Re: Another RC
On Oct 26, 2009, at 4:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: So, just to clarify, here's the plan as I understand it: 1. Put up a 1.4.0 RC today w/ 2.9.1-RC2 2. Commence vote on 1.4.0 3. Once 2.9.1 is finalized, replace in Solr and generate final artifacts We also must make sure the maven pom.xml points to the right place. (currently it still points to 2.9... not the solr specific ones) 4. Release Is that correct? This basically works on the assumption that the only thing that has changed between 2.9.1-RC2 and 2.9.1 final is the name of the jars. If that is the case, I'm fine w/ this process. sounds good. Thanks Grant! -Grant On Oct 19, 2009, at 5:57 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: OK, so let's do the following: as soon as the Lucene 2.9.1 official RC is put up (the one that will be voted on), I'll update Solr and we can do our vote at the same time, saving 3 or 4 days... this release has really been held up long enough :-) We can re-evaluate what to do if for some reason the Lucene vote doesn't pass (i.e., we won't blindly release Solr if the lucene vote fails). Hopefully everyone has looked at the latest Solr distributions for any potential showstoppers that would cause them to vote -1 during the official vote. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Walter Underwood > wrote: Please wait for an official release of Lucene. It makes thing SO much easier when you need to dig into the Lucene code. It is well worth a week delay. wunder On Oct 19, 2009, at 10:27 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll > wrote: Are we ready for a release? +1 I don't think we need to wait for Lucene 2.9.1 - we have all the fixes in our version, and there's little point in pushing things off yet another week. Seems like the next RC should be a *real* one (i.e. no RC label in the version, immediately call a VOTE). -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com I got busy at work and haven't been able to address things as much, but it seems like things are progressing. Shall I generate another RC or are we waiting for Lucene 2.9.1? If we go w/ the 2.9.1-dev, then we just need to restore the Maven stuff for them. Hopefully, that stuff was just commented out and not completely removed so as to make it a little easier to restore. -Grant
Re: Another RC
On Oct 26, 2009, at 4:05 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: So, just to clarify, here's the plan as I understand it: 1. Put up a 1.4.0 RC today w/ 2.9.1-RC2 Yes, ASAP please :-) 2. Commence vote on 1.4.0 3. Once 2.9.1 is finalized, replace in Solr and generate final artifacts If the lucene vote succeeds, we have the final artifacts already, and we won't change anything. What you put up today will most likely be the *exact* bits/files we release. So updates to CHANGES/README should be made and a branch should be created, and the Solr RC built from that. Yep, I was originally thinking the Lucene bits were named something other than what the final bits would be named, but they are not. They are, in fact, the final bits.
Re: Another RC
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > So, just to clarify, here's the plan as I understand it: > > 1. Put up a 1.4.0 RC today w/ 2.9.1-RC2 Yes, ASAP please :-) > 2. Commence vote on 1.4.0 > 3. Once 2.9.1 is finalized, replace in Solr and generate final artifacts If the lucene vote succeeds, we have the final artifacts already, and we won't change anything. What you put up today will most likely be the *exact* bits/files we release. So updates to CHANGES/README should be made and a branch should be created, and the Solr RC built from that. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: Another RC
So, just to clarify, here's the plan as I understand it: 1. Put up a 1.4.0 RC today w/ 2.9.1-RC2 2. Commence vote on 1.4.0 3. Once 2.9.1 is finalized, replace in Solr and generate final artifacts 4. Release Is that correct? This basically works on the assumption that the only thing that has changed between 2.9.1-RC2 and 2.9.1 final is the name of the jars. If that is the case, I'm fine w/ this process. -Grant On Oct 19, 2009, at 5:57 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: OK, so let's do the following: as soon as the Lucene 2.9.1 official RC is put up (the one that will be voted on), I'll update Solr and we can do our vote at the same time, saving 3 or 4 days... this release has really been held up long enough :-) We can re-evaluate what to do if for some reason the Lucene vote doesn't pass (i.e., we won't blindly release Solr if the lucene vote fails). Hopefully everyone has looked at the latest Solr distributions for any potential showstoppers that would cause them to vote -1 during the official vote. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Walter Underwood > wrote: Please wait for an official release of Lucene. It makes thing SO much easier when you need to dig into the Lucene code. It is well worth a week delay. wunder On Oct 19, 2009, at 10:27 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll > wrote: Are we ready for a release? +1 I don't think we need to wait for Lucene 2.9.1 - we have all the fixes in our version, and there's little point in pushing things off yet another week. Seems like the next RC should be a *real* one (i.e. no RC label in the version, immediately call a VOTE). -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com I got busy at work and haven't been able to address things as much, but it seems like things are progressing. Shall I generate another RC or are we waiting for Lucene 2.9.1? If we go w/ the 2.9.1-dev, then we just need to restore the Maven stuff for them. Hopefully, that stuff was just commented out and not completely removed so as to make it a little easier to restore. -Grant
Re: Another RC
Will do once I have a Lucene RC. On Oct 25, 2009, at 3:59 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: If all goes well in lucene-land 2.9.1 should start a vote on Monday sometime... I've recently tested the latest stable Jetty (6.1.21) ... so we can avoid some duplication, has anyone tested with the latest tomcat, resin, or other popular servlet containers? -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: OK, so let's do the following: as soon as the Lucene 2.9.1 official RC is put up (the one that will be voted on), I'll update Solr and we can do our vote at the same time, saving 3 or 4 days... this release has really been held up long enough :-) We can re-evaluate what to do if for some reason the Lucene vote doesn't pass (i.e., we won't blindly release Solr if the lucene vote fails). Hopefully everyone has looked at the latest Solr distributions for any potential showstoppers that would cause them to vote -1 during the official vote. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Walter Underwood > wrote: Please wait for an official release of Lucene. It makes thing SO much easier when you need to dig into the Lucene code. It is well worth a week delay. wunder On Oct 19, 2009, at 10:27 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll > wrote: Are we ready for a release? +1 I don't think we need to wait for Lucene 2.9.1 - we have all the fixes in our version, and there's little point in pushing things off yet another week. Seems like the next RC should be a *real* one (i.e. no RC label in the version, immediately call a VOTE). -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com I got busy at work and haven't been able to address things as much, but it seems like things are progressing. Shall I generate another RC or are we waiting for Lucene 2.9.1? If we go w/ the 2.9.1-dev, then we just need to restore the Maven stuff for them. Hopefully, that stuff was just commented out and not completely removed so as to make it a little easier to restore. -Grant -- Grant Ingersoll http://www.lucidimagination.com/ Search the Lucene ecosystem (Lucene/Solr/Nutch/Mahout/Tika/Droids) using Solr/Lucene: http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
Re: Another RC
: I've recently tested the latest stable Jetty (6.1.21) ... so we can : avoid some duplication, has anyone tested with the latest tomcat, : resin, or other popular servlet containers? I've done some basic testing on apache-tomcat-6.0.20 -- nothing strenuous, but basic functionality all seemed to work fine. -Hoss
Re: Another RC
So far so good on Resin 3.0.x (that's not the latest version of Resin). Bill On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote: > I've been testing with jetty 7.0.0.v20091005, and everything works good so > far.. > > > > On Oct 25, 2009, at 3:59 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > > If all goes well in lucene-land 2.9.1 should start a vote on Monday >> sometime... >> >> I've recently tested the latest stable Jetty (6.1.21) ... so we can >> avoid some duplication, has anyone tested with the latest tomcat, >> resin, or other popular servlet containers? >> >> -Yonik >> http://www.lucidimagination.com >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Yonik Seeley >> wrote: >> >>> OK, so let's do the following: as soon as the Lucene 2.9.1 official RC >>> is put up (the one that will be voted on), I'll update Solr and we can >>> do our vote at the same time, saving 3 or 4 days... this release has >>> really been held up long enough :-) >>> >>> We can re-evaluate what to do if for some reason the Lucene vote >>> doesn't pass (i.e., we won't blindly release Solr if the lucene vote >>> fails). >>> >>> Hopefully everyone has looked at the latest Solr distributions for any >>> potential showstoppers that would cause them to vote -1 during the >>> official vote. >>> >>> -Yonik >>> http://www.lucidimagination.com >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Walter Underwood >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Please wait for an official release of Lucene. It makes thing SO much >>>> easier >>>> when you need to dig into the Lucene code. >>>> >>>> It is well worth a week delay. >>>> >>>> wunder >>>> >>>> On Oct 19, 2009, at 10:27 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll >>>> > >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Are we ready for a release? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> I don't think we need to wait for Lucene 2.9.1 - we have all the fixes >>>>> in our version, and there's little point in pushing things off yet >>>>> another week. >>>>> >>>>> Seems like the next RC should be a *real* one (i.e. no RC label in the >>>>> version, immediately call a VOTE). >>>>> >>>>> -Yonik >>>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com >>>>> >>>>> I got busy at work and haven't been able to >>>>>> address things as much, but it seems like things are progressing. >>>>>> >>>>>> Shall I generate another RC or are we waiting for Lucene 2.9.1? If we >>>>>> go >>>>>> w/ >>>>>> the 2.9.1-dev, then we just need to restore the Maven stuff for them. >>>>>> Hopefully, that stuff was just commented out and not completely >>>>>> removed >>>>>> so >>>>>> as to make it a little easier to restore. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Grant >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >
Re: Another RC
I've been testing with jetty 7.0.0.v20091005, and everything works good so far.. On Oct 25, 2009, at 3:59 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: If all goes well in lucene-land 2.9.1 should start a vote on Monday sometime... I've recently tested the latest stable Jetty (6.1.21) ... so we can avoid some duplication, has anyone tested with the latest tomcat, resin, or other popular servlet containers? -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: OK, so let's do the following: as soon as the Lucene 2.9.1 official RC is put up (the one that will be voted on), I'll update Solr and we can do our vote at the same time, saving 3 or 4 days... this release has really been held up long enough :-) We can re-evaluate what to do if for some reason the Lucene vote doesn't pass (i.e., we won't blindly release Solr if the lucene vote fails). Hopefully everyone has looked at the latest Solr distributions for any potential showstoppers that would cause them to vote -1 during the official vote. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Walter Underwood > wrote: Please wait for an official release of Lucene. It makes thing SO much easier when you need to dig into the Lucene code. It is well worth a week delay. wunder On Oct 19, 2009, at 10:27 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll > wrote: Are we ready for a release? +1 I don't think we need to wait for Lucene 2.9.1 - we have all the fixes in our version, and there's little point in pushing things off yet another week. Seems like the next RC should be a *real* one (i.e. no RC label in the version, immediately call a VOTE). -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com I got busy at work and haven't been able to address things as much, but it seems like things are progressing. Shall I generate another RC or are we waiting for Lucene 2.9.1? If we go w/ the 2.9.1-dev, then we just need to restore the Maven stuff for them. Hopefully, that stuff was just commented out and not completely removed so as to make it a little easier to restore. -Grant
Re: Another RC
If all goes well in lucene-land 2.9.1 should start a vote on Monday sometime... I've recently tested the latest stable Jetty (6.1.21) ... so we can avoid some duplication, has anyone tested with the latest tomcat, resin, or other popular servlet containers? -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > OK, so let's do the following: as soon as the Lucene 2.9.1 official RC > is put up (the one that will be voted on), I'll update Solr and we can > do our vote at the same time, saving 3 or 4 days... this release has > really been held up long enough :-) > > We can re-evaluate what to do if for some reason the Lucene vote > doesn't pass (i.e., we won't blindly release Solr if the lucene vote > fails). > > Hopefully everyone has looked at the latest Solr distributions for any > potential showstoppers that would cause them to vote -1 during the > official vote. > > -Yonik > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Walter Underwood > wrote: >> Please wait for an official release of Lucene. It makes thing SO much easier >> when you need to dig into the Lucene code. >> >> It is well worth a week delay. >> >> wunder >> >> On Oct 19, 2009, at 10:27 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Are we ready for a release? >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> I don't think we need to wait for Lucene 2.9.1 - we have all the fixes >>> in our version, and there's little point in pushing things off yet >>> another week. >>> >>> Seems like the next RC should be a *real* one (i.e. no RC label in the >>> version, immediately call a VOTE). >>> >>> -Yonik >>> http://www.lucidimagination.com >>> >>>> I got busy at work and haven't been able to >>>> address things as much, but it seems like things are progressing. >>>> >>>> Shall I generate another RC or are we waiting for Lucene 2.9.1? If we go >>>> w/ >>>> the 2.9.1-dev, then we just need to restore the Maven stuff for them. >>>> Hopefully, that stuff was just commented out and not completely removed >>>> so >>>> as to make it a little easier to restore. >>>> >>>> -Grant >>> >> >> >
Re: Another RC
+1 on the Solr 1.4 voting process being parallel to that of Lucene 2.9.1. Bill On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > OK, so let's do the following: as soon as the Lucene 2.9.1 official RC > is put up (the one that will be voted on), I'll update Solr and we can > do our vote at the same time, saving 3 or 4 days... this release has > really been held up long enough :-) > > We can re-evaluate what to do if for some reason the Lucene vote > doesn't pass (i.e., we won't blindly release Solr if the lucene vote > fails). > > Hopefully everyone has looked at the latest Solr distributions for any > potential showstoppers that would cause them to vote -1 during the > official vote. > > -Yonik > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Walter Underwood > wrote: > > Please wait for an official release of Lucene. It makes thing SO much > easier > > when you need to dig into the Lucene code. > > > > It is well worth a week delay. > > > > wunder > > > > On Oct 19, 2009, at 10:27 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Are we ready for a release? > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> I don't think we need to wait for Lucene 2.9.1 - we have all the fixes > >> in our version, and there's little point in pushing things off yet > >> another week. > >> > >> Seems like the next RC should be a *real* one (i.e. no RC label in the > >> version, immediately call a VOTE). > >> > >> -Yonik > >> http://www.lucidimagination.com > >> > >>> I got busy at work and haven't been able to > >>> address things as much, but it seems like things are progressing. > >>> > >>> Shall I generate another RC or are we waiting for Lucene 2.9.1? If we > go > >>> w/ > >>> the 2.9.1-dev, then we just need to restore the Maven stuff for them. > >>> Hopefully, that stuff was just commented out and not completely > removed > >>> so > >>> as to make it a little easier to restore. > >>> > >>> -Grant > >> > > > > >
Re: Another RC
OK, so let's do the following: as soon as the Lucene 2.9.1 official RC is put up (the one that will be voted on), I'll update Solr and we can do our vote at the same time, saving 3 or 4 days... this release has really been held up long enough :-) We can re-evaluate what to do if for some reason the Lucene vote doesn't pass (i.e., we won't blindly release Solr if the lucene vote fails). Hopefully everyone has looked at the latest Solr distributions for any potential showstoppers that would cause them to vote -1 during the official vote. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Walter Underwood wrote: > Please wait for an official release of Lucene. It makes thing SO much easier > when you need to dig into the Lucene code. > > It is well worth a week delay. > > wunder > > On Oct 19, 2009, at 10:27 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll >> wrote: >>> >>> Are we ready for a release? >> >> +1 >> >> I don't think we need to wait for Lucene 2.9.1 - we have all the fixes >> in our version, and there's little point in pushing things off yet >> another week. >> >> Seems like the next RC should be a *real* one (i.e. no RC label in the >> version, immediately call a VOTE). >> >> -Yonik >> http://www.lucidimagination.com >> >>> I got busy at work and haven't been able to >>> address things as much, but it seems like things are progressing. >>> >>> Shall I generate another RC or are we waiting for Lucene 2.9.1? If we go >>> w/ >>> the 2.9.1-dev, then we just need to restore the Maven stuff for them. >>> Hopefully, that stuff was just commented out and not completely removed >>> so >>> as to make it a little easier to restore. >>> >>> -Grant >> > >
Re: Another RC
Yes... On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Walter Underwood wrote: > Please wait for an official release of Lucene. It makes thing SO much easier > when you need to dig into the Lucene code. > > It is well worth a week delay. > > wunder > > On Oct 19, 2009, at 10:27 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll >> wrote: >>> >>> Are we ready for a release? >> >> +1 >> >> I don't think we need to wait for Lucene 2.9.1 - we have all the fixes >> in our version, and there's little point in pushing things off yet >> another week. >> >> Seems like the next RC should be a *real* one (i.e. no RC label in the >> version, immediately call a VOTE). >> >> -Yonik >> http://www.lucidimagination.com >> >>> I got busy at work and haven't been able to >>> address things as much, but it seems like things are progressing. >>> >>> Shall I generate another RC or are we waiting for Lucene 2.9.1? If we go >>> w/ >>> the 2.9.1-dev, then we just need to restore the Maven stuff for them. >>> Hopefully, that stuff was just commented out and not completely removed >>> so >>> as to make it a little easier to restore. >>> >>> -Grant >> > >
Re: Another RC
Please wait for an official release of Lucene. It makes thing SO much easier when you need to dig into the Lucene code. It is well worth a week delay. wunder On Oct 19, 2009, at 10:27 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: Are we ready for a release? +1 I don't think we need to wait for Lucene 2.9.1 - we have all the fixes in our version, and there's little point in pushing things off yet another week. Seems like the next RC should be a *real* one (i.e. no RC label in the version, immediately call a VOTE). -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com I got busy at work and haven't been able to address things as much, but it seems like things are progressing. Shall I generate another RC or are we waiting for Lucene 2.9.1? If we go w/ the 2.9.1-dev, then we just need to restore the Maven stuff for them. Hopefully, that stuff was just commented out and not completely removed so as to make it a little easier to restore. -Grant
Re: Another RC
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > Are we ready for a release? +1 I don't think we need to wait for Lucene 2.9.1 - we have all the fixes in our version, and there's little point in pushing things off yet another week. Seems like the next RC should be a *real* one (i.e. no RC label in the version, immediately call a VOTE). -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com > I got busy at work and haven't been able to > address things as much, but it seems like things are progressing. > > Shall I generate another RC or are we waiting for Lucene 2.9.1? If we go w/ > the 2.9.1-dev, then we just need to restore the Maven stuff for them. > Hopefully, that stuff was just commented out and not completely removed so > as to make it a little easier to restore. > > -Grant
Another RC
Are we ready for a release? I got busy at work and haven't been able to address things as much, but it seems like things are progressing. Shall I generate another RC or are we waiting for Lucene 2.9.1? If we go w/ the 2.9.1-dev, then we just need to restore the Maven stuff for them. Hopefully, that stuff was just commented out and not completely removed so as to make it a little easier to restore. -Grant
