It would take
a little while for the water to get into the foam but I like the extra
protection from the elements.

Of course coating those raw edges will add some weight.

Later...

Lee Cox wrote:
> 
> I would like to hear some of the pros and cons about
> whether or not the edges of the ailerons / flaps &
> back side of wing should be finished or left as open
> foam.
> It seems to me that if edges are sealed with
> (glass-epoxy or?? )it would structurally be a stronger
> wing and would help to stop any twist. I see a lot of
> wings unfinished.  HELP!!! LEE
> 
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
> RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
>"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Save Speedvision petition.

2001-07-10 Thread Dave Nasatir

While this is not soaring related, in any way, it does touch upon the
use of RCSE for propagating ideas that may be of interest to some.
Perhaps.

Signers of the "Save Speedvision" (and other) electronic petitions may
wish to examine the privacy policy of the organization hosting the
petition drive, if not the authors of the petition itself.  It is not
uncommon to discover that the information you provide while "signing"
the petition become grist for the marketing (and spamming)  mill of
organizations that have nothing to do with Fox Television, Rupert
Murdoch, NASCAR racing or other agencies close to the hearts of the
signers.

caveat firmator

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Wait till you see the JUNE issue of RC Soaring Digest!

2001-07-10 Thread James V. Bacus

At 08:30 PM 7/10/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 things
I have observed from 
watching National Class soaring greats like Jim Bacus of Chicago
area
No I am not.  I am not even a local club great.

Jim
Downers Grove, IL
Member of Chicago SOAR club
ICQ 6997780    R/C Soaring Page at
http://www.mcs.net/~bacuslab/soaring.html



Re: [RCSE] JR 341 servo dimensions....

2001-07-10 Thread Brett Jaffee

http://www.horizonhobby.com/description.asp?prod=JRPS341&ThisPage=&Item=&refer=&category=D

> Paul Helmbold wrote:
> 
> Hi all
> 
> I am building a Tekoa Shadow 2m for  a good friend. I was wondering if anyone had JR 
>341 dimensions, and if so could you post them? I would be most grateful :o)
> 
> Many thanks
> 
> Paul

-- 
_

Brett Jaffee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://home.earthlink.net/~jaffee

The Unoffical Extra 300 Home Page
http://www.bayarea.net/~nathan/extra300

OnTheWay Quake 3 Server Utility
http://www.planetquake.com/ontheway
_

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] JR 341 servo dimensions....

2001-07-10 Thread Paul Helmbold




Hi all
 
I am building a Tekoa Shadow 2m for  a good 
friend. I was wondering if anyone had JR 341 dimensions, and if so could you 
post them? I would be most grateful :o)
 
Many thanks
 
Paul


[RCSE] RCSD question

2001-07-10 Thread Dave Seay

What is the going opinion of the RC Soaring Digest which currently has an
annual subscription rate of $30 in the US.

Thanks,
Dave

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Finishing a glass wing??

2001-07-10 Thread Lee Cox

I would like to hear some of the pros and cons about
whether or not the edges of the ailerons / flaps &
back side of wing should be finished or left as open
foam.
It seems to me that if edges are sealed with
(glass-epoxy or?? )it would structurally be a stronger
wing and would help to stop any twist. I see a lot of
wings unfinished.  HELP!!! LEE

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [RCSE] RES kit

2001-07-10 Thread Albert Long

>AL: The ability to design a good airplane has to cost something.!
>
>STAN

Hi Stan:

Are you saying that the $50.00 design isn't any good or are you saying it 
costs more to market (not design) the $85.00 plane?

I would guess the $50.00 standard class design has good engineering backing 
the design. The one I have been flying, hasn't blown up on a winch launch. 
Mine hasn't fluttered during flight.

Are you saying the $50.00 glider doesn't? If so, why do you say that?

AL
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Profi 4000 programming.

2001-07-10 Thread Jason Werner

Steve,
You need to change the direction of the travel of the one elevator
servo.  Go to Menu 1  then servo, then travel.  Go to the incorrect moving
servo.  Then selevt the input (elevator) and set the travel to opposite
(down right arrow, pull up, press R to reverse, push down stick, press R to
reverse).   I think I am remembering the keys there!

Jason

- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 10:48 PM
Subject: [RCSE] Profi 4000 programming.


I know this should be a simple thing to do, but I can't get the V-tail to
work right.  I get either both ways on the stick to work as either rudder or
elevator.  Swapping the two servo wires around didn't help, and I'm stumped.

Steve Schneider
SOAR
Chicago
ICQ 7304857

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] It's here... Chris Kaiser's Kahu DLG plans are waiting for you!

2001-07-10 Thread tony estep

This is an outstanding and admirable design embodying a lot of
knowledge and good ideas. Have a look, everybody! Thanks to Chris for
the pix and plans, and as always thanks to Joel and Charles River for
disseminating this cool and valuable info.


--- "Joel A. Foner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris has kindly offered to put his design up for all to see, and
> after a
> little web fooling around it's up.  The page has a description and
> construction notes, along with an Acrobat PDF of both a 3-view and
> the wing
> bagging layup details. Thanks for sharing, Chris!  This kind of
> community
> spirit makes a lot of people happy, and helps to brew even more great
> ideas.
> 
> The Kahu DLG page is at (this next URL should be all on one line):
>
http://www.charlesriverrc.org/articles/kahudlg/chriskaiser_kahudlg.htm
> 
> Also see our Articles & Tips index page for more online plans and
> other
> information.  The left column of the index is the online plans,
> including
> Mark Drela's Apogee updates (now available in a handy 30" version ;).
> 
> http://www.charlesriverrc.org/articles.htm
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Joel
> 
> Joel Foner
> Webmaster - Charles River Radio Controllers
> http://www.charlesriverrc.org/
> IRCHA #1458
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send
> "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] It's here... Chris Kaiser's Kahu DLG plans are waiting for you!

2001-07-10 Thread Joel A. Foner

Chris has kindly offered to put his design up for all to see, and after a
little web fooling around it's up.  The page has a description and
construction notes, along with an Acrobat PDF of both a 3-view and the wing
bagging layup details. Thanks for sharing, Chris!  This kind of community
spirit makes a lot of people happy, and helps to brew even more great ideas.

The Kahu DLG page is at (this next URL should be all on one line):
http://www.charlesriverrc.org/articles/kahudlg/chriskaiser_kahudlg.htm

Also see our Articles & Tips index page for more online plans and other
information.  The left column of the index is the online plans, including
Mark Drela's Apogee updates (now available in a handy 30" version ;).

http://www.charlesriverrc.org/articles.htm

Regards,

Joel

Joel Foner
Webmaster - Charles River Radio Controllers
http://www.charlesriverrc.org/
IRCHA #1458
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE:[RCSE] I Circumnavigated the Santa Maria

2001-07-10 Thread ALNephew

Apropos the lower cortex of the brain, have you tried flying a different mode 
when you are well used to one of them? I had always flown mode 2 until not 
too long ago I tried flying a swift slope plane on mode one. The owner, a 
very generous guy named Chester Tai, offered his plane to me to fly since I 
didn't have one at the time. But I've never flown mode 1, I said. 

Awww, you won't have any problem, Chester said, and he put the plane up about 
three or four mistakes high and handed me the transmitter. I had to 
consciously make my left hand do what was necessary to control the plane for 
mode 1, but my right hand unconsciously made the movements that would have 
been correct for mode 2. My wife  and I laughed as we watched my right hand 
moving the right stick for mode 2 independently of any conscious thought 
process on my part (thanks for the line, Tom and Ray) while I was wrenching 
my brain to make the plane do what I wanted with my left hand. Chester wasn't 
laughing. It was his plane going through those gyrations. I stayed at least 
two mistakes high, however.

Bye and bye my brain got with the program, and got the plane flying okay, but 
the mental work was exhausting; before long I gave the Tx back to Chester. He 
was relaxed now or very polite, and he invited me to fly it again. What a 
guy! I thanked him, but my brain needed a rest. Even later when he offered 
again I was satisfied with the experience for that day.

I wonder if there is anyone who has trained himself to fly both mode one and 
two interchangeably (?). I'd suppose it would be possible just as some people 
can switch languages in mid-sentence.

The mode 1 experience reminded me of what it was like to learn to fly R/C in 
the first place. It is abe so easy to the experienced and so difficult to the 
beginner. Flight simulators and foamies are great inventions for reducing the 
necessity for repairs.

And gyros are neat for DLG. They are 'way faster than the fastest lower 
cortex, or at least mine.

I always enjoy your posts, Tom, and thanks for the invitation,

Al Nephew
Duluth, MN

Tom Nagel writes:

>>   On the way back to the boat ramp, my neighbor Paul and I cooked up a
scheme for an entry  in the 4th of July Doo Dah Parade, which runs past the
house in my neighborhood.   We would round up a bunch of folks with RC cars,
decorate them, buy some Fezes and go as the RC Shriners.  And so it came to
pass.

Paul had his little Radio Shack RC car decorated with Godzilla holding
an American Flag.   Rick had an electric 4x4 with a big flag on it.   Wiese
wimped out. We only had three entries.  The kid and I stuck and EPP pillar
into the cockpit of his car, and velroed a stuffed Flamingo onto the top of
it, with the legs dangling.

We checked for TX interference, and headed out for the parade, joining
up with the other entries (The Marching Fidels, the Starbucks Stormtroopers,
the Dick Cheney CPR Drill Team, the Chuy's Bar float, where every Wednesday
night is President's Daughter Night, and so on.)

And this is were the RC soaring connection sort of sneaks in.  When we
got the parade master's command "Gentlemen Start Your Flamingos!"  the kid
immediately had no control over his RC bird.  He couldn't drive it at all.
Turns out we'd checked to make sure our TX did not interfere with Paul's
Godzillamobile, but we hadn't checked the other way around.   Godzilla was
jamming the heck out of the Pink Flamingo.

So the kid gave me the TX, and I wound up driving the Flamingo.  " How"
you say, "if there was all that interference?"  The answer is that I am not
really sure.  The throttle made the Flamingo turn sometimes.  Sometimes not.
The steering was sometimes effective, and sometimes it worked like a
throttle, or reverse.  But without really thinking about it much, I was able
to veer and swerve the Flamingo down the parade route.

Thinking about it later, I decided that RC pilots don't really think
about what we are doing.  Our fingers get wired to our eyeballs in some
route that doesn't include the cerebral cortex (certainly not for Gordy or
me anyway) and we twiddle the sticks mostly by reflex.   I couldn't explain
to the kid how to drive the Flamingo with all that interference, but I could
do it myself.  I think that's how we get after flying a while.   You can't
explain what the expert flyer did to save his plane after half his stab blew
off, or after he lost half of one wing in a mid air. You can't explain to
the new guy how to move the sticks to do a roll or to set up a landing.  But
after flying for a while the new guy will get his fingers wired to his
eyeballs and get RC reflexes just like the rest of us.

I hope you all had a fun 4th of July, and that you will join us in the
RC Shriner's marching unit next summer.
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Practical application...

2001-07-10 Thread Bill Harris

Great, this gives me something a bit more concrete to go on, a step above 
the "TLAR" criteria.

Another side-question on this project: assume a two-piece, 2-meter wing, 550 
in^2 area, "type 2" spar, what size wingrod would be needed to match the 
spar strength?For a respectable 50 pound winch load and a full-pedal 150 
pound winch load?

Again, thanks for your input.

--Bill


>From: Mark Drela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [RCSE] Practical application...
>Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 23:13:06 -0400
>
> >Two approaches:
> >1. Strengthen the existing [spruce] spar.
> >2. Make a Balsa-Core Carbon spar
> >Question is, how much lighter?
>
>
>Here are some numbers I did some time ago:
>
>The Allegro-Lite spar (#2 type) is stressed for a 150 lb winch load.
>Excluding the joiners, it weighs 3 oz.
>
>An equivalent spruce spar would be a 0.6" x 5" solid cross section
>in the wing center (basically a floor plank).  With optimal taper
>towards the tips it would still weigh about 24 oz.
>
>A #1 type spar would be somewhere in between, depending on
>the spruce/carbon mix.
>
>Obviously #2 type is by far the lightest solution.  A 2M spar
>which takes a still-respectable 50 lb winch load can weigh only 1 oz!
>
>- Mark
>RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
>"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] So Cal PicoJet Race

2001-07-10 Thread Dan Borer

Just a reminder that there will be a stock PicoJet race at 12:00 this
Saturday July 14, 2001 at the Silent Wings Soaring Association (SWSA) field
in Covina, CA. Directions can be found at:

http://swsa.8k.com/cgi-bin/i/images/swsamap.gif

Dan

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Kits for sale

2001-07-10 Thread Rlpfly

I have 2 new in box Dodgson Designs kits
1 Pixy
1 Camano
$250.00 each plus shipping
Email me directly
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Lee
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [RCSE] servos...digital vs analog

2001-07-10 Thread Kerry Cochrell



Arne,
  Most of the new helicopter gyros have an option to drive servos at a high
frame rate [250-270hz] and I can tell you that a standard analog and some
digital servos will self destruct when driven at the high rate.  More than a
few heli pilots have done this either by accident or as you suggest as an
expensive experiment; loosing yaw control on a heli makes it very difficult
to land safely :(
  It's not that easy.
Kerry


> what happens when you pulse the analog servo at 300hz? it should have all
> the advantages of the digital servo except the programmability. but will
> the more frequent pulsing cause any trouble like overheating of the servo
> or smth?

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Why not aileron->elevator mix?

2001-07-10 Thread Jeff Reid

>Coordinated flight produces the minimum drag flight condition.
>How you get it is not all that important.

Wouldn't minimal surface deflections, a combination of ailerons,
flaps, rudder, and possibly elevator, reduce drag during a
roll?



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Searching for Greg Potter

2001-07-10 Thread Carl Otto

Hey you all,

I am trying to contact Greg Potter.  He's an Aussie, and I hope one of you
guys from Down Under can give me his email.  The address I have doesn't seem
to work any more.  Perhaps he is on the list and can respond.

Thanks,

Carl Otto

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Mini-Ellipse

2001-07-10 Thread Bill Malvey

Just flew my new Jaro Muller Mini-Ellipse that I purchased from Aero-Models
in Arizona (http://www.aero-model.com/).

For those that are not familiar with this plane, it is an all molded 60"
sloper with a V-tail. Mine is yellow on top and a deep blue on bottom. The
canopy is a light sky blue.

The workmanship is outstanding, as is typical of the molded European stuff.
No surprises here.

Took me about 2 days of sporadic effort to get it airborne. I installed 2
servos in the fuse (JR 241's) for the Rudder-Vators and 2 Volz Micro-Maxx
servos in the wings. The wings have servo wells premolded into them. All
that is need is to cut a hole for the wires and install the servo and
linkages. Little ball links are supplied and screw into the ailerons. Very
slick.

V-tail sets up easy with the pre-installed pushrod housings. You have to
supply your own pushrod material (0.8 mm). I used steel since I had some. CF
would work well also.

I made a small tray for the 2 JR 241's and used a JR 549X receiver without
the case (I fly ham band and have a bunch of these RX's). I used an 800 mAh
6-volt Duralite battery.

I needed about 1.5 ounces in the nose for balance. All up weight, ready to
fly is 21 ounces on the nose.

First flights were totally uneventful. Plane tracks arrow straight and I
only needed minor tweaking of the throws from those suggested in the
"instructions" . Balance is about 2.6 inches from the LE (range is 2.44 to
2.83 inches). With this CG the plane goes right down on a 45 with no
tendency to pull or tuck.

I need to make up some ballast to fit the fuse and I'm set. Instructions say
up to 600 grams (21 ounces) can be put in it. I think this is a little
optimistic. I plan to make up some 4 or 5 ounce bars to drop into the small
ballast area.

This is going to be a fun little sloper. It will stay up in very light air,
yet speeds up and provides lots of fun in better lift.

Given the workmanship, pre-fabrication, and overall performance I thin this
is well worth the money ($289) and is a great plane for anyone looking for a
60" sport sloper.

Oh yeah, Sean also sells an electric version. You can get BOTH fuses and use
the same wing to go electric OR slope!! How's that??

Oh yeah - you've GOT to get one of these if for no other reason than to
"read" the "instructions". That is the most difficult task in this
plane.

~~

Bill Malvey
Ladera Ranch, California





RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Balloon method for making tubes/booms?

2001-07-10 Thread GCGassaway

Can someone post some URL's for sites (or other information sources) 
describing how to use balloons or inflated surgical tubing in the process of 
laying up tubes on a mandrel?

- George Gassaway
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Why not aileron->elevator mix?

2001-07-10 Thread Bill Malvey

On 7/9/01 9:43 PM, "Jeff Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I understand this, but instead of eliminating the adverse yaw with a
> lot of aileron differential and no rudder compensation.


You've lost me. You seem to want this to be more complicated than it really
is.

Adverse yaw is primarily counter acted using rudder (especially in full
size). Aileron differential helps reduce it as well. Coordinated flight is
important regardless of speed or task. Coordinated flight produces the
minimum drag flight condition. How you get it is not all that important.


~~

Bill Malvey
Ladera Ranch, California





RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Why not aileron->elevator mix?

2001-07-10 Thread Jeff Reid

> balance the lift and drag on both wings

Forgot to mention, aileron differential can balance drag, but
only for a limited range of airspeed. Again, I assume that
the goal is efficient thermal turns (not high speed turns),
so this speed range limitation is not much of an issue.

F3B gliders have high and low speed requirements, maybe
different mixes for each task?.




RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Save Speedvision petition.

2001-07-10 Thread Quiet Man

Dear Friends,

I have just read and signed the online petition:

   "Speedvision & NASCAR programming"

hosted on the web by PetitionOnline.com, the free
online petition
service, at:

   http://www.PetitionOnline.com/svsn/

I personally agree with what this petition says,
and I think you might
agree, too.  If you can spare a moment, please
take a look, and consider
signing yourself.

Best wishes,

John Roe

=
Professor John Roe
Laguna Hills, Ca
www.MartialArtsAcademy.org

"In God we trust"
...the official motto of the United States.

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Why not aileron->elevator mix?

2001-07-10 Thread Jeff Reid

{sorry, posted without entering proper subject, reposting with text cleaned up}

> > Differential aileron and rudder coupling are used to limit the effects
> > of adverse yaw, NOT a pitching moment.
 
 > Actually, I think what he was implying is that the aileron differntial
> that's used to counter adverse yaw could also PRODUCE an unwanted pitch
> response as well.  I'm not sure how that would work, since I would assume
> a proper amount of differential would balance the lift and drag on both
> wings, but I'd be curious to hear about it.
> 

Balanced lift is not the issue here, I'm assuming that lift is balanced
(see below).
 
The issue is: is lift produced during a roll is the same as lift produced
during level flight? If there's more up aileron than down (differential),
then it seems to me that the overall lift from both wings is less when
ailerons are deflected than when they are not. Assuming reduced wing
pitching moment (explained below for those that don't know about this)
from lowered angle of attack has less overall effect than reduced lift
from the wings, a model should pitch down (relative to fuselage) when
it's rolling.

Technical stuff here for anyone interested...

Balanced lift
To initiate a roll, the lift from the wings is different (angular
acceleration). Once a model is in a steady roll, whether or
not the lift of the wings are equal depends on how lift relative to a
wing is defined (reference point issue). Since there is no angular
acceleration (about roll axis) some would consider the lift from the
wings to be "equal", even though each wing's flight path is different,
relative to fuselage path.

Wing pitching moment
Most undercambered airfoils have a tendency to pitch "downwards" depending
on angle of attack and airspeed (as either increases, there's more of
a tendency to pitch down). This can contribute to unexpected reactions
when trailing edges are raised or lowered significantly. If the chord
(front to back) distance on the wing is long enough, then trailing edges
also act a bit like elevons (since they are far enough away from center of
mass to cause this effect), for example, raising trailing edge may cause
a model to pitch up (like my DAW 1-26 2m with spoilerons for example).

Some flying wing airfoils (like on my www.f3x.com Bandit) have the
opposite pitching moment. Because the trailing edge is overcambered
(turns upwards), this airfoil has a tendency to pitch up instead of
down. This means that pitch stability can be adjusted somewhat by
just trimming the elevons, without having to move the center of gravity.
It also makes adjusting the center of gravity more difficult (just
keep moving it back until the model starts to be difficult to control,
[pilot judgment here, glad it's a foamie] then move it forwards a bit).

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]