2017-03-01 10:56 GMT+01:00 Florian Schmaus <f...@geekplace.eu>: > On 28.02.2017 17:37, JC Brand wrote: >> XSF Council Minutes: 28 February 2017 >> ===================================== >> >> 1). Clarify CSI and Carbons state after SM resumption >> >> Tobias: Flow created PRs which clarify things and asked council to review. >> Would be nice if people could do so. >> … >> Link Mauve mentions that a NS bump is required due to the removal of >> <private>. > > That is not entirely correct: The namespace bump is required so that > clients know when they can assume that the carbons state is restored > after the stream got resumed. That is why I changed the namespace in the PR. > > But since bump was necessary anyway, I also decided to remove <private/> > in favour in xep334 hints, which I think is sensible.
sorry about that; This was just about Georgs PR by itself. We were talking about if Georgs PR has changes (other than the <private> tag) that would require NS bump. The context probably got lost in the minutes. If we need the NS anyway than it would be more of a no-brainer to merge yours as well. cheers Daniel _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
