Re: [RCSE] RES vs UNL vs DLG

2008-08-04 Thread Keith McLellan
I once got a several guys to build one or more Skeeters, and we all modified 
them so that there was not even one in the group that was stock.  We flew 
the heck out of them all that summer and had more fun thermalling, sloping 
tree lines and backyard walls... it was really great.


Mentioning that model sure brings back some fun memories!

- Original Message - 
From: Bill's Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Cc: RCSE soaring@airage.com
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: [RCSE] RES vs UNL vs DLG


I think it is abundantly clear the path that is needed to be taken in 
soaring to restore it to all its glory.  Yes, I am talking about the 
complete prohibition of all but one aircraft from soaring competition.


The one and only aircraft that shall be used is the venerable Skeeter, and 
it MUST be built by the pilot. This will restore the need for building 
skills and also positively determine who the best pilot is. Anyone who can 
keep a Skeeter aloft from more than a few minutes truly is a a soaring 
God!!


So there it is, the salvation of soaring is the Skeeter. Who'd a thunk 
it??


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe 
and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note 
that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format 
with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and 
AOL are generally NOT in text format




RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] unsubscribing

2004-10-21 Thread Keith McLellan



Thanks to all who pointed out to me that my email was formatted in 
HTML/RTF. I thought I had my default set to plain text. Problem is 
now solved and am leaving the list for the winter while I get my new business up 
and running (not enough time to deal with R/C of any kind for the next couple of 
months). See ya all in Phoenix area in Feb.

Keith McLellan
Northampton, PA


Re: [RCSE] Security issues and R/C models

2004-10-17 Thread Keith McLellan




Martin,

Didn't mean to sound too serious in my previous reply, but it's just that I 
know what can be done with something like a model airplane, and I was really 
only responding to people's complaints about their model flying activities being 
curtailed temporarily when a security-sensitive "asset" is nearby. I am 
definitely against anything like our club flying fields being closed permanently 
for misguided security concerns!

Also, I think we can all be as accurate as needed if we're trying to 
bullseye our timers!!! LOL!!!

Keith 


Re: [RCSE] V-tails, Euro-moldies suck for....

2001-04-13 Thread Keith McLellan

That's why I love my Sharon Profi!!!  It has plenty of tail volume, a more
acute angle between the tails and handles like a dream for such a big plane!
Thermals out from a hand-launch pretty well, too!

Keith McLellan
Hawaii

- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 12:25 PM
Subject: Re: [RCSE] V-tails, Euro-moldies suck for


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Any one have comments on how the recent trend of light weight V-tail
  Euro-molded ships handle in a TD contest?  Always hearing they don't
  fair
  well in the landing task.  But then again the earlier ships were much
  heavier with higher wing loading.
  V-tails suck for landings Heavy planes suck for landings...
  Compared to full flying stabs on light airplanes..
 

 The real issue is design.  Most of the european V-tails are not designed
 to provide enough control authority.  If they made the tail bigger and
 decreased the angle between the tails they would be much better.

 Put some current conventional tail models into Plane Geometry and then
 put in some of the European designs.  Look at the numbers.
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe"
and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Hawaii Pilots are Lucky

2001-03-27 Thread Keith McLellan

For those of you interested in F3F racing, there is a move on to try to
secure a site on Maui for the 2002 Viking Race (kinda the unofficial F3F
World Championship).  If we pull it off, who's coming?

Keith McLellan
Hawaii
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Swingle" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 5:56 AM
Subject: [RCSE] Hawaii Pilots are Lucky


 The slope pilots in Hawaii are driving me crazy. Bikini babes, whales in
the
 background, beautiful slopes, wind all the time, great temperatures... It
 ain't fair!

 Bill Swingle
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Janesville, CA


 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe"
and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] A note of interest for the F3J guys.

2001-03-27 Thread Keith McLellan

These are the kind of thoughts I had when I first read the post about the
rule change.  Flying in my one and only F3J contest a few years ago in
England with a local club northeast of London, I saw that the most
competitive pilots were flying very light weight, long-span gliders, towed
up on light, stretchy mono (and where possible by guys who could run fast
and were not all that big).  They were using one-man tows, straight ahead,
no pulleys, etc.

Keith McLellan
Hawaii

- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "James V. Bacus" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 8:34 PM
Subject: Re: [RCSE] A note of interest for the F3J guys.


 I think there is no easy solution and banning tethered lines in very
 understandable to prevent similiar accidents in the future.
 For those not familiar with F3J towing (many in the US): you only have 5
 minutes to run out on the field, stake your lines, and prepare before the
 flight.  This process is often hurried and introduces some very real
 dangers.

 So, If everyone uses two towmen pulling straight (without a pulley) will
it
 change the competitive advantage of having two big  and strong guys?
Kinda,
 in no wind to light wind situations you will want towmen that can run fast
 as well. They won't need to be quite as big because they now only have the
 tension of the plane, not 2X.  The difference between "good" towmen and
 "bad" towmen will be more noticeable when not using a pulley, especially
in
 light conditions.

 Since you won't be able to get line speed needed in no wind/light wind
 conditons having a specialized "light air" plane in your 3 airplane quiver
 would  be advantagous (more so than previously) to make the most of the
 tension you do have.

 Does this change the weight of the line you would use?  Maybe,  I might
try
 something extra light and stretchy in those no/light wind situations.

 Did I miss any possible stratedgy changes this might introduce?


 Mark Taylor
 Tower for Team US and Team Ukraine at 2000 World Champs.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 - Original Message -
 From: "James V. Bacus" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 5:10 PM
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] A note of interest for the F3J guys ( gals, if
 appropro.)


  This does not sound well thought out...
 
  In the two man option the man who runs with the pulley is gonna get
 WHAPPED
  HARD if the man who is acting as the "spike" looses grip.
 
  Tows with out a staked in pulley, if even by two average men takes about
  twice the exertion to even getting close to what we think of as a
  competitive tow.  Time for a different set of models now, and damn is
that
  expensive.
 
  I personally liked it the way it was, maybe they should have spec'ed the
  equipment we should use or something a bit less drastic.
 
  Jim
 
 
  At 04:26 PM 3/25/2001, Les Grammer wrote:
  Off of the FAI exchange came the following announcement:
  _
  
  British Association of Radio Control Soarers
  Thanks to Nick Neve UK delegate to CIAM Meeting for the information
  and to Chris Bishop, Chairman of BMFA SFTC who wrote the following:-
  
  Major change.
  
  With immediate effect as of Monday 26th March the F3B  F3J rules will
  prohibit the tethering to the ground of any hand towline while towing.
  
  Two man towing is still is OK, as is the use of pulleys. Winch
turnaround
  pulleys and bungee stakes are not affected by this ruling.
  
  Although this was not on the published CIAM agenda it was obvious that
 the
  subject of stakes and pulley towing was going to be discussed following
 the
  tragic death last year in Slovakia. This change has been introduced on
 the
  grounds of safety following that event.
  
  There had been late proposal from the Swiss backed by various other
  countries to introduce winches. It was unanimously (nearly) felt that
  banning the stake was a better solution and that F3J would not loses
it's
  identity as a hand towed only event.
  
  For those able to get out and practice it gives you something to think
  about. Quite a few fliers have already come to realise that in windy
  conditions there is little to be gained from using a pulley and that a
  straight two man tow gives equal if not better results.
  
  In calm/light wind conditions one tower will now act as the stake but
 with
  the option of increasing the line speed by moving away from the tower
 with
  the pulley.
  
  There were no other major changes.
  
  Full details will be posted on the FAI web-site next week.
  
  There will also be a statement issued on participation in non FAI
  sanctioned International events. There's nothing new here but it will
  clarify the situation.
  
  Chris Bishop
  Chairman SFTC
  
  
  
  -Les Grammer, NWSS
  
  RCSE-List facilities provided by Model A

Re: [RCSE] beauty is only skin deep.

2001-02-27 Thread Keith McLellan

Hey there, Karlton.  I'm with you!  Look at the intro to the LSF site.  It
refers to the aesthetic beauty of soaring in the opening lines: "A slim,
graceful, long-winged craft arcs upward smoothly and steeply into the summer
sky, accompanied only by the faint whistle of air accelerating past its
gleaming surfaces.".  While Bill is correct in stating that you don't
get points for your glider's "looks" in a contest, you will earn the
admiration of your fellow pilots for a clean, well built and beautifully
finished model, regardless of type!  Some of the lightest, strongest and
best engineered models I've seen, and that includes good 'ol fashioned built
up models, were also the most beautifully finished models.  It shows a real
attention to detail and a striving for technical excellence when someone
goes to the trouble of engineering and then finishing a plane so that it
looks as good as it flies, two goals that are not often compatible.
Besides, a good looking plane is jus' w cl...   :-)

Keith M
Hawaii

- Original Message -
From: "Bill Johns" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 4:39 PM
Subject: [RCSE] beauty is only skin deep.


 At 06:22 PM 2/26/2001 -0800, Karlton Spindle wrote:

   This is an aesthetic sport and L@@KS do count...

 ...for what?  They give points for time, sometimes for speed around
pylons,
 sometimes for precision landings.  I've not seen anyone, anywhere give
 beauty points.

 And if you don't pile on gobs of paint, the plane will weigh less and go
 higher and you can't tell it's ugly when it's 500 feet over your head.

 Bill

 --
 There is no such thing as a pretty good alligator wrestler.

 Bill Johns
 Pullman, WA

 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe"
and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] SouthWest Classic 2001 - Team 'N Sink Picture Pages

2001-02-26 Thread Keith McLellan

Skip's photos are great, but does anyone have any photos of the whole group?
There are a bunch of us that are cut off on the right of the group photos on
Skip's page.

Keith M
Hawaii

- Original Message -
From: "Skip Richards" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2001 11:50 PM
Subject: [RCSE] SouthWest Classic 2001 - Team 'N Sink Picture Pages


Team 'N Sink had a great time at this year's SWC...  Finally got the
new Hera flying (Just barely, like the day before!) First round was
literally the first time it had been winch launched... had about 20
launches off my super highstart the day before.  So, we had a pop-off,
and spent a couple of rounds getting the plane tuned...
Watch out next year!

Hope you enjoy the pictures:
http://members.home.com/skip.richards/swc01/page_01.htm
http://members.home.com/skip.richards/swc01/page_02.htm

BTW, Netscape seems to read these pages ok, but I checked with MS IE
and had trouble with Page_01.  Let me know if anyone experiences the
problems I did with IE having trouble with the links on the bottom of
the first page.

Check out JOE WURTZ in the big group photo - His sailplane looks like
it's balanced on his finger tips and is a good foot higher than the
rest of the crowd - and he's NOT that tall - no offence Joe!

Skip "Team 'N Sink" Richards


+---+
** **
**Skip Richards - WB7VXM   **
** Phoenix, AZ **
** AMA  536167 **
** **
** http://members.home.net/skip.richards/  **
** **
+---+
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] SouthWest Classic 2001 - Team 'N Sink Picture Pages

2001-02-26 Thread Keith McLellan

My apologies to Skip!  In my haste to view evrything on his site, it never
occurred to me to scroll horizontally when viewing the panoramic group
shots!!  Great photos, Skip!!  However, for some reason, when I click on the
first ("full size") photo link, it won't load for me, though all the others
do.

Keith M
Hawaii

- Original Message -
From: "Skip Richards" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Keith McLellan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 8:07 AM
Subject: Re: [RCSE] SouthWest Classic 2001 - Team 'N Sink Picture Pages


Keith, not sure what you mean... Are you talking about the panorama
group shot.  If so, scroll to the right... they're there!  If it's
another shot, let me know what the caption says and I'll go check it
out on the original picture.
Skip
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001 08:00:06 -1000, you wrote:

Skip's photos are great, but does anyone have any photos of the whole
group?
There are a bunch of us that are cut off on the right of the group photos
on
Skip's page.

Keith M
Hawaii



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Crossing the launch area....

2001-02-18 Thread Keith McLellan

"Circling in the launch area is dumb, dangerous, and
selfish.  On rare occasions, it may be necessary to cross the launch area
when out of lift, altitude, and ideas but the pilot does so at his own
risk."  -Chuck Anderson


and at risk to everyone else trying to launch, too!  It is never
"necessary" to cross the launch area at low altitude.  Just "be a man", :-)
and accept that you blew it and land out instead of selfishly delaying the
launch cycle, risking a midair or fouled winch line or even possible injury
to others.  A pilot should be smart enough to know when it's time to head
out if he or she is working a part of the sky that places the launch area
between the glider and the landing area.

Keith M
Hawaii


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] highstart and backside air

2000-12-20 Thread Keith McLellan

Dieter,

I'll just make sure to bring my toxic waste disposal gloves and maybe an
anti-radiation suit for good measure!

Keith


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Fw: [RCSE] Landings: a complete waste of time?

2000-12-20 Thread Keith McLellan


- Original Message -
From: "Keith McLellan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Dennis Phelan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 10:33 PM
Subject: Re: [RCSE] Landings: "a complete waste of time"?


 Dudes,
 I'm not a skeg guy but you're missing one point.
 How many seconds was he off the "Mark" when he touched down?

 Dennis

 Milt was off 8 sec on his worst attempt, and probably on average about 3
to
 4 secs.  Mine were on average within 2 secs.  That's stopping the time on
 touchdown, not when the model stopped sliding, though at best that was
only
 1 to 3 sec.  Why doesn't everyone just go out and TRY it?  I'm sure you'll
 be pleasantly surprised!

 Keith M
 Hawaii



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] (RCSE) Landings, etc., etc.......

2000-12-20 Thread Keith McLellan

I'm planning on holding a TD contest sometime next year with a precision
landing task that will be a "real" test of skill: a 1.5m wide "runway" that
is 7m long - if the nose of the model stops anywhere in the first 2m it's
25pts., in the second it's 50pts, in the 3rd it's 75pts. and in the last
meter 100pts., with a big ZERO for going past the end of the runway or for
landing "short".  Now for the real "ba--buster"!  The ENTIRE fuselage of the
model (includes the bottom of the trailing edge of the rudder) must rest
within the 1.5m lateral boundaries of the runway!  So that means no coming
in from the side, or landing outside and spinning or sliding your nose into
the box.  Won't work here.  You'll have to be able to accurately fly your
plane precisely down a centerline to a controlled landing.  If there is a
crosswind, well then you better know how to coordinate rudder and ailerons
properly (gee, we have to do that with power planes all the time).  Too much
of a challenge?  Oh, well.  There's a bunch of guys in SoCal that have been
doing this for years with slope gliders of all kinds, without the benefit of
flaps or "crow", etc. and going a lot faster than most TD ships will ever
have to on landing.  Now, that's just the landing task!  The soaring tasks
will be just as creative!  First round is a 7 min "warm up" duration with
the precision landing, with 1pt per second deducted for up to 10 sec off the
mark, and 2pt per sec for 11 up to 20 sec off, and finally, 3pt per sec for
anything over 20 sec off the mark.  The second round will consist of a 12
min task and precision landing, with the same scoring.  The third will be a
10 min task with precision landing, but will have the added challenge of
having a prescribed path to be flown after launch before being able to chase
thermals (and yes, that means if you fly through a thermal before you
complete that path, you just have to keep going until you reach the "release
point" at the end of that flight path).  The flight path chosen will be very
easy to fly and to enforce, and relatively short.  So there you have it
folks!  Anyone interested in competing in such an event, email me offline.
I'd like to hold this contest someplace in SoCal this summer, but I'll
consider going to any field in the country and CDing it personally, with
support from any club willing to host it!  The contest could be flown as a
two day "IronMan" event with additional tasks that I have thought of to test
the all around skills of the pilots involved.  Any takers?

Keith M
Hawaii

...have jet, will travel.


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]