[sqlalchemy] Re: sqlite unicode/datetime issue in 0.4
Is there a different way to do this that's compatible with both versions, or is there a new 0.4 way of doing this, or have I just been doing something wrong all along and only 0.4 is catching it? DateTime objects in sqlite currently expect a datetime.datetime object, and not a string. previous versions accepted both. a lot of people are getting this issue so i think im going to see what psycopg2 and mysqldb do, and emulate them. historically ive been against hardcoding a particular string format. What's odd here is that I'm not setting the value myself -- it's getting set in pre_exec by the column default, which (I believe) is running the func in sqlite and returning the results, which I'd think should wind up with a datetime.datetime. I'll try to put together a minimal test case that shows what's happening. JP --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sqlalchemy group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sqlalchemy] Re: sqlite unicode/datetime issue in 0.4
On Aug 16, 10:06 am, JP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's odd here is that I'm not setting the value myself -- it's getting set in pre_exec by the column default, which (I believe) is running the func in sqlite and returning the results, which I'd think should wind up with a datetime.datetime. I'll try to put together a minimal test case that shows what's happening. right...youd have to say default=func.current_timestamp(type_=DateTime) for now. so yeah accepting the date format that sqlite actually produces is probably reasonable here. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sqlalchemy group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sqlalchemy] Re: sqlite unicode/datetime issue in 0.4
ok thats in r3322 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sqlalchemy group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sqlalchemy] Re: sqlite unicode/datetime issue in 0.4
Yup, that fixed things. Thanks! On Aug 16, 10:49 am, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok thats in r3322 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sqlalchemy group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sqlalchemy] Re: sqlite unicode/datetime issue in 0.4
On Aug 15, 2007, at 6:22 PM, JP wrote: Is there a different way to do this that's compatible with both versions, or is there a new 0.4 way of doing this, or have I just been doing something wrong all along and only 0.4 is catching it? DateTime objects in sqlite currently expect a datetime.datetime object, and not a string. previous versions accepted both. a lot of people are getting this issue so i think im going to see what psycopg2 and mysqldb do, and emulate them. historically ive been against hardcoding a particular string format. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sqlalchemy group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
