Re: [Standards] XSF Council Minutes: 28 February 2017
2017-03-01 10:56 GMT+01:00 Florian Schmaus : > On 28.02.2017 17:37, JC Brand wrote: >> XSF Council Minutes: 28 February 2017 >> = >> >> 1). Clarify CSI and Carbons state after SM resumption >> >> Tobias: Flow created PRs which clarify things and asked council to review. >> Would be nice if people could do so. >> … >> Link Mauve mentions that a NS bump is required due to the removal of >> . > > That is not entirely correct: The namespace bump is required so that > clients know when they can assume that the carbons state is restored > after the stream got resumed. That is why I changed the namespace in the PR. > > But since bump was necessary anyway, I also decided to remove > in favour in xep334 hints, which I think is sensible. sorry about that; This was just about Georgs PR by itself. We were talking about if Georgs PR has changes (other than the tag) that would require NS bump. The context probably got lost in the minutes. If we need the NS anyway than it would be more of a no-brainer to merge yours as well. cheers Daniel ___ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org ___
Re: [Standards] xmpp namespaces registry lacks rosterver namespace
On 01.03.2017 08:58, Ruslan N. Marchenko wrote: > I've been trying to find a registration of the > urn:xmpp:features:rosterver namespace and found it's only mentioned > once(!) in RFC6121 and nowhere else - namely neither in > https://xmpp.org/registrar/namespaces.html nor in > https://xmpp.org/registrar/stream-features.html registry. > > Is it not a real namespace? Or why is it having so little attention? It is a real namespace, it just was not added to the registry. Likely simply forgotten. Patches welcome. :) - Florian signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org ___
Re: [Standards] XSF Council Minutes: 28 February 2017
On 28.02.2017 17:37, JC Brand wrote: > XSF Council Minutes: 28 February 2017 > = > > 1). Clarify CSI and Carbons state after SM resumption > > Tobias: Flow created PRs which clarify things and asked council to review. > Would be nice if people could do so. > … > Link Mauve mentions that a NS bump is required due to the removal of > . That is not entirely correct: The namespace bump is required so that clients know when they can assume that the carbons state is restored after the stream got resumed. That is why I changed the namespace in the PR. But since bump was necessary anyway, I also decided to remove in favour in xep334 hints, which I think is sensible. - Florian signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org ___
