Re: Query problem in Solr
@ Pravesh: It's 2 seperate cores, not 2 indexes. Sorry for that. @ Erick: Yes, I've seen this suggestion and it seems to be the only possible solution. I'll look into it. Thanks for your answers guys! Kurt On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote: If I read this correctly, one approach is to specify an increment gap in a multiValued field, then search for phrases with a slop less than that increment gap. i.e. incrementGap=100 in your definition, and search for apple orange~99 If this is gibberish, please post some examples and we'll try something else. Best Erick On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:21 AM, Kurt Sultana kurtanat...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, We're using Solr to search on a Shop index and a Product index. Currently a Shop has a field `shop_keyword` which also contains the keywords of the products assigned to it. The shop keywords are separated by a space. Consequently, if there is a product which has a keyword apple and another which has orange, a search for shops having `Apple AND Orange` would return the shop for these products. However, this is incorrect since we want that a search for shops having `Apple AND Orange` returns shop(s) having products with both apple and orange as keywords. We tried solving this problem, by making shop keywords multi-valued and assigning the keywords of every product of the shop as a new value in shop keywords. However as was confirmed in another post http://markmail.org/thread/xce4qyzs5367yplo#query:+page:1+mid:76eerw5yqev2aanu+state:results , Solr does not support all words must match in the same value of a multi-valued field. (Hope I explained myself well) How can we go about this? Ideally, we shouldn't change our search infrastructure dramatically. Thanks! Krt_Malta
Re: Query problem in Solr
We're using Solr to search on a Shop index and a Product index Do you have 2 separate indexes (using distributed shard search)?? I'm sure you are actually having only single index. Currently a Shop has a field `shop_keyword` which also contains the keywords of the products assigned to it. You mean, for a shop, you are first concatenating all keywords of all products and then saving in shop_keywords field for the shop?? In this case there is no way u can identify which keyword occurs in which product in ur index. You might need to change the index structure, may be, when u post documents, then post a single document for a single product(with fields like title,price,shop-id, etc), instead of single document for a single shop. Hope I make myself clear -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-problem-in-Solr-tp3009812p3010072.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Query problem in Solr
If I read this correctly, one approach is to specify an increment gap in a multiValued field, then search for phrases with a slop less than that increment gap. i.e. incrementGap=100 in your definition, and search for apple orange~99 If this is gibberish, please post some examples and we'll try something else. Best Erick On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:21 AM, Kurt Sultana kurtanat...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, We're using Solr to search on a Shop index and a Product index. Currently a Shop has a field `shop_keyword` which also contains the keywords of the products assigned to it. The shop keywords are separated by a space. Consequently, if there is a product which has a keyword apple and another which has orange, a search for shops having `Apple AND Orange` would return the shop for these products. However, this is incorrect since we want that a search for shops having `Apple AND Orange` returns shop(s) having products with both apple and orange as keywords. We tried solving this problem, by making shop keywords multi-valued and assigning the keywords of every product of the shop as a new value in shop keywords. However as was confirmed in another post http://markmail.org/thread/xce4qyzs5367yplo#query:+page:1+mid:76eerw5yqev2aanu+state:results, Solr does not support all words must match in the same value of a multi-valued field. (Hope I explained myself well) How can we go about this? Ideally, we shouldn't change our search infrastructure dramatically. Thanks! Krt_Malta
