Re: struggling with solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory and periods . or dots
hello, Or does your field in schema.xml have anything like autoGeneratePhraseQueries=true in it? there is no reference to this in our production schema. this is extremely confusing. i am not completely clear on the issue? reviewing our previous messages - it looks like the data is being tokenized correctly according to the analysis page and output from Luke. it also looks like the definition of the field and field type is correct in the schema.xml it also looks like there is no errant data (quotes) being introduced in to the query string submitted to solr: example: *http://hfsthssolr1.intra.searshc.com:8180/solrpartscat/core1/select?indent=onversion=2.2q=itemNo%3ABP21UAAfq=start=0rows=10fl=*%2Cscoreqt=wt=debugQuery=onexplainOther=hl.fl=* *so - does the real issue reside in HOW the query is being contructed / parsed ??? and if so - what drives this query to become a MultiPhraseQuery with embedded quotes * lst name=debugstr name=rawquerystringitemNo:BP21UAA /strstr name=querystringitemNo:BP21UAA /strstr name=parsedqueryMultiPhraseQuery(itemNo:bp 21 (uaa bp21uaa))/strstr name=parsedquery_toStringitemNo:bp 21 (uaa bp21uaa)/str please note - i also mocked up a simple test on my personal linux box - just using the solr 3.5 distro (we are using 3.3.0 on our production box under centOS) i was able to get a simple test to work and yes - my query does look different output from my simple mock up on my personal box: *http://localhost:8983/solr/select?indent=onversion=2.2q=manu%3ABP21UAAfq=start=0rows=10fl=*%2Cscoreqt=wt=debugQuery=onexplainOther=hl.fl=* lst name=debugstr name=rawquerystringmanu:BP21UAA/strstr name=querystringmanu:BP21UAA/strstr name=parsedquerymanu:bp manu:21 manu:uaa manu:bp21uaa/strstr name=parsedquery_toStringmanu:bp manu:21 manu:uaa manu:bp21uaa/strlst name=explain schema.xml fieldType name=text_en_splitting class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100analyzer type=indextokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true words=stopwords_en.txt enablePositionIncrements=true/filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory generateWordParts=1 generateNumberParts=1 catenateWords=1 catenateNumbers=1 catenateAll=1 splitOnCaseChange=1/filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/filter class=solr.KeywordMarkerFilterFactory protected=protwords.txt/filter class=solr.PorterStemFilterFactory//analyzeranalyzer type=querytokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/filter class=solr.SynonymFilterFactory synonyms=synonyms.txt ignoreCase=true expand=true/filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true words=stopwords_en.txt enablePositionIncrements=true/filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory generateWordParts=1 generateNumberParts=1 catenateWords=0 catenateNumbers=0 catenateAll=1 splitOnCaseChange=1/filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/filter class=solr.KeywordMarkerFilterFactory protected=protwords.txt/filter class=solr.PorterStemFilterFactory//analyzer/fieldType field name=manu type=text_en_splitting indexed=true stored=true omitNorms=true/ any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. mark -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/struggling-with-solr-WordDelimiterFilterFactory-and-periods-or-dots-tp3724822p3733486.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: struggling with solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory and periods . or dots
OK, first question is why are you searching on two different values? Is that intentional? If I'm reading your problem right, you should be able to get/not get any response just by toggling whether the period is in the search URL, right? But assuming that's not the problem, there's something you're not telling us. In particular, why is this parsing as MultiPhraseQuer? Are you putting quotes in somehow, either through the URL or by something in your solrconfig.xml? Because this works fine for me, using your schema definition and without using quotes. I get, however, this as the parsed query: eoe:b eoe:12 eoe:0123 eoe:120123 eoe:b120123 not a phrase in sight. If I *do* put quotes around the version without the period, I get no results returned and a MultiPhraseQuery. Best Erick On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:54 AM, geeky2 gee...@hotmail.com wrote: hello, thanks for sticking with me on this ...very frustrating ok - i did perform the query with the debug parms using two scenarios: 1) a successful search (where i insert the period / dot) in to the itemNo field and the search returns a document. itemNo:BP2.1UAA http://hfsthssolr1.intra.searshc.com:8180/solrpartscat/core1/select/?q=itemNo%3ABP2.1UAAversion=2.2start=0rows=10indent=ondebugQuery=on results from debug ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? response lst name=responseHeader int name=status0/int int name=QTime1/int lst name=params str name=indenton/str str name=rows10/str str name=version2.2/str str name=debugQueryon/str str name=start0/str str name=qitemNo:BP2.1UAA/str /lst /lst result name=response numFound=1 start=0 doc arr name=brandstrPHILIPS/str/arr str name=groupId0333500/str str name=id0333500,1549 ,BP2.1UAA /str str name=itemDescPLASMA TELEVISION/str str name=itemNoBP2.1UAA /str int name=itemType2/int arr name=modelstrBP2.1UAA /str/arr arr name=productTypestrPlasma Television^/str/arr int name=rankNo0/int str name=supplierId1549 /str /doc /result lst name=debug str name=rawquerystringitemNo:BP2.1UAA/str str name=querystringitemNo:BP2.1UAA/str str name=parsedqueryMultiPhraseQuery(itemNo:bp 2 (1 21) (uaa bp21uaa))/str str name=parsedquery_toStringitemNo:bp 2 (1 21) (uaa bp21uaa)/str lst name=explain str name=0333500,1549 ,BP2.1UAA 22.539911 = (MATCH) weight(itemNo:bp 2 (1 21) (uaa bp21uaa) in 134993), product of: 0.9994 = queryWeight(itemNo:bp 2 (1 21) (uaa bp21uaa)), product of: 45.079826 = idf(itemNo: bp=829 2=29303 1=43943 21=6716 uaa=32 bp21uaa=1) 0.02218287 = queryNorm 22.539913 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(itemNo:bp 2 (1 21) (uaa bp21uaa) in 134993), product of: 1.0 = tf(phraseFreq=1.0) 45.079826 = idf(itemNo: bp=829 2=29303 1=43943 21=6716 uaa=32 bp21uaa=1) 0.5 = fieldNorm(field=itemNo, doc=134993) /str /lst str name=QParserLuceneQParser/str lst name=timing double name=time1.0/double lst name=prepare double name=time0.0/double lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent double name=time0.0/double /lst lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.FacetComponent double name=time0.0/double /lst lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.MoreLikeThisComponent double name=time0.0/double /lst lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.HighlightComponent double name=time0.0/double /lst lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.StatsComponent double name=time0.0/double /lst lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.DebugComponent double name=time0.0/double /lst /lst lst name=process double name=time1.0/double lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent double name=time1.0/double /lst lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.FacetComponent double name=time0.0/double /lst lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.MoreLikeThisComponent double name=time0.0/double /lst lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.HighlightComponent double name=time0.0/double /lst lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.StatsComponent double name=time0.0/double /lst lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.DebugComponent double name=time0.0/double /lst /lst /lst /lst /response 2) a NON-successful search (where i do NOT insert a period / dot) in to the itemNo field and the search does NOT return a document itemNo:BP21UAA http://hfsthssolr1.intra.searshc.com:8180/solrpartscat/core1/select/?q=itemNo%3ABP21UAAversion=2.2start=0rows=10indent=ondebugQuery=on ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? response lst name=responseHeader int name=status0/int int name=QTime1/int lst name=params str
Re: struggling with solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory and periods . or dots
OK, first question is why are you searching on two different values? Is that intentional? yes - our users have to be able to locate a part or model number (that may or may not have periods in that number) even if they do NOT enter the number with the embedded periods. example: actual part number in our database is BP2.1UAA however the user needs to be able to search on BP21UAA and find that part. there are business reason why a user may see something different in the field then is actually in the database. does this make sense? If I'm reading your problem right, you should be able to get/not get any response just by toggling whether the period is in the search URL, right? yes - simply put - the user MUST get a hit on the above mentioned part if they enter BP21UAA or BP2.1UAA. But assuming that's not the problem, there's something you're not telling us. In particular, why is this parsing as MultiPhraseQuer? sorry - i did not know i was doing this or how it happened - it was not intentional and i did not notice this until your posting. i am not sure of the implications related to this or what it means to have something as a MultiPhraseQuery. Are you putting quotes in somehow, either through the URL or by something in your solrconfig.xml? i did not use quotes in the url - i cut and pasted the urls for my tests in the message thread. i do not see quotes as part of the url in my previous post. what would i be looking for in the solrconfig.xml file that would force the MultiPhraseQuery? it seems that this is the crux of the issue - but i am not sure how to determine what is manifesting the quotes? as previously stated - the quotes are not being entered via the url - they are pasted (in this message thread) exactly as i pulled them from the browser. thank you, mark -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/struggling-with-solr-WordDelimiterFilterFactory-and-periods-or-dots-tp3724822p3730070.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: struggling with solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory and periods . or dots
Hmmm, Try looking at either anything you've done in solrconfig.xml where to the request handler (probably called search) with default=true set. Or does your field in schema.xml have anything like autoGeneratePhraseQueries=true in it? Best Erick On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:02 PM, geeky2 gee...@hotmail.com wrote: OK, first question is why are you searching on two different values? Is that intentional? yes - our users have to be able to locate a part or model number (that may or may not have periods in that number) even if they do NOT enter the number with the embedded periods. example: actual part number in our database is BP2.1UAA however the user needs to be able to search on BP21UAA and find that part. there are business reason why a user may see something different in the field then is actually in the database. does this make sense? If I'm reading your problem right, you should be able to get/not get any response just by toggling whether the period is in the search URL, right? yes - simply put - the user MUST get a hit on the above mentioned part if they enter BP21UAA or BP2.1UAA. But assuming that's not the problem, there's something you're not telling us. In particular, why is this parsing as MultiPhraseQuer? sorry - i did not know i was doing this or how it happened - it was not intentional and i did not notice this until your posting. i am not sure of the implications related to this or what it means to have something as a MultiPhraseQuery. Are you putting quotes in somehow, either through the URL or by something in your solrconfig.xml? i did not use quotes in the url - i cut and pasted the urls for my tests in the message thread. i do not see quotes as part of the url in my previous post. what would i be looking for in the solrconfig.xml file that would force the MultiPhraseQuery? it seems that this is the crux of the issue - but i am not sure how to determine what is manifesting the quotes? as previously stated - the quotes are not being entered via the url - they are pasted (in this message thread) exactly as i pulled them from the browser. thank you, mark -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/struggling-with-solr-WordDelimiterFilterFactory-and-periods-or-dots-tp3724822p3730070.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: struggling with solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory and periods . or dots
Hmmm, seems OK. Did you re-index after any schema changes? You'll learn to love admin/analysis for questions like this, that page should show you what the actual tokenization results are, make sure to click the verbose check boxes. Best Erick On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:52 PM, geeky2 gee...@hotmail.com wrote: hello all, i am struggling with getting solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory to behave as is indicated in the solr book (Smiley) on page 54. the example in the books reads like this: Here is an example exercising all options: WiFi-802.11b to Wi, Fi, WiFi, 802, 11, 80211, b, WiFi80211b essentially - i have the same requirement with embedded periods and need to return a successful search on a field, even if the user does NOT enter the period. i have a field, itemNo that can contain periods .. example content in the itemNo field: B12.0123 when the user searches on this field, they need to be able to enter an itemNo without the period, and still find the item. example: user enters: B120123 and a document is returned with B12.0123. unfortunately, the search will NOT return the appropriate document, if the user enters B120123. however - the search does work if the user enters B12 0123 (a space in place of the period). can someone help me understand what is missing from my configuration? this is snipped from my schema.xml file fields ... field name=itemNo type=text indexed=true stored=true/ ... /fields fieldType name=text class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100 analyzer type=index tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.SynonymFilterFactory synonyms=synonyms.txt ignoreCase=true expand=true/ filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true words=stopwords.txt/ *filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory generateWordParts=1 generateNumberParts=1 catenateWords=1 catenateNumbers=1 catenateAll=1 splitOnCaseChange=1/* filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ filter class=solr.KeywordMarkerFilterFactory protected=protwords.txt/ filter class=solr.PorterStemFilterFactory/ filter class=solr.RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilterFactory/ /analyzer analyzer type=query tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true words=stopwords.txt/ filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory generateWordParts=1 generateNumberParts=1 catenateWords=1 catenateNumbers=1 catenateAll=1 splitOnCaseChange=1/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ filter class=solr.KeywordMarkerFilterFactory protected=protwords.txt/ filter class=solr.PorterStemFilterFactory/ filter class=solr.RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilterFactory/ /analyzer /fieldType -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/struggling-with-solr-WordDelimiterFilterFactory-and-periods-or-dots-tp3724822p3724822.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: struggling with solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory and periods . or dots
hello,
thank you for the reply.
yes - i did re-index after the changes to the schema.
also - thank you for the direction on using the analyzer - but i am not sure
if i am interpreting the feedback from the analyzer correctly.
here is what i did:
in the Field value (Index) box - i placed this: BP2.1UAA
in the Field value (Query) box - i placed this: BP21UAA
then after hitting the Analyze button - i see the following:
Under Index Analyzer for:
org.apache.solr.analysis.WordDelimiterFilterFactory {splitOnCaseChange=1,
generateNumberParts=1, catenateWords=1, luceneMatchVersion=LUCENE_33,
generateWordParts=1, catenateAll=1, catenateNumbers=1}
i see
position1 2 3 4
term text BP 2 1 UAA
21 BP21UAA
Under Query Analyzer for:
org.apache.solr.analysis.WordDelimiterFilterFactory {splitOnCaseChange=1,
generateNumberParts=1, catenateWords=1, luceneMatchVersion=LUCENE_33,
generateWordParts=1, catenateAll=1, catenateNumbers=1}
i see
position1 2 3
term text BP 21 UAA
BP21UAA
the above information leads me to believe that i should have BP21UAA as an
indexed term generated from the BP2.1UAA value coming from the database.
also - the query analysis lead me to believe that i should find a document
when i search on BP21UAA in the itemNo field
do i have this correct
am i missing something here?
i am still unable to get a hit when i search on BP21UAA in the itemNo field.
thank you,
mark
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/struggling-with-solr-WordDelimiterFilterFactory-and-periods-or-dots-tp3724822p3726021.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: struggling with solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory and periods . or dots
Hmmm, that all looks correct, from the output you pasted I'd expect
you to be finding the doc.
So next thing: add debugQuery=on to your query and look at
the debug information after the list of documents, particularly
the parsedQuery bit. Are you searching against the fields you
think you are? If you don't specify a field, Solr uses the default
defined in schema.xml.
Next, look at your actual index using either Luke or the TemsComponent
to see what's actually *in* your index rather than what you *think* is. I
can't tell you how many times I've made the wrong assumptions.
My guess would be that you aren't searching the fields you think you are...
Best
Erick
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:06 AM, geeky2 gee...@hotmail.com wrote:
hello,
thank you for the reply.
yes - i did re-index after the changes to the schema.
also - thank you for the direction on using the analyzer - but i am not sure
if i am interpreting the feedback from the analyzer correctly.
here is what i did:
in the Field value (Index) box - i placed this: BP2.1UAA
in the Field value (Query) box - i placed this: BP21UAA
then after hitting the Analyze button - i see the following:
Under Index Analyzer for:
org.apache.solr.analysis.WordDelimiterFilterFactory {splitOnCaseChange=1,
generateNumberParts=1, catenateWords=1, luceneMatchVersion=LUCENE_33,
generateWordParts=1, catenateAll=1, catenateNumbers=1}
i see
position 1 2 3 4
term text BP 2 1 UAA
21 BP21UAA
Under Query Analyzer for:
org.apache.solr.analysis.WordDelimiterFilterFactory {splitOnCaseChange=1,
generateNumberParts=1, catenateWords=1, luceneMatchVersion=LUCENE_33,
generateWordParts=1, catenateAll=1, catenateNumbers=1}
i see
position 1 2 3
term text BP 21 UAA
BP21UAA
the above information leads me to believe that i should have BP21UAA as an
indexed term generated from the BP2.1UAA value coming from the database.
also - the query analysis lead me to believe that i should find a document
when i search on BP21UAA in the itemNo field
do i have this correct
am i missing something here?
i am still unable to get a hit when i search on BP21UAA in the itemNo field.
thank you,
mark
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/struggling-with-solr-WordDelimiterFilterFactory-and-periods-or-dots-tp3724822p3726021.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: struggling with solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory and periods . or dots
hello, thanks for sticking with me on this ...very frustrating ok - i did perform the query with the debug parms using two scenarios: 1) a successful search (where i insert the period / dot) in to the itemNo field and the search returns a document. itemNo:BP2.1UAA http://hfsthssolr1.intra.searshc.com:8180/solrpartscat/core1/select/?q=itemNo%3ABP2.1UAAversion=2.2start=0rows=10indent=ondebugQuery=on results from debug ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? response lst name=responseHeader int name=status0/int int name=QTime1/int lst name=params str name=indenton/str str name=rows10/str str name=version2.2/str str name=debugQueryon/str str name=start0/str str name=qitemNo:BP2.1UAA/str /lst /lst result name=response numFound=1 start=0 doc arr name=brandstrPHILIPS/str/arr str name=groupId0333500/str str name=id0333500,1549 ,BP2.1UAA /str str name=itemDescPLASMA TELEVISION/str str name=itemNoBP2.1UAA /str int name=itemType2/int arr name=modelstrBP2.1UAA /str/arr arr name=productTypestrPlasma Television^/str/arr int name=rankNo0/int str name=supplierId1549 /str /doc /result lst name=debug str name=rawquerystringitemNo:BP2.1UAA/str str name=querystringitemNo:BP2.1UAA/str str name=parsedqueryMultiPhraseQuery(itemNo:bp 2 (1 21) (uaa bp21uaa))/str str name=parsedquery_toStringitemNo:bp 2 (1 21) (uaa bp21uaa)/str lst name=explain str name=0333500,1549 ,BP2.1UAA 22.539911 = (MATCH) weight(itemNo:bp 2 (1 21) (uaa bp21uaa) in 134993), product of: 0.9994 = queryWeight(itemNo:bp 2 (1 21) (uaa bp21uaa)), product of: 45.079826 = idf(itemNo: bp=829 2=29303 1=43943 21=6716 uaa=32 bp21uaa=1) 0.02218287 = queryNorm 22.539913 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(itemNo:bp 2 (1 21) (uaa bp21uaa) in 134993), product of: 1.0 = tf(phraseFreq=1.0) 45.079826 = idf(itemNo: bp=829 2=29303 1=43943 21=6716 uaa=32 bp21uaa=1) 0.5 = fieldNorm(field=itemNo, doc=134993) /str /lst str name=QParserLuceneQParser/str lst name=timing double name=time1.0/double lst name=prepare double name=time0.0/double lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent double name=time0.0/double /lst lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.FacetComponent double name=time0.0/double /lst lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.MoreLikeThisComponent double name=time0.0/double /lst lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.HighlightComponent double name=time0.0/double /lst lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.StatsComponent double name=time0.0/double /lst lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.DebugComponent double name=time0.0/double /lst /lst lst name=process double name=time1.0/double lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent double name=time1.0/double /lst lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.FacetComponent double name=time0.0/double /lst lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.MoreLikeThisComponent double name=time0.0/double /lst lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.HighlightComponent double name=time0.0/double /lst lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.StatsComponent double name=time0.0/double /lst lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.DebugComponent double name=time0.0/double /lst /lst /lst /lst /response 2) a NON-successful search (where i do NOT insert a period / dot) in to the itemNo field and the search does NOT return a document itemNo:BP21UAA http://hfsthssolr1.intra.searshc.com:8180/solrpartscat/core1/select/?q=itemNo%3ABP21UAAversion=2.2start=0rows=10indent=ondebugQuery=on ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? response lst name=responseHeader int name=status0/int int name=QTime1/int lst name=params str name=indenton/str str name=rows10/str str name=version2.2/str str name=debugQueryon/str str name=start0/str str name=qitemNo:BP21UAA/str /lst /lst result name=response numFound=0 start=0/ lst name=debug str name=rawquerystringitemNo:BP21UAA/str str name=querystringitemNo:BP21UAA/str str name=parsedqueryMultiPhraseQuery(itemNo:bp 21 (uaa bp21uaa))/str str name=parsedquery_toStringitemNo:bp 21 (uaa bp21uaa)/str lst name=explain/ str name=QParserLuceneQParser/str lst name=timing double name=time1.0/double lst name=prepare double name=time1.0/double lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent double name=time1.0/double /lst lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.FacetComponent double name=time0.0/double /lst lst
struggling with solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory and periods . or dots
hello all, i am struggling with getting solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory to behave as is indicated in the solr book (Smiley) on page 54. the example in the books reads like this: Here is an example exercising all options: WiFi-802.11b to Wi, Fi, WiFi, 802, 11, 80211, b, WiFi80211b essentially - i have the same requirement with embedded periods and need to return a successful search on a field, even if the user does NOT enter the period. i have a field, itemNo that can contain periods .. example content in the itemNo field: B12.0123 when the user searches on this field, they need to be able to enter an itemNo without the period, and still find the item. example: user enters: B120123 and a document is returned with B12.0123. unfortunately, the search will NOT return the appropriate document, if the user enters B120123. however - the search does work if the user enters B12 0123 (a space in place of the period). can someone help me understand what is missing from my configuration? this is snipped from my schema.xml file fields ... field name=itemNo type=text indexed=true stored=true/ ... /fields fieldType name=text class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100 analyzer type=index tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.SynonymFilterFactory synonyms=synonyms.txt ignoreCase=true expand=true/ filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true words=stopwords.txt/ *filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory generateWordParts=1 generateNumberParts=1 catenateWords=1 catenateNumbers=1 catenateAll=1 splitOnCaseChange=1/* filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ filter class=solr.KeywordMarkerFilterFactory protected=protwords.txt/ filter class=solr.PorterStemFilterFactory/ filter class=solr.RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilterFactory/ /analyzer analyzer type=query tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true words=stopwords.txt/ filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory generateWordParts=1 generateNumberParts=1 catenateWords=1 catenateNumbers=1 catenateAll=1 splitOnCaseChange=1/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ filter class=solr.KeywordMarkerFilterFactory protected=protwords.txt/ filter class=solr.PorterStemFilterFactory/ filter class=solr.RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilterFactory/ /analyzer /fieldType -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/struggling-with-solr-WordDelimiterFilterFactory-and-periods-or-dots-tp3724822p3724822.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
