[squid-users] fatal error!!!!
After #squid -z return this error FATAL: getpwnam failed to find userid for effective user 'squid' Squid Cache (Version 2.4.STABLE7): Terminated abnormally. CPU Usage: 0.010 seconds = 0.010 user + 0.000 sys Maximum Resident Size: 0 KB Page faults with physical i/o: 317 Aborted What is the problem??? hello Giuseppe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [squid-users] SQUID SETTINGS
Duane, I have been watching my processes and cache all day today. Squid is the only thing running on this server and seems to be running at 99% CUP utilization. I currently have 600MB free mem out of 2GB (I reset squid 2 hours ago). I changed my cache_mem to 128MB and set the cache_dir to 5 16 256. What I am concerned about is running out of RAM. From the output of my "top" screen... there is no swap being used. Is there a point where squid will stop consuming more RAM? Does it hurt the caching process with frequent reboots? Thanks in advance for your advice. Scott Phalen
RE: [squid-users] is it a DOS attack ??
Yea I can saw the forwarding loop thing in cache.log.. but plz tell me in detail that how I overcome that. Regards Danish Khan -Original Message- From: Duane Wessels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 5:51 AM To: Danish Khan Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [squid-users] is it a DOS attack ?? On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, Danish Khan wrote: > I have configured my box with 8192 FD but still I got warnings of FD's and > tooo many comm.(23) Port error WHY plz update :( > > Danish > > -Original Message- > From: Mahmood Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 10:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [squid-users] is it a DOS attack ?? > > Hello List! > > I have been facing this strange problem for last 3 days. I hope some one > here will be able to shed light on it. I dont know wheather its a bug or a > virus or a DOS attack but it is hitting my squid box very hard. in my access > > log i am seeing a lot of these. > > 1076806934.151451 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET > http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - > 1076806934.163461 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET This looks to me like a forwarding loop. Are you using HTTP interception? Duane W.
[squid-users] Transparent proxy issue
For some reason, a linux client works fine with konqueror, mozilla-firefox and lynx... however, IE 6.x just hangs ideas? Thanks, Mark pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
[squid-users] Squid As A Non-Caching Reverse Proxy/Web Accelerator?
Hi, I am thinking of solutions for minimizing apache's memory use on a small memory server in the presence of several slow clients or long-running http requests (large downloads) and with about 50% of the requested pages being dynamic. I need a reverse proxy server that can buffer output from apache so that I won't need many active apache processes to be able to serve slow clients, and I'm considering squid with caching disabled. I'd like to know how squid, in reverse proxy mode, handles a situation where the origin server is very fast but the client it's serving is slow. Does it buffer the server's response and allow it to close the connection quickly and serve other processes? Is there an architecture document somewhere that _fully_ answers my question? Regards, Seun Osewa ___ BT Yahoo! Broadband - Free modem offer, sign up online today and save £80 http://btyahoo.yahoo.co.uk
[squid-users] Fail-over of cache_peer parent...
I work in a small company with even smaller sales offices all over the country with very limited network connectivity. 56k legacy leased lines in some cases. We have a hub and spoke network connecting all our offices. In order to maximize the responsiveness of our intranet in the field offices, I've implemented squid in a caching hierarchy distribution. The problem is when the local hub goes down, I loose the cache in all the offices relying on that hub. I'd like to set them up using the 'cache_peer' option to fail-over to the next hub and then the home office as a last resort, but I can't seem to figure out exactly how to do this from the FAQ's and the configuration guide. This is a representation of the hierarchy: 192.168.1.10 (HQ) 10.0.1.10 (Hub1) - 10.0.1.11 (Field1) - 10.0.1.15 (Field2) 10.0.1.20 (Hub2) - 10.0.1.21 (Field3) - 10.0.1.25 (Field4) 10.0.2.10 (Hub3) - 10.0.2.11 (Field5) - 10.0.2.15 (Field6) 10.0.2.20 (Hub4) - 10.0.2.21 (Field7) - 10.0.2.25 (Field8) 10.0.2.30 (Hub5) - 10.0.2.31 (Field9) - 10.0.2.35 (Field10) Each field office has the nearest hub as their httpd_accel_host httpd_accel_host 10.0.1.10 httpd_accel_port 80 httpd_accel_single_host on httpd_accel_with_proxy off httpd_accel_uses_host_header off Each hub has the home office apache server as it's httpd_accel_host httpd_accel_host 192.168.1.10 httpd_accel_port 80 httpd_accel_single_host on httpd_accel_with_proxy off httpd_accel_uses_host_header off Here's what I'm thinking: cache_peer 10.0.1.10 parent 80 3130 weight=1 cache_peer 10.0.1.20 parent 80 3130 weight=2 cache_peer 10.0.2.10 parent 80 0 weight=3 cache_peer 10.0.2.20 parent 80 0 weight=3 cache_peer 10.0.2.30 parent 80 0 weight=3 cache_peer 192.168.1.10 parent 80 0 weight=4 default prefer_direct off Any guidance would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Mike
Re: [squid-users] cache_dir L1 L2 question
> > I have a 80GB drive on a system that I would like to dedicate to a squid > > server. The notes in squid.conf say that I should subtract 20% and use > > that number for the Mbytes field for cache_dir. So I would have 64000. > > You should do that to start with. After Squid has been running with > a full cache you can think about increasing the cache size. You mean set the cache size to 64GB to start with, right? > Also, please read: http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/squid/chapter/index.html I bought your book a few weeks ago, now I am waiting for Amazon to ship it. Thanks, Murrah Boswell
Re: [squid-users] ftp clients trouble: helpme please
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've a beautifull squid 2.5.4 server running with gentoo. > It works really well with http and https client requests. > If a client requests an ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/some_RFC_#.txt > the browser displays it without trouble (the address is not > correct because at now I'm not there), but with all other > ftp requests (it is ftp://ftp.gnu.org, ftp://ftp.microsoft.com, > ftp://ftp.cdrom.com) the browser client's can't display the > page and after a long time (about 30-60 seconds) it > give up. From the squid server with an ftp client I can connect > with those sites without trouble. In the squid access logs > I can't see the ftp client request that don't work, they aren't > logged. > I can't understand what's happening, please helpme. You can probably get some additional info by enabling debugging for the FTP code: debug_options All,1 9,9 Then make some FTP requests to the servers that don't work and look at cache.log. Feel free to send us some cache.log excerpts if they don't make any sense. Duane W.
Re: [squid-users] Proxy-Chaining
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, Andreas Neumeier wrote: > Hello there, > > I tried to build a proxy chain with > > cache_peer > and > cache_peer_access > as well using: > always_direct deny > never_direct allow > > Now, normal operation seems to work like this: > > client <-> squid1 <-> squid2 <-> target-net You proably shouldn't mix always_direct and never_direct. On squid1 you should probably only put: never_direct allow all > Only thing that doesn't seem to work: Any POST seems to be ignored (by > proxy1, probably). You need to explain what you mean by ignored. Be as specific as possible. > > Also, I'm not sure how to handle SSL, (CONNECT). This must return DIRECT, > which actually must bypass both squids. Am I right here? You need to either configure your clients to forward SSL requests to squid1, or configure your firewall to allow SSL traffic to pass through directly. Duane W.
Re: [squid-users] cache_dir L1 L2 question
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, OTR Comm wrote: > Hello, > > I have a 80GB drive on a system that I would like to dedicate to a squid > server. The notes in squid.conf say that I should subtract 20% and use > that number for the Mbytes field for cache_dir. So I would have 64000. You should do that to start with. After Squid has been running with a full cache you can think about increasing the cache size. > The question is, what is a reasonable L1 and L2 to put for this setting? I'm not sure it matters much. You can use 16/256 (the default) or try 32/512 if you want. > Also, I don't understand the different storage types, (ufs, aufs, diskd, > etc), but for the system I want to set up, would either one be > preffered? Depends on your operating system and expected load. I advise that you stick with UFS (the default) for now and try one of the others if you suspect that performance is suffering due to disk I/O bottlenecks. Also, please read: http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/squid/chapter/index.html Duane W.
RE: [squid-users] is it a DOS attack ??
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, Danish Khan wrote: > I have configured my box with 8192 FD but still I got warnings of FD's and > tooo many comm.(23) Port error WHY plz update :( > > Danish > > -Original Message- > From: Mahmood Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 10:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [squid-users] is it a DOS attack ?? > > Hello List! > > I have been facing this strange problem for last 3 days. I hope some one > here will be able to shed light on it. I dont know wheather its a bug or a > virus or a DOS attack but it is hitting my squid box very hard. in my access > > log i am seeing a lot of these. > > 1076806934.151451 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET > http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - > 1076806934.163461 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET This looks to me like a forwarding loop. Are you using HTTP interception? Duane W.
Re: [squid-users] Low hit rate
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, Kemi Salam-Alada wrote: > Hi all, > > How can I tune my squid so that I can generate high hit rate? Presently, I > am running squid using FreeBSD 4.3 OS and Squid 2.5 STABLE2. > The file system used for the disk is aufs. See the 'refersh_pattern' directive in squid.conf. You can probably increase your hit ratio by increasing the values of the refresh_pattern line(s). Duane W.
Re: [squid-users] child squid proxy not saving data on disk, but anyway operating correctly.
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, [iso-8859-2] Éliás [iso-8859-2] Tamás wrote: > Hy all! I have an ordinary transparent squid proxy defined on my gateway, wich > operates correctly. An other transparent proxy has been set up on the other > part of the network, wich has the proxy on the gateway as a parent defined. > cache_peer parentproxy.net 3113 3030 > No other options (like proxy-only) defined. > OS is a Linux woody, squid is beta3 from 17th january. > Interesting, the proxy wich has the parent defined do not save anything in it's > cache, although it seems operating correctly, so there are FIRST_PARENT_MISSes > and other lines in the log, indicating the data has been sent through. My Could it be that your system clock is set incorrectly? Also, what do you get from: % squidclient mgr:store_check_cachable_stats > firewall is operating correctly, by redirecting packages from port 80 to my > proxy port 3113. When the child proxy is going direct (on queries containing ? > or cgi-bin) it is accessing the port 80 of the parent proxy, wich is > transparent, so redirects the query again. you can probably avoid this forwarding loop by adding this to the child: acl all src 0/0 never_direct allow all > Has anyone idea why the child proxy > is not saving anything on the disk? see my suggestions above Duane W.
[squid-users] child squid proxy not saving data on disk, but anyway operating correctly.
Hy all! I have an ordinary transparent squid proxy defined on my gateway, wich operates correctly. An other transparent proxy has been set up on the other part of the network, wich has the proxy on the gateway as a parent defined. cache_peer parentproxy.net 3113 3030 No other options (like proxy-only) defined. OS is a Linux woody, squid is beta3 from 17th january. Interesting, the proxy wich has the parent defined do not save anything in it's cache, although it seems operating correctly, so there are FIRST_PARENT_MISSes and other lines in the log, indicating the data has been sent through. My firewall is operating correctly, by redirecting packages from port 80 to my proxy port 3113. When the child proxy is going direct (on queries containing ? or cgi-bin) it is accessing the port 80 of the parent proxy, wich is transparent, so redirects the query again. Has anyone idea why the child proxy is not saving anything on the disk? -- Thomas Elias Tel.: +3630/3299315 ICQ UIN: 206-714-459 - - Vége a továbbított üzenetnek - -- Thomas Elias Tel.: +3630/3299315 ICQ UIN: 206-714-459 -
[squid-users] Low hit rate
Hi all, How can I tune my squid so that I can generate high hit rate? Presently, I am running squid using FreeBSD 4.3 OS and Squid 2.5 STABLE2. The file system used for the disk is aufs. Regards.
RE: [squid-users] is it a DOS attack ??
I have configured my box with 8192 FD but still I got warnings of FD's and tooo many comm.(23) Port error WHY plz update :( Danish -Original Message- From: Mahmood Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 10:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [squid-users] is it a DOS attack ?? Hello List! I have been facing this strange problem for last 3 days. I hope some one here will be able to shed light on it. I dont know wheather its a bug or a virus or a DOS attack but it is hitting my squid box very hard. in my access log i am seeing a lot of these. 1076806934.151451 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.163461 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.170419 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.173403 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.182391 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.184361 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.191314 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.236318 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.282365 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.285350 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.325372 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.454134 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.784383 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.862418 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.892334 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806935.048381 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806935.048380 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806935.048374 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806935.055337 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806935.101358 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806935.178412 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806935.353530 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806935.362539 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806935.439585 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806935.563694 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806935.641751 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806935.710784 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806935.730802 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806935.730775 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806935.747786 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806935.789781 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806935.811802 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806935.845746 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806935.854685 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806935.868698 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806936.169653 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806936.169612 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806936.169610 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806936.304707 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806936.407775 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806937.343 1171 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806937.663 1322 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806937.815 1289 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806937.873 1266 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806937.923 10
[squid-users] is it a DOS attack ??
Hello List! I have been facing this strange problem for last 3 days. I hope some one here will be able to shed light on it. I dont know wheather its a bug or a virus or a DOS attack but it is hitting my squid box very hard. in my access log i am seeing a lot of these. 1076806934.151451 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.163461 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.170419 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.173403 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.182391 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.184361 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.191314 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.236318 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.282365 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.285350 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.325372 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.454134 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.784383 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.862418 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806934.892334 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806935.048381 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806935.048380 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806935.048374 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806935.055337 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806935.101358 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806935.178412 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806935.353530 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806935.362539 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806935.439585 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806935.563694 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806935.641751 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806935.710784 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806935.730802 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806935.730775 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806935.747786 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806935.789781 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806935.811802 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806935.845746 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806935.854685 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806935.868698 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806936.169653 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806936.169612 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806936.169610 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806936.304707 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806936.407775 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806937.343 1171 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806937.663 1322 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806937.815 1289 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806937.873 1266 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806937.923 1083 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806938.002 1473 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - NONE/- - 1076806938.080 1279 202.133.44.214 TCP_MISS/000 0 GET http://www.microsoft.com/ - DIRECT/www.microsoft.com - 1076806938.090 11
Re: [squid-users] NTLMv2
Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> is there any plan to support NTLMv2 authentication through winbind helpers >> in the next releases of Squid ? > > Yes. It should already work with Samba-3.0.2 and the current Squid nightly > snapshots, but has not yet been verified. See the Squid release notes for > the nightly snapshots. I'm about to run such a test, hopefully as soon as next Monday. -- kinkie (kinkie-squid [at] kinkie [dot] it) Random fortune, unrelated to the message: Three actors, Tom, Fred, and Cec, wanted to do the jousting scene from Don Quixote for a local TV show. "I'll play the title role," proposed Tom. "Fred can portray Sancho Panza, and Cecil B. De Mille."
[squid-users] cache_dir L1 L2 question
Hello, I have a 80GB drive on a system that I would like to dedicate to a squid server. The notes in squid.conf say that I should subtract 20% and use that number for the Mbytes field for cache_dir. So I would have 64000. The question is, what is a reasonable L1 and L2 to put for this setting? Also, I don't understand the different storage types, (ufs, aufs, diskd, etc), but for the system I want to set up, would either one be preffered? Thank you, Murrah Boswell
[squid-users] Proxy-Chaining
Hello there, I tried to build a proxy chain with cache_peer and cache_peer_access as well using: always_direct deny never_direct allow Now, normal operation seems to work like this: client <-> squid1 <-> squid2 <-> target-net Only thing that doesn't seem to work: Any POST seems to be ignored (by proxy1, probably). Also, I'm not sure how to handle SSL, (CONNECT). This must return DIRECT, which actually must bypass both squids. Am I right here? If anyone had a similar problem and is able to help, i could supply more excact configurations and acls. Thanks a lot! -- Andreas Neumeier _o o Walter-Paetzmannstr 9 -\<, Germany (+49)89-61098960 (+49)89-38077929 (+49)179-2431882 http://andreas.neumeier.org mailto:andreas(at)neumeier.org UIN:14143331 --
RE: [squid-users] ftp clients trouble: helpme please
--- Elsen Marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I've a beautifull squid 2.5.4 server running with > gentoo. > > What is 'gentoo' ? it is favour of Linux which compiled from source many find it very robust .. www.gentoo.org > > M. > > > It works really well with http and https client > requests. > > If a client requests an > ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/some_RFC_#.txt > > the browser displays it without trouble (the > address is not > > correct because at now I'm not there), but with > all other > > ftp requests (it is ftp://ftp.gnu.org, > ftp://ftp.microsoft.com, > > ftp://ftp.cdrom.com) the browser client's can't > display the > > page and after a long time (about 30-60 seconds) > it > > give up. From the squid server with an ftp client > I can connect > > with those sites without trouble. In the squid > access logs > > I can't see the ftp client request that don't > work, they aren't > > logged. > > I can't understand what's happening, please > helpme. > > > > Andrea > > > > __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
RE: [squid-users] ftp clients trouble: helpme please
> > I've a beautifull squid 2.5.4 server running with gentoo. What is 'gentoo' ? M. > It works really well with http and https client requests. > If a client requests an ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/some_RFC_#.txt > the browser displays it without trouble (the address is not > correct because at now I'm not there), but with all other > ftp requests (it is ftp://ftp.gnu.org, ftp://ftp.microsoft.com, > ftp://ftp.cdrom.com) the browser client's can't display the > page and after a long time (about 30-60 seconds) it > give up. From the squid server with an ftp client I can connect > with those sites without trouble. In the squid access logs > I can't see the ftp client request that don't work, they aren't > logged. > I can't understand what's happening, please helpme. > > Andrea > >
[squid-users] ftp clients trouble: helpme please
I've a beautifull squid 2.5.4 server running with gentoo. It works really well with http and https client requests. If a client requests an ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/some_RFC_#.txt the browser displays it without trouble (the address is not correct because at now I'm not there), but with all other ftp requests (it is ftp://ftp.gnu.org, ftp://ftp.microsoft.com, ftp://ftp.cdrom.com) the browser client's can't display the page and after a long time (about 30-60 seconds) it give up. From the squid server with an ftp client I can connect with those sites without trouble. In the squid access logs I can't see the ftp client request that don't work, they aren't logged. I can't understand what's happening, please helpme. Andrea
