[RCSE] Off Topic - Virus issues

2001-11-27 Thread David Goebel

Folks, its been on CNN and other news all day.  If your
AV is current 24 Nov or later, it should catch it, if not
check Norton AV website at http://www.sarc.com and it
includes how to manually remove the W32.BadTrans.B@mm
virus, and there is another that's just as bad.

Symantec Security Response is currently tracking two 
threats. Both threats have a rating of Category 4 (Severe).
W32.Badtrans.B@mm is a MAPI worm that emails itself 
out as one of several different filenames. W32.Aliz.Worm
is an SMTP mass mailer worm that can be executed just 
by reading or previewing the file.
-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 
Fair Winds,
David Goebel
Small Computer Tech whose been removing the darn thing
from many customers who refused to update their AV...
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Off Topic - Virus issues

2001-11-27 Thread rcsoar4fun

Good information David.  For those without virus scanners you can go to
www.antivirus.com and you can scan your PC via the web.  They also have a
tool for checking Outlook to see if its already infected.  For those using
MS Outlook (I believe the only target of these worms) go to Microsoft's
website for an update.

Kristopher
- Original Message -
From: David Goebel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: RCSE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:18 PM
Subject: [RCSE] Off Topic - Virus issues

 Symantec Security Response is currently tracking two
 threats. Both threats have a rating of Category 4 (Severe).
 W32.Badtrans.B@mm is a MAPI worm that emails itself
 out as one of several different filenames. W32.Aliz.Worm
 is an SMTP mass mailer worm that can be executed just
 by reading or previewing the file.
 --


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] 2.9 Saturn

2001-11-27 Thread pete darr

What airfoil was used on the 2.9 Saturn? I have been
looking for it without any success. So now I'm asking
the PRO'S.

   Pete Darr 

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month.
http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Batteries America - Caution Virus

2001-11-27 Thread Jack Iafret

I did also, I just hit delete when I got the warning.


Jack Iafret
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Keeper of the Nostalgia Rules
- Original Message -
From: Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 6:24 PM
Subject: [RCSE] Batteries America - Caution Virus


 Last week I sent an e-mail to Batteries America with an inquiry
 regarding a receiver pack. Since then, I have received two e-mails from
 them, both infected with a virus (detected by Norton Anti Virus.) The
 last one was an .exe file.

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Batteries America)

 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month.
 http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe
and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Winchdoc Web Address

2001-11-27 Thread Fred A. Sheplavy

Scott
http://www.monkeytumble.com/winchdoc/
Fred

- Original Message -
From: Scott Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:08 PM
Subject: [RCSE] Winchdoc Web Address


 Please post the web address for the winchdoc site. the ones I have aren't
 working.

 Thanks - Scott

 http://members.nbci.com/winchdoc/
 http://members.xoom.com/winchdoc/

 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe
and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Fwd: [RCSE] 2.9 Saturn

2001-11-27 Thread Mark Wales

From the pages of an old NSP catalog:
The Saturn utilizes the HQ 2.0/9-2.0/8 airfoils; the wing starts with the HQ 
2.0/9 and transitions to an HQ 2.0/8 at the tip.

Thermals

Mark Wales

www.skyfamily.com/mhcommunications



From: pete darr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: RCSE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [RCSE] 2.9 Saturn
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 20:14:55 -0800 (PST)

What airfoil was used on the 2.9 Saturn? I have been
looking for it without any success. So now I'm asking
the PRO'S.

Pete Darr

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month.
http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Pull-pull Info

2001-11-27 Thread Andrew E. Mileski

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Are there any websites out there with detailed info on installing pull-pull
 systems for hand launch gliders?  I'm particularly interested in what others
 do where the strings exit the carbon boom near the tail.  Do you just let
 them rub against the hole in the boom, or should a short piece of tubing be
 installed there?

Hmmm ... Bookmarks-RC-Construction Tips-Pull Pull
  http://users.ids.net/~bdfelice/
Brian has a really good site with the explanation of Ackerman and lots of
photos on installation.  He gets his Teflon bearing tubes from Mcmaster-Carr
by the way (I asked).

--
Andrew E. Mileski   http://isoar.ca/
Ottawa, Canada
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Porter Wilga Tow Aircraft

2001-11-27 Thread Simon Van Leeuwen

Looking on behalf of a friend for either of the above kits, preferably
in 3rd+ scale and hopefully composite. I(we) appreciate your responses. 
-- 
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
   Simon Van Leeuwen, Calgary, Alberta
 RADIUS SYSTEMS
Cogito-Ergo-Zoom
  IAC25233*MAAC12835*IMAC1756*LSF5953*IMAA20209
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Icon test flight

2001-11-27 Thread Jim Bacus

At 06:55 PM 11/27/2001, Jim Bacus wrote:
At 05:54 PM 11/26/2001, John Ensoll wrote:

The Icon was a little slower to round up on launch

If you can launch your Icon like this, you don't have to worry about 
rotation.  8-)

http://silentflight.org/F3J_USA_2002/MOV01362.MPG

Gordon Jennings launching his Icon at the US F3J Team Selections, Joe at 
his side.  Turn up the volume while watching this one to hear Gordon grunt.


Jim
Downers Grove, IL
Member of the Chicago SOAR club,  AMA 592537LSF 7560 Level III
ICQ 6997780R/C Soaring Page at www.jimbacus.net

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [RCSE] Icon test flight

2001-11-27 Thread John Ensoll

Hi Jim,
 I was talking about winch launching, not two man towing which has a lot
more power available.  You have missed the main point which was to do with
the lack of noise over the other Mouldies.
Regards,
John Ensoll.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LSF 1383 Level II
Builder, Flier, Flyfisherman, in retirement.
http://www.canterburysailplanes.co.nz

-Original Message-
From: Jim Bacus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 7:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RCSE] Icon test flight


At 06:55 PM 11/27/2001, Jim Bacus wrote:
At 05:54 PM 11/26/2001, John Ensoll wrote:

The Icon was a little slower to round up on launch

If you can launch your Icon like this, you don't have to worry about
rotation.  8-)

http://silentflight.org/F3J_USA_2002/MOV01362.MPG

Gordon Jennings launching his Icon at the US F3J Team Selections, Joe at
his side.  Turn up the volume while watching this one to hear Gordon grunt.


Jim
Downers Grove, IL
Member of the Chicago SOAR club,  AMA 592537LSF 7560 Level III
ICQ 6997780R/C Soaring Page at www.jimbacus.net

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [RCSE] Icon test flight

2001-11-27 Thread Jim Bacus

At 12:29 AM 11/27/2001, John Ensoll wrote:
Hi Jim,
  I was talking about winch launching, not two man towing which has a lot
more power available.

You can do that on a winch too, trust me.


You have missed the main point which was to do with
the lack of noise over the other Mouldies.

I touched on that in a previous note in this thread, and about six months 
ago in RCSE, maybe you missed my post(s)?  I just thought the MPEG was 
cool, and would add it to the thread.


Jim
Downers Grove, IL
Member of the Chicago SOAR club,  AMA 592537LSF 7560 Level III
ICQ 6997780R/C Soaring Page at www.jimbacus.net

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Re: [RCSE] RDS drag reduction, speed increase

2001-11-27 Thread WDimick


In a message dated 11/27/01 10:15:14 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 One other thing to be careful of is the difference between stiffness and 
stiffness-to-weight. The stiffness of most carbon fiber-epoxy per square 
inch of material is nowhere near as high as that of steel. A 1/8 diameter 
carbon rod, even with the fibers oriented for torsion, would be torsionally 
much less stiff than a 1/8 steel rod.

However, the stiffness-to-weight ratio of the carbon is much higher than 
steel. If you replaced a 1/8 diameter steel rod with a 
torsionally-oriented carbon fiber rod of the same WEIGHT, the carbon fiber 
rod would be stiffer. However, it would also be more than twice as big in 
diameter. Whether you could get an improvement from that approach would 
depend on whether you had enough room for the fatter rod. At that point you 
might also want to consider a steel tube.

For stiffness-critical structures, if space is the limiting factor, its 
usually best to go with the stiffest material available. If weight is the 
criteria and space is not a constraint, the best choice is probably the 
material with the best stiffness-to-weight ratio. For RADS, where the 
thickness available for the pocket in the control surface is usually the 
limiting factor (at least in most of our applications), steel is therefore 
probably the best choice.


Don Stackhouse @ DJ Aerotech 

Don,
Thanks for your extensive examination of the heat treated drive shaft issue. 
I think that we have arrived at the same conclusion (hardened tool steel rods 
are the best choice for the RDS application) with very different approaches. 
I'm just a machinist, occasionally a blacksmith,  and not an engineer. My 
problem with the tubing approach was the same one you pointed out though. It 
would have to be a larger tube than most wings could accomidate in order to 
be strong enough to do the job. I know that Mike Garton is doing some tests 
on servos and RDS that might contribute some data for this discussion. He 
told me that the results would be in his February Model Aviation, soaring 
column.
Regards,
Walt Dimick
I. R. F. Machine Works, Inc.



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] S4233 data

2001-11-27 Thread Andrew E. Mileski

Lincoln Ross wrote:
 
 Someone was looking for data on the S4233. Try this site:
 http://www.nasg.com/afdb/list-polar-e.phtml

I'll add my Bookmarks-RC-Airfoils-Wind Tunnel Data Analyser
  http://eiss.cnde.iastate.edu/calcs/frames.shtml

--
Andrew E. Mileski
Ottawa, Canada
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Pull-pull Info

2001-11-27 Thread CrashK

It looks like the pull-pull cables go through the airframe at an angle, i.e.
it is not a straight shot towards the tail.  Is this commonly done and is
there no friction penalty if using teflon tubing?

   http://users.ids.net/~bdfelice/
 Brian has a really good site with the explanation of Ackerman and lots of
 photos on installation.  He gets his Teflon bearing tubes from
Mcmaster-Carr
 by the way (I asked).


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Pull-pull Info

2001-11-27 Thread Andrew E. Mileski

CrashK wrote:
 
 It looks like the pull-pull cables go through the airframe at an angle, i.e.
 it is not a straight shot towards the tail.  Is this commonly done and is
 there no friction penalty if using teflon tubing?

Given the great friction reduction you get when using pull-pull in
straight runs (compared to a shaft in a tube) a little bit in a bend
is no problem.  On a larger model you can use a pully though.

I don't know if it is commonly done, but it works :)

--
Andrew E. Mileski
Ottawa, Canada
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Scale Soaring and EMM have moved!

2001-11-27 Thread John Derstine

The web address has changed for the Scale Soaring Page and the Endless
Mountain Models page. A new look for The Scale Soaring information page, and
lots of new pictures and updates on the EMM page.

Scalesoaring and EMM: http:/www.scalesoaring.net

EMM only: http://www.scalesoaring.net/EMM/rand.htm

To celebrate the change we are offering special prices on selected EMS and
HKM sailplanes.
Thanks,
John Derstine

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]