Re: solr search issue
An id field simply uniquely identifies a row or document. It sounds like you are trying to use id as if it were a type field. Generally, one would not search in id field other than to select a specific row/document. It is rather unhelpful to label a column/field as data - that conveys no useful information to the reader. Pick a term that DESCRIBES the purpose of the data. Finally, be aware that the default operator is OR, so if your query has two or more terms (or is a composite term that gets split into two or more terms), then you will get ALL documents that match ANY of the terms. If you want ONLY the documents that match ALL of the terms, set the default query operator (q.op) to AND. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Romita Saha Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 4:01 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: solr search issue Hi, I am new to solr. Could you kindly explain a bit about defining free text search. In my database I have two columns. One is id another is data. I want my query to spread across multiple fields. When i search for a parameter from id filed, it searches it in both the fields. However whenever I search a parameter from data field, it only searches in data. Below is my query. http://localhost:8983/solr/db/select/?defType=dismaxq=2qf=data id^2start=0rows=11fl=data,id In my table, id=2 for data=level2. id=4 for data=cashier2. When I search q=2qf=data id, it searches for '2' in data field also and gives me both the results i.e data=level2 and data=cashier2. However, when i search for q=cashier2qf=data id, it only gives me result as data=cashier2 and not data=level2 (please note that id=2 for data = level2. Ideally it should break the query into cashier+2 and search in id field as well) Thanks and regards, Romita Saha Panasonic RD Center Singapore Blk 1022 Tai Seng Avenue #06-3530 Tai Seng Ind. Est. Singapore 534415 DID: (65) 6550 5383 FAX: (65) 6550 5459 email: romita.s...@sg.panasonic.com From: Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org, Date: 11/02/2012 02:42 PM Subject:Re: solr search issue First, define a free text search. If what you're after is that your terms (i.e. q=term1 term2) get spread across multiple fields, simply add them to your qf parameter (qf=field1,field2). If you want the terms bound to a particular field, it's just the usual q=field:term, in which case any field term does NOT get spread amongst all the fields in your qf parameter. Best Erick On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Romita Saha romita.s...@sg.panasonic.comwrote: Hi, Thank you for your reply. What if I want to do a free text search? Thanks and regards, Romita From: Gora Mohanty g...@mimirtech.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org, Date: 11/02/2012 12:36 PM Subject:Re: solr search issue On 2 November 2012 09:51, Romita Saha romita.s...@sg.panasonic.com wrote: Hi, I am trying to search a database . In my database I have a field level2. My query: http://localhost:8983/solr/db/select/?defType=dismaxq=search%20level2qf=data%20id ^2%20start=0rows=11fl=data,id Where did you get this syntax from? If you want to search just on the field level2, you should have: http://localhost:8983/solr/db/select/?q=termdefType=dismaxqf=level2 where term is your search term. (I have omitted boosts, and extra parameters.) Regards, Gora
Re: index solr using jquery AJAX
Hi Luis
I tried sending an array too, but no luck
This is how the request looks like.
$.ajax({
url: http://192.168.10.113:8080/solr/update/json?commit=true;,
type: POST,
contentType: application/json; charset=utf-8,
data: [ { id: 22, name: Seattle seahawks} ],
dataType: 'jsonp',
crossDomain: true,
jsonp: 'json.wrf'
});
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/index-solr-using-jquery-AJAX-tp4017490p4017822.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
RE: Solr 4.0 admin panel
Thank you Hoss. I am switching from Solr3.6 to Silr 4.0. In Solr 3.6 a link http://localhost:8983/solr/admin or http://localhost:8983/solr/coreName/admin leads to an administration panel page with some useful information. Swapping also is done through the same link http://localhost:8983/solr/admin?action=SWAPcore=toSearchother=toIndex . I expected from Solr 4.0 similar features. I work for government and it does not allow other than IE browsers. Lev -Original Message- From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 6:19 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr 4.0 admin panel : The right address to go is http://localhost:8983/solr/ on Solr 4.0. : http://localhost:8983/solr/admin links to nothing if you go check the : servlet. For back compat, http://localhost:8983/solr/admin should automatially redirect to http://localhost:8983/solr/#/ -- regardless of wether you are in legacy single core mode or not (unless perhaps you have a solr core named admin ?.. haven't tried that) : administration panel. In Solr4.0 it returns just a general Apache Solr page : with dead links. Dead links means that when I click on them nothing : happends. Can you elaborate on what exactly you are seeing? A Jira issue with a screenshot attached would be helpful. It would also be good to know what browser you are using, i think there are bugs with using hte new UI javascript works in IE9 that have never been addressed because the relative usage of IE by solr-users is so low there was no strong push to invest time in trying to figure them out. Yeha, here's hte issue... https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3876 -Hoss
SolrCloud indexing blocks if node is recovering
Hi, We just tested indexing some million docs from Hadoop to a 10 node 2 rep SolrCloud cluster with this week's trunk. One of the nodes gave an OOM but indexing continued without interruption. When i restarted the node indexing stopped completely, the node tried to recover - which was unsuccessful. I restarted the node again but that wasn't very helpful either. Finally i decided to stop the node completely and see what happens - indexing resumed. Why or how won't the other nodes accept incoming documents when one node behaves really bad? The dying node wasn't the node we were sending documents to and we are not using CloudSolrServer yet (see other thread). Is this known behavior? Is it a bug? Thanks, Markus
Re: Solr 4.0 admin panel
On 11/2/2012 7:13 AM, Tannen, Lev (USAEO) [Contractor] wrote: Thank you James. In Solr 3.6 http://localhost:8983/solr/admin links to the admin panel. So the question remains how to invoke an admin panel in Solr 4.0? Does it mean that there is no such a thing as admin panel in Solr 4.0? Try this URL on any version: http://localhost:8983/solr In 4.0, this will get you to an admin panel for everything. In 3.x, this will get you to a page with links for all your admin panels. The 3.x panel is fairly simple, such that you can save the URL for almost any page you're looking at and use that URL in a script. The 4.x page is much more complex, generally you can't use the URL in your browser's address bar in scripts. The new admin uses URLs like the following behind the scenes to gather information: http://localhost:8983/solr/CORE/admin/mbeans?stats=true On another of your messages you indicated the government only allows IE. This is a problem. The 4.0 admin interface is known to be broken under IE9, and quite possibly IE8 as well. It may be worth pointing out that you can install and run Google Chrome without admin privileges of any kind. There are also a number of pocket browsers designed to run from a USB stick that should run just fine from a directory on your hard drive. I would not suggest using these without permission, but the capability is there. Thanks, Shawn
Re: After adding field to schema, the field is not being returned in results.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
What happens if you sort ascending rather than descending? Depending on
what (if anything) you've done with sortMissingFirst/Last on that field,
it's possible that you're just seeing the results of the sort and docs with
your new field are somewhere down the list. If you've done nothing, you
should be seeing the docs with the new field at the top of the list with
the query you posted, so this is grasping at straws a bit.
Thanks. Sorting ASC or DESC still does not show the field, even in
documents for which the field should exist based on the time that it
was created. However, I am starting to wonder that perhaps my
application is creating the wrong field values and perhaps that is why
the field don't exist. This is the field in question:
fieldType name=tdate class=solr.TrieDateField omitNorms=true
precisionStep=6 positionIncrementGap=0/
field name=created_iso8601 type=tdate stored=true
multiValued=false indexed=true/
My application is writing dates in this format (ISO 8601):
2012-11-02T13:48:10Z
Here is the PHP code:
date(Y-m-d\TH:i:s\Z)
I am setting the server timezone, as PHP = 5.1 requires:
date_default_timezone_set('UTC');
The solr admin page, try going to collectionschema browser and choose the
field in question from your drop-down. see if it looks like it is stored
and indexed, and see what some of the values are. This is getting the vals
from the indexed terms, but at least it should say stored in the schema
and index sections. If it doesn't, then you somehow have a mismatch between
your schema and what's actually in your index. This really shouldn't be the
case since it's a brand-new field
Sorry, no Term Info available :(
Alright, so it is an issue with the data that I'm feeding it. Would
Solr include the fields with good data and reject the fields with bad
data, but update the Document anyway? I can confirm that the variable
used to populate the field in question is not empty.
Two other things I'd try.
1 If you have the ID of the document you're _sure_ has a date field in it
try your query just on that, with fl=*. This would avoid any possible
sortMissingFirst/Last issues.
Yes, I've done that, with and without fl.
2 Another way to restrict this would be to add an fq clause to the query
so docs without the field would not be displayed, something like
fq=[NOW-1YEAR TO NOW] assuming your dates are in the last year.
But I guess we're down to needing to see the schema definition etc. if that
doesn't work.
Best
Erick
Thanks, Erick. It does look like the issue is that the field remains
empty. Perhaps I'm writing ISO 8601 wrong, I'll get to looking at that
now. I'm surprised that Solr accepts the documents with bad data in
some of the fields, I will look into that too as well.
Have a peaceful Saturday.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://gibberish.co.il
http://what-is-what.com
Re: After adding field to schema, the field is not being returned in results.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote: Have you uploaded data with that field populated? Solr is not like a relational database. It does not automatically populate a new field when you add it to the schema. If you sort on a field, a document with no data in that field comes first or last (I don't know which). Thank you. In fact, I am being careful to try to pull up records after the date in which the application was updated to populate the field. -- Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.il http://what-is-what.com
RE: DataImport Handler : Transformer Function Eval Failed Error
We have a scenario where the same products are available from multiple vendors
at different prices. We want to store these prices along with the products in
the index (product has many prices), so that we can apply dynamic filtering on
the prices at the time of search.
Thanks,
Shikhar
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis.gospodne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 8:13 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: DataImport Handler : Transformer Function Eval Failed Error
Hi,
That looks a little painful... what are you trying to achieve by storing JSON
in there? Maybe there's a simpler way to get there...
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm On Nov 1, 2012 6:16 PM,
Mishra, Shikhar shikhar.mis...@telcobuy.com
wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to store a list of JSON objects as stored value for the
field prices (see below).
I'm getting the following error from the custom transformer function
(see the data-config file at the end) of data import handler.
Error Message
--
- Caused by:
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerException:
'eval' failed with language: JavaScript and script:
function vendorPrices(row){
var wwtCost = row.get('WWT_COST');
var listPrice = row.get('LIST_PRICE');
var vendorName = row.get('VENDOR_NAME');
//Below approach fails
var prices = [];
prices.push({'vendor':vendorName});
prices.push({'wwtCost':wwtCost});
prices.push({'listPrice':listPrice});
row.put('prices':prices);
//Below approach works
//row.put('prices', '{' + 'vendor:' + vendorName +
', ' + 'wwtCost:' + wwtCost + ', ' + 'listPrice:' + listPrice + '}');
return row;
} Processing Document # 1
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerException.wrapAndT
hrow(DataImportHandlerException.java:71)
Data Import Handler Configuration File dataConfig
script
![CDATA[
function vendorPrices(row){
var wwtCost = row.get('WWT_COST');
var listPrice = row.get('LIST_PRICE');
var vendorName = row.get('VENDOR_NAME');
//Below approach fails
var prices = [];
prices.push({'vendor':vendorName});
prices.push({'wwtCost':wwtCost});
prices.push({'listPrice':listPrice});
row.put('prices':prices);
//Below approach works
//row.put('prices', '{' + 'vendor:' + vendorName +
', ' + 'wwtCost:' + wwtCost + ', ' + 'listPrice:' + listPrice + '}');
return row;
}
]]
/script
dataSource driver=oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver
url=jdbc:oracle:thin:@(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=
rac-scan.somr.com)(PORT=3465))(CONNECT_DATA=(SERVICE_NAME=
ERP_GENERAL.SOMR.ORG))) user=dummy password=xx/
document
entity name=item query=select * from
wwt_catalog.wwt_product prod, wwt_catalog.wwt_manufacturer mfg where
prod.mfg_id = mfg.mfg_id and prod.mfg_product_number = 'CON-CBO2-B22HPF'
field column=PRODUCT_ID name=id /
field column=MFG_PRODUCT_NUMBER name=name /
field column=MFG_PRODUCT_NUMBER name=nameSort /
field column=MFG_NAME name=manu /
field column=MFG_ITEM_NUMBER name=alphaNameSort /
field column=DESCRIPTION name=features /
field column=DESCRIPTION name=description /
entity name=vendor_sources
transformer=script:vendorPrices query=SELECT PRICE.WWT_COST,
PRICE.LIST_PRICE, VEND.VENDOR_NAME, AVAIL.LEAD_TIME,
AVAIL.QTY_AVAILABLE FROM wwt_catalog.wwt_product prod,
wwt_catalog.wwt_product_pricing price, wwt_catalog.wwt_vendor vend,
wwt_catalog.wwt_product_availability avail WHERE PROD.PRODUCT_ID =
price.product_id(+) AND price.vendor_id =
vend.vendor_id(+) AND PRICE.PRODUCT_ID = avail.product_id(+) AND
PRICE.VENDOR_ID = AVAIL.VENDOR_ID(+) AND prod.PRODUCT_ID =
'${item.PRODUCT_ID}'
/entity
/entity
/document
/dataConfig
Are there any syntactic errors in the JavaScript code above? Thanks.
Shikhar
Possible memory leak in recovery
Hi, We wiped clean the data directories for one node. That node is never able to recover and regularly runs OOM. On another cluster (with an older build, september 10th) memory consumption on recovery is fairly low when recoverign and with only a 250MB heap allocated it's easy to recover two 4GB cores from scratch at the same time. On this new test cluster we see the following happening: - no index, start recovery - recovery fails (see other thread, cannot read past EOF when reading index files) - heap is not released - recovery is retried, fails - heap is not released .. OOM The distinct saw tooth pattern is not there, heap consumption only grows with siginifant steps when recovery is retried but fails. If i increase heap recovery simply fails a few more times. I cannot find an existing issue but may have overlooked it. File bug or did i miss an Jira issue? Thanks, Markus
Re: SOLR - To point multiple indexes in different folder
That should be OK. The recursive bit happens when you define the shard locations in your config files in the default search handler. On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:42 AM, ravi.n rav...@ornext.com wrote: Erick, We are forming request something like below for default /select request handler, will this cause an issue? So far we are not facing any recursive issues. http://94.101.147.150:8080/solr/select/?q=*%3A*version=2.2start=0rows=10indent=onshards=localhost:8080/solr/coll1,localhost:8080/solr/coll2,localhost:8080/solr/coll3,localhost:8080/solr/coll4,localhost:8080/solr/coll5,localhost:8080/solr/coll6,localhost:8080/solr/coll7 Below is the solrconfig for /select requestHandler name=/select class=solr.SearchHandler lst name=defaults str name=echoParamsexplicit/str int name=rows10/int str name=dfrecordid/str /lst recordid - is the unique field in the document. Regards, Ravi -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-To-point-multiple-indexes-in-different-folder-tp4016640p4017783.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: SolrCloud: general questions
Hi Tomás!!! The first three questions are major for me. Many thanks for your response. About number of shards and documents in it I'll try to test. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-general-questions-tp4017769p4017836.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Solr Replication is not Possible on RAMDirectory?
so it is not possible to use RAMdirectory for replication? No, RAMDirectory doesn't work for replication. Use MMapDirectory... it ends up storing the index in RAM and more efficiently so, plus it's backed by disk. Just be sure to not set a big heap because MMapDirectory works outside of heap. Michael Della Bitta Appinions 18 East 41st Street, 2nd Floor New York, NY 10017-6271 www.appinions.com Where Influence Isn’t a Game On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:44 AM, deniz denizdurmu...@gmail.com wrote: so it is not possible to use RAMdirectory for replication?
Re: After adding field to schema, the field is not being returned in results.
Well, I'm at my wits end. I tried your field definitions (using the exampledocs XML) and they work just fine. As far as if you mess up the date on the way in, you should be seeing stack traces in your log files. The only way I see not getting the Sorry, no Term Info available :( message is if you don't have any values in the field. So, my guess is that you're not getting the format right and the docs aren't getting indexed, but that's just a guess. You can freely sort even if there are no values at all in a particular field. This can be indicated if you sort asc and desc and the order doesn't change. It just means the field is defined in the schema, not necessarily that there are any values in it. So, I claim you have no date values in your index. The fact that you can sort is just an artifact of sortMissingFirst/Last doing something sensible. Next question, are you absolutely sure that your indexing program and your searching program are pointing at the same server? So what I'd do next is 1 create a simple XML doc that conforms to your schema and use the post.jar tool to send it to your server. Watch the output log for any date format exceptions. 2 Use the admin UI to insure that you can see terms in docs added this way. 3 from there back up and see what step in the indexing process isn't working (assuming that's the problem). Solr logs help here. Note I'm completely PHP-ignorant, I have no clue whether the formatting you're doing is OK or not. You might try logging the value somewhere in your php so you an post that and/or include it in your sample XML file... Best Erick On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote: Have you uploaded data with that field populated? Solr is not like a relational database. It does not automatically populate a new field when you add it to the schema. If you sort on a field, a document with no data in that field comes first or last (I don't know which). Thank you. In fact, I am being careful to try to pull up records after the date in which the application was updated to populate the field. -- Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.il http://what-is-what.com
Nested Join Queries
At a high level, I have a need to be able to execute a query that joins
across cores, and that query during its joining may join back to the
originating core.
Example:
Find all Books written by an Author who has written a best selling Book.
In Solr query syntax
A) against the book core - bestseller:true
B) against the author core - {!join fromIndex=book from=id
to=bookid}bestseller:true
C) against the book core - {!join fromIndex=author from=id
to=authorid}{!join fromIndex=book from=id to=bookid}bestseller:true
A - returns results
B - returns results
C - does not return results
Given that A and C use the same core, I started looking for join code that
compares the originating core to the fromIndex and found this
in JoinQParserPlugin (line #159).
if (info.getReq().getCore() == fromCore) {
// if this is the same core, use the searcher passed in...
otherwise we could be warming and
// get an older searcher from the core.
fromSearcher = searcher;
} else {
// This could block if there is a static warming query with a
join in it, and if useColdSearcher is true.
// Deadlock could result if two cores both had useColdSearcher
and had joins that used eachother.
// This would be very predictable though (should happen every
time if misconfigured)
fromRef = fromCore.getSearcher(false, true, null);
// be careful not to do anything with this searcher that requires
the thread local
// SolrRequestInfo in a manner that requires the core in the
request to match
fromSearcher = fromRef.get();
}
I found that if I were to modify the above code so that it always follows
the logic in the else block, I get the results I expect.
Can someone explain to me why the code is written as it is? And if we were
to run with only the else block being executed, what type of adverse
impacts we might have?
Does anyone have other ideas on how to solve this issue?
Thanks in advance.
-Gerald
Re: index solr using jquery AJAX
Hello,
In that case try again with a JSON array and check if:
1. The request arrives to Solr server. In that case, copypaste the log
traces here.
2. The request is never executed. Analyze with Firebug in your browser.
Regards,
Luis Cappa.
2012/11/2 amit amit.mal...@gmail.com
Hi Luis
Yes solr.JsonUpdateRequestHandler is configured in solrconfig.
If I try with json array without jsonp, I get the Cross Origin Error.
My solr server is in a different domain.
Thanks
Amit
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Rakudten [via Lucene]
ml-node+s472066n4017849...@n3.nabble.com wrote:
Hello,
Check if you have solr.JsonUpdateRequestHandler configured in your
solrconfig.xml file. Tried again with a JSON array and without any jsonp
reference (dataType, crossDomain, jsonp).
Good luck!
Regards,
Luis Cappa.
2012/11/2 amit [hidden email]
http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=4017849i=0
I am using solr 3.6 version.
Thanks
Amit
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Rakudten [via Lucene]
[hidden email] http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=4017849i=1
wrote:
Hello,
Are you using Solr 4.0 version? If you are using the last Solr 4.0
version
the endpoint url appears to be bad formed. Try with:
http://192.168.10.113:8080/solr/update?commit=true
http://192.168.10.113:8080/solr/update/json?commit=true
Regards,
Luis Cappa.
2012/11/2 amit [hidden email]
http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=4017835i=0
Hi Luis
I tried sending an array too, but no luck
This is how the request looks like.
$.ajax({
url:
http://192.168.10.113:8080/solr/update/json?commit=true
,
type: POST,
contentType: application/json; charset=utf-8,
data: [ { id: 22, name: Seattle seahawks} ],
dataType: 'jsonp',
crossDomain: true,
jsonp: 'json.wrf'
});
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/index-solr-using-jquery-AJAX-tp4017490p4017822.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
discussion
below:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/index-solr-using-jquery-AJAX-tp4017490p4017835.html
To unsubscribe from index solr using jquery AJAX, click here
.
NAML
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewerid=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.namlbase=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespacebreadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/index-solr-using-jquery-AJAX-tp4017490p4017846.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
below:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/index-solr-using-jquery-AJAX-tp4017490p4017849.html
To unsubscribe from index solr using jquery AJAX, click here
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=4017490code=YW1pdC5tYWxsaWtAZ21haWwuY29tfDQwMTc0OTB8LTk5Njc5OTA3NA==
.
NAML
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewerid=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.namlbase=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespacebreadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/index-solr-using-jquery-AJAX-tp4017490p4017851.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
How to use (if it is applicable) hibernate inside a solr plugin
Hi to everyone, I'm a .NET developer, so I'm pretty new to java developing. I was able to write a custom filter to use in solr, but I had problem with another filter that should use hibernate to read some data from a database during initialization. First of all I was not able to make it read the hibernate.cfg.xml file, because I always got a hibernate.cfg.xml not found. This is not a big issue, I configured hibernate entirely with code and that problem was solved (even if I'd like to understand how can I use it inside a solr plugin). Now the problem is that when hibernate Configuration try to configure the mapping it is not able to find Mapped classes. In the error I found: caused by: org.hibernate.MappingException: class Dictionary.Term not found while looking for property: value My question is, anyone had already managed to access a database with hibernate inside a solr plugin? Is this an unsupported scenario so I need to resort to some other technique to access database, or am I missing something? Thanks for any help. -- Ricci Gian Maria MVP Visual Studio ALM http://www.codewrecks.com/ http://www.codewrecks.com http://blogs.ugidotnet.org/rgm http://blogs.ugidotnet.org/rgm Twitter: http://twitter.com/alkampfer http://twitter.com/alkampfer Msn: mailto:alkamp...@nablasoft.com alkamp...@nablasoft.com
Re: Dynamic core selection
Hi all!
Just sharing the solution)
I've extended SolrDispatchFilter with my own implementation and did like
this:
...
String core = determineCore(req);
super.doFilter(new CoreRoutingReqWrapper(req, core), response, chain);
...
code for the CoreRoutingReqWrapper class:
class CoreRoutingReqWrapper extends HttpServletRequestWrapper {
private String pathToCore;
public CoreRoutingReqWrapper(HttpServletRequest request, String
core) {
super(request);
pathToCore = / + core + request.getServletPath();
}
@Override
public String getServletPath() {
return pathToCore;
}
}
Would be nice to have something like CoreResolver component in Solr
architecture.
Something like this:
interface CoreResolver {
String resolveCore(HttpServlerRequest req);
}
Would make Solr server more customizable.
What do you think?
Thanx,
: as I said we have our own search handler (wrapping handleRequestBody
method
: and adding logic before it) where we convert those custom_paramX
params into
: Solr understandable params like q, fq, facet, etc. Then we delegate to
Solr to
: process them.
:
: So what I want to do is core0 handle things if custom_param1=aaa and
core1 if
: custom_param1=ccc.
Ah.. i think i'm understanding:
* you know you need a custom search handler
* you have a custom search handler that delegates to some other handler
based on some logic
* your customer handler modifies the request params before delegating to
the handler it picks.
* the part you are missing is how to delegate to an entirely differnet
SolrCore.
does that capture your question?
The nutshell is you would need to ask your current SolrCore for access to
the CoreContainer -- then create a new LocalSolrQueryRequest and ask
that SolrCore to execute it. one hitch to watch out for is keeping track
of thinkgs like the SolrIndexSearcher used -- because stuff like
DocList
values in the response will come from the *other* SolrIndexSearcher, and
you'll need to use that when writting the response out (because the
QueryResponseWriter needs to as the SolrInexSearcher for the stored
fields
from those docids).
(Note: i have never tried this ... there may be other gotcha's i'm not
aware of)
-Hoss
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
unable to create new native thread while importing
I'm having a problem importing data into Solr 4.0 (the same error happens in 3.6.1). Here is the Error I get: 2012-11-02 09:50:07.265:WARN:oejs.AbstractConnector: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread at java.lang.Thread.start0(Native Method) at java.lang.Thread.start(Thread.java:658) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.startThread(QueuedThreadPool .java:436) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.dispatch(QueuedThreadPool.ja va:361) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.bio.SocketConnector$ConnectorEndPoint.dispatch(Soc ketConnector.java:212) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.bio.SocketConnector.accept(SocketConnector.java:11 6) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractConnector$Acceptor.run(AbstractConnector.j ava:933) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java :599) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$3.run(QueuedThreadPool.java: 534) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680) This error occurs after approximately 344k documents imported using 4100 calls and containing aproximately 40mb (raw xml, so the data is smaller). The full import will be approximately 1300x this size if I'm able to finish it. I'm importing use Java's HttpURLConnection and my imports look something like this: (data in the name column is redacted but contains a 7-bit-clean string in this example) POST http://172.31.1.127:8983/solr/ ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 standalone=yes? add doc field name=id3841/field field name=name.../field /doc doc field name=id3842/field field name=name.../field /doc ...etc... /add There is a single import HttpURLConnection - I have multiple threads and they're mutexing on the connection - and the client seems to operate find until the server throws this error, then the client pauses until it times out, then tries again and generates more outofmemory errors. Also, as far as I can tell, the documents that appear to have been imported never get indexed. The configuration being used is the one in the solr example folder. How do I do my import into Solr? I've seen reference to changing the AutoCommit settings which I've tried to no effect. I also found mention of a similar problem to do with Alpha 4.0 ConcurrentUpdateSolrServer but since I'm not sure how to change this so I haven't tried this (http://www.searchworkings.org/forum/-/message_boards/view_message/489575). Thanks, Chris...
large text blobs in string field
hello environment - solr 3.5 i would like to know if anyone is using the technique of placing large text blobs in to a non-indexed string field and if so - are there any good/bad aspects to consider? we are thinking of doing this to represent a 1:M relationship with the Many being represented as a string in the schema (probably comprised either of xml or json objects). we are looking at the classic part : model scenario, where the client would look up a part and the document would contain a string field with potentially 200+ model numbers. edge cases for this could be 400+ model numbers. thx -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/large-text-blobs-in-string-field-tp4017882.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: unable to create new native thread while importing
Have you tried doing a thread dump and seeing how many threads you have and what they are doing. Maybe a connection is not being closed somehow. Regards, Alex. Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch - Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book) On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Chris Brown cbr...@infoblox.com wrote: I'm having a problem importing data into Solr 4.0 (the same error happens in 3.6.1). Here is the Error I get: 2012-11-02 09:50:07.265:WARN:oejs.AbstractConnector: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread at java.lang.Thread.start0(Native Method) at java.lang.Thread.start(Thread.java:658) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.startThread(QueuedThreadPool .java:436) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.dispatch(QueuedThreadPool.ja va:361) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.bio.SocketConnector$ConnectorEndPoint.dispatch(Soc ketConnector.java:212) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.bio.SocketConnector.accept(SocketConnector.java:11 6) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractConnector$Acceptor.run(AbstractConnector.j ava:933) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java :599) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$3.run(QueuedThreadPool.java: 534) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680) This error occurs after approximately 344k documents imported using 4100 calls and containing aproximately 40mb (raw xml, so the data is smaller). The full import will be approximately 1300x this size if I'm able to finish it. I'm importing use Java's HttpURLConnection and my imports look something like this: (data in the name column is redacted but contains a 7-bit-clean string in this example) POST http://172.31.1.127:8983/solr/ ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 standalone=yes? add doc field name=id3841/field field name=name.../field /doc doc field name=id3842/field field name=name.../field /doc ...etc... /add There is a single import HttpURLConnection - I have multiple threads and they're mutexing on the connection - and the client seems to operate find until the server throws this error, then the client pauses until it times out, then tries again and generates more outofmemory errors. Also, as far as I can tell, the documents that appear to have been imported never get indexed. The configuration being used is the one in the solr example folder. How do I do my import into Solr? I've seen reference to changing the AutoCommit settings which I've tried to no effect. I also found mention of a similar problem to do with Alpha 4.0 ConcurrentUpdateSolrServer but since I'm not sure how to change this so I haven't tried this (http://www.searchworkings.org/forum/-/message_boards/view_message/489575 ). Thanks, Chris...
Solr-UIMA integration : analyzing multi-fields
Hello all, how to analyze multiple fields using UIMA when we add the UIMA update chain to the update handler ? and how to map which field gets analyzed to which field. For instance, lets say there are two text fields, text1 text2 for which I need to generate pos-tags using UIMA. In the fields section I can definitely do this : lst name=analyzeFields bool name=mergefalse/bool arr name=fields strtext1/str strtext2/str /arr /lst and in the fieldMappings : lst name=type str name=nameorg.apache.uima.TokenAnnotation/str lst name=mapping str name=featureposTag/str str name=fieldpostags1/str /lst /lst but how to specify that I need pos-tags for field text2 too and that too in postags2 field. If there is any schema/DTD for these configuration settings - please let me know. Also, how can I change the code or is there a way to specify to generate pos-tags after getting the token stream from an analyzer. Currently, the update processor gets the text from the input field and generates pos-tags into postags1 field using WhitespaceTokenizer defined in the xml configuration files by default. how can I change the tokenizer such that it uses a Solr Analyzer/ Tokenizer ? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-UIMA-integration-analyzing-multi-fields-tp4017890.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: unable to create new native thread while importing
Thanks for that, I didn't know I could see the thread dump so easily. That does appear to have been the problem - I wasn't flushing my input and the underlining api held the connection open-and-not-reusable until garbage collection. Chris... On 12-11-02 1:05 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com wrote: Have you tried doing a thread dump and seeing how many threads you have and what they are doing. Maybe a connection is not being closed somehow. Regards, Alex. Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch - Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book) On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Chris Brown cbr...@infoblox.com wrote: I'm having a problem importing data into Solr 4.0 (the same error happens in 3.6.1). Here is the Error I get: 2012-11-02 09:50:07.265:WARN:oejs.AbstractConnector: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread at java.lang.Thread.start0(Native Method) at java.lang.Thread.start(Thread.java:658) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.startThread(QueuedThreadPo ol .java:436) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.dispatch(QueuedThreadPool. ja va:361) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.bio.SocketConnector$ConnectorEndPoint.dispatch(S oc ketConnector.java:212) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.bio.SocketConnector.accept(SocketConnector.java: 11 6) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractConnector$Acceptor.run(AbstractConnector .j ava:933) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.ja va :599) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$3.run(QueuedThreadPool.jav a: 534) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680) This error occurs after approximately 344k documents imported using 4100 calls and containing aproximately 40mb (raw xml, so the data is smaller). The full import will be approximately 1300x this size if I'm able to finish it. I'm importing use Java's HttpURLConnection and my imports look something like this: (data in the name column is redacted but contains a 7-bit-clean string in this example) POST http://172.31.1.127:8983/solr/ ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 standalone=yes? add doc field name=id3841/field field name=name.../field /doc doc field name=id3842/field field name=name.../field /doc ...etc... /add There is a single import HttpURLConnection - I have multiple threads and they're mutexing on the connection - and the client seems to operate find until the server throws this error, then the client pauses until it times out, then tries again and generates more outofmemory errors. Also, as far as I can tell, the documents that appear to have been imported never get indexed. The configuration being used is the one in the solr example folder. How do I do my import into Solr? I've seen reference to changing the AutoCommit settings which I've tried to no effect. I also found mention of a similar problem to do with Alpha 4.0 ConcurrentUpdateSolrServer but since I'm not sure how to change this so I haven't tried this (http://www.searchworkings.org/forum/-/message_boards/view_message/489575 ). Thanks, Chris...
Puzzled by search score
Howdy,
I'm reading a table in a db using the following schema:
fields
field name=id type=string indexed=true stored=true
required=true /
field name=cid type=long indexed=true stored=true
required=true/
field name=lang type=string indexed=true stored=true
required=true/
field name=file_version type=int indexed=true stored=true
required=true/
field name=search_id type=long indexed=true stored=true
required=true/
field name=tag type=text_general indexed=true stored=true
required=true/
field name=created type=date indexed=false stored=true/
field name=last_modified type=date indexed=true stored=true/
field name=version type=long indexed=true stored=true/
field name=_version_ type=long indexed=true stored=true
multiValued=false/
/fields
uniqueKeyid/uniqueKey
defaultSearchFieldtag/defaultSearchField
solrQueryParser defaultOperator=OR/
So make the following query
http://localhost:8080/apache-solr-4.0.0/core0/select?q=tag%3Aclothes~%2Bcid%3A14sort=score+descrows=10fl=tag+scorewt=jsonindent=true
You will notice that I'm doing a search on the tag field against the string
clothes and the cid field against the long 14 and requesting that the
results come back sorted on descending score values. So I'm surprised to see
these results:
{
responseHeader:{
status:0,
QTime:1,
params:{
q:tag:clothes~+cid:14,
sort:score desc,
rows:10,
fl:tag score,
wt:json,
indent:true}},
response:{numFound:1835,start:0,maxScore:3.9238024,docs:[
{
tag:Table Cloth,
score:3.9238024},
{
tag:Clothes,
score:3.9134552},
{
tag:Clothes,
score:3.9134552},
{
tag:Clothes,
score:3.9134552},
{
tag:Clothes,
score:3.9134552},
{
tag:Clothes,
score:3.9134552},
{
tag:Clothes,
score:3.9134552},
{
tag:Boys Clothes,
score:3.3968315},
{
tag:Everyday Clothes,
score:3.3968315},
{
tag:Designer Clothes,
score:3.3968315}]
}}
Why does Table Cloth have a higher score than Clothes (which is an exact
textual match)? I could use some help understanding why I have these results
and how to tweak my query so that the results match my expectations.
Regards,
Tim
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Puzzled-by-search-score-tp4017904.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Solr 4.0 error message: Unsupported ContentType: Content-type:text/xml
Hello all, Trying to get Solr 4.0 up and running with a port of our production 3.6 schema and documents. We are getting the following error message in the logs: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Unsupported ContentType: Content-type:text/xml Not in: [app lication/xml, text/csv, text/json, application/csv, application/javabin, text/xml, application/json] We use exactly the same code without problem with Solr 3.6. We are sending a ContentType 'text/xml'. Is it likely that there is some other problem and this is just not quite the right error message? Tom
Re: Solr 4.0 error message: Unsupported ContentType: Content-type:text/xml
That message makes it sounds as if the literal text Content-type: is included in your content type. How exactly are you setting/sending the content type? -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Tom Burton-West Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 5:30 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Solr 4.0 error message: Unsupported ContentType: Content-type:text/xml Hello all, Trying to get Solr 4.0 up and running with a port of our production 3.6 schema and documents. We are getting the following error message in the logs: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Unsupported ContentType: Content-type:text/xml Not in: [app lication/xml, text/csv, text/json, application/csv, application/javabin, text/xml, application/json] We use exactly the same code without problem with Solr 3.6. We are sending a ContentType 'text/xml'. Is it likely that there is some other problem and this is just not quite the right error message? Tom
Re: Solr 4.0 error message: Unsupported ContentType: Content-type:text/xml
Thanks Jack, That is exactly the problem. Apparently earlier versions of Solr ignored the extra text, which is why we didn't catch the bug in our code earlier. Thanks for the quick response. Tom On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.comwrote: That message makes it sounds as if the literal text Content-type: is included in your content type. How exactly are you setting/sending the content type? -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Tom Burton-West Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 5:30 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Solr 4.0 error message: Unsupported ContentType: Content-type:text/xml Hello all, Trying to get Solr 4.0 up and running with a port of our production 3.6 schema and documents. We are getting the following error message in the logs: org.apache.solr.common.**SolrException: Unsupported ContentType: Content-type:text/xml Not in: [app lication/xml, text/csv, text/json, application/csv, application/javabin, text/xml, application/json] We use exactly the same code without problem with Solr 3.6. We are sending a ContentType 'text/xml'. Is it likely that there is some other problem and this is just not quite the right error message? Tom
Re: trouble instantiating CloudSolrServer
I think the maven jars must be out of whack?
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote:
Hi,
We use trunk but got SolrJ 4.0 from Maven. Creating an instance of
CloudSolrServer fails because its constructor calls a not existing LBServer
constructor, it attempts to create an instance by only passing a HttpClient.
How is LBHttpSolrServer supposed to work without passing a SolrServer URL to
it?
public CloudSolrServer(String zkHost) throws MalformedURLException {
this.zkHost = zkHost;
this.myClient = HttpClientUtil.createClient(null);
this.lbServer = new LBHttpSolrServer(myClient);
this.updatesToLeaders = true;
}
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.LBHttpSolrServer.init(Lorg/apache/http/client/HttpClient;[Ljava/lang/String;)V
at
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrServer.init(CloudSolrServer.java:84)
Thanks,
Markus
--
- Mark
Re: SolrCloud indexing blocks if node is recovering
Doesn't sound right. Still have the logs? - Mark On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote: Hi, We just tested indexing some million docs from Hadoop to a 10 node 2 rep SolrCloud cluster with this week's trunk. One of the nodes gave an OOM but indexing continued without interruption. When i restarted the node indexing stopped completely, the node tried to recover - which was unsuccessful. I restarted the node again but that wasn't very helpful either. Finally i decided to stop the node completely and see what happens - indexing resumed. Why or how won't the other nodes accept incoming documents when one node behaves really bad? The dying node wasn't the node we were sending documents to and we are not using CloudSolrServer yet (see other thread). Is this known behavior? Is it a bug? Thanks, Markus -- - Mark
Re: After adding field to schema, the field is not being returned in results.
If any value is in a bogus format, the entire document batch in that HTTP request fails. That is the right timestamp format. The index may be corrupted somehow. Can you try removing all of the fields in data/ and trying again? - Original Message - | From: Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com | To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org | Sent: Friday, November 2, 2012 7:32:40 AM | Subject: Re: After adding field to schema, the field is not being returned in results. | | Well, I'm at my wits end. I tried your field definitions (using the | exampledocs XML) and they work just fine. As far as if you mess up | the date | on the way in, you should be seeing stack traces in your log files. | | The only way I see not getting the Sorry, no Term Info available :( | message is if you don't have any values in the field. So, my guess is | that | you're not getting the format right and the docs aren't getting | indexed, | but that's just a guess. You can freely sort even if there are no | values at | all in a particular field. This can be indicated if you sort asc and | desc | and the order doesn't change. It just means the field is defined in | the | schema, not necessarily that there are any values in it. | | So, I claim you have no date values in your index. The fact that you | can | sort is just an artifact of sortMissingFirst/Last doing something | sensible. | | Next question, are you absolutely sure that your indexing program and | your | searching program are pointing at the same server? | | So what I'd do next is | 1 create a simple XML doc that conforms to your schema and use the | post.jar tool to send it to your server. Watch the output log for any | date | format exceptions. | 2 Use the admin UI to insure that you can see terms in docs added | this way. | 3 from there back up and see what step in the indexing process isn't | working (assuming that's the problem). Solr logs help here. | | Note I'm completely PHP-ignorant, I have no clue whether the | formatting | you're doing is OK or not. You might try logging the value somewhere | in | your php so you an post that and/or include it in your sample XML | file... | | Best | Erick | | | On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com | wrote: | | On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com | wrote: | Have you uploaded data with that field populated? Solr is not | like a | relational database. It does not automatically populate a new field | when | you add it to the schema. If you sort on a field, a document with | no data | in that field comes first or last (I don't know which). | | | Thank you. In fact, I am being careful to try to pull up records | after | the date in which the application was updated to populate the | field. | | | -- | Dotan Cohen | | http://gibberish.co.il | http://what-is-what.com | |
Re: How to migrate index from 3.6 to 4.0 with solrcloud
It's not clear whether your index is already sharded or not. But it doesn't matter because: 1 if it's not sharded, there's no shard-splitter (yet). So you can't copy the right parts of your single index to the right shard. 2 if your 3.6 index _is_ sharded already, I pretty much guarantee that it wasn't created with the same hashing algorithm that SolrCloud uses, so just copying the shards to some node on the cloud won't work. In either case, you'll have to re-indexing everything fresh. Best Erick On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Zeng Lames lezhi.z...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all, we have an existing index with solr 3.6, and now we want to migrate it to Solr4.0 with shard (2 shards, 2 nodes in a shard). The question are: 1.which node should i copy the existing index files to? any node in any shard ? 2. if copy the index files into any one of nodes, can it be replicated to the 'right' shard according hash code? 3. if above steps can't fulfill a index migrate to solrcloud, how should we do? thanks a lot Lames
Re: solr search issue
First, define a free text search. If what you're after is that your terms (i.e. q=term1 term2) get spread across multiple fields, simply add them to your qf parameter (qf=field1,field2). If you want the terms bound to a particular field, it's just the usual q=field:term, in which case any field term does NOT get spread amongst all the fields in your qf parameter. Best Erick On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Romita Saha romita.s...@sg.panasonic.comwrote: Hi, Thank you for your reply. What if I want to do a free text search? Thanks and regards, Romita From: Gora Mohanty g...@mimirtech.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org, Date: 11/02/2012 12:36 PM Subject:Re: solr search issue On 2 November 2012 09:51, Romita Saha romita.s...@sg.panasonic.com wrote: Hi, I am trying to search a database . In my database I have a field level2. My query: http://localhost:8983/solr/db/select/?defType=dismaxq=search%20level2qf=data%20id ^2%20start=0rows=11fl=data,id Where did you get this syntax from? If you want to search just on the field level2, you should have: http://localhost:8983/solr/db/select/?q=termdefType=dismaxqf=level2 where term is your search term. (I have omitted boosts, and extra parameters.) Regards, Gora
Re: How to migrate index from 3.6 to 4.0 with solrcloud
thanks all for your prompt response. i think i know what should i do now. thank you so much again. On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote: It's not clear whether your index is already sharded or not. But it doesn't matter because: 1 if it's not sharded, there's no shard-splitter (yet). So you can't copy the right parts of your single index to the right shard. 2 if your 3.6 index _is_ sharded already, I pretty much guarantee that it wasn't created with the same hashing algorithm that SolrCloud uses, so just copying the shards to some node on the cloud won't work. In either case, you'll have to re-indexing everything fresh. Best Erick On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Zeng Lames lezhi.z...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all, we have an existing index with solr 3.6, and now we want to migrate it to Solr4.0 with shard (2 shards, 2 nodes in a shard). The question are: 1.which node should i copy the existing index files to? any node in any shard ? 2. if copy the index files into any one of nodes, can it be replicated to the 'right' shard according hash code? 3. if above steps can't fulfill a index migrate to solrcloud, how should we do? thanks a lot Lames
Re: solr search issue
Hi, I am new to solr. Could you kindly explain a bit about defining free text search. In my database I have two columns. One is id another is data. I want my query to spread across multiple fields. When i search for a parameter from id filed, it searches it in both the fields. However whenever I search a parameter from data field, it only searches in data. Below is my query. http://localhost:8983/solr/db/select/?defType=dismaxq=2qf=data id^2start=0rows=11fl=data,id In my table, id=2 for data=level2. id=4 for data=cashier2. When I search q=2qf=data id, it searches for '2' in data field also and gives me both the results i.e data=level2 and data=cashier2. However, when i search for q=cashier2qf=data id, it only gives me result as data=cashier2 and not data=level2 (please note that id=2 for data = level2. Ideally it should break the query into cashier+2 and search in id field as well) Thanks and regards, Romita Saha Panasonic RD Center Singapore Blk 1022 Tai Seng Avenue #06-3530 Tai Seng Ind. Est. Singapore 534415 DID: (65) 6550 5383 FAX: (65) 6550 5459 email: romita.s...@sg.panasonic.com From: Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org, Date: 11/02/2012 02:42 PM Subject:Re: solr search issue First, define a free text search. If what you're after is that your terms (i.e. q=term1 term2) get spread across multiple fields, simply add them to your qf parameter (qf=field1,field2). If you want the terms bound to a particular field, it's just the usual q=field:term, in which case any field term does NOT get spread amongst all the fields in your qf parameter. Best Erick On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Romita Saha romita.s...@sg.panasonic.comwrote: Hi, Thank you for your reply. What if I want to do a free text search? Thanks and regards, Romita From: Gora Mohanty g...@mimirtech.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org, Date: 11/02/2012 12:36 PM Subject:Re: solr search issue On 2 November 2012 09:51, Romita Saha romita.s...@sg.panasonic.com wrote: Hi, I am trying to search a database . In my database I have a field level2. My query: http://localhost:8983/solr/db/select/?defType=dismaxq=search%20level2qf=data%20id ^2%20start=0rows=11fl=data,id Where did you get this syntax from? If you want to search just on the field level2, you should have: http://localhost:8983/solr/db/select/?q=termdefType=dismaxqf=level2 where term is your search term. (I have omitted boosts, and extra parameters.) Regards, Gora
Solr Replication is not Possible on RAMDirectory?
Hi all, I am trying to set up a master/slave system, by following this page : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication I was able to set up and did some experiments with that, but when i try to set the index for RAMDirectory, i got errors for indexing. While master and slave are both using a non-RAM directory, everything is okay... but when i try to use RAMdirectory on both I got this error below: 16:40:31.626 [qtp28208563-24] ERROR org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore - org.apache.lucene.index.IndexNotFoundException: no segments* file found in org.apache.lucene.store.RAMDirectory@7e693f lockFactory=org.apache.lucene.store.NativeFSLockFactory@92c787: files: [] at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$FindSegmentsFile.run(SegmentInfos.java:741) at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$FindSegmentsFile.run(SegmentInfos.java:630) at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos.read(SegmentInfos.java:343) at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.init(IndexWriter.java:639) at org.apache.solr.update.SolrIndexWriter.init(SolrIndexWriter.java:75) at org.apache.solr.update.SolrIndexWriter.create(SolrIndexWriter.java:62) at org.apache.solr.update.DefaultSolrCoreState.createMainIndexWriter(DefaultSolrCoreState.java:191) at org.apache.solr.update.DefaultSolrCoreState.getIndexWriter(DefaultSolrCoreState.java:77) at org.apache.solr.update.DirectUpdateHandler2.commit(DirectUpdateHandler2.java:511) at org.apache.solr.update.processor.RunUpdateProcessor.processCommit(RunUpdateProcessorFactory.java:87) at org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processCommit(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:64) at org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor.processCommit(DistributedUpdateProcessor.java:1016) at org.apache.solr.update.processor.LogUpdateProcessor.processCommit(LogUpdateProcessorFactory.java:157) at org.apache.solr.handler.RequestHandlerUtils.handleCommit(RequestHandlerUtils.java:69) at org.apache.solr.handler.ContentStreamHandlerBase.handleRequestBody(ContentStreamHandlerBase.java:68) at org.apache.solr.handler.RequestHandlerBase.handleRequest(RequestHandlerBase.java:129) at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:1699) at org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.execute(SolrDispatchFilter.java:455) at org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:276) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1337) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doHandle(ServletHandler.java:484) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:119) at org.eclipse.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:524) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doHandle(SessionHandler.java:233) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doHandle(ContextHandler.java:1065) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doScope(ServletHandler.java:413) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doScope(SessionHandler.java:192) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doScope(ContextHandler.java:999) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:117) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:250) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerCollection.handle(HandlerCollection.java:149) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:111) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.handle(Server.java:351) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractHttpConnection.handleRequest(AbstractHttpConnection.java:454) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.BlockingHttpConnection.handleRequest(BlockingHttpConnection.java:47) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractHttpConnection.headerComplete(AbstractHttpConnection.java:890) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractHttpConnection$RequestHandler.headerComplete(AbstractHttpConnection.java:944) at org.eclipse.jetty.http.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:634) at org.eclipse.jetty.http.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:230) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.BlockingHttpConnection.handle(BlockingHttpConnection.java:66) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.bio.SocketConnector$ConnectorEndPoint.run(SocketConnector.java:254) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:599) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$3.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:534) at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) 16:40:31.627 [qtp28208563-24] ERROR o.a.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter - null:org.apache.lucene.index.IndexNotFoundException: no segments* file found in org.apache.lucene.store.RAMDirectory@7e693f
SolrCloud: general questions
Hi all! We plan to migrate from Solr 3.5 to SolrCloud 4.0. We pass some tests and I want to conform results with you. So, what I have on tests: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, Oracle JDK 7u7, Jetty 8, SolrCloud 4.0, 4 shards (4 JVM's on the same machine on different ports [9080, 9081, 9082, 9083]), no replicas My questions are: 1) Is it true, that I may send data to any of shards [9080, 9081, 9082, 9083] and don't care about how SolrCloud will distribute data between shards? What algorithm is used: round robin? 2) For example, in ColrCloud there is a document: docfield name=id1/fieldfield name=namethis is Solr 3.5/field/doc I have no information about shard in which this doc is. I need to update information at field name. The new doc is: docfield name=id1/fieldfield name=namethis is SolrCloud/field/doc Is it true, that I may send this doc to any of shards [9080, 9081, 9082, 9083] and after commit, when I run the query, I'll have this is SolrCloud instead of this is Solr 3.5 in results? As I see old data is still at index until optimize done? 3) Is it true, that delete by query works regardless of where to send the request? 4) My DnumShards=4. If I need to expand SolrCloud, for example, to 6 shards, I need to remove Zookeeper data directory, set DnumShards to 6 and restart Jetty. Can I set DnumShards=20 and only add new shards in a future with out any removal and restart JVM? 5) Currently we have 30 shards with 50M docs. What schema you advice: shards with ~15M docs, or more shards with less count of docs? What will be faster: search on shards with ~15M docs or search on more shards with less count of docs? Expected count of docs are ~1 500 000 000. Thanks for your responses. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-general-questions-tp4017769.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
how to get solr termVectorComponent results using solrj
I am trying to write this query; *localhost/solr/tvrh/?q=queryStringversion=2.2indent=ontv.tf_idf=true* I want to get tf and idf values below; /lst name=doc-40797 str name=uniqueKeytest20508/str lst name=content lst name=98 double name=tf-idf0.002304147465437788/double /lst lst name=apaan double name=tf-idf0.1/double /lst lst name=aryadea double name=tf-idf1.0/double /lst lst name=chelsea double name=tf-idf0.005208/double /lst lst name=gua double name=tf-idf0.0/double /lst lst name=osa double name=tf-idf0.004662004662004662/double /lst lst name=pegangı double name=tf-idf0.5/double /lst lst name=rt double name=tf-idf1.4009526478005044E-4/double /lst lst name=vs double name=tf-idf0.0030581039755351682/double /lst /lst /lst str name=uniqueKeyFieldNameid/str lst name=doc-40746 str name=uniqueKeytest20457/str lst name=content lst name=075 double name=tf-idf0.027776/double /lst lst name=9 double name=tf-idf9.76657876745776E-5/double /lst lst name=atlético double name=tf-idf0.045454545454545456/double /lst lst name=co double name=tf-idf1.1130899376669635E-4/double /lst lst name=http double name=tf-idf1.034233116144379E-4/double /lst lst name=jorna double name=tf-idf0.25/double /lst lst name=lh double name=tf-idf0.07142857142857142/double /lst lst name=ngn double name=tf-idf0.5/double /lst lst name=osa double name=tf-idf0.004662004662004662/double /lst lst name=puntuaciones double name=tf-idf1.0/double /lst lst name=t double name=tf-idf7.038783698176955E-5/double /lst lst name=vavelco double name=tf-idf0.2/double /lst lst name=vía double name=tf-idf0.03125/double /lst /lst /lst str name=uniqueKeyFieldNameid/str/ Up to now; *SolrQuery query = new SolrQuery(queryString); query.setQueryType(/tvrh); query.setParam(tv.tf_idf, true); QueryResponse response = server.query(query);* I have written the query and I think I am gonna need QueryResponse object, I think it is true. But I don't know what is next to get those tf-idf values using solrj? Or is there a better way to get tf-idf values using solrj? Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-get-solr-termVectorComponent-results-using-solrj-tp4017772.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
trouble instantiating CloudSolrServer
Hi,
We use trunk but got SolrJ 4.0 from Maven. Creating an instance of
CloudSolrServer fails because its constructor calls a not existing LBServer
constructor, it attempts to create an instance by only passing a HttpClient.
How is LBHttpSolrServer supposed to work without passing a SolrServer URL to it?
public CloudSolrServer(String zkHost) throws MalformedURLException {
this.zkHost = zkHost;
this.myClient = HttpClientUtil.createClient(null);
this.lbServer = new LBHttpSolrServer(myClient);
this.updatesToLeaders = true;
}
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.LBHttpSolrServer.init(Lorg/apache/http/client/HttpClient;[Ljava/lang/String;)V
at
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrServer.init(CloudSolrServer.java:84)
Thanks,
Markus
Re: SOLR - To point multiple indexes in different folder
Erick, We are forming request something like below for default /select request handler, will this cause an issue? So far we are not facing any recursive issues. http://94.101.147.150:8080/solr/select/?q=*%3A*version=2.2start=0rows=10indent=onshards=localhost:8080/solr/coll1,localhost:8080/solr/coll2,localhost:8080/solr/coll3,localhost:8080/solr/coll4,localhost:8080/solr/coll5,localhost:8080/solr/coll6,localhost:8080/solr/coll7 Below is the solrconfig for /select requestHandler name=/select class=solr.SearchHandler lst name=defaults str name=echoParamsexplicit/str int name=rows10/int str name=dfrecordid/str /lst recordid - is the unique field in the document. Regards, Ravi -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-To-point-multiple-indexes-in-different-folder-tp4016640p4017783.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: SolrCloud: general questions
My questions are: 1) Is it true, that I may send data to any of shards [9080, 9081, 9082, 9083] and don't care about how SolrCloud will distribute data between shards? What algorithm is used: round robin? It is true, the document is forwarded to the correct shard automatically. It's not round robin, it's a hash function applied to the unique key of the document. 2) For example, in ColrCloud there is a document: docfield name=id1/fieldfield name=namethis is Solr 3.5/field/doc I have no information about shard in which this doc is. I need to update information at field name. The new doc is: docfield name=id1/fieldfield name=namethis is SolrCloud/field/doc Is it true, that I may send this doc to any of shards [9080, 9081, 9082, 9083] and after commit, when I run the query, I'll have this is SolrCloud instead of this is Solr 3.5 in results? As I see old data is still at index until optimize done? You'll only see the updated document, yes, as the hash function will give the same result on the id field and it will go to the same shard as before, there the document will be updated (deleted the old one and inserted the new one). The old document will remain on the index (not visible, as you said) until the segment where it is located is merged, this can be due to optimize or background segment merging. 3) Is it true, that delete by query works regardless of where to send the request? yes. 4) My DnumShards=4. If I need to expand SolrCloud, for example, to 6 shards, I need to remove Zookeeper data directory, set DnumShards to 6 and restart Jetty. Can I set DnumShards=20 and only add new shards in a future with out any removal and restart JVM? I think you could remove the collection and create it again. See the new collections API. You need to have at least as many Solr instances (or Solr cores) as the number of shards in order to be able to anything with your collection. You won't be able to index of search if the number of nodes number of shards. Any change in the number of shards requires re indexing everything. 5) Currently we have 30 shards with 50M docs. What schema you advice: shards with ~15M docs, or more shards with less count of docs? What will be faster: search on shards with ~15M docs or search on more shards with less count of docs? Expected count of docs are ~1 500 000 000. I think you'll have to test it, as it will depend much on your context (the shape of your docs/index, your queries and other use cases), shards with 15M docs doesn't sound crazy, but I never tested with 100 shards really. Tomás Thanks for your responses. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-general-questions-tp4017769.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: SolrCloud Tomcat configuration: problems and doubts.
Hello, Mark! How are you? Thanks a lot for helping me. You were right about jetty.host parameter. My fianl test solr.xml looks like: * cores adminPath=/admin/cores defaultCoreName=items_en host=localhost hostPort=9080 hostContext=items_en* *core name=items_en instanceDir=items_en /* * /cores* I´ve noticed that 'hostContext' parameter was also required, so I included it. After that corrections Cloud graph tree looks right, and executing queries doesn' t return a 503 error. Phew! However, I checked in the Cloud graph tree that acollection1 appears too pointing to http://localhost:8983/solr. I will continue testing if I missed something, but looks like it is creating another collection with default parameters (collection name, port) without control. While using Apache Tomcat I was forced to include in catalina.sh (or setenv.sh) the following environment parameters, as I told you before: *JAVA_OPTS=-DzkHost=127.0.0.1:9000 -Dcollection.configName=items_en * Just three questions more: *1.* That´s a problem for me, because I would like to deploy in each Tomcat instance more than one Solr server with different configurations file (I mean, differents configName parameters), so including that JAVA_OPTS forces to me to deploy in that Tomcat server only Solr servers with this kind of configuration. In a production environment I would like to deploy in a single Tomcat instance at least for Solr servers, one per each kind of documents that I will index and query to. Do you know any way to configure the configName per each Solr server instance? Is it posible to configure it inside solr.xml file? Also, it make sense to deploy in each Solr server a multi-core configuration, each core with each configName allocated in Zookeeper, but again using that kind of JAVA_OPTS on-fire params configuration makes it impossible, :-( *2.* The other question is about indexing. What is the best way to plain index (I mean, without DIH or similar) in SolrCloud? Maybe configuring a LBHttpSolrServer that decides itself what is the best Solr server instance per indexation process? *3.* The following question may sound strange, but... but the thing is that I would like to help anyway in Apache Solr project contributing with code (bugs corrections, new features, etc.). How can I contribute to the community? Thanks a lot. Best Regards, Luis Cappa. 2012/10/31 Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com A big difference if you are using tomcat is that you still need to specify jetty.port - unless you change the name of that sys prop in solr.xml. Some more below: On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com wrote: Hello! How are you?I followed SolrCloud Wiki tutorial and noticed that all worked perfectly with Jetty and with a very basic configuration. My first impression was that SolrCloud is amazing and I´m interested on deploying a more complex and near-production environment SolrCloud architecture with tests purposes. I´m using Tomcat as application server, so I´ve started testing with it. I´ve installed Zookeper sevice in a single machine and started up with the following configuration: *1.)* ~zookeperhome/conf/zoo.cfg *tickTime=2000* *initLimit=10* *syncLimit=5* *dataDir=~zookeperhome/data/* *clientPort=9000* *2.) * I testing with a single core Solr server called 'items_en'. I have the configuration is as follows: *Indexes conf/data tree*: /mnt/data-store*/solr/* /solr.xml /zoo.cfg /items_en/ /conf/ schema.xml solrconfig.xml etc. So we have a simple configuration where conf files and data indexes files are in the same path. *3.)* Ok, so we have Solr server configured, but I have to save into Zookeper the configuration. I do as follows: *./bin/zkcli.sh -cmd upconfig -zkhost 127.0.0.1:9000 -confdir * /mnt/data-store/solr/*items_en/conf -collection items_en -confname items_en * And seems to work perfectly, because if I use Zookeper client and executes 'ls' command the files appear: *./bin/zkCli.sh -server localhost:9000 * * * *[zk: localhost:9000(CONNECTED) 1] ls /configs/items_en* *[admin-extra.menu-top.html, currency.xml, protwords.txt, mapping-FoldToASCII.txt, solrconfig.xml, lang, spellings.txt, mapping-ISOLatin1Accent.txt, admin-extra.html, xslt, scripts.conf, synonyms.txt, update-script.js, velocity, elevate.xml, zoo.cfg, admin-extra.menu-bottom.html, stopwords_en.txt, schema.xml]* * * * * *4.) *I would like that all the Solr servers deployed in that Tomcat instance points to Zookeper port 9000 service, so I included the following JAVA_OPTS hoping that they´ll make that posible: *JAVA_OPTS=-DzkHost=127.0.0.1:9000
RE: Solr 4.0 admin panel
Thank you Peter,
I know this. I cannot access admin in both cases single core and multicore. In
the single core case I have had a generic solr page and in the multi core case
I got just NOT FOUND message. Select works in both cases.
Lev
-Original Message-
From: Péter Király [mailto:kirun...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 4:48 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr 4.0 admin panel
Dear Lev,
core0 is only available on multicore environment. You should start Solr as
java -Dsolr.solr.home=multicore -jar start.jar
cheers,
Péter
2012/10/31 Tannen, Lev (USAEO) [Contractor] lev.tan...@usdoj.gov:
Hi,
I apologize for the trivial question, but I cannot find out what is wrong. I
try to switch from Solr 3.6 to Solr 4.0. All what I have done was I have
downloaded and unzipped the official binary file for Windows (32 bit) and
run just an example and it does not work.
In Solr 3.6 the request http://localhost:8983/solr/admin returns an
administration panel. In Solr4.0 it returns just a general Apache Solr page
with dead links. Dead links means that when I click on them nothing happends.
I have try to run the multicore example and
http://localhost:8983/solr/core0/admin returns not found
An attempt to run the cloud example also return a generic page. In all cases
search works. I can even add a document to the index and search for it. Only
admin does not work.
Does Solr 4.0 works differently from 3.6?
Please advise.
Thank you.
Lev Tannen
Info: Operating system --- Windows 7 enterprise
Java--- jre6 or jdk6
Log:
C:\myWork\apache-solr-4.0.0\examplejava -jar start.jar
2012-10-31 11:44:44.526:INFO:oejs.Server:jetty-8.1.2.v20120308
2012-10-31 11:44:44.526:INFO:oejdp.ScanningAppProvider:Deployment
monitor C:\myWork\apache-solr-4.0.0\example\contexts at interval 0
2012-10-31 11:44:44.542:INFO:oejd.DeploymentManager:Deployable added:
C:\myWork\apache-solr-4.0.0\example\contexts\solr.xml
2012-10-31 11:44:45.290:INFO:oejw.StandardDescriptorProcessor:NO JSP
Support for /solr, did not find org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet
2012-10-31 11:44:45.322:INFO:oejsh.ContextHandler:started
o.e.j.w.WebAppContext{/solr,file:/C:/myWork/apache-solr-4.0.0/example/
solr-webapp/webapp/},C:\myWork\a
pache-solr-4.0.0\example/webapps/solr.war
2012-10-31 11:44:45.322:INFO:oejsh.ContextHandler:started
o.e.j.w.WebAppContext{/solr,file:/C:/myWork/apache-solr-4.0.0/example/
solr-webapp/webapp/},C:\myWork\a
pache-solr-4.0.0\example/webapps/solr.war
Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader
locateSolrHome
INFO: JNDI not configured for solr (NoInitialContextEx) Oct 31, 2012
11:44:45 AM org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader locateSolrHome
INFO: solr home defaulted to 'solr/' (could not find system property
or JNDI) Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM
org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader init
INFO: new SolrResourceLoader for deduced Solr Home: 'solr/'
Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter
init
INFO: SolrDispatchFilter.init()
Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader
locateSolrHome
INFO: JNDI not configured for solr (NoInitialContextEx) Oct 31, 2012
11:44:45 AM org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader locateSolrHome
INFO: solr home defaulted to 'solr/' (could not find system property
or JNDI) Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM
org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer$Initializer initialize
INFO: looking for solr.xml:
C:\myWork\apache-solr-4.0.0\example\solr\solr.xml
Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer init
INFO: New CoreContainer 2091149
Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer load
INFO: Loading CoreContainer using Solr Home: 'solr/'
Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader
init
INFO: new SolrResourceLoader for directory: 'solr/'
Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer load
INFO: Registering Log Listener
Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer create
INFO: Creating SolrCore 'collection1' using instanceDir:
solr\collection1 Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM
org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader init
INFO: new SolrResourceLoader for directory: 'solr\collection1\'
Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM org.apache.solr.core.SolrConfig initLibs
INFO: Adding specified lib dirs to ClassLoader Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45
AM org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader replaceClassLoader
INFO: Adding
'file:/C:/myWork/apache-solr-4.0.0/contrib/extraction/lib/apache-mime4
j-core-0.7.2.jar' to classloader Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM
org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader replaceClassLoader
INFO: Adding
'file:/C:/myWork/apache-solr-4.0.0/contrib/extraction/lib/apache-mime4
j-dom-0.7.2.jar' to classloader Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM
org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader replaceClassLoader
INFO: Adding
RE: Solr 4.0 admin panel
Thank you James.
In Solr 3.6 http://localhost:8983/solr/admin links to the admin panel. So the
question remains how to invoke an admin panel in Solr 4.0?
Does it mean that there is no such a thing as admin panel in Solr 4.0?
Lev
-Original Message-
From: James Ji [mailto:jiayu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 4:51 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr 4.0 admin panel
The right address to go is http://localhost:8983/solr/ on Solr 4.0.
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin links to nothing if you go check the servlet.
Cheers
James
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Tannen, Lev (USAEO) [Contractor]
lev.tan...@usdoj.gov wrote:
Hi,
I apologize for the trivial question, but I cannot find out what is wrong.
I try to switch from Solr 3.6 to Solr 4.0. All what I have done was I
have downloaded and unzipped the official binary file for Windows (32
bit) and run just an example and it does not work.
In Solr 3.6 the request http://localhost:8983/solr/admin returns an
administration panel. In Solr4.0 it returns just a general Apache Solr
page with dead links. Dead links means that when I click on them
nothing happends.
I have try to run the multicore example and
http://localhost:8983/solr/core0/admin returns not found
An attempt to run the cloud example also return a generic page. In all
cases search works. I can even add a document to the index and search
for it. Only admin does not work.
Does Solr 4.0 works differently from 3.6?
Please advise.
Thank you.
Lev Tannen
Info: Operating system --- Windows 7 enterprise
Java--- jre6 or jdk6
Log:
C:\myWork\apache-solr-4.0.0\examplejava -jar start.jar
2012-10-31 11:44:44.526:INFO:oejs.Server:jetty-8.1.2.v20120308
2012-10-31 11:44:44.526:INFO:oejdp.ScanningAppProvider:Deployment
monitor C:\myWork\apache-solr-4.0.0\example\contexts at interval 0
2012-10-31 11:44:44.542:INFO:oejd.DeploymentManager:Deployable added:
C:\myWork\apache-solr-4.0.0\example\contexts\solr.xml
2012-10-31 11:44:45.290:INFO:oejw.StandardDescriptorProcessor:NO JSP
Support for /solr, did not find org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet
2012-10-31 11:44:45.322:INFO:oejsh.ContextHandler:started
o.e.j.w.WebAppContext{/solr,file:/C:/myWork/apache-solr-4.0.0/example/
solr-webapp/webapp/},C:\myWork\a
pache-solr-4.0.0\example/webapps/solr.war
2012-10-31 11:44:45.322:INFO:oejsh.ContextHandler:started
o.e.j.w.WebAppContext{/solr,file:/C:/myWork/apache-solr-4.0.0/example/
solr-webapp/webapp/},C:\myWork\a
pache-solr-4.0.0\example/webapps/solr.war
Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader
locateSolrHome
INFO: JNDI not configured for solr (NoInitialContextEx) Oct 31, 2012
11:44:45 AM org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader
locateSolrHome
INFO: solr home defaulted to 'solr/' (could not find system property
or
JNDI)
Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader
init
INFO: new SolrResourceLoader for deduced Solr Home: 'solr/'
Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter
init
INFO: SolrDispatchFilter.init()
Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader
locateSolrHome
INFO: JNDI not configured for solr (NoInitialContextEx) Oct 31, 2012
11:44:45 AM org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader
locateSolrHome
INFO: solr home defaulted to 'solr/' (could not find system property
or
JNDI)
Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM
org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer$Initializer
initialize
INFO: looking for solr.xml:
C:\myWork\apache-solr-4.0.0\example\solr\solr.xml
Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer init
INFO: New CoreContainer 2091149
Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer load
INFO: Loading CoreContainer using Solr Home: 'solr/'
Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader
init
INFO: new SolrResourceLoader for directory: 'solr/'
Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer load
INFO: Registering Log Listener
Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer create
INFO: Creating SolrCore 'collection1' using instanceDir:
solr\collection1 Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM
org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader init
INFO: new SolrResourceLoader for directory: 'solr\collection1\'
Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM org.apache.solr.core.SolrConfig initLibs
INFO: Adding specified lib dirs to ClassLoader Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45
AM org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader
replaceClassLoader
INFO: Adding
'file:/C:/myWork/apache-solr-4.0.0/contrib/extraction/lib/apache-mime4j-core-0.7.2.jar'
to classloader
Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader
replaceClassLoader
INFO: Adding
'file:/C:/myWork/apache-solr-4.0.0/contrib/extraction/lib/apache-mime4j-dom-0.7.2.jar'
to classloader
Oct 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader
replaceClassLoader
INFO: Adding
