Re: [RCSE] SS antenna

2002-11-01 Thread Ryan Flowers
For such a joint, between solid SS and stranded copper, you should use heat
shrink tubing, extending well onto the copper, as a strain relief.
___
Ryan Flowers
www.ryanflowers.com
www.cruiserpages.com
Reno, NV





- Original Message -
From: Bill Swingle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rick Van Clief [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 8:04 AM
Subject: RE: [RCSE] SS antenna


 Yep, this would most likely work. I did something similar myself and the
DAW
 Dragonette instructions called for this method as well. When I did it I
just
 used one of my pushrods.

 Just make sure your solder joint can tolerate all the motion. Because
you're
 using a solid wire the joint with the stranded wire will suffer allot of
 flexing. Over time this could become a failure spot.

 A separate wire is usually not necessary though sometimes simpler and less
 problematic.

 Be cautious of metal to metal contact points such as between a pushrod and
a
 clevis or, worse, one pushrod to another. Typically we can get away with
 allot of poor installation mistakes (I did) but it's always better to be
 careful with the installation.

 Bill Swingle
 Janesville, CA
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe
and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with
MIME turned off.

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.



Re: [RCSE] CL-DSing or Model Aviation Soaring Column

2002-11-01 Thread Denoferth
  Dan--Sometime during WW2, I think Jim Walker brought out an unpowered U/C, 
that was flown with a fishing pole--the lines running thru the loops on the 
pole.  The weight in the nose was plaster of paris.  I flew one of these,
I did that in '48 or '49 too. Seem to remember it was a built up P-84 by 
Burkley(???) that I got from AHC. Dennis in NH
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.



[RCSE] CL-DSing: A memory revived

2002-11-01 Thread Scobie Puchtler or Sarah Felstiner
A memory revived for me too on this thread.

As a young boy in Fairbanks Alaska, my pals and I
made super-crude sort of U-C planes from
corrugated cardboard and wood scraps. Over one
summer, we took them through three levels of
complexity. The first were simply cardboard
planforms roughly modeled after a favorite paper
airplane design of ours, weighted and balanced to
be flung in a constant circle on the end of a
single string. The only control influence was
having the string short enough so that oscillating
one's arm had some effect on altitude. You could
get sort of a dive or climb out of the deal, but
that was about it. Thing was, that was plenty
fascinating enough for a good while. Just the
chance to stare at a 'flying' craft of my own
creation, with utter concentration, while the rest
of the world whizzed past in a blur, was enough
motivation to fly session after session, even
though the recovery was often long and queasy!
Strangely, of the three levels of glider, in some
ways, this simplest one was the best, because
there was the most sense that the thing was
finding it's own trim, and kind of 'flying
itself'.

The next level of craft had the pilot holding a
ten or twelve inch stick with a line at each end,
tied off fore and aft on the aircraft planform
(which was essentially a flying wing). The idea
was to give some better control over pitch, which
worked some. If you got too agressive and tried a
loop, the lines would cross, and since we had only
high friction string, even a single line crossing
would usually lead to disaster. More crashes meant
more repairs, and less motivation to keep flying.
Interesting how those forces come into play in a
kid's world. We could always go work on the tree
fort, so at some point the cardboard planes lost
out.

The final level was actual elevator control with a
central swing line to take the centripetal force,
and two control lines off of each end of a control
stick, turned through some kind of eyes on a
central wood-stick fuselage, and controlling a
broad elevator. This probably got the biggest
laughs out of us, because the combination of
poorly designed systems, and aerodynamic
misunderstandings led to a flight profile in
which, if you were lucky, you'd get the swing
started, hold it level for a few circles with
intense paranoia, try just one elevator movement,
and immediately end in a furball of damaged
airplane and tangled string. The funny thing was
that if we'd had just a little more patience,
materials, and engineering, we were actually
pretty close to something that would have been
serious fun. Instead, the 'full house' version was
a constant disaster, and was quickly scrapped.

I guess it's no wonder that I find such joy as an
adult in radio control gliders. And, generally, I
still seem to prefer the simple over the complex.

Lift,
Scobie in Seattle



 -Original Message-
 From: James C Deck [mailto:jcdeck;attbi.com]
 Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 7:16 PM
 To: RCSE
 Subject: [RCSE] CL-DSing: A memory revived


 OK, when I was very young, model
 airplane engines were beyond the
 economic capabilities of some of us.
 Enter whip-powered UC - the plane was
 simply whipped (BTW, a no-no in UC)
 and controlled.  Some got quite good,
 others quite dizzy, but all had fun.
 All of the thrills of UC with none of
 the noise - we flew in a jr. high gym.
 No ARFs in those days.
 Jim Deck

 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model
 Airplane News.  Send subscribe and
 unsubscribe requests to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please
 note that subscribe and unsubscribe
 messages must be sent in text only
 format with MIME turned off.


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.



[RCSE] SanFran Questions

2002-11-01 Thread GRW
I'm done in SF for the next couple of days where do they fly here and also isn't Multiplex around here somewhere? Directions and ideas would be appreciated thanks.--Glenn W.Tri-Cities, WaDo you Yahoo!?
Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site

[RCSE] Makin' wings and lookin' for advice.

2002-11-01 Thread Monkey King
I'm working on a 1m scratchbuild for bombing around on our surly New 
England slopes, and I have a couple of questions.

1: I'd like a semisymmetrical airfoil so I can get some of the speed I've
been missing with my 7037 wings.  However, our lift here is erratic and 
often lighter than I might wish.  What's the liftiest airfoil I could find 
that will still be low-drag?  Please remember that this is a small ship 
and excessive subtlety will be lost in the manufacture.

2: I'd like to have my cores computer cut.  Someone posted to the list a 
couple of months ago about cutting cores, but I've lost the address.  
Could I get a sound-off about who people use?  

-J

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.



RE: [RCSE] Makin' wings and lookin' for advice.

2002-11-01 Thread Bill Swingle
A 1 meter span is pretty small. Your RE#'s will be quite small as well. It's
not a problem necessarily, but you may see some surprises.

Personally, I'd suggest the RG14. It did well for me but I've never tried it
with chord lengths as small as what your planning.

Steve Patton's small warbirds were quite zippy in only moderate lift. Anyone
know what did Steve used?

Bill Swingle
Janesville, CA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.



Re: [RCSE] Alternative to 3M 77

2002-11-01 Thread Steven Bixby
'cept for this part.. (from a warning box near the bottom):

* The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has established new lower
levels of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) and banned the use of some
solvents for certain categories of aerosol products.  This product DOES NOT
comply with the new CARB regulation and is not offered for sale in the State
of California.  For CARB compliant products, please ask to see our new
Shelby product line.

Ok, I'm all for cleaner air, but California is overdoing it - they work so
hard to control the stuff that would have such a minimal effect as to be
pointless.


- Original Message -
From: Tom Broeski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: soaring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 6:59 AM
Subject: Re: [RCSE] Alternative to 3M 77


 Camie works great and is cheaper.

 http://www.camie.com/prod_cat/adh_cat.htm


 Tom


 TG
 32 Mount View Dr
 Afton, VA  22920
 540 943-3356
 fax/  943-4178
 - Original Message -
 From: Roy G Biv [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 7:56 AM
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] Alternative to 3M 77


 
  Any body come up with a reasonable alternative to the old 3M77 yet?
  I'd prefer not to have to brush it on whatever it is.
 
  I like Southern's Sorghum (sp?) from Dave Brown Products.
  Prolly sheeted 10 sets of wings with the stuff, and expect
  to sheet the next ten sets with it.
 
  Water-based (no stink, no fire hazard) contact adhesive.
  Brush-on with disposable foam brush lets you accurately
  control the application rate and amount.
 
  Roy G. Biv, Publisher
  Slope Trash Magazine
  www.slopeflyer.com
 
 
 
 
 
  _
  Broadband? Dial-up? Get reliable MSN Internet Access.
  http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp
 
  RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe
 and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note
that
 subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with
 MIME turned off.
 
 

 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe
and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with
MIME turned off.

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.



Re: [RCSE] Makin' wings and lookin' for advice.

2002-11-01 Thread Brian Chan
At 12:50 PM -0500 11/1/02, Monkey King wrote:

I'm working on a 1m scratchbuild for bombing around on our surly New
England slopes, and I have a couple of questions.


2: I'd like to have my cores computer cut.  Someone posted to the list a
couple of months ago about cutting cores, but I've lost the address.
Could I get a sound-off about who people use? 


However the core is cut, by hand (over template) or comuputer, the 
accuracy come from how you finish the wing. Couple passed of the 
sanding block will send all the accuracy out the window.

Brian
--
Brian Chan,
An Electric Airplane Junkie @ San Mateo.Ca.USA
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


Re: [RCSE] Alternative to 3M 77

2002-11-01 Thread Tom Broeski



I use 300 for general use.
The 303 I use for gluing fabric to 
foam
313 for foam to foam (very flammable and not good 
for you)
373 as a replacement for 3M 77 (won't eat the foam 
like new 77)

I have to buy by the case (24 cans) and will gladly 
resell if anyone is interested. Min order will be three cans and it will 
be a week or so before I have the next case in. Cost varies a bit from 
order to order, but is usually afew dollars less than the 3M brand. 


If you are in a rush, you might be able to get some 
old 77 from here:
http://falconcues.com/13m77.html 
be sure to ask the date of manufacture.

Tom

TG 32 Mount View DrAfton, VA 22920540 
943-3356fax/ 943-4178

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 11:53 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [RCSE] Alternative to 3M 
  77
  In a message dated 
  11/1/02 9:59:52 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  http://www.camie.com/prod_cat/adh_cat.htmTom, 
  what number do you use for foam safe adhesive, and where do you buy 
  it? TIA Bill Grenoble 


Re: [RCSE] Alternative to 3M 77

2002-11-01 Thread Andrew E. Mileski
Steven Bixby wrote:


Ok, I'm all for cleaner air, but California is overdoing it - they 
work so hard to control the stuff that would have such a minimal 
effect as to be pointless.

Oh, and don't forget the warning on servos about the dangers of eating them.

Here in Canada we have things like a different formula of GOOP that 
isn't as flammable, but the alternative solvent used is a known carcinogen.

--
Andrew E. Mileski
Ottawa, Canda

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


[RCSE] Leginair postmortem...

2002-11-01 Thread Jack Womack
We were kicking the parkflyers around real good a
couple of weeks ago. Suddenly, I saw about 300 hours
of work destroy itself...(sniff!)...so I joined the
fray. To those of you that urged me to look
further...my receiver went south. Pure and simple, my
Hitec-RCD-3800 receiver was the cause of the crash.
That's my sad story.

The up side is Delores is letting me order a MOLDIE!!!
That sad expression works, sometimes, (I've practiced
it to perfection..;^)..). Just in time for Christmas!

The Legionair will not be rebuilt...I'm building 2 new
ones, a 140 and a 100, both with carbon spars, for
next year.

Thanks to all who shared their opinions...I should
have known, I was sure sick about it.

Jack Womack

__
Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.



[RCSE] Thanks for V tail advise

2002-11-01 Thread Ed Berris



Thanks to those that sent details of attaching "V" 
tails.
Ed


Re: [RCSE] Leginair postmortem...

2002-11-01 Thread Jim Bacus
At 01:13 PM 11/1/2002, Jack Womack wrote:

The up side is Delores is letting me order a MOLDIE!!!


8-)


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.



[RCSE] Vision for sale

2002-11-01 Thread Stan Koch
Vision 8SP in excellent condition ( just returned from Airtronics for it's
annual check up ). $ 275.00 plus shipping.

STAN KOCH

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.



[RCSE] Airfoil alignment on a scratchbuilt fuse

2002-11-01 Thread Lee Estingoy



Gentlemen,

Scratchbuilding a large scale glider. I've gotten to 
the point of making the wing root fillets. I've got my balsa cut in the shape of 
the root, complete with the center lines courtesy of Compufoil. My 
question is simply: Do I align the center line of the airoil as provided by 
Compufoil with the fore/aft centerline of the fuselage? The obvious 
concern is that I would like the fuselage to be slightly nose down in most 
aspects of the gliding flight.

The airfoil is Eppler 67at the root. 

The glider is an SZD-19 Zefir 4. Not a lot of info 
out there on this ship, but I like the looks. Sorta like an X-1 with some 
growth issues. Not a lot of complex curves.

Info on the full size here - http://www.piotrp.de/SZYBOWCE/dszd31.htm.

Info on a polish model here - hope you can read Polish... 
http://www.piotrp.de/MODELE/zefir4.htm


TIA
Lee Estingoy
Overland Park, KS


[RCSE] Re: 3m 77 substitutes

2002-11-01 Thread MSu1049321

I tried Southern Sorghum, it worked fine, though the ammoniac stink is 
somewhat off-putting, also, last I heard, they don't ship it during the 
winter, as it is very sensitive to freezing cold while in the bottle. That 
info is old, you might want to double-check on it...
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.