[RCSE] Digital Camera - Final Update, I chose the Canon EOS Rebel

2004-11-11 Thread Nathan Woods
I'm astonished that this was such a productive topic on these groups,
but I received a large amount of emails on this topic, and I really
appreciated each and every one of them.  In addition to comments and
opinions, and some excellent reference sites, many people sent me sample
images from the various cameras that I was considering, and these were
very helpful in making an educated and informed decision.

Ultimately my decision was forced on me by an ill-timed and expensive
computer problem. The EOS Rebel with all the gear I needed was $600
cheaper than the Nikon D70. So that's what I went with.

I was really leaning toward the Nikon D70 based on it's phenomenal feel
and speed. But the sample images sent to me by a number of people (boy
did I get a lot of images - thanks guys!), left me a little
disappointed. They weren't quite as crisp as I'm hoping for, and there
was a lot of noise above ISO 800 that I could visually see. Granted,
none of the D70 users I talked to had the very nice pro-level lens with
Vibration Dampening, so perhaps that $2500 lens would have made a
dramatic difference. But since my budget was already forcing the issue,
I felt pretty comfortable going with the Canon and it's $400 dollar
75-300mm Image Stabilized lens, plus the kit lens, a 1GB high-speed CF
card, a bag, spare battery, etc... Did I mention that the EOS now comes
in black (limited edition model), which really helps add a more
professional look to it.

My deliberations about the various cameras are posted here:
http://www.nextstepdesigns.com/blog/2004/11/digital-revolutionor-is-that
-revolt.htm

My final decision is posted in more detail here:
http://www.nextstepdesigns.com/blog/2004/11/digital-resolution.htm

My first photos with this camera are posted here:
http://www.nextstepdesigns.com/blog/2004/11/new-camera-test-photos.htm

Clearly, I have lots to learn with this camera, and I need to get better
at getting sharper images, but for these hand-held shots, I'm pretty
satisfied. Now I just need to get my percentage of keepers somewhere up
above 5% !

Cheers,

Nathan Woods

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


RE: [RCSE] Digital Camera - Final Update, I chose the Canon EOS Rebel

2004-11-11 Thread Ron Kramer
Good choice. Image quality is vastly superior on the Canon's. 
While the Rebel is bottom of the line, it's an incredible value
for the price.  Enjoy
R. Kramer - 30 year pro photographer







Ultimately my decision was forced on me by an ill-timed and expensive
computer problem. The EOS Rebel with all the gear I needed was $600
cheaper than the Nikon D70. So that's what I went with.

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


[RCSE] Foam Worms (Again)

2004-11-11 Thread RegDave
Update on the foam 'worms' question raised several weeks ago. Many helpful  
hints were posted and most have been run to ground. The problem is definitely 
in  retreat so it seemed appropriate to share what's been learned.

One source  of the problem appears to be defects in the foam - either 
inherent or introduced  by me in handling before bagging. When coupled with 
vacuum 
above ~ 15in Hg, the  surface of the foam appears to collapse slightly along 
sinuous tracks, primarily  in the spanwise direction. 
 
Keep in mind that this observation is limited to Foamular 150, which has a  
rated compression strength of ~ 15psi.

Thanks to Phil Barnes for noting  that baking the wax probably wasn't the 
root cause. I've gone back to a single  wax application with no deliberate 
delay 
before bagging and the release is just  fine and the 'worms' appear to be 
relatively unaffected. Subsequent evaluations  indicate the initial favorable 
outcome was fortuitous.

After following  the method in Phil's video in detail, the problem persisted. 
The one exception  I'll note is I mix the epoxy while standing but I doubt 
that's it. 
 
I'll also suggest that using anything less than 4 mil for the release  behind 
the breather is not a good idea - too easy to wrinkle. Those wrinkles  don't 
get through the mylar but it's easier to work with 4 mil or thicker  anyway.

I'll also note that working with anything but 3M77 is a pain -  especially 
when setting up the breather. Photo-Mount adhesive doesn't have the  tack and 
Elmer's spray contact doesn't do much of anything at all. Go with the  good 
stuff.

Suggestions about epoxy mixing and keeping the layup dry were  evaluated. No 
problems there. The layup was so dry that you couldn't really sop  anything 
out of it anyway.

The breather arrangement was worked over some  more. As noted, the method in 
Phil's video is a lot easier than laying down the  layers separately. But all 
breather arrangements seemed to give about the same  result.

Layups were tried with the beds inside and outside the bag. No  difference.

I took a sample to the recent KCSE 'Turkey Fly' (pctures  posted on their web 
site, by the way: http://www.kcse.us/). Jim Frickey  suggested the tracks 
looked a lot like problems he had with defective foam when  he was bagging a 
few 
years ago with Mark LeVoe. Pat McCleave took a look and  thought that might be 
it as well.

So we tried a third batch of foam - and  had the same problem. Following the 
thought that this was mechanical damage,  older samples were hit with a heat 
gun and all the 'worms' popped back out. Now  I've got all these great looking 
samples but still lacking an appropriate  solution!

Meanwhile, lurking in the corner of the basement is the old CST  Mighty 
Mini-Vac which pulls ~ 6in Hg. A vague memory stirs about using this  level of 
vacuum for white beaded foam and obechi and anything higher would cause  
damage. 
Hmmm.

Bottom line - after two cycles of DLG wings with the Mighty  Mini, I've got 
two of the most gorgeous sets wings I've ever made. No  worms, no dents, no 
errors.

I'll allow as how I may have gotten lucky but  one of these wings has the old 
foam in the root and the new foam in the tip and  both sections are in great 
shape.

So a potential solution is excess  pressure for this foam. It is possible - 
maybe even likely - that some of this  may arise from handling, especially when 
de-fuzzing the surface while prepping  the cores. However, a very close 
inspection of the cores after sanding does not  show any obvious dents on the 
surface. If it's handling damage then it's  incipient until enough pressure is 
applied to stress concentrate the weakened  foam in that area. 

A trial was run (at 20in Hg) in which no attempt was  made to clean the core 
surfaces before layup. It had 'worms' also. Another was  run with typical 
handling and sanding but 6in Hg - no worms.
 
As soon as I can get to Tulsa and get some 25psi Dow or Owens product,  we'll 
try it again with full vacuum. However, from others' experience, and the  
comments in Phil's video, this should be successful.
 
Regarding Foamular 150, full vacuum is right at the compressive strength of  
this material. Partial vacuum may be within the variability of the strength of 
 this material in localized pockets. But one result here is that using 6in Hg 
or  thereabouts seems to take care of this problem with this type of foam. 
Since the  core weight is not a large part of the final wing weight, the only 
reason to use  150 is that it's the only thing readily available at hardware 
outlets like Home  Depot (at least in this part of Oklahoma).
 
Thanks for many suggestions from many folks. If this observation is  
significantly at odds with other experience, I'd appreciate comments.
 
- Dave R
 
PS - One solid conclusion - the vacuum bagging process as taught in Phil's  
video is incredibly robust. 
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe 

[RCSE] supplies

2004-11-11 Thread Cheryl and Bill


Greetings!
We are in the process of doing a mess of remodeling of our new
home. Some observations are worth noting.
If you need bits of foam rubber of a nice firmness for packing/protecting
electrical gear in carriers or planes, go talk to the people who install
carpeting. They use foams of 1/4 and thicker for padding and
every job ends up with enough scraps to last the average plane builder a
couple of lifetimes. These scraps are invariable taken to the local
dump and are free for the asking.
The nice man who is making our kitchen cabinets generates in any one
month waste barrels full of small pieces of straight-grained, defect-free
birch or maple. A visit with a bag or small box will net you all
the small chunks of hardwood you'll need for a dozen or more
planes.
Cheers,
Bill

--
The man who follows the crowd will usually get no further than
the crowd. The man who walks alone is likely to find himself
in places no one has ever been. Alan
Ashley-Pitt
Bill Johns  Cheryl Greenstreet
Colton, WA 



[RCSE] Pike Superior For Sale

2004-11-11 Thread kasra_naghshineh

Pike Superior F3J Carbon For Sale New out of the wrappers once for 
pictures. I will post a picture on RCGroups soon.

$1300 can deliver to Sacramento or LA area.

Thanks,

Kasra

P.S. Sorry about the multiple posts on Tragi.



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


[RCSE] FS: Multiplex Profli 4000

2004-11-11 Thread cheeseboy1963

For Sale Multiplex Profli 4000
Like New condition, Latest Software, Side slider added
Ch 24, additional modified Syn module, extra battery pack
Shift selectable
Original manuals and box
All work done by Ernie Pritchard

$625 plus shipping
Please email me for any questions and pictures

Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


RE: [RCSE] Battery food-Charger

2004-11-11 Thread Regis White
Efficient cells like the KAN's do not induce a voltage depression
adequate enough to trip the peak-detect, so the charger keeps pumping in
the current.

That explains why the packs got hot.

The above applies to NiMH cells used for normal(?) operation, as
opposed to
propulsion applications (F5B, etc).

So, is there a truly automatic charger for Efficient NiMH cells?

Regis

-Original Message-
From: Simon Van Leeuwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 5:30 PM
To: Cameron
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RCSE] Battery food-Charger


Since the A4 was released, the charge protocol for NiMH has changed
significantly to better represent the characteristics of the cell
chemistry. If
memory serves (I owned one, then ditched it) only the peak overvoltage
was
dropped by a few mV as compared to the NiCD algorythm.

The current accepted regime for NiMH is similar to:

Stage 1:
Charger algorythm applies a zero (slope) delta, essentially turns off
the
charge phase as soon as the fully charged state is reached (based on a V
value,
no overcharge above rated V). This brings the cell to ~80-90% of rated
capacity
(this value will decrease the more current pushed into the cell, as the
rated V
is reached sooner with an elevated charge V)
Stage 2:
Same charge current (or another lesser rate) is pulsed (duty cycle) to
bring
the cell 95% of rated
Stage 3:
Maintenance rate - same charge current (or another lesser value) is
pulsed
(shorter duty cycle) to maintain a fully charged state.

The above applies to NiMH cells used for normal(?) operation, as opposed
to
propulsion applications (F5B, etc).

Quoting Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 To quote Litco Systems directly from their manual for the Alpha 4
charger:

 PLEASE NOTE: ALL DEVICES ON A-4 EXCEPT W DEVICE ARE INTENDED FOR
NI-CADS.
 ONLY V AND W DEVICES MAY BE USED WITH WET AND GEL CELLS (LEAD-ACID
 BATTERIES). ALL DEVICES EXCEPT A,S W ARE SUITABLE FOR NIMH
BATTERIES
 (NICKEL-METAL-HYDRIDE). TO BE ON THE SAFE SIDE USE ONLY I AND C
CHARGER
 WITH NIMH CELLS.

 :-)  *smile*

 Cameron

 -Original Message-

 Date: Tue,  9 Nov 2004 11:43:28 -0800
 From: Simon Van Leeuwen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] Battery food-Charger
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 That's the probelm with employing a NiCD charger that peak-detects for
NiCD
 instead of NiMH. NiMH are endomthermic, while NiCD technology is
exothermic.

 This means as an NiCD becomes fully charged, the increase in heat
causes an
 increase in internal resistance, which lowers the charge V, which
trips the
 peak-detect circuitry.

 Efficient cells like the KAN's do not induce a voltage depression
adequate
 enough to trip the peak-detect, so the charger keeps pumping in the
current.

 NiCD chargers are great at ruining perfectly good NiMH cells. Then the
cells

 get blamed for poor performance...




RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


Re: [RCSE] NiMH Peak

2004-11-11 Thread Bill Swingle
Efficient cells

Isn't the peak to which we're referring here dependant upon only the
battery chemistry?
Thus, a NiMH will always peak the same?

The rate of charge does change the peak. Particularly the slope. Possibly
this is what they were relying upon to create some promotional verbiage?

Bill Swingle

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


[RCSE] RE: Foam Worms (Again)

2004-11-11 Thread E Wikran
Sorry but I haven't followed this discussion but only read your conclusion
post. I may have been covered butt...

I see that you talk about applying pressure at the edge of compressive
strength of the material. In Norway, and possible the rest of the world, the
compressive strength is given as short time pressure allowing for 10%
deformation in the material. It is also given a long time pressure allowing
for only 2% deformation. The long-time pressure is approximately 30% of the
short time pressure which often is part of the product name. EPS 150 (kpa)
has a long-time strength of 45kpa. Some deformation in the material is bound
to happen when applying pressure and you are maybe applying sufficient
pressure to show some differences in the material, and local parts that get
larger deformations shows up as worms.

Regarding the lengthwise worms, I suspect this is due to the curvature of
the bagging materials. Try to bend a sheet of paper to an airfoil shape (top
surface) and then try to wrinkle it/bending it in the other direction. The
small difference in bending resistance is the reason you only get lengthwise
worms.

Just my humble opinion. Create some nice wings and go out flying.

---
Hilsen / Regards
E. Wikran
Tromso, Norway
---

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


Re: [RCSE] NiMH Peak

2004-11-11 Thread Simon Van Leeuwen

The best way to picture this is to remember that NiCD cell's reistance (R) 
increases when near full charge/fully charged. As a result, for a given current 
(I), and an increase in R, the voltage (V) drops...to the point that the 
algorythm shuts off the charge process (it varies from MFG to MFG, but 
~8mV/cell, which is reduced as cell-count increases).

With NiMH cells, as their internal temperature increases, there is a reduction 
in resistance (up to a point). This is why those who employ NiMH for racing 
purposes (F5B/D cars, etc) like to operate the cells immediately off the 
charger (@ ~50-55C - FWIW can stand to hold in my hand a pack that is at ~60-
65C, but just barely).

So, as a charger with a peak detect designed for NiCD charges a NiMH the 
temperature within the cell rises after reaching a fully charged state (now 
in overcharge), which pushes their internal resistance down, which moves 
further away from the peak detect V, which heats the cell(s) more, which...you 
get the picture I'm sure.

The end result is cells that have eventually kicked off the peak detect, have 
been overcharged...

 
Quoting Bill Swingle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Efficient cells
 
 Isn't the peak to which we're referring here dependant upon only the
 battery chemistry?
 Thus, a NiMH will always peak the same?
 
 The rate of charge does change the peak. Particularly the slope. Possibly
 this is what they were relying upon to create some promotional verbiage?
 
 Bill Swingle
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
 subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME
 turned off.
 


Radius Systems
Cogito Ergo Zoom

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


Re: [RCSE] NiMH Peak

2004-11-11 Thread Simon Van Leeuwen
Forgot to mention, actually the rate of charge does effect actual peak 
detection on quality (key word here) chargers. It's a give and take scenario, 
the more cells in the pack means one has to be a little more conservative by 
reducing the peak-detect value (in mV/cell - designed into the algorythm). 

This is so to alleviate inconsistancies from cell to cell (at start of charge, 
every cell in a pack is gauranteed to be sitting at differing V), which would 
have one or more cells reaching capacity before others, and being slightly 
overcharged as the rest catch up.

I tolerate chargers with options for NiMH, but still employ the peak-detect 
method, essentially the designer has reduced the mV/cell to, say, ~4-5mV, or as 
the Triton does, leaves it up to the end-user to set any value they desire. The 
reason I tolerate them is that I monitor my packs...and take the time to 
understand them (we go for coffee regularly :^). I like the fact that when to 
ceases charging, I have a full pack which has been knowingly abused with the 
understanding and acceptance of loss of cell life.

The algorythm I spoke of the other day nicely charges the cells, but when it 
kicks off, the pack is not full...yet. You must them wait a lengthy (too 
lengthy for me) period of time for the cells to go through maybe two more 
stages to reach actual peak... 



Quoting Bill Swingle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Efficient cells
 
 Isn't the peak to which we're referring here dependant upon only the
 battery chemistry?
 Thus, a NiMH will always peak the same?
 
 The rate of charge does change the peak. Particularly the slope. Possibly
 this is what they were relying upon to create some promotional verbiage?
 
 Bill Swingle
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
 subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME
 turned off.
 


Radius Systems
Cogito Ergo Zoom

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


[RCSE] STYLUS Transmitter For Sale

2004-11-11 Thread Barrett Stridiron
Up for sale is my Stylus transmitter. I bought it from a fellow on RCU in
January, 2001. Other than the usual scuffs on its bottom the radio is in
excellent shape.

I've upgraded the TX pack to 1650 mAh. The Stylus is a bit of a battery hog,
and the stock 700 mAh pack would die after a couple hours of usage. With the
1650 NIMH pack I can fly all day without recharging!

Included is a module on channel 18, the blue-and-white logoed neckstrap and
the original manual.

No servos, receivers or chargers are included.

Asking $200 for everything.

Email for quickest response!


 -==- Barrett


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


[RCSE] Dream catcher close out sales

2004-11-11 Thread KEVIN KAVANEY

Roy Simpson has some personal kits he is selling at reasonable prices
ie  Grand Espirit for  $300.00, Grand Aquila etc.
check it out.
www.dchobby.com
sorry to see another resource go away.

KEVIN KAVANEY
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


Re: [RCSE] Dream catcher close out sales

2004-11-11 Thread Jeff Gortatowsky

--- KEVIN KAVANEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 sorry to see another resource go away.

Me too. 

Look, I know people hate this but the fact is he was a rude intolerant jerk
to his customers and to his *potential* customers. Sounds like a great
business plan to me?  NOT. And I hope I *did* cost him sales here on the net.
Business people need to learn it's not just ONE customer's money they throw
away. Either hire someone with a personality to do your customer service,
take a charm course, or suffer the consequences.


Sorry to see his kits, but not him, go.

Obviously YMMV greatly,
J
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


RE: [RCSE] Foam Worms (Again)/thoughts about vacuum

2004-11-11 Thread Phil Barnes
There are still mysterious and unexplanable things going on with your
bagging efforts. I'll just give you some more observations from my bagging
experience and I won't try to reconcile it with your experiences.

Back in the dark ages, around 1994 when I learned how to do vac bagging, I
was taught to use Dow grey foam and I wasn't taught to use a regulator on my
vacuum pump. Grey foam is about as punky (my word) as extruded foam gets,
about the same as Foamular 150, actually. My vacuum pump in those days (and
today too) could pull about 26 ( one atmosphere =about 30 for any
eurodudes reading this). I figure I must have made a few hundred wings for
Frank Weston, all from grey foam and all subjected to the full fury of my
unregulated continuous duty vacuum pump.

Today I still use a continuous duty vacuum pump without a regulator. I do
use a bleed valve, however, when I use any foam lighter than Foamular 600/Hi
Load 60/ spyder foam. I crack open the bleed valve until I get about 22 on
my vacuum gauge. To this day I still don't bag anything with less than 22
of vacuum. It is my experience that lots of things turn out better with lots
of vacuum and not much that's bad happens with lots of vacuum.

The foam I use today is exclusively Foamular 250 and Foamular 600. I agree
that it makes no sense to use Foamular 150 or the equivalent blue foam (Dow
score board) if Foamular 250 or Dow square edge are available. There is
almost no difference in weight but a noticeable difference in strength.

In all of my high-vacuum bagging experience I have never seen a foam worm.
So for me, the mystery remains.

My main purpose for this post is to avoid the beginning or propagation of a
mythology about the hazards of high vacuum in the vac bagging of foam core
wings.

Phil



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


Re: [RCSE] Dream catcher close out sales

2004-11-11 Thread Chuck Anderson
I first met Jim Simpson at the 1995 Nats.  We shared a tent and spent many 
hours watching the rain and discussing his plans to manufacture classic 
sailplane kits.  He had a custom giant scale sailplane that he was selling 
and had just completed the first run of 50 Sailaire kits.  I had just 
started flying my Sailaire again when the Nats started including 
Nostalgia.  I bought one of the first 50 kits to have a backup just in case 
my Sailaire came to an untimely end.  The kit was much better than the 
original Tom Williams Sailaire that I built back in 1978.  I found Roy to 
be very pleasant to deal with and know many people who have had equally 
high opinions.  For several years, Roy contributed heavily to the workers 
raffle for the Nats.  I haven't seen Roy since he quit attending the 
Nats.  Wonder how much having to deal with obnoxious customers had to do 
with his decision  to get out of the kit manufacturing business.  Whatever 
the cause, we have lost another kit manufacturer.  Wonder who will be the 
next to go.

Chuck Anderson
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.